en POLSKI
eISSN: 2083-8441
ISSN: 2081-237X
Pediatric Endocrinology Diabetes and Metabolism
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
2/2023
vol. 29
 
Share:
Share:
Original paper

Are menstrual disorders in adolescent girls related to metabolic disorders?

Elżbieta Foryś
1
,
Adrianna Baran
2
,
Aleksandra Dziurdzia
2
,
Ewelina Jarosz-Wójcik
2
,
Paweł Matusik
3
,
Aneta Gawlik
1
,
Ryszard Tomaszewski
4, 5
,
Agnieszka Zachurzok
6

  1. Department of Pediatrics and Pediatric Endocrinology, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
  2. Student Scientific Association, Department of Pediatrics and Pediatric Endocrinology, Medical University of Silesia, School of Medicine in Katowice, Poland
  3. Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Obesity and Metabolic Bone Diseases, Chair of Pediatrics and Pediatric Endocrinology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
  4. Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
  5. Department of Pediatric Traumatology and Orthopedy, Upper Silesian Child Centre in Katowice, Poland
  6. Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab 2023; 29 (2): 75-82
Online publish date: 2023/04/27
Article file
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 

Introduction

Menstrual disorders in adolescent girls are a significant clinical problem. The normal cycle duration in teenage girls is 21–45 days, but in the first 2 years after menarche, cycles are usually irregular and many of them are anovulatory, due to the immaturity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovary axis. The mean age of the first menstruation is 12–13 years, and most often, 2–3 years after menarche the cycles become ovulatory, resulting in their normalization [1, 2].

However, in some girls, disturbances in the menstrual cycle, such as rare menstruation, are not an expression of immaturity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovary axis, but a symptom of disease. It is believed that menstrual cycles lasting more than 90 days in the first year after menarche or longer than 45 days in subsequent years, and amenorrhoea up to the age of 15 or secondary amenorrhoea, require diagnostics, with particular emphasis on polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). It is estimated that approximately 50% of adolescent girls with oligomenorrhea will develop full-blown PCOS in the future. The syndrome is characterized by a wide spectrum of symptoms associated with ovulation disorders and androgen excess [37]. Additionally, patients with PCOS tend to be overweight and obese. Dyslipidaemia, insulin resistance (IR), impaired glucose tolerance, and type 2 diabetes occur more often than in the general population, and the level of metabolic disturbances is associated with the severity of PCOS phenotype [8, 9]. Da Silva Bouzas et al. [10] found that also adolescent girls with irregular cycles are at higher risk of glucose and lipid disturbances as well as metabolic syndrome (MS). We hypothesized that in adolescent girls the severity of menstrual disturbances can be related to the lipid and glucose metabolism disturbances.

The aim of the study was to investigate the metabolic profile in adolescent girls with menstrual disorders with respect to their severity.

Material and methods

The study was retrospective and included 165 adolescent girls with menstrual disturbances (chronological age: 16.4 ±1.2 years, gynaecological age: 4.0 ±2.0 years) and 49 regularly menstruating girls without clinical symptoms of hyperandrogenism (chronological age: 16.2 ±1.3 years, gynaecological age: 4.4 ±1.4 years) in whom hormonal disorders were excluded. The girls were recruited from the patients of the Department of Paediatrics and Paediatric Endocrinology and matched for chronological and gynaecological age. All participants were Caucasian.

According to menstrual disturbances the subjects from study group were divided into 2 subgroups. The OLIGO group comprised 111 girls with oligomenorrhoea (chronological age:16.4 ±1.3 years, gynaecological age: 4.2 ±1.7 years), and the SA group comprised 54 girls with secondary amenorrhoea (chronological age:16.4 ±1.1 years, gynaecological age: 3.6 ±2.4 years). Oligomenorrhoea was defined as menstrual cycles ≥ 45 days; secondary amenorrhoea was defined as absence of menstruation within the last 3 months in a patient who previously had normal menstruation [11]. Patients with eating disorders, thyroid dysfunction, disorders of the adrenal cortex, hyperprolactinemia, and gynaecological age below 2 years were excluded from the study. No subject was using medication known to influence endocrine, glucose, and lipid profiles. PCOS diagnosis was made on the basis of the criteria of Pena AS et al. [12, 13].

The study was approved by the Local Bioethics Committee (no. PCN/CBN/0022/KB/201/21).

In all patients, the following data were analysed:

  1. Anthropometric measurements (body weight, height). Body weight was measured with an accuracy of 0.1 kg; body height was determined with a Harpenden stadiometer with a precision of 0.1 cm. Body mass index (BMI) and standard deviation of the mean BMI value (BMI z-score; calculated using the Paediatric Z-score Calculator based on percentile grids) were calculated [14].

  2. Biochemical tests results – fasting total cholesterol (TC), HDL cholesterol (HDL), LDL-cholesterol (LDL), triglycerides (TG), as well as fasting and at 120 minutes glucose in oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) after a load of 75 g glucose. Hyperlipidaemia was diagnosed when the TC, LDL-cholesterol, or TG level were above, and/or HDL-cholesterol below, the age and gender normal values [15]. Elevated glucose concentration was considered when fasting glucose was > 99 mg/dl and/or glucose in 120’ of OGTT was > 139 mg/dl, and respectively hyperinsulinaemia was diagnosed when fasting insulin was > 15 mIU/l and/or insulin in 120’ of OGTT was >75 mIU/l [16].

  3. Hormonal tests results: total testosterone (T), oestradiol (E2), luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS), 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17OHP), androstenedione (A), fasting and 120-minute OGTT insulin (INS). The assessment of the homeostasis model of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), defined as fasting blood glucose (mg/dl) and INS (µU/ml) divided by the constant (22.5), was used to calculate the insulin resistance index. Additionally, TyG index, known to be a good and reliable index of insulin resistance, was calculated as Ln (fasting triglycerides [mg/dl] × fasting glucose [mg/dl]/2) [15]. Hyperandrogenaemia was defined as a total T concentration greater than 45 ng/dl (standard given by the laboratory). Hyperinsulinaemia was diagnosed when fasting INS was >15 mIU/l and/or INS in 120’ of OGTT was >75 mIU/l [16].

To determine the biochemical and hormonal parameters, a venous blood sample was drawn during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle (day 2–5 of the cycle) or 3 months after the last menstruation, in the morning, in the fasting state (12 hours after the last meal).

The basal plasma concentration of LH, FSH, INS, and DHEAS was determined using the chemiluminescence method (Immulite 2000XPi; Siemens, Germany), and the concentration of E2 and T using the electrochemiluminescence method (Cobas e601, Roche, Germany). To determine the concentration of 17OHP and A, enzyme immunoassays (ELISA) were used (DS2). The lipid profile was done by enzymatic calorimetric test.

Auxological data and hormonal results were compared using Statistica 13.3 PL software. All values were expressed as mean (standard deviation) for normal distribution or median (interquartile range) for skewed distribution. Differences between 3 groups were assessed by one-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by the least significant difference (LSD) test for multiple comparisons when applicable. Correlation analysis was performed using the Pearson correlation coefficient for normally distributed samples and the Spearman correlation coefficient for non-normally distributed data. Gamma correlation was used for non-normal distributions with many tied ranks. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The anthropometric, clinical, biochemical, and hormonal characteristics of the adolescent girls are presented in Tables 1 and 2. The differences in chronological age, and BMI z-score, between the groups were insignificant (p > 0.05). Although the age of menarche was significantly younger in the REG group than in the OLIGO (p = 0.03) and SA (p < 0.001) groups. The prevalence of obesity was higher in the SA (52%) group than in the REG (31%) (p = 0.045) group and OLIGO (43%) (p > 0.05) group. According to the criteria of Pena et al., PCOS could be diagnosed in 78 girls from the OLIGO (70.3%) group and 25 (46.3%) from the SA group (p = 0.003) [16]. In the OLIGO group the T concentration was significantly higher than in the REG group (p < 0.001). There were no differences in DHEAS, 17OHP, and A levels between the groups. In the SA group the FSH concentration was the highest and significantly higher than in the OLIGO group (p = 0.007). Girls with regular menstruation had a significantly lower LH concentration compared to the SA group (p = 0.009) and OLIGO group (p = 0.03). The highest value of the LH/FSH ratio was observed in the REG group, and the lowest in the OLIGO group. These differences were statistically significant (p < 0.001).

Table I

Clinical and hormonal characteristics of adolescent girls with menstrual disorders: with oligomenorrhoea (OLIGO, n = 111) and secondary amenorrhoea (SA, n = 54), and control group of regularly menstruating girls (REG, n = 49)

ParameterOLIGO (n= 111)SA (n= 54)REG (n= 49)
Chronological age [years]16.4 1.316.4 1.116.2 1.3
Gynaecological age [years]4.2 1.73.7 2.4a4.4 1.4b
Age of menarche [years]12.3 1.613.0 1.3c11.9 1.5d
BMI Z-score2.1 9.51.1 1.40.8 1.1
Ferriman-Gallwey score6.2 6.22.9 5.2e1.9 2.7f
LH [mIU/ml]9.6 ±7.69.8 ±6.87.2 ±8.5g,h
FSH [mIU/ml]4.8 ±1.87.5 ±12.8i5.1 ±2.2
Testosterone [ng/dl]59.8 23.253.7 27.644.3 19.0j
Androstenedione [ng/ml]4.6 2.34.1 1.74.1 1.7
DHEAS [g/dl]303.5 126.0274.9 114.5294.4 115.7
17OHprogesteron [ng/ml]2.5 1.52.2 1.52.2 0.9
Oestradiol [pmol/l]214.3 175.0174.0 109.8225.1 225.3

a OLIGO vs. SA, p = 0.04; bSA vs. REG, p = 0.01; cOLIGO vs. SA, p = 0.03; dSA vs. REG, p < 0.001; eOLIGO vs. SA, p < 0.001; fSA vs. REG, p < 0.001; gOLIGO vs. REG, p = 0.03; hSA vs. REG, p = 0.009; iOLIGO vs. SA, p = 0.007; jOLIGO vs. REG, p < 0.001

Table II

Metabolic characteristics of adolescent girls with menstrual disorders: with oligomenorrhoea (OLIGO, n = 111) and secondary amenorrhoea (SA, n = 54), and control group of regularly menstruating girls (REG, n = 49)

ParameterOLIGO (n= 111)SA (n= 54)REG (n= 49)
Total cholesterol [mg/dl]164.5 ±31.2188.7 ±40.5a163.3 ±30.4b
HDL cholesterol [mg/dl]50.9 ±11.853.2 ±12.354.0 ±10.1
LDL cholesterol [mg/dl]90.2 ±26.3109.7 ±34.8c91.8 ±25.6d
Triglycerides [mg/dl]116.1 ±51.1120.8 ±54.0e88.4 ±33.1f
Fasting glucose [mg/dl]88.0 ±7.688.4 ±8.487.0 ±9.1
Glucose at 120 min of OGTT [mg/dl]106.1 ±28.0110.4 ±30.3105.7 ±27.7
Fasting insulin [μIU/ml]14.3 ±8.916.2 ±11.413.9 ±7.2
Insulin at 120 minutes of OGTT [μIU/ml]87.4 ±63.894.9 ±66.093.9 ±65.3
HOMA-IR3.2 ±2.03.6 ±2.73.1 ±1.8
Triglyceride-glucose index (TyG index)8.5 ±0.428.5 ±0.47g8.2 ±0.36h

a OLIGO vs. SA, p < 0.001; bSA vs. REG, p < 0.001; cOLIGO vs. SA, p < 0.001; dSA vs. REG, p = 0.009; eSA vs. REG, p = 0.001; fOLIGO vs. REG, p = 0.002; gSA vs. REG, p < 0.001; hOLIGO vs. REG, p = 0.001;

Mean ovarian volumes were the highest in the SA group, while the lowest was observed among patients without menstrual disorders (p = 0.012). In the OLIGO group, 78 patients (70.3%) showed polycystic ovarian morphology, while in the SA group such a structure was found in 25 girls (46.3%). These were statistically significant differences (p = 0.003).

We found significant differences between the examined subgroups in the parameters of lipid metabolism (Table 2). The highest mean concentrations of TC, LDL, and TG were found in the SA group as compared to controls (p < 0.001; p = 0.009; p = 0.001, respectively). TC and LDL levels in the SA group were also significantly higher than in the OLIGO group (p < 0.001; p < 0.001, respectively). In the OLIGO group the mean TG concentration was significantly higher than in the REG group (p = 0.002).

The prevalence of lipid metabolism disorders was highest in the SA group (65%) compared to the REG (40%) (p = 0.01) and OLIGO (51%) (p > 0.05) groups. The prevalence of hypertriglyceridaemia (TG > 130 mg/dl) was highest in the SA group (39%) compared to the REG (12 %) (p = 0.003) and OLIGO (24%) (p > 0.05) groups. Moreover, the prevalence of level LDL > 110 mg/dl was highest in the SA group (41%) compared to the REG (20%) (p = 0.03) and OLIGO (17%) (p = 0.002) groups. The highest prevalence of HDL<40 mg/dl was found in the OLIGO group (15%) compared to the REG group (6%) (p > 0.05), and it was similar to the prevalence in the SA group (13%) (p > 0.05).

All 3 subgroups did not differ significantly in terms of fasting and OGTT glucose and INS concentration as well as HOMA-IR (Table 2). However, the TyG index was significantly higher in the study groups than in the control group (OLIGO: p = 0.001, SA: p < 0.001). The prevalence of increased glucose level (SA: 7 girls [13%], OLIGO: 17 girls [15%], REG: 8 girls [17%], p > 0.05) and INS level (SA: 28 girls [54%], OLIGO: 59 girls [53%], REG: 24 girls [51%], p > 0.05) did not differ between the groups.

In girls with menstrual disturbances the BMI z-score was positively correlated with TG, LDL, fasting and OGTT glucose and INS level, HOMA-IR, and TyG and negatively with HDL concentration (Table 3).

Table III

Correlation between BMI z-score and metabolic parameters in the study group

BMI Z-scoreRp
Total cholesterol0.130.06
HDL cholesterol–0.44< 0.001
LDL cholesterol0.200.003
Triglycerides0.42< 0.001
Fasting glucose0.170.016
Glucose at 120 min of OGTT0.24< 0.001
Fasting insulin0.53< 0.001
Insulin at 120 min of OGTT0.33< 0.001
HOMA IR0.53< 0.001
Triglyceride-glucose index (TyG index)0.42< 0.001

There was no relationship between the lipids and glucose disturbances and E2, LH, and DHEAS in girls with menstrual disorders. However, the DHEAS level was related to glucose and INS in 120 min of OGTT (r = 0.2, p = 0.02, r = 0.2, p = 0.02, respectively). Whereas 17OHP correlated with fasting hyperglycaemia (rγ = 0.26, p = 0.03). Moreover, we found that the T and 17OHP level were related negatively with the LDL level (r = –0.16, p = 0.04, r = –0.20, p = 0.02, respectively) as well as LDL>110 mg/dl (rγ = –0.19, p = 0.03, rγ = –0.29, p = 0.002, respectively). Also, E2 negatively correlated with the TC and LDL concentration (r = –0.16, p = 0.04, r = –0.19, p = 0.02, respectively). FSH concentration was related positively with TC and LDL (r = 0.27, p < 0.001, r = 0.25, p = 0.002, respectively) and LDL > 110 mg/dl (rγ = 0.18, p = 0.05).

Because of the high prevalence of PCOS in groups with menstrual disturbances, we decided to look at the adolescent girls with menstrual disturbances and their lipid and carbohydrate metabolism in respect to PCOS diagnosis. We divided the study group into PCOS and non-PCOS subgroups. In the PCOS group we found the highest (significantly higher than in the non-PCOS group) hirsutism score (p < 0.001), TTE (p < 0.001), DHEAS (p < 0.001), 17OHP (p = 0.007), and A (p < 0.001) level (Table 4). In terms of metabolic characteristics, the TG concentration (PCOS vs. REG, p = 0.002; non-PCOS vs. REG, p < 0.001) and TyG index were significantly higher in both study groups than in the control group. The other lipids, glucose, INS concentration, and HOMA-IR did not differ significantly between the groups.

Table IV

MHormonal and metabolic characteristics of adolescent girls with menstrual disorders: with PCOS diagnosis (PCOS, n = 103) and without PCOS diagnosis (non-PCOS, n = 62), and control group of regularly menstruating girls (REG, n = 49)

ParameterPCOS (n= 103)non-PCOS (n= 62)REG (n= 49)
Ferriman-Gallwey score7.8 ±6.2a0.7 ±1.8b1.9 ±2.7
Testosterone [ng/dl]69.2 ±23.2c37.4 ±10.5d44.3 ±19.0
Androstenedione [ng/ml]4.9 ±2.3e3.3 ±1.14.1 ±1.7
DHEAS [g/dl]328.3 ±128.1f254.0 ±99.0294.4 ±115.7
17OHprogesteron [ng/ml]2.6 ±1.5g2.0 ±1.32.2 ±0.9
Total cholesterol [mg/dl]166.7 ±30.8181.9 ±42.2163.3 ±30.4
HDL cholesterol [mg/dl]50.3 ±12.453.5 ±11.054.0 ±10.1
LDL cholesterol [mg/dl]92.3 ±25.7103.8 ±36.791.8 ±25.7
Triglycerides [mg/dl]116.3 ±51.9h119.9 ±52.5i88.5 ±33.1
Fasting glucose [mg/dl]88.9 ±8.486.8 ±6.687.0 ±9.1
Glucose at 120 min of OGTT [mg/dl]109.6 ±30.4103.9 ±25.6105.7 ±27.7
Fasting insulin [μIU/ml]15.5 ±9.814.0 ±9.713.9 ±7.3
Insulin at 120 min of OGTT [μIU/ml]96.9 ±71.177.8 ±49.5393.9 ±65.3
HOMA-IR3.5 ±2.33.1 ±2.23.1 ±1.8
Triglyceride-glucose index (TyG index)8.5 ±0.43j8.5 ±0.44k8.2 ±0.36

a PCOS vs. non-PCOS, p < 0.001; bPCOS vs. REG, p < 0.001; cPCOS vs. non-PCOS, p < 0.001; dPCOS vs. REG, p < 0.001; ePCOS vs. non-PCOS, p < 0.001; fPCOS vs. non-PCOS, p < 0.001; gPCOS vs. non-PCOS, p = 0.007; hPCOS vs. REG, p = 0.002; inon-PCOS vs. REG, p < 0.001; jPCOS vs. REG, p = 0.001; knon-PCOS vs. REG, p < 0.001

Discussion

In our study we evaluated metabolic profiles in adolescent girls with menstrual disorders with respect to symptomatic severity (oligomenorrhoea and secondary amenorrhoea) and compared them to regularly menstruating patients. Despite similar BMI z-score, we found that in girls with secondary amenorrhoea the concentrations of TC and LDL cholesterol were the highest and significantly higher than in girls with regular menses and oligomenorrhoea. The TG level was also the significantly higher in girls with menstrual disorders than in regularly menstruating peers. The prevalence of lipid metabolism disorders was the highest in girls with secondary amenorrhoea. When we divided the study group into PCOS and non-PCOS subgroups, we found higher TG level and TyG index in the study group that in the control group. Metabolic abnormalities in the study group were mainly related to BMI-score. Based on our study, we conclude that girls with menstrual disorders are insulin resistant, but girls with SA have the highest risk of lipid disturbances.

PCOS is closely related to the occurrence of metabolic disorders such as obesity or insulin resistance (IR) with accompanying compensation hyperinsulinaemia [19]. Moreover, PCOS is associated with higher risk of developing other metabolic disorders, such as type 2 diabetes (T2D), hypertension, dyslipidaemia, and cardiovascular diseases [20]. Previous data suggest that the pattern of menstrual cycle irregularities may correlate with metabolic disorders [21, 22]. It is well established that insulin resistance is directly related to obesity and BMI, playing an important role not only in the pathophysiology of MS, but also PCOS. Also, hyperinsulinaemia may promote menstruation disorders, altering the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) pulse secretion pattern, suppressing sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), and stimulating ovarian androgenesis. Hyperandrogenaemia has been reported to be an independent risk factor for MS in adult women without PCOS [2325]. There are still limited data in the literature concerning the metabolic features of different PCOS phenotypes in adolescence. Coviello et al. [24] confirmed that the prevalence of MS was significantly higher in patients with menstrual disorders. Many other authors also found the relationship between high cholesterol and LDL levels and low HDL concentration in patients with long cycles. Recent studies suggested that the severity of lipid and carbohydrate disorders may depend on the presented phenotype [21, 26, 27]. Fruzzetti et al. [21] evaluated the endocrine and metabolic characteristic of adolescents with PCOS showing different phenotypes. Their study indicates an increased concentration of androgens as a critical factor for the development of lipid disorders. Similarly to other studies, our data show that adolescents with irregular menstruation present a higher prevalence of lipid alterations, with high TC, LDL, and TG levels. The lipid metabolism disorders were most pronounced in the group of patients with secondary amenorrhoeaAs is commonly known IR is one of the most common metabolic disorders in women with PCOS, and it concerns 65–70% of all patients [28]. IR and hyperinsulinaemia are considered important components in the pathogenesis of this endocrinopathy [29]. Unexpectedly, the subgroups also did not differ significantly in terms of carbohydrate and insulin parameters. The hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamp remains a gold standard for accurate evaluation of insulin resistance. However, due to its complexity it cannot be implemented on a routine basis [30]. The great diversity of insulin concentration in the population, both fasting and post-loaded (OGTT), different assay methods, and the contribution of multiple confounding factors that can significantly affect the result, make it impossible to clearly define the cut-off point for hyperinsulinism. Moreover, studies indicate that fasting insulin is not a good marker of insulin resistance [31, 32]. Alternatively, in clinical research to estimate insulin action, several surrogate indexes are widely used. These indexes are derived from plasma glucose and insulin levels at fasting or after oral glucose load [3032]. In our study differences between the groups in regard to fasting and OGTT glucose and INS concentration as well as HOMA-IR were not statistically significant. But higher values of the HOMA-IR index were observed in the group of patients with menstrual disorders, especially in the SA group. In addition, when we used the TyG index, we found it significantly higher in the study groups than in the control group. TyG is considered as a simple, available surrogate for identifying IR, and it showed an association with diabetes, hypertension, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and atherosclerosis [17, 33]. Moreover, it is not based on the fasting INS concentration, which is considered not to be a reliable index of IR assessment.

Recent studies show that adolescent girls with irregular menstruation present a higher prevalence of IR and clinical/laboratory disorders related to IR, including higher waist circumference, higher glucose level after 2 hours of OGTT, fasting, and post-overload insulin, HDL suppression, and TG elevation, compared to the subgroup with regular menstrual cycles. Panidis et al. [29] suggested that amenorrhoea is associated with more severe IR in PCOS. This association can be explained by the relationship between IR and anovulation. Despite the lack of statistically significant differences in the assessment of carbohydrate metabolism between the groups, patients with SA presented higher blood glucose levels in 120 ‘OGTT and higher insulin levels, both fasting and 120’ OGTT and HOMA-IR. We also observed the highest concentrations of TG in this group. The accumulation of triglyceride content has been associated with the insulin-resistant state. Also, when we looked at our patients with respect to PCOS diagnosis, HOMA-IR was highest in the PCOS group without reaching statistical significance, but TyG and TG were similar in the non-PCOS and PCOS groups and significantly higher than in the control group.

Moreover, we found many significant correlations between metabolic parameters and BMI Z-score, whereas only a few with hormones levels. In our study, all 3 subgroups did not differ significantly in terms of androgens concentrations. We only noticed that in the group with menstrual disturbances androgens as well as oestradiol levels were negatively related with high TC and LDL levels. 17OHP was the only hormone related to high TG concentration. The main factor associated with elevated TG levels and decreased HDL levels was BMI Z-score. Excess body weight seems to be the key factor worsening the metabolic profile of patients with secondary amenorrhoea and oligomenorrhoea since adolescence.

Our study weakness is its retrospective approach, which is related with the lack or incompleteness of some data. The analysis would be more valuable if we were able to analyse the relationship between metabolic disturbances and some anthropometric data (waist and hip circumference), family interview regarding the occurrence of lipid metabolism disorders, or SHBG concentration. The strength of our manuscript is the biochemical and hormonal analysis of a high number of patients matched for gynaecological age.

In conclusion, adolescent girls with menstrual disorders are insulin resistant, regardless of fulfilling PCOS diagnostic criteria. Moreover, girls with the most severe menstrual disturbances (secondary amenorrhoea) have the least favourable lipid profile. Metabolic disturbances in girls with menstrual disorders are associated mainly with body weight, and only some weak relationship with hormonal level can be considered. We concluded that all girls with menstrual disturbances should be closely monitored for metabolic parameters and that the severity of menstrual disorders may be related to the incidence of lipid disorders.

Conflict of interests

none declared.

References

1 

ACOG Committee Opinion No. 651: Menstruation in Girls and Adolescents: Using the Menstrual Cycle as a Vital Sign. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 126: e143–e146.

2 

Adams Hillard PJ. Menstruation in adolescents: what do we know? And what do we do with the information? J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2014; 27: 309–319. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2013.12.001.

3 

DiVall S, Merjaneh L. Adolescent Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: An Update. Pediatr Ann 2019; 48: e304-e310.

4 

Witchel SF, Burghard AC, Tao RH, Oberfield SE. The diagnosis and treatment of PCOS in adolescents: an update. Curr Opin Pediatr 2019; 31: 562–569. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000778.

5 

Williams RM, Ong KK, Dunger DB, et al. Polycystic ovarian syndrome during puberty and adolescence. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2013; 373: 61–67. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2013.01.005.

6 

Hickey M, Doherty DA, Atkinson H, et al. Clinical, ultrasound and biochemical features of polycystic ovary syndrome in adolescents: implications for diagnosis. Hum Reprod 2011; 26: 1469–1477. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der102.

7 

Drosdzol-Cop A, Stojko R, Skrzypulec-Plinta V, et al. Zespół policystycznych jajników u nastolatek–diagnostyka i leczenie. Ginekologia po Dyplomie 2017; 3.

8 

Farhadi-Azar M, Behboudi-Gandevani S, Rahmati M, et al. The Prevalence of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Its Phenotypes and Cardio-Metabolic Features in a Community Sample of Iranian Population: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13: 825528. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.825528.

9 

Tehrani FR, Rashidi H, Khomami MB, et al. The prevalence of metabolic disorders in various phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome: a community based study in Southwest of Iran. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2014; 12: 89. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-89.

10 

Bouzas IC, Cader SA, Leão L, et al. Menstrual cycle alterations during adolescence: early expression of metabolic syndrome and polycystic ovary syndrome. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2014; 27: 335-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2014.01.002.

11 

Teede HJ, Misso ML, Costello MF, et al. International PCOS Network. Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 2018; 110: 364-379. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey256.

12 

Peña AS, Witchel SF, Hoeger KM, et al. Adolescent polycystic ovary syndrome according to the international evidence-based guideline. BMC Med 2020; 18: 72. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01516-x.

13 

Peña AS, Codner E, Witchel S. Criteria for Diagnosis of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome during Adolescence: Literature Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12: 1931. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12081931.

15 

Jolliffe CJ, Janssen I. Distribution of lipoproteins by age and gender in adolescents. Circulation. 2006; 114: 1056-1062. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.620864.

16 

2021 Guidelines on the management of patients with diabetes. A position of Diabetes Poland. Clin Diabetol 2021; 10: 1-113

17 

Simental-Mendía LE, Rodríguez-Morán M, Guerrero-Romero F. The product of fasting glucose and triglycerides as surrogate for identifying insulin resistance in apparently healthy subjects. Metab Syndr Relat Disord 2008;6: 299-304. doi: 10.1089/met.2008.0034.

18 

Ibáñez L, Oberfield SE, Witchel S, et al. An International Consortium Update: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome in Adolescence. Horm Res Paediatr 2017; 88: 371-395. doi: 10.1159/000479371.

19 

Gilbert EW, Tay CT, Hiam DS, et al. Comorbidities and complications of polycystic ovary syndrome: An overview of systematic reviews. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2018; 89: 683-699. doi: 10.1111/cen.13828.

20 

Bednarska S, Siejka A. The pathogenesis and treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome: What’s new? Adv Clin Exp Med 2017; 26: 359-367. doi: 10.17219/acem/59380.

21 

Fruzzetti F, Perini D, Lazzarini V, Parrini D, Genazzani AR. Adolescent girls with polycystic ovary syndrome showing different phenotypes have a different metabolic profile associated with increasing androgen levels. Fertil Steril 2009; 92: 626-634. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.06.004.

22 

Welt CK, Gudmundsson JA, Arason G, et al. Characterizing discrete subsets of polycystic ovary syndrome as defined by the Rotterdam criteria: the impact of weight on phenotype and metabolic features. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006; 91: 4842–4848. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-1327.

23 

Demirel F, Bideci A, Cinaz P, et al. Serum leptin, oxidized low density lipoprotein and plasma asymmetric dimethylarginine levels and their relationship with dyslipidemia in adolescent girls with polycystic ovary syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2007; 67: 129–134. doi: 10.1210/jc.2005-1666.

24 

Coviello AD, Legro RS, Dunaif A. Adolescent girls with polycystic ovary syndrome have an increased risk of metabolic syndrome associated with increasing androgen levels independent of obesity and insulin resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006; 91: 492–497. doi: 10.1210/jc.2005-1666.

25 

Anagnostis P, Tarlatzis BC, Kauffman RP. Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS): Long-term metabolic consequences. Metabolism 2018; 86: 33-43. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2017.09.016.

26 

Panidis D, Tziomalos K, Chatzis P, et al. Association between menstrual cycle irregularities and endocrine and metabolic characteristics of the polycystic ovary syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol 2013; 17; 168: 145-152. doi: 10.1530/EJE-12-0655.

27 

Altintas KZ, Dilbaz B, Cirik DA, et al. The incidence of metabolic syndrome in adolescents with different phenotypes of PCOS. Ginekol Pol 2017; 88: 289-295. doi: 10.5603/GP.a2017.0055.

28 

Marshall JC, Dunaif A. Should all women with PCOS be treated for insulin resistance? Fertil Steril 2012; 97: 18-22. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.11.036.

29 

Moghetti P, Tosi F. Insulin resistance and PCOS: chicken or egg? J Endocrinol Invest 2021; 44: 233-244. doi: 10.1007/s40618-020-01351-0.

30 

Tosi F, Bonora E, Moghetti P. Insulin resistance in a large cohort of women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a comparison between euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamp and surrogate indexes. Hum Reprod 2017; 32: 2515-2521. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex308.

31 

Park SY, Gautier JF, Chon S. Assessment of Insulin Secretion and Insulin Resistance in Human. Diabetes Metab J 2021; 45: 641-654. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2021.0220.

32 

Placzkowska S, Pawlik-Sobecka L, Kokot I, Piwowar A. Indirect insulin resistance detection: Current clinical trends and laboratory limitations. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub 2019; 163: 187-199.33. doi: 10.5507/bp.2019.021.

33 

Huang R, Cheng Z, Jin X, et al. Usefulness of four surrogate indexes of insulin resistance in middle-aged population in Hefei, China. Ann Med 2022; 54: 622-632. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2039956.

 
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.