eISSN: 1897-4252
ISSN: 1731-5530
Kardiochirurgia i Torakochirurgia Polska/Polish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
4/2023
vol. 20
 
Share:
Share:
Original paper

A decade later: long-term results of the first percutaneous epicardial closure of the left atrial appendage using the LARIAT device

Marian Burysz
1
,
Michalina Malec-Litwinowicz
2
,
Jakub Batko
3, 4
,
Radoslaw Litwinowicz
1, 3, 4
,
Mariusz Kowalewski
4, 5, 6
,
Bogusław Kapelak
7
,
Krzysztof Bartus
7

  1. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Regional Specialist Hospital, Grudziądz, Poland
  2. Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland
  3. CAROL – Cardiothoracic Anatomy Research Operative Lab, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantology, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
  4. Thoracic Research Centre, Collegium Medicum Nicolaus Copernicus University, Innovative Medical Forum, Bydgoszcz, Poland
  5. Department of Cardiac Surgery and Transplantology, National Medical Institute of the Ministry of Interior and Administration, Warsaw, Poland
  6. Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Department, Heart and Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands
  7. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantology, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
Kardiochirurgia i Torakochirurgia Polska 2023; 20 (4): 215-219
Online publish date: 2024/01/11
Article file
- A decade later.pdf  [0.15 MB]
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 

Introduction

Over the past decade, left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as an established alternative to oral anticoagulation for patients diagnosed with atrial fibrillation (AF) [1, 2]. The increasing recognition and effectiveness of these therapeutic approaches have prompted rapid advancements in LAAO device technology. Notably, the new cardiology guidelines released by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) in August 2020, pertaining to AF management, have substantiated the efficacy and validity of LAAO treatments for patients with contraindications to oral anticoagulation [3]. Currently, the atrial fibrillation market is predominantly influenced by endocardial products, extensively employed in clinical practice, with their outcomes corroborated by multicenter studies [4].

Epicardial devices, with the LARIAT device as a notable example, are comparatively less utilized in AF management, despite offering certain advantages over their endocardial counterparts. Epicardial LAAO is recommended for patients intolerant of antiplatelet therapy. Additionally, following epicardial LAAO, the risk of device embolization or thrombus formation is eliminated [5]. However, data pertaining to the long-term outcomes of the epicardial LAAO procedure remain notably scarce.

Aim

The primary objective of this study was to present the extended results (spanning over 9 years of observation) within a cohort of 121 patients with AF who underwent the epicardial LAAO procedure.

Material and methods

All patients received comprehensive information regarding the procedure and provided written informed consent. The study protocol obtained approval from the Polish Ministry of Health and the Ethics Committee at John Paul II Hospital in Krakow, Poland.

This prospective, single-center study encompassed 121 patients referred between July 2010 and May 2013 for left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) using the LARIAT device. Briefly, the procedure involves three primary components: a compliant occlusion balloon, two magnet-tipped guidewires, and a 12-Fr suture delivery device. Employing a percutaneous pericardial approach, a trans-septal puncture is executed. The first endocardial magnet-tipped guidewire is positioned near the apex of the left atrial appendage (LAA). Through percutaneous femoral access, the second endocardial magnet-tipped guidewire is positioned at the LAA’s tip, establishing a secure connection between the guidewires. Subsequently, the LARIAT snare device is advanced over the epicardial guidewire to effect LAA occlusion. Following confirmation of LAA closure via transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and fluoroscopy, a pre-tied suture is deployed and tightened to ligate the LAA. Notably, no periprocedural colchicine was administered for pericarditis prophylaxis during the procedure.

Follow-up assessments were conducted at 3 and 6 months post-procedurally, each including transesophageal echocardiography. Leaks were defined as the presence of flow from the left atrium to the LAA exceeding 5 mm. Additionally, annual telephone follow-up visits were conducted after the procedure. The physician who performed the procedure was responsible for data collection and reporting of adverse events. Adverse events and mortality were documented during follow-up visits in accordance with the Munich LAA consensus document and the VARC-2 consensus document.

Long-term survival data

Retrospective data were extracted from the KROK (Krajowy Rejestr Operacji Kardiochirurgicznych) (Polish National Registry for Cardiac Surgery Procedures) registry, which is accessible at www.krok.csioz.gov.pl. This registry constitutes an ongoing, nationwide, and multi-institutional database encompassing all-encompassing cardiac surgical interventions in Poland. It systematically gathers in-hospital data concerning patients and outcomes. The registry’s structure has been described in detail in other academic publications.

Regarding long-term survival data, these are directly integrated into the registry from follow-up mortality information acquired from the National Health Fund. This fund operates as a mandatory, comprehensive public health insurance institution on a nationwide scale within Poland. The assimilation of these data into the registry contributes to its comprehensiveness and accuracy.

Post-procedure anticoagulation

Aspirin-based antiplatelet therapy was initially advised for all patients. However, the ultimate therapeutic approach exhibited variability attributed to patient-specific comorbidities, contraindications, and the discretion of the attending physician.

Thromboembolism and bleeding reduction calculation

Adverse events documented during follow-up visits, in accordance with the Munich consensus document, encompassed various categories, notably mortality (cardiovascular, non-cardiovascular, procedural, immediate procedural), thromboembolic events (stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), systemic embolism), and bleeding (life-threatening or incapacitating, major, minor).

Similar to our preceding study, the individual annual risk of each patient was meticulously recorded, and subsequently, the mean annual risk for the entire study cohort was computed [6]. The cumulative count of thromboembolic events observed throughout the overall follow-up duration was divided by the cumulative patient-years of follow-up. This quotient was then multiplied by 100 to derive the actual annual rate of thromboembolic events. The assessment of thromboembolism reduction was conducted through the following formula: (estimated percentage – actual percentage event rate) divided by estimated percentage event rate.

The procedural efficacy in averting thromboembolic events (such as stroke, TIA, systemic embolism, and intracardiac thrombus formation) was gauged by contrasting the factual event rate with the rate forecasted by CHA2DS2-VASc scores. The calculation of annual risk encompassed both individual patients and the collective study population.

The assessment of bleeding reduction followed a similar approach. Actual bleeding events were juxtaposed with the projected events based on the HAS-BLED score to evaluate the degree of reduction achieved.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables underwent assessment for normal distribution using the Shapiro-Wilk test. The data are presented as either mean ± standard deviation or as median (interquartile range; Q1 – 25th percentile and Q3 – 75th percentile), unless otherwise specified. In instances where non-parametric tests were employed, the obtained data were also displayed as mean ± standard deviation to facilitate comparison with other relevant studies. Categorical variables were presented as counts and percentages.

Baseline characteristics across groups were subjected to comparison utilizing the t-test for continuous variables and the χ2 test for categorical variables. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to extrapolate survival estimates across time intervals. All statistical analyses were carried out using Statistica 10.0 software (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK, USA). A two-sided p-value of less than 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

Results

Baseline patient characteristics are summarized in Table I. The average CHADS2 score was 1.9 ±1.0, the mean CHA2DS2-VAS score was 2.8 ±1.5, and the HAS-BLED score averaged 2.7 ±1.0. Prior to the LAAC procedure, thromboembolic events were documented in 22.3% of cases.

Table I

Patient characteristics

VariableLAAO (n = 121)
Age [years]:
 Mean ± SD62.1 ±10.2
 Median (Q1; Q3)64 (56.8; 69.2)
 Range21–81
 Female49.1%
 BMI [kg/m2], mean ± SD29.4 ±4.9
CHADS2 score:
 Mean ± SD1.9 ±1.0
 Median (Q1; Q3)2 (1;2)
CHA2DS2-VAS score:
 Mean ± SD2.8 ±1.5
 Median (Q1; Q3)3 (2;4)
HAS-BLED score:
 Mean ± SD2.7 ±1.0
 Median (Q1; Q3)2 (2;3)
 Ejection fraction60.1%
 Chronic heart failure16.6%
 Hyperlipidemia17.5%
 Coronary artery disease19.4%
 Diabetes mellitus25.4%
 Previous TIA/stroke22.3%
 History of ablation9.4%
 Hypertension87.6%
Pre-procedure medications:
 Vitamin K antagonist89.0%
 Antiplatelet agents9.2%
 None1.8%
Indication for LAAC:
 Stroke/TIA while on OAC32.2%
 Failure/complication* while on OAC14.0%
 Contraindicated to OAC9.1%
 Labile INR44.6%

The average duration of follow-up was 74.18 months, with the longest follow-up period extending beyond 8.4 years. Cumulatively, the study population amassed 748 patient-years of follow-up. Throughout the study’s duration, the mean annual rate of thromboembolic events was 0.7%. This encompassed 2 cases of stroke, 1 transient ischemic stroke, and 2 instances of thrombi formation within the left atrium, which subsequently resolved with the administration of unfractionated heparin, yielding no further complications. Notably, this equated to a 75% reduction in the estimated thromboembolic risk. The yearly occurrence rate of major bleeding complications was 0.8%, encompassing three hemorrhagic strokes, two gastrointestinal bleeds, and one urinary tract bleed. The calculated risk of bleeding was effectively reduced by 67.9% (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Effectiveness in stroke risk and bleeding reduction (/100 patient-years) during follow-up

/f/fulltexts/KiTP/52193/KITP-20-52193-g001_min.jpg

The overall annual mortality rate was 1.2%. The causes of death included cardiovascular disease in 3 cases, with the remaining attributed to lymphoma, pneumonia, sepsis (as a complication of orthopedic surgery), and progression of Alzheimer’s disease. In 2 cases, the immediate cause of death could not be definitively ascertained. Survival estimates, established via Kaplan-Meier analysis for all adverse events, are graphically represented in Figure 2.

Figure 2

Survival estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method for allcause mortality

/f/fulltexts/KiTP/52193/KITP-20-52193-g002_min.jpg

Discussion

Non-surgical epicardial LAAO closure has evolved into a standard treatment modality for AF at our center [7]. In this study, we outline the enduring outcomes of the initial patient cohort undergoing epicardial LAAO. Our findings demonstrate robust long-term results, showing substantial reductions in both thromboembolic and bleeding risk. It is noteworthy that the presented results encompass the lengthiest follow-up period documented in the extant literature.

The LAA holds a pivotal role as the primary source of thrombus in AF patients, as confirmed through autopsy, radiological investigations, and molecular analysis. The HEART-CLOT study revealed that the LAA distinctly maintains a localized state, evidenced by the formation of dense fibrin clots [8]. Blood derived from the LAA exhibits diminished fibrin clot permeability and a protracted clot dissolution time when contrasted with peripheral blood and various heart chambers, including the right and left atria and ventricles. The most recent fundamental research reaffirms the clinical rationale behind left atrial appendage closure for prophylaxis against thromboembolic events in patients with atrial fibrillation [9].

Regrettably, the recommendation grade for the LAAO procedure remains at IIb B in the 2020 update of the atrial fibrillation guidelines, primarily due to the paucity of randomized clinical trials and extended observational studies [3]. Currently, the LAAO procedure may be contemplated for stroke prevention in AF patients with contraindications to long-term anticoagulation therapy, such as those with non-reversible intracranial bleeding. It should be highlighted that LAAO interventions are increasingly performed for secondary prevention of ischemic stroke in patients without contraindications to oral anticoagulants, a stance supported by certain local cardiology societies [10]. Analysis of patients with a history of previous thromboembolic events underscores the notable efficacy of reducing secondary strokes of cardiac origin [11].

Over the past decade, two main approaches have emerged for complete LAA closure. An array of systems for LAA closure has arisen in recent years, with many centered on endocardial closure involving the insertion of a metal occluder within the LAA. An alternative strategy involves epicardial closure using the LARIAT system [12]. These approaches differ in terms of access type, postoperative leakage tendencies, and the necessity for postoperative anticoagulation. Following endocardial procedures, most manufacturers advise immediate antiplatelet therapy to deter occlusive thrombus formation. In the case of epicardial occlusion, post-procedure discontinuation of anticoagulants is plausible. Interestingly, some studies suggest that epicardial LAA occlusion leads to reduced secretion of natriuretic hormones, resulting in lowered blood pressure and heart rate – a phenomenon not observed following endocardial occlusion [13, 14]. This could be attributed to necrosis and tissue atrophy subsequent to LAA occlusion.

The efficacy of endocardial systems has been substantiated through numerous clinical trials and registries, often comparing favorably to oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy [15]. However, experience with epicardial devices is less extensive. The extended follow-up of epicardial LAAO is confined to a limited number of multicenter registries and/or single-center studies. To date, no randomized clinical trials have directly compared these two methodologies. Nevertheless, a retrospective study contrasting 55 matched patients who underwent endocardial and epicardial LAAO exhibited comparable efficacy in reducing thromboembolic and bleeding events during medium-term follow-up, with a slight advantage observed in favor of epicardial LAAO [16].

In this study, we present the longest-ever outcomes of epicardial LAAO within the pioneering patient group that underwent this procedure globally. Our findings include a 75% reduction in the anticipated rate of thromboembolic events and a 67% reduction in the expected rate of bleeding complications. These results align with those obtained from studies involving endocardial devices such as EWOLUTION [17] and the Amplatzer study [18]. Our outcomes also mirror prior discoveries concerning the epicardial LAAO system. Therefore, our findings indicate excellent efficacy in mitigating stroke risk, despite the heightened risk of thrombosis within an aging research population.

Limitations

This study followed a non-randomized, retrospective, observational design conducted within a single center. The primary limitations inherent in assessing the comprehensive efficacy of LAAO include the absence of a control group and the exclusive reliance on calculated stroke or bleeding risk scores for analytical purposes.

Conclusions

Epicardial LAAO with the LARIAT device yields exceptional long-term results in stroke and bleeding risk reduction.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Polish National Science Center, grant number UMO-2019/33/B/NZ5/02395. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Disclosure

Bartus K: Recipient of research grant funded by the National Science Centre.

References

1 

Burysz M, Litwinowicz R, Bryndza M, Skowronek R, Ogorzeja W, Bartus K. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure using the LAmbre device. First clinical results in Poland. Adv Interv Cardiol 2019; 15: 251-254.

2 

Karczewski M, Woźniak S, Skowronek R, Burysz M, Fischer M, Anisimowicz L, Demkow M, Konka M, Ogorzeja W. Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion – treatment outcomes and 6 months of follow-up – a single-center experience. Kardiochir Torakochir Pol 2016; 13: 98-104.

3 

Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, Arbelo E, Bax JJ, Blomström-Lundqvist C, Boriani G, Castella M, Dan GA, Dilaveris PE, Fauchier L, Filippatos G, Kalman JM, La Meir M, Lane DA, Lebeau JP, Lettino M, Lip GYH, Pinto FJ, Thomas GN, Valgimigli M, Van Gelder IC, Van Putte BP, Watkins CL; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 2021; 42: 373-498.

4 

Kowalewski M, Wañha W, Litwinowicz R, Ko³odziejczak M, Pasierski M, Januszek R, Kuźma £, Grygier M, Lesiak M, Kap³on-Cieœlicka A, Reczuch K, Gil R, Paw³owski T, Bartuœ K, Dobrzycki S, Lorusso R, Bartuœ S, Deja MA, Smolka G, Wojakowski W, Suwalski P. Stand-Alone Left Atrial appendage occlusion for throMboembolism prevention in nonvalvular Atrial fibrillatioN DiseasE Registry (SALAMANDER): protocol for a prospective observational nationwide study. BMJ Open 2022; 12: e063990.

5 

Litwinowicz R, Filip G, Sobczyk D, Lakkireddy D, Vuddanda V, Bartuœ M, Kapelak B, Bartuœ K. Long-term effect of anticoagulation following left atrial appendage occlusion with the LARIAT device in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: impact on thromboembolism, bleeding and mortality. Real life data. Adv Interv Cardiol 2020; 16: 89-96.

6 

Litwinowicz R, Bartus M, Ceranowicz P, Brzezinski M, Kapelak B, Lakkireddy D, Bartus K. Left atrial appendage occlusion for stroke prevention in diabetes mellitus patients with atrial fibrillation: long-term results.. J Diabetes 2019; 11: 75-82.

7 

Litwinowicz R, Mazur P, Burysz M, Filip G, Wasilewski G, Kapelak B, Bartus K. Why should cardiac surgeons occlude the left atrial appendage percutaneously? J Cardiac Surg 2020; 35: 3458-3464.

8 

Bartus K, Litwinowicz R, Natorska J, Zabczyk M, Undas A, Kapelak B, Lakkireddy D, Lee RJ. Coagulation factors and fibrinolytic activity in the left atrial appendage and other heart chambers in patients with atrial fibrillation: is there a local intracardiac prothrombotic state? (HEART-CLOT study). Int J Cardiol 2020; 301: 103-107.

9 

Litwinowicz R, Natorska J, Zabczyk M, Kapelak B, Lakkireddy D, Vuddanda V, Bartus K. Changes in fibrinolytic activity and coagulation factors after epicardial left atrial appendage closure in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Thorac Dis 2022; 14: 4226-4235.

10 

Grygier M, Wojakowski W, Smolka G, Demkow M, W¹sek W, Sorysz D, Kralisz P, Bartuœ K, Sukiennik A, Pracoñ R, Witkowski A, Kowalski O, Legutko J. Left atrial appendage occlusion: consensus document of Association of Cardiovascular Interventions and Heart Rhythm Section of Polish Cardiac Society. Kardiol Pol 2018; 76: 677-697.

11 

Litwinowicz R, Bartus M, Malec-Litwinowicz M, Michalski M, Banaszkiewicz K, Kapelak B, Lakkireddy D, Bartus K. Left atrial appendage occlusion for secondary stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation: long-term results. Cerebrovasc Dis 2019; 47: 188-195.

12 

Litwinowicz R, Bartus M, Burysz M, Brzeziñski M, Suwalski P, Kapelak B, Vuddanda V, Lakkireddy D, Lee RJ, Trabka R, Bartus K. Long term outcomes after left atrial appendage closure with the LARIAT device – stroke risk reduction over five years follow-up. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0208710.

13 

Bartus K, Kanuri SH, Litwinowicz R, Ali Elbey M, Natorska J, Zabczyk M, Bartus M, Kapelak B, Gopinnathannair R, Garg J, Turagam MK, Malecki MT, Lee RJ, Lakkireddy D. Long term impact of epicardial left atrial appendage ligation on systemic hemostasis: LAA HOMEOSTASIS-2. J Clin Med 2022; 11: 1495.

14 

Bartus K, Elbey MA, Kanuri SH, Lee R, Litwinowicz R, Natorska J, Zabczyk M, Bartus M, Kapelak B, Malecki MT, Lakkireddy D. Metabolic effects of the left atrial appendage exclusion (the heart hormone study). J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2022; 33: 2064-2071.

15 

Burysz M, Litwinowicz R, Burysz A, Ogorzeja W, Bartuœ K. Causes of death and morbidity in patients with atrial fibrillation after left atrial appendage occlusion. Kardiol Pol 2019; 77: 1047-1054.

16 

Litwinowicz R, Burysz M, Mazur P, Kapelak B, Bartus M, Lakkireddy D, Lee RJ, Malec-Litwinowicz M, Bartus K. Endocardial versus epicardial left atrial appendage exclusion for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation: midterm follow-up. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2021; 32: 93-101.

17 

Boersma LV, Ince H, Kische S, Pokushalov E, Schmitz T, Schmidt B, Gori T, Meincke F, Protopopov AV, Betts T, Foley D, Sievert H, Mazzone P, De Potter T, Vireca E, Stein K, Bergmann MW, EWOLUTION Investigators. Efficacy and safety of left atrial appendage closure with WATCHMAN in patients with or without contraindication to oral anticoagulation: 1-Year follow-up outcome data of the EWOLUTION trial. Heart Rhythm 2017; 14: 1302-1308.

18 

Piayda K, Sievert K, Della Rocca DG, Adeola OG, Alkhouli M, Yoo D, Benito-González T, Cruz-González I, Galea R, Skurk C, De Backer O, Nielsen-Kudsk JE, Grygier M, Beaty EH, Newton J, Pérez de Prado A, Räber L, Gibson D, Van Niekerk C, Ellis CR, Horton RP, Natale A, Grundwald I, Zeus T, Sievert H. Safety and feasibility of peri-device leakage closure after LAAO: an international, multicentre collaborative study. EuroIntervention 2021; 17: e1033-e1040.

Copyright: © 2024 Polish Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons (Polskie Towarzystwo KardioTorakochirurgów) and the editors of the Polish Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (Kardiochirurgia i Torakochirurgia Polska). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.