Current issue
Archive
Manuscripts accepted
About the journal
Editorial board
Abstracting and indexing
Contact
Instructions for authors
Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
|
Review paper
Application of bone turnover markers in skeletal and extra-skeletal conditions in children and adults
Agnieszka Postępska
1
,
Przemysław Sikora
1
Pediatr Pol 2023; 98 (4):
Online publish date: 2024/12/30
Article file
- Application of bone turnover.pdf
[0.19 MB]
ENW EndNote
BIB JabRef, Mendeley
RIS Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
INTRODUCTIONIn human ontogenesis the bone tissue undergoes continuous transformation that includes growth and adaptation to changing conditions (modeling) and maintenance in a state of well-being (remodeling). The main purpose of the former is to shape bones and increase their mass. Hence, it occurs primarily during developmental age as a physiological adaptation to changing physical conditions and in adulthood as a mechanism of bone repair. The primary role of remodeling, on the other hand, is renewal of existing bone tissue and repair of microdamage. In addition, it enables the maintenance of calcium-phosphate homeostasis [1]. Bone modeling includes both bone formation as the result of the action of osteoblasts and resorption triggered by osteoclasts [1]. In children, bone formation predominates over resorption, and the bone turnover rate is up to three times higher than in adults [2].The cycle of bone remodeling includes phases of activation, resorption, formation and resting. It is initiated by the activation of osteoclasts, mainly forced by natural apoptosis and microdamage of osteocytes. The disruption of cytoplasmic connections between the latter cells triggers the secretion of the receptor activator for nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL). The binding of RANKL with the RANK receptor, which activates nuclear factor κB on the surface of osteoclast progenitor cells, is crucial for the induction of osteoclastogenesis [1]. The opposite effect is exhibited by osteoprotegerin (OPG), whose soluble form acts as a decoy receptor for RANKL. Bone formation is initiated by the migration of osteoblasts into the bone resorption cavity. The main regulator of this process is the canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, which activates mesenchymal cells to differentiate into osteoblasts [1]. As soon as osteoid production and its initial mineralization are completed, osteoblasts undergo apoptosis or differentiation into osteocytes [1]. Assessing bone condition is challenging. It comprises histomorphometry, imaging techniques and laboratory biomarkers. The transiliac biopsy with histomorphometry with double-labeled tetracycline is considered the gold standard for the evaluation of bone structure as well as dynamic processes of bone formation and resorption [2]. To determine bone turnover, the bone formation rate/bone surface (BFR/BS) measure is mostly used, but this parameter reflects directly only bone formation while the resorption rate is assumed indirectly [3]. Another limitation is related to the possible non-representativeness of a single sample obtained from the iliac crest biopsy [2]. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the method of choice for assessing bone mineral density (BMD) and, to a lesser extent, fracture risk. The results of DXA in children may be influenced by motion artefacts and growth disorders, which may lead to both under- and overestimation of BMD. It is caused by DXA methodology, reflecting areal density and not volumetric, three-dimensional BMD [4]. Other imaging techniques proposed for bone evaluation, such as quantitative computed tomography (QCT), high-resolution QCT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), high-resolution MRI and bone quantitative ultrasound (QUS), are still not widely used in clinical practice [5]. Nuclear medicine is considered as a suitable tool in the evaluation of different bone conditions. Isotopic methods have applications mainly in bone metastases and traumas but also in metabolic diseases [2]. The uptake of radiotracer, usually technetium 99m-labeled bisphosphonates, by osteoblasts allows the identification of sites of increased metabolic activity and vascularization [6]. A novel sensitive method for the diagnosis of bone mineralisation disorders is the assessment of calcium isotope concentrations in serum and urine, although the results may be disturbed by factors such as dietary calcium intake [7]. Bone turnover markers (BTMs) are bone derived products which can be measured in blood and urine. Considering the disadvantages and limitations of imaging techniques, they provide an additional, non-invasive source of information about the metabolic activity of the entire skeleton. BTMs are traditionally classified into two groups, reflecting both bone formation and resorption. The former group mostly includes bone alkaline phosphatase (BALP), osteocalcin (OC) and procollagen type I propeptide (PINP), while the latter mostly includes C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX-I) and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase type 5b (TRAP5b). There is also a group of BTMs, mainly of osteocyte origin, whose role is complex: sclerostin (SCL), fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), OPG, periostin. More recently, new BTMs have been proposed: cathepsin K and Dickkopf-1 (Dkk-1) (Table 1). Historically, the first non-specific bone marker – serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) –was found about a century ago, and the first bone-specific marker – OC – has been assayed since 1980s. BTMs are usually determined with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and validated against bone histomorphometry or DXA [2]. Although some of them are already recommended for evaluation of bone mineralization and their usefulness has been reported in many conditions, the proper interpretation of BTM values may be challenging, mainly due to their biological variability and methodological reasons [8]. BTMs exhibit a circadian rhythm, which is generally expressed to a greater extent for bone resorption than for formation markers [9]. Therefore they should be assessed in standard conditions, usually after overnight fasting, as food intake can significantly affect their levels in biological fluids [9]. BTMs are strongly age-dependent, usually reaching their highest values during adolescence [2]. In early childhood, serum BTM concentrations do not differ between the sexes, but after puberty, they are usually higher in males due to the higher bone mass [2, 9]. Overall, BTMs reach the lowest levels in the fourth decade in women and in the fifth in men. In the former, they increase significantly during menopause and remain relatively high thereafter [9]. Physical activity affects serum BTM levels [2, 9]. Therefore, refraining from intense exercise for 24 hours before assessment is recommended [9]. BTMs’ evaluation may also be affected by medications, including antiepileptic drugs, hormonal contraception, glucocorticoids or antiosteoporotic agents [2]. BONE FORMATION MARKERSBONE ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE AND ALKALINE PHOSPHATASEBALP is an enzyme that is released from immature osteoblasts [2]. It is responsible for breaking down pyridoxal phosphate, which is an inhibitor of hydroxyapatite formation. Along with its hepatic and intestinal – as well as, in pregnant women, placental –isoforms, BALP accounts for the total ALP activity. Therefore, in contrast to BALP, ALP may only be treated as a bone marker in the case of intact liver and bowel function [2]. In early childhood, serum ALP and BALP concentrations are not sex-dependent. They reach a peak in early adolescence, which is more prominent in males [8]. In children, serum BALP is related to anthropometric factors and growth velocity [8]. Fasting and circadian rhythm do not significantly affect it. As BALP is not influenced by glomerular filtration rate (GFR), it is suitable in patients with impaired kidney function [8]. Similarly to ALP, serum BALP reference values for both adults and children have been established [10, 11].In hypophosphatasia (HPP), a congenital metabolic bone disease, mutations of the ALPL gene encoding the tissue (liver/bone/kidney) non-specific ALP lead to a persistently low serum ALP concentration [12]. HPP is characterized by the accumulation of inorganic pyrophosphate, which is an inhibitor of bone mineralization. Therefore, HPP manifests as rickets or osteomalacia and dental hypoplasia [12]. In contrast, serum ALP is highly elevated in patients with Paget’s disease, a condition leading to dysregulation of bone remodeling and serious skeletal deformities [13]. It is also used to monitor the effectiveness of treatment in this disease [13]. A higher serum BALP level is observed in osteoporosis [14] and is found to be significantly reduced by antiresorptive treatment [15]. For instance, in children with osteogenesis imperfecta, serum BALP concentration decreases upon therapy with intravenous bisphosphonate [16]. Moreover, it is observed in adults during anti-osteoporotic therapy and it is believed to be strongly correlated with a lower risk of vertebral fractures [15]. The level of BALP may have prognostic value in bone neoplasms [17, 18]. For instance, in children with osteosarcoma, high serum BALP concentrations may correlate with disease progression or recurrence and poor prognosis [17]. BALP is also a promising biomarker in the monitoring bone metastases in various neoplasms [19]. OSTEOCALCINOC is a small protein consisting of 49 amino acids. It is encoded by the BGLAP gene synthesized by osteoblasts, odontoblasts and hypertrophic chondrocytes [2]. Vitamin D and glucocorticoids are among the key modulators of its production. OC expression is also influenced by insulin level and glucose metabolism [2]. Gamma-carboxylation allows OC to bind to hydroxyapatite, enabling its incorporation into the bone matrix [20]. Only the circulating undercarboxylated form of OC functions as a hormone [20].In both sexes, serum OC concentrations are highest during puberty and gradually decline after reaching a peak in early adulthood [21]. Its upper normal level at the age of 19 years is a positive predictor of BMD and bone size in young men [22]. Serum OC concentrations exhibit diurnal variation, with the peak during the night and the trough in the afternoon [23]. Efforts to define reference values for OC have been undertaken in both adult and pediatric populations [10, 24]. In postmenopausal women, serum OC values are negatively correlated with BMD and its high concentration is considered as a risk factor of fractures [25, 26]. Therefore its decrease during antiosteoporotic treatment is expected [27]. In children with fibrous dysplasia, increased serum OC concentration is associated with disease progression [28]. Apart from its skeletal function, OC serves as an endocrine factor in various tissues. It promotes pancreatic β-cell proliferation, insulin secretion and its peripheral sensitivity. Therefore the role of OC in the pathogenesis of diabetes mellitus (DM) was analyzed [29]. It was found that children and adolescents with DM type 1 (DM1) show lower serum OC concentrations in comparison to non-diabetic controls and there is a negative correlation between serum OC and hemoglobin A1c levels (HbA1c) [30]. Moreover, OC enhances lipid metabolism in adipose tissue and in the liver. It affects the adiponectin expression in adipocytes and promotes the processes of lipolysis and programmed adipocyte necrosis [31]. Therefore, administration of uncarboxylated OC may be considered as a new therapeutic strategy for obesity and dyslipidemia [31]. There is a significant negative correlation between serum OC levels and obesity in children and adults [32, 33]. Moreover, decreased serum OC concentration predicts the progression of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in obese children [34]. OC and its receptors are present in the brain, suggesting their potential roles in neurodevelopment and cognition. OC inhibits γ-aminobutyric acid production and increases the synthesis of some monoamine neurotransmitters, including serotonin, dopamine and norepinephrine [35]. Animal studies showed that OC crosses the placental barrier and enhances neurogenesis in the hippocampus of the embryo [35]. PROCOLLAGEN TYPE I PROPEPTIDEPINP is released from collagen type I – the predominant bone protein – during a process of collagen synthesis in the bone extracellular matrix [2, 8]. In blood, PINP is present in two forms: a trimeric “intact” peptide, which is metabolized in the liver, and a monomeric peptide, excreted by the kidneys [2]. As the serum PINP is minimally dependent on the circadian rhythm and food intake, it is recommended by the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) as a reference marker of bone formation [2]. To establish normative values for PINP, a few studies have been carried out in both adult and pediatric cohorts [35, 36].In boys, an association between serum PINP concentration and bone mineral content was reported. Furthermore, this marker was non-significantly associated with reduced BMD in adolescent, amenorrheic girls [8]. PINP may be a sensitive marker in detecting osteoporosis in elderly women [38]. Elevated PINP levels may suggest excessive or dysregulated bone remodeling, potentially increasing fracture risk. However, PINP is not currently included in fracture risk calculators. Several metaanalyses based on adult studies showed a positive correlation between its serum level and the risk of fractures [39, 40]. Unfortunately, there are no data to confirm it in children. Antiresorptive agents lower serum PINP levels, making it a suitable marker of treatment efficacy. It was observed that bisphosphonate therapy reduced PINP concentrations to the target goal in the majority of osteoporotic, postmenopausal women [41]. Furthermore, administration of the RANKL inhibitor denosumab and selective estrogen receptor modulators suppressed serum PINP concentrations as well [42]. In contrast, therapy with teriparatide, a recombinant PTH molecule, increased it in parallel to the improvement of BMD [43, 44]. Unfortunately, the role of PINP in evaluating the effectiveness of anti-osteoporotic treatment in the pediatric population has not been established yet. Higher concentrations of serum PINP are also observed in some patients with hyperparathyroidism. As expected, they decrease shortly after parathyroidectomy [45, 46]. Furthermore, serum PINP level is elevated in Paget’s disease and it seems to be superior to ALP in monitoring the disease activity [46]. Serum PINP concentration in children and adolescents with DM1 was significantly decreased [47, 48]. In addition, in newly diagnosed patients with DM2 it was found to be negatively correlated with HbA1c [49]. These observations provide some insights into the pathomechanism of increased risk of bone fractures in DM [50]. Serum PINP levels may be impaired by malignancies. Numerous adult studies have shown that PINP is a reliable marker of bone metastases [51]. In children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), serum PINP levels are often reduced, which may be related to chemotherapy [52]. The same tendency was observed in children treated with systemic glucocorticosteroids [53]. Notably, the serum concentrations of total and monomeric forms of PINP are elevated in patients with advanced kidney failure. Therefore, only intact PINP can be used in an assessment of bone metabolism in this group [54]. BONE RESORPTION MARKERSC-TERMINAL TELOPEPTIDE OF TYPE I COLLAGENCTX-I is released during the breakdown of type I collagen by the enzyme cathepsin K in the extracellular bone matrix [55]. Its serum levels strongly fluctuate in a circadian rhythm and should be assessed in a fasting status in the morning [9]. CTX-I serves as a valuable indicator of bone resorption activity in osteoporosis, which was emphasized in the IOF and IFCC recommendations [2, 8]. Its reference values in children and adults were recently published [56, 57].In the pediatric population, serum CTX-I levels are fairly constant, with a slight peak at the onset of puberty, and are related to height [8]. It was found that in adults, elevated serum CTX-I concentration may indicate an increased fracture risk [40]. As its decrease is observed upon therapy with bisphosphonates and denosumab, CTX-I may be a useful parameter in the assessment of anti-osteoporotic treatment efficacy [41, 58]. In contrast, a significant increase of serum CTX-I concentration was observed in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis after 2 years of immunosuppressive treatment with tocilizumab [59]. Of note, serum CTX-I levels correlate only to a limited extent with joint damage [60]. As in Paget’s disease bone turnover is very rapid, leading to bone matrix resorption before the process of beta-isomerization of CTX, only the nonisomerized ααCTX form may be used as a marker of the disease activity [61]. Serum CTX-I levels may be elevated in patients with bone metastasis in lung and prostate cancer [62, 63]. It was suggested that CTX-I monitoring may be even more widely used in assessing prognosis, evaluating treatment response and guiding therapeutic strategies in bone neoplasm [62, 63]. The data in pediatric patients are very limited. Children with ALL who underwent intensive chemotherapy were found to have higher serum CTX-I concentrations than healthy subjects [64]. TARTRATE-RESISTANT ACID PHOSPHATASE TYPE 5BTRAP5b is an enzyme secreted by the osteoclasts. It is a 35 kDa protein, encoded by the ACP5 gene [2]. TRAP5b is a hydrolase that cleaves phosphate from proteins such as osteopontin and bone sialoproteins [65]. Its activity is optimal in acidic pH environments, such as bone lacunae [65]. In children, serum TRAP5b levels are the highest at birth and then gradually decline [8].Serum TRAP5b concentration is found to be elevated in patients with increased bone resorption and is used to monitor the effectiveness of anti-osteoporotic treatment in adults [66]. As the serum TRAP5b level is not affected by GFR and dialysis, it is proposed as an accurate BTM for patients with kidney failure [65]. Serum TRAP5b reference values in children were proposed [8]. Accordingly, elevated TRAP5b values have been reported in different pediatric conditions including steroid therapy and osteopathy due to sickle cell disease [67, 68]. Increased serum TRAP5b values were also observed in children with osteosarcoma, whereas high TRAP5b concentrations in the fluid of bone solitary cysts are thought to be associated with an increased risk of postoperative recurrence [69, 70]. By contrast, children with congenital hypothyroidism and low bone turnover show decreased serum TRAP5b levels [71]. OTHER BONE TURNOVER MARKERSSCLEROSTINSCL is a glycoprotein encoded by the SOST gene and primarily produced by osteocytes [72]. SCL is mostly considered an inhibitor of bone formation, suppressing the activity of osteoblasts by antagonizing the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway [73]. In children, serum SCL concentrations are significantly higher in boys than in girls and decrease in late adolescence [74].It was reported that serum SCL concentrations positively correlate with a higher risk of bone fractures [75]. Furthermore, they are positively associated with the bone cortical porosity index in children [74]. Of note, in van Buchem disease and sclerosteosis, the serum level of SCL is strongly decreased due to the SOST gene mutations in the latter or chromosomal deletion involving this gene in the former. In these conditions, reduced production or loss of function of SCL leads to excessive bone formation and abnormally high bone density [76]. It was reported that circulating SCL values are significantly higher in adult DM2 patients compared to healthy controls. In the former group a positive association between serum SCL level and subclinical atherosclerosis was noted [77]. Furthermore, increased serum SCL concentrations were found in children and adolescents with DM1 [78]. In pediatric patients with obesity, a negative correlation between SCL and HOMA-IR levels suggests its role in the pathomechanism of insulin resistance [79]. Serum SCL levels are elevated in adult patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) [80]. Surprisingly, in children and adolescents, no association between serum SCL concentrations and stages of CKD was found [81]. SCL has become a potential therapeutic target for conditions associated with low bone mass. The effectiveness of romosozumab, an anti-SCL monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women at high risk of fractures, was recently confirmed [82]. Its potential usefulness in children and adolescents has been discussed [83]. FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR 23 AND Α-KLOTHO PROTEINFGF-23 is a glycoprotein of 251 amino acids which is synthesized mainly in osteocytes and osteoblasts [84]. It regulates phosphate homeostasis by binding to the receptor complex, consisting of the FGF receptor (FGFR) and α-Klotho protein (α-KL), in renal proximal tubular cells. Thereby, FGF23 activates signaling pathways that lead to the downregulation of sodium-phosphate co-transporters, reduces tubular phosphate reabsorption and increases urinary phosphate excretion [85]. In parallel, FGF23 suppresses the synthesis and activation of calcitriol as well as inhibiting the production and release of PTH [86]. Serum FGF23 concentrations in the pediatric population are age- and sex-independent [87].Mutations in the FGF23 gene result in dysregulated production and function of FGF23 [86]. In individuals with autosomal dominant hypophosphatemic rickets (ADHR), the mutated FGF23 protein is resistant to proteolytic cleavage leading to its overexpression, hypophosphatemia and disturbed bone mineralization [86]. Serum FGF23 levels are also elevated in X-linked hypophosphatemic rickets (XLH) caused by the PHEX gene mutation [88]. Similar symptoms are described in tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO), a rare paraneoplastic syndrome caused by tumoral overproduction of FGF23 [89]. In this condition, serum FGF23 concentrations decrease after the surgical removal of the tumor. Non-operative management includes therapy with the anti-FGF23 monoclonal antibody burosumab, originally approved for the treatment of XLH in children and adults [88, 90]. Several studies have revealed a significant negative correlation between FGF23 levels and BMD in osteoporosis in adults, but other reports failed to find a similar association [91]. Elevated serum FGF23 levels are also observed in CKD [92]. They are inversely correlated with GFR [93]. In children and adults with CKD, the increase of serum FGF23 concentration appears even before the onset of secondary hyperparathyroidism, making it an early marker of calcium-phosphate disturbances [94]. In pediatric CKD patients, a high FGF23 level is positively correlated with the risk of left ventricular hypertrophy [95]. It is also a risk factor for the development of acute kidney injury in critically ill children and after cardiac surgery [96, 97]. Although α-KL protein is not a BTM, it plays an important role in the regulation of bone formation, both directly and indirectly as a co-receptor for FGF23 [98]. It is a transmembrane protein produced mainly by the distal renal tubular cells, but is also expressed in the brain, liver and blood vessels. Due to proteolytic cleavage, a soluble form of α-KL is released into circulation and may be detected in body fluids. Its biological role is not limited to being a co-receptor for FGFR [98]. α-KL is involved in the regulation of signaling pathways that are associated with aging [98]. Through its pleiotropic effects, it also influences the processes of neoplasia, cellular integrity, inflammation, oxidative stress and many others [98, 99]. Therefore, α-KL deficiency may lead to endothelial dysfunction, hyperphosphatemia, hypercalcemia, progressive aging and specific age-related disorders [100]. It has been reported that girls have higher serum α-KL levels than boys and their values are higher in both genders in the pubertal period. In children, there is also a strong positive correlation between serum α-KL and IGF-1 concentrations [101]. The average serum α-KL values decrease with age, and they negatively correlate with the all-cause mortality ratio [102]. Therefore, higher levels of serum α-KL are linked to an increased lifespan [103]. Strategies aimed at enhancing α-KL expression may hold promise for extending the healthy lifespan and delaying the onset of age-related disorders [104]. It was reported that α-KL plays a significant role in the regulation of bone formation [105]. The canonical FGF23/FGFR/α-KL signaling pathway is related to the regulation of bone extracellular matrix mineralization and calcium-phosphate homeostasis [105]. Moreover, α-KL upregulates osteoclastogenesis through activation of the NF-κB signaling pathway [106]. In adults, a correlation between low serum α-KL concentration and the occurrence of osteoporosis was found [107]. Unfortunately, there is a lack of similar data in the pediatric population. OSTEOPROTEGERINOPG is a glycoprotein included in the tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) superfamily [108] secreted by osteoblasts, but it is also expressed in other tissues, such as the liver, spleen and circulatory system [109]. OPG acts as a decoy receptor for RANK and prevents its binding to RANKL. Thus, OPG inhibits osteoclast differentiation and prevents excessive bone resorption [108]. Therefore the RANKL antagonist denosumab was used successfully in osteoporosis treatment [110]. The result of loss of function mutations in the TNFRSF11B gene encoding OPG is the juvenile Paget’s disease. It leads to a very high bone turnover, which manifests as bone deformities, hearing loss, retinopathy and vascular calcification [111]. Several studies in adults and children have suggested an impact of TNFRSF11B polymorphisms on BMD disturbance [112, 113]. The data on serum OPG concentrations in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis are conflicting. While some indicate elevated values [114], others show the opposite results [115]. On the other hand, antiosteoporotic treatment caused an increase of OPG levels in this group [116]. Serum OPG concentrations seem to be positively correlated with the risk of arteriosclerosis and coronary artery disease [117]. They are also significantly higher in diabetic children than in healthy controls [118]. The RANK/RANKL/OPG system has a proven role in the pathogenesis of bone metastasis, particularly in breast and prostate cancer, and appears to be a potential treatment target [110].NEW BONE TURNOVER MARKERSCathepsin K and Dickkopf-1 have been proposed for the evaluation of bone metabolism in adults [119]. The former is a catalytic enzyme that degrades type I collagen and may serve as bone resorption marker. Its serum concentrations have been found to be elevated in patients with osteoporosis, Paget’s disease and some rheumatic disorders [119]. Its connection with cardiovascular diseases was also found [119]. Dkk-1 is a protein that acts as an inhibitor of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Its utility has been considered in evaluation of bone mineralization disorders and vascular calcification [119]. Recently, various circulating microRNA molecules such as miR-34a and miRNA-133a were proven to be involved in the regulation of bone homeostasis. Therefore, they have become proposed as biomarkers in several bone diseases, such as osteoporosis and osteogenesis imperfecta [120]. So far, research on new BTMs in the pediatric population is very limited [121].CONCLUSIONSThe development of BTMs represents significant progress in the assessment of bone metabolism. Currently available BTMs have found applications as research and clinical tools in a wide range of skeletal and extra-skeletal conditions. However, their utility in routine clinical practice is still limited, mainly due to problems with the interpretation of results. It is caused by heterogenous methodology, intra- and inter-patient variability, and a paucity of accurate reference ranges and approved guidelines. Therefore there is a need for standardized clinical trials based on large groups of patients, both in adults and children. An obstacle to more widespread determination of BTMs is still the cost of assays, especially when they are performed manually. A search for new, more clinically useful BTMs would clearly be welcomed.DISCLOSURES1. Institutional review board statement: Not applicable.2. Assistance with the article: None. 3. Financial support and sponsorship: None. 4. Conflicts of interest: None. REFERENCES1. Kenkre JS, Bassett JHD. The bone remodelling cycle. Ann Clin Biochem 2018; 55: 308-327. 2.
Schini M, Vilaca T, Gossiel F, et al. Bone turnover markers: basic biology to clinical applications. Endocr Rev 2023; 44: 417-473. 3.
Szulc P. Bone turnover: biology and assessment tools. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2018; 32: 725-738. 4.
Messina C, Maffi G, Vitale JA, et al. Diagnostic imaging of osteoporosis and sarcopenia: a narrative review. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2018; 8: 86-99. 5.
Di Iorgi N, Maruca K, Patti G, et al. Update on bone density measurements and their interpretation in children and adolescents. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2018; 32: 477-498. 6.
Blake GM, Siddique M, Frost ML, et al. Imaging of site specific bone turnover in osteoporosis using positron emission tomography. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2014; 12: 475-485. 7.
Eisenhauer A, Müllerb M, Heuser A, et al. Calcium isotope ratios in blood and urine: a new biomarker for the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Bone Reports 2019; 10: 100200. DOI: 10.1016/j.bonr.2019.100200. 8.
Ladang A, Rauch F, Delvin E, et al. Bone turnover markers in children: from laboratory challenges to clinical interpretation. Calcif Tissue Int 2023; 112: 218-232. 9.
Eastell R, Szulc P. Use of bone turnover markers in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2017; 5: 908-923. 10.
Diemar SS, Møllehave LT, Quardon N, et al. Effects of age and sex on osteocalcin and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase – reference intervals and confounders for two bone formation markers. Arch Osteoporos 2020; 15: 26. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-020-00715-6. 11.
Diemar SS, Lylloff L, Rønne MS, et al. Reference intervals in Danish children and adolescents for bone turnover markers carboxy-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen (β-CTX), pro-collagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP), osteocalcin (OC) and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (bone ALP). Bone 2021; 146: 115879. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2021.115879. 12.
Tournis S, Yavropoulou MP, Polyzos SA, et al. Hypophosphatasia. J Clin Med 2021; 10: 5676. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10235676. 13.
Ralston SH, Corral-Gudino L, Cooper C, et al. Diagnosis and management of Paget’s disease of bone in adults: a clinical guideline. J Bone Miner Res 2019; 34: 579-604. 14.
Biver E, Chopin F, Coiffier G, et al. Bone turnover markers for osteoporotic status assessment? A systematic review of their diagnosis value at baseline in osteoporosis. Joint Bone Spine 2012; 79: 20-25. 15.
Bauer DC, Black DM, Bouxsein ML, et al. Treatment-Related Changes in Bone Turnover and Fracture Risk Reduction in Clinical Trials of Anti-Resorptive Drugs: A Meta-Regression. J Bone Miner Res 2018; 33: 634-642. 16.
Diacinti D, Pisani D, Cipriani C, et al. Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) for monitoring vertebral reshaping in children and adolescents with osteogenesis imperfecta treated with intravenous neridronate. Bone 2021; 143: 115608. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115608. 17.
Rychłowska-Pruszyńska M, Gajewska J, Ambroszkiewicz J, et al. The levels of bone alkaline phosphatase BALP and soluble epidermal growth factor receptor 2 ECD/HER2 in pediatric patients with osteosarcoma during clinical treatment. Dev Period Med 2018; 22: 58-64. 18.
Leunga KS, Kumta SM, Fung KP. Clinical Study bone-specific alkaline phosphatase in plasma as tumour. Oncology 1996; 53: 275-280. 19.
Du WX, Duan SF, Chen JJ, et al. Serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase as a biomarker for osseous metastases in patients with malignant carcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Ther 2014; 10: C140-C143. DOI: 10.4103/0973-1482.145842. 20.
Mizokami A, Kawakubo-Yasukochi T, Hirata M. Osteocalcin and its endocrine functions. Biochem Pharmacol 2017; 132: 1-8. 21.
Vanderschueren D, Gevers G, Raymaekers G, Devos P, Dequeker J. Calcified tissue international sex-and age-related changes in bone and serum osteocalcin. Calcif Tissue Int 1990; 46: 179-182. 22.
Darelid A, Nilsson M, Kindblom JM, Mellström D, Ohlsson C, Lorentzon M. Bone turnover markers predict bone mass development in young adult men: a five-year longitudinal study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015; 100: 1460-1468. 23.
Gundberg CM, Markowitz ME, Mizruchi M, Rosen JF. Osteocalcin in human serum: a circadian rhythm. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1985; 4: 736-739. 24.
Geserick M, Vogel M, Eckelt F, et al. Children and adolescents with obesity have reduced serum bone turnover markers and 25-hydroxyvitamin D but increased parathyroid hormone concentrations – results derived from new pediatric reference ranges. Bone 2020; 132: 115124. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2019.115124. 25.
Vergnaud P, Garnero P, Meunier PJ, et al. Undercarboxylated osteocalcin measured with a specific immunoassay predicts hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1997; 82: 719-724. 26.
Kalaiselvi VS, Prabhu K, Ramesh M, et al. The association of serum osteocalcin with the bone mineral density in post menopausal women. J Clin Diagn Res 2013; 7: 814-816. 27.
Bowden SA, Akusoba CI, Hayes JR, et al. Biochemical markers of bone turnover in children with clinical bone fragility. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2016; 29: 715-722. 28.
Szymczuk V, Taylor J, Michel Z, et al. Skeletal disease acquisition in fibrous dysplasia: natural history and indicators of lesion progression in children. J Bone Miner Res 2022; 37: 1473-1478. 29.
Zeng H, Ge J, Xu W, et al. Type 2 diabetes is causally associated with reduced serum osteocalcin: a genomewide association and mendelian randomization study. J Bone Miner Res 2021; 36: 1694-1707. 30.
Madsen JOB, Jørgensen NR, Pociot F, et al. Bone turnover markers in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes – a systematic review. Pediatr Diabetes 2019; 20: 510-522. 31.
Otani T, Mizokami A, Kawakubo-Yasukochi T, et al. The roles of osteocalcin in lipid metabolism in adipose tissue and liver. Adv Biol Regul 2020; 78: 100752. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbior.2020.100752. 32.
Luo Y, Ma X, Hao Y, et al. Association between serum osteocalcin level and visceral obesity in Chinese postmenopausal women. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2015; 83: 429-434. 33.
Kim GS, Jekal Y, Kim HS, et al. Reduced serum total osteocalcin is associated with central obesity in Korean children. Obes Res Clin Pract 2014; 8: e201-e298. DOI: 10.1016/j.orcp.2012.12.003. 34.
Amin S, El Amrousy D, Elrifaey S, et al. Serum osteocalcin levels in children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2018; 66: 117-121. 35.
Obri A, Khrimian L, Karsenty G, et al. Osteocalcin in the brain: from embryonic development to age-related decline in cognition. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2018; 14: 174-182. 36.
Bayer M. Reference values of osteocalcin and procollagen type I N-propeptide plasma levels in a healthy Central European population aged 0-18 years. Osteoporos Int 2014; 25: 729-736. 37.
Glover SJ, Gall M, Schoenborn-Kellenberger O, et al. Establishing a reference interval for bone turnover markers in 637 healthy, young, premenopausal women from the United Kingdom, France, Belgium, and the United States. J Bone Miner Res 2009; 24: 389-397. 38.
Saad MA, Aboelwafa RA, Elsayed EH. Could procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) and bone alkaline phosphatase (B-ALP) be valid alternative diagnostic markers to dual X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in elderly females with osteoporosis? An Egyptian radiological and laboratory monocentric study. Egypt Rheumatol Rehabil 2021; 48: 20: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43166-021-00069-y. 39.
Johansson H, Odén A, Kanis JA, et al. A meta-analysis of reference markers of bone turnover for prediction of fracture. Calcif Tissue Int 2014; 94: 560-567. 40.
Tian A, Ma J, Feng K, et al. Reference markers of bone turnover for prediction of fracture: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 2019; 14: 68. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1100-6. 41.
Naylor KE, Jacques RM, Paggiosi M, et al. Response of bone turnover markers to three oral bisphosphonate therapies in postmenopausal osteoporosis: the TRIO study. Osteoporos Int 2016; 27: 21-31. 42.
Gillett MJ, Vasikaran SD, Inderjeeth CA. The role of PINP in diagnosis and management of metabolic bone disease. Clin Biochem Rev 2021; 42: 3-10. 43.
Krege JH, Lane NE, Harris J, et al. PINP as a biological response marker during teriparatide treatment for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2014; 25: 2159-2171. 44.
Tsujimoto M, Chen P, Miyauchi A, et al. PINP as an aid for monitoring patients treated with teriparatide. Bone 2011; 48: 798-803. 45.
Alonso S, Ferrero E, Donat M, et al. The usefulness of high pre-operative levels of serum type I collagen bone markers for the prediction of changes in bone mineral density after parathyroidectomy. J Endocrinol Invest 2012; 35: 640-644. 46.
Al Nofal AA, Altayar O, BenKhadra K, et al. Bone turnover markers in Paget’s disease of the bone: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 2015; 26: 1875-1891. 47.
El Amrousy D, El-Afify D, Shabana A. Relationship between bone turnover markers and oxidative stress in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Pediatr Res 2021; 89: 878-881. 48.
Maggio ABR, Ferrari S, Kraenzlin M, et al. Decreased bone turnover in children and adolescents with well controlled type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2010; 23: 697-707. 49.
Li H, Wen Y, Liu P, et al. Characteristics of bone metabolism in postmenopausal women with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2021; 95: 430-438. 50.
Vilaca T, Schini M, Harnan S, et al. The risk of hip and non-vertebral fractures in type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis update. Bone 2020; 137: 115457. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115457. 51.
Koopmans N, de Jong IJ, Breeuwsma AJ, et al. Serum bone turnover markers (PINP and ICTP) for the early detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: a longitudinal approach. J Urol 2007; 178: 849-853. 52.
Jaeger B, Tauer J, Ulmer A, et al. Changes in bone metabolic parameters in children with chronic myeloid leukemia on imatinib treatment. Med Sci Monit 2012; 18: 721-728. 53.
Vihinen MK, Kolho KL, Ashorn M, et al. Bone turnover and metabolism in paediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with systemic glucocorticoids. Eur J Endocrinol 2008; 159: 693-698. 54.
Tridimas A, Milan A, Marks E. Assessing bone formation in patients with chronic kidney disease using procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP): the choice of assay makes a difference. Ann Clin Biochem 2021; 58: 528-536. 55.
Greenblatt MB, Tsai JN, Wein MN. Bone turnover markers in the diagnosis and monitoring of metabolic bone disease. Clin Chem 2017; 63: 464-474. 56.
De Melo VCP, Ferreira PRS, Ricardi LO, et al. Definition of reference ranges for β-isomerized carboxy-terminal telopeptide collagen type i for children and adolescents. JPEM 2018; 31: 637-640. 57.
Li M, Li Y, Deng W, et al. Chinese bone turnover marker study: reference ranges for C-terminal telopeptide of type i collagen and procollagen I N-terminal peptide by age and gender. PLoS One 2014; 9: e103841. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103841. 58.
Bone HG, Bolognese MA, Yuen CK, et al. Effects of denosumab treatment and discontinuation on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 96: 972-980. 59.
De Benedetti F, Brunner H, Ruperto N, et al. Catch-up growth during tocilizumab therapy for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Results from a phase iii trial. Arthritis Rheumatol 2015; 67: 840-848. 60.
Karsdal MA, Woodworth T, Henriksen K, et al. Biochemical markers of ongoing joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis – current and future applications, limitations and opportunities. Arthritis Res Ther 2011; 13: 215. 61.
Alexandersen P, Peris P, Guañabens N, et al. Non-isomerized C-telopeptide fragments are highly sensitive markers for monitoring disease activity and treatment efficacy in Paget’s disease of bone. J Bone Miner Res 2005; 20: 588-595. 62.
Chai X, Yinwang E, Wang Z, et al. Predictive and prognostic biomarkers for lung cancer bone metastasis and their therapeutic value. Front Oncol 2021; 11: 692788. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.692788. 63.
Chen S, Wang L, Qian K, et al. Establishing a prediction model for prostate cancer bone metastasis. Int J Biol Sci 2019; 15: 208-220. 64.
Muggeo P, Grassi M, D’Ascanio V, et al. Bone remodeling markers in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia after intensive chemotherapy: the screenshot of a biochemical signature. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15: 2554. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092554. 65.
Vervloet MG, Brandenburg VM, Bover J, et al. Circulating markers of bone turnover. J Nephrol 2017; 30: 663-670. 66.
Nenonen A, Cheng S, Ivaska KK, et al. Serum TRACP 5b is a useful marker for monitoring alendronate treatment: comparison with other markers of bone turnover. J Bone Miner Res; 20: 1804-1812. 67.
Zhang J, Zeng H, Fu S, et al. Changes in the Dickkopf-1 and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b serum levels in preschool children with nephrotic syndrome. Biomed Rep 2016; 4: 605-608. 68.
Mokhtar GM, Tantawy AAG, Hamed AAS, et al. Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b in young patients with sickle cell disease and trait siblings: relation to vasculopathy and bone mineral density. Clin Appl Thromb Hem 2017; 23: 64-71. 69.
Bellini G, Pinto D Di, Tortora C, et al. The role of mifamurtide in chemotherapy-induced osteoporosis of children with osteosarcoma. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 2017; 17: 650-656. 70.
Hoshi M, Oebisu N, Iwai T, et al. High tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRACP 5b) level in cystic fluid is a significant prognostic marker for postoperative recurrence in solitary bone cysts. J Child Orthop 2022; 16: 519-527. 71.
Karakaş NM, Kınık ST, Özdemir B, et al. Congenital hypothyroidism and bone remodeling cycle. JCRPE J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol 2017; 9: 106-110. 72.
Sharifi M, Ereifej L, Lewiecki EM. Sclerostin and skeletal health. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2015; 16: 149-156. 73.
Maeda K, Kobayashi Y, Koide M, et al. The regulation of bone metabolism and disordersby wnt signaling. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20: 1694. DOI: 10.3390/ijms20071694. 74.
Kirmani S, Amin S, McCready LK, et al. Sclerostin levels during growth in children. Osteoporos Int 2012; 23: 1123-1130. 75.
Arasu A, Cawthon PM, Lui LY, et al. Serum sclerostin and risk of hip fracture in older caucasian women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012; 97: 2027-2032. 76.
Sebastian A, Loots GG. Genetics of Sost/SOST in sclerosteosis and van Buchem disease animal models. Metabolism 2018; 80: 38-47. 77.
Shalash MAM, Rohoma KH, Kandil NS, et al. Serum sclerostin level and its relation to subclinical atherosclerosis in subjects with type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Complications 2019; 33: 592-597. 78.
Wędrychowicz A, Sztefko K, Starzyk JB. Sclerostin and its significance for children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D). Bone 2019; 120: 387-392. 79.
Wędrychowicz A, Sztefko K, Starzyk JB. Sclerostin and its association with insulin resistance in children and adolescents. Bone 2019; 120: 232-238. 80.
Bouquegneau A, Evenepoel P, Paquot F, et al. Sclerostin within the chronic kidney disease spectrum. Clinica Chimica Acta 2020; 502: 84-90. 81.
Guven S, Gokce I, Cicek N, et al. Sclerostin and osteoprotegerin: New markers of chronic kidney disease mediated mineral and bone disease in children. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2020; 33: 1383-1390. 82.
Singh S, Dutta S, Khasbage S, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of Romosozumab in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 2022; 33: 1-12. 83.
Ward LM, Rauch F. Anabolic therapy for the treatment of osteoporosis in childhood. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2018; 16: 269-276. 84.
Saito T, Fukumoto S. Fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) and disorders of phosphate metabolism. Int J Pediatr Endocrinol 2009; 2009: 496514. DOI: 10.1155/2009/496514. 85.
Kung CJ, Haykir B, Schnitzbauer U, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 23 leads to endolysosomal routing of the renal phosphate cotransporters NaPi-IIa and NaPi-IIc in vivo. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2021; 321: 785-798. 86.
Ho BB, Bergwitz C. FGF23 signalling and physiology. J Mol Endocrinol 2021; 66: 23-32. 87.
Brescia V, Fontana A, Lovero R, et al. Determination of iFGF23 upper reference limits (URL) in healthy pediatric population, for its better correct use. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13: 1018523. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1018523. 88.
Athonvarangkul D, Insogna KL. New therapies for hypophosphatemia-related to FGF23 excess. Calcif Tissue Int 2021; 108: 143-157. 89.
Florenzano P, Hartley IR, Jimenez M, et al. Tumor-induced osteomalacia. Calcif Tissue Int 2021; 108: 128-142. 90.
Linglart A, Imel EA, Whyte MP, et al. Sustained efficacy and safety of burosumab, a monoclonal antibody to FGF23, in children with X-linked hypophosphatemia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2022; 107: 813-824. 91.
Sirikul W, Siri-Angkul N, Chattipakorn N, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 23 and osteoporosis: evidence from bench to bedside. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23: 2500. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23052500. 92.
Wolf M. Update on fibroblast growth factor 23 in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 2012; 82: 737-747. 93.
Damasiewicz MJ, Toussaint ND, Polkinghorne KR. Fibroblast growth factor 23 in chronic kidney disease: new insights and clinical implications. Nephrology 2011; 16: 261-268. 94.
Isakova T, Wahl P, Vargas GS, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 23 is elevated before parathyroid hormone and phosphate in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 2011; 79: 1370-1378. 95.
Mitsnefes MM, Betoko A, Schneider MF, et al. FGF23 and left ventricular hypertrophy in children with CKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2018; 13: 45-52. 96.
Bai Z, Fang F, Xu Z, et al. Serum and urine FGF23 and IGFBP-7 for the prediction of acute kidney injury in critically ill children. BMC Pediatr 2018; 18: 192. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-018-1175-y. 97.
Ali FN, Hassinger A, Price H, Langman CB. Preoperative plasma FGF23 levels predict acute kidney injury in children: results of a pilot study. Pediatr Nephrol 2013; 28: 959-962. 98.
Prud’homme GJ, Kurt M, Wang Q. Pathobiology of the Klotho antiaging protein and therapeutic considerations. Front Aging 2022; 3: 931331. DOI: 10.3389/fragi.2022.931331. 99.
Donate-Correa J, Martín-Carro B, Cannata-Andía JB, et al. Klotho, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial damage in kidney disease. Antioxidants (Basel) 2023; 12: 239. DOI: 10.3390/antiox12020239. 100.
Xu Y, Sun Z. Molecular basis of klotho: from gene to function in aging. Endocr Rev 2015; 36: 174-193. 101.
Gkentzi D, Efthymiadou A, Kritikou D, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 23 and Klotho serum levels in healthy children. Bone 2014; 66: 8-14. 102.
Kresovich JK, Bulka CM. Low serum Klotho associated with all-cause mortality among a nationally representative sample of American adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sc 2022; 77: 452-456. 103.
Kuro-o M. Klotho and aging. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj 2009; 1790: 1049-1058. 104.
Kanbay M, Demiray A, Afsar B, et al. Role of Klotho in the development of essential hypertension. Hypertension 2021; 77: 740-750. 105.
Quarles LD. Fibroblast growth factor 23 and α-Klotho co-dependent and independent functions. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2019; 28: 16-25. 106.
Yu T, Dou C, Lu Y, et al. Klotho upregulates the interaction between RANK and TRAF6 to facilitate RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis via the NF-κB signaling pathway. Ann Transl Med 2021; 9: 1499. DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-4332. 107.
Jiang J, Liu Q, Mao Y, et al. Klotho reduces the risk of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: a cross-sectional study of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). BMC Endocr Disord 2023; 23: 151. DOI: 10.1186/s12902-023-01380-9. 108.
Baud’huin M, Duplomb L, Teletchea S, et al. Osteoprotegerin: multiple partners for multiple functions. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2013; 24: 401-409. 109.
Boyce BF, Xing L. Biology of RANK, RANKL, and osteoprotegerin. Arthritis Res Ther 2007; 9 (Suppl 1): S1. DOI: 10.1186/ar2165. 110.
Zhang Y, Liang J, Liu P, et al. The RANK/RANKL/OPG system and tumor bone metastasis: potential mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13: 1063815. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1063815. 111.
Polyzos SA, Cundy T, Mantzoros CS. Juvenile Paget disease. Metabolism 2018; 80: 15-26. 112.
Ding J, Zhang C, Guo Y. The association of OPG polymorphisms with risk of osteoporotic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100: E26716. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026716. 113.
Paternoster L, Ohlsson C, Sayers A, et al. OPG and RANK polymorphisms are both associated with cortical bone mineral density: findings from a metaanalysis of the Avon longitudinal study of parents and children and Gothenburg osteoporosis and obesity determinants cohorts. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 95: 3940-3948. 114.
Veshnavei HA. Evaluation of the serum level of osteoprotegerin and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol 2022; 14: 10-15. 115.
Azizieh FY, Shehab D, Jarallah K, et al. Circulatory levels of RANKL, OPG, and oxidative stress markers in postmenopausal women with normal or low bone mineral density. Biomark Insights 2019; 14: 1177271919843825. DOI: 10.1177/1177271919843825. 116.
Dobnig H, Hofbauer LC, Viereck V, et al. Changes in the RANK ligand/osteoprotegerin system are correlated to changes in bone mineral density in bisphosphonate-treated osteoporotic patients. Osteoporosis Int 2006; 17: 693-703. 117.
Tousoulis D, Siasos G, Maniatis K, et al. Serum osteoprotegerin and osteopontin levels are associated with arterial stiffness and the presence and severity of coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiol 2013; 167: 1924-1928. 118.
Chrysis D, Efthymiadou A, Mermigka A, et al. Osteoprotegerin, RANKL, ADMA, and fetuin – a serum levels in children with type I diabetes mellitus. Pediatr Diabetes 2017; 18: 277-282. 119.
Chapurlat RD, Confavreux CB. Novel biological markers of bone: from bone metabolism to bone physiologya. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2016; 55: 1714-1725. 120.
Gennari L, Bianciardi S, Merlotti D. MicroRNAs in bone diseases. Osteoporos Int 2017; 28: 1191-1213. 121.
Faienza MF, Ventura A, Delvecchio M, et al. High sclerostin and dickkopf-1 (DKK-1) serum levels in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2017; 102: 1174-1181.
Copyright: © 2024 Polish Society of Paediatrics. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
|