Assessment of the relationship between the incidence of urogenital complaints in young women and pelvic floor muscle weakness

Julia Buszko-Michalczak

doi:10.5114/phr.2023.128863

eISSN: 2719-9665
ISSN: 2719-5139

Physiotherapy Review

Bieżący numer Archiwum Artykuły zaakceptowane O czasopiśmie Rada naukowa Bazy indeksacyjne Prenumerata Kontakt Zasady publikacji prac Standardy etyczne i procedury

Panel Redakcyjny

Zgłaszanie i recenzowanie prac online

Wyszukiwanie

Zasady redakcyjne

Sarajevo Declaration on Integrity and Visibility of Scholarly Publications

2/2023
vol. 27

Poleć ten artykuł:

Wyślij znajomemu

Skopiuj link:

Udostępnij:

Artykuł oryginalny

Assessment of the relationship between the incidence of urogenital complaints in young women and pelvic floor muscle weakness

Julia Buszko-Michalczak

¹

Department of Clinical Rehabilitation, University of Physical Education in Krakow, Polska

Research, Physiotherapy Review, 2023, 27(2), 66-75

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/phr.2023.128863

Data publikacji online: 2023/06/28

Plik artykułu:

- art7 2_2023.pdf [0.21 MB]

Pobierz cytowanie

Metryki PlumX:

1. Szukiewicz D. Fizjoterapia w Ginekologii i Położnictwie, Edition 1. PZWL Publisher, Warszawa 2019.

2. Glazer H, Hacad C. The Glazer Protocol: Evi- dence-Based Medicine Pelvic Floor Muscle (PFM) Surface Electromyography (SEMG). Biofeedback. 2012; 40(2): 75–79.

3. Bo K, Frawley HC, Haylen BT, Abramov Y, Almeida FG, Berghmans B, et al. An International Urogyne- cological Association (IUGA)/International Conti- nence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for the conservative and nonpharmacological man- agement of female pelvic floor dysfunction. Neu- rourol Urodyn. 2017; 36(2): 221–244. doi: 10.1002/ nau.23107.

4. Majkusiak W, Barcz E. Pelvic floor disorders. Jus- tification for the implementation of clinical guide- lines [Schorzenia dna miednicy. Uzasadnienie dla opracowania rekomendacji klinicznych]. Ginekol Perinatol Prakt. 2017 2(4), 155–161.

5. Zhang Q, Wang L, Zheng W. Surface electromy- ography of pelvic floor muscles in stress urinary incontinence. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006; 95(2): 177–178. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.07.006.

6. Adamiak-Godlewska A, Rechberger T. Evaluation of pelvic floor muscle anatomy and function in wom- en: modern techniques [Nowoczesne techniki oce- ny anatomii i funkcji dna miednicy u kobiet]. Przegl Menopauz. 2012, 4: 259–263.

7. Zuchelo LTS, Bezerra IMP, Da Silva ATM, Gomes JM, Soares Júnior JM, Chada Baracat E, et al. Ques- tionnaires to evaluate pelvic floor dysfunction in the postpartum period: a systematic review. Int J Womens Health. 2018; 10: 409–424. doi: 10.2147/ IJWH.S164266.

8. Auchincloss CC, McLean L. The reliability of sur- face EMG recorded from the pelvic floor mus- cles. J Neurosci Methods. 2009; 182(1): 85–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.05.027.

9. Glazer HI, Laine CD. Pelvic floor muscle biofeedback in the treatment of urinary incontinence: a litera- ture review. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2006; 31(3): 187–201. doi: 10.1007/s10484-006-9010-x.

10. Oleksy Ł, Wojciechowska M, Mika A, Antos E, Bylina D, Kielnar R, et al. Normative values for Glazer Pro- tocol in the evaluation of pelvic floor muscle bioel- ectrical activity. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020; 99(5): e19060. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019060.

11. Peterson TV, Karp DR, Aguilar VC, Davila GW. Val- idation of a global pelvic floor symptom bother questionnaire. Int Urogynecol J. 2010; 21(9): 1129– 1135. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1148-7.

12. Kocur D. Women’s knowledge concerning pelvic floor muscles [Wiedza kobiet na temat mięśni dna miednicy]. Seksuol Pol, 2016, 14, 31–38.

13. Workman DE, Cassisi JE, Dougherty MC. Validation of surface EMG as a measure of intravaginal and intra-abdominal activity: implications for biofeed- back-assisted Kegel exercises. Psychophysiology. 1993; 30 (1): 120–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993. tb03210.x.

14. Bø K, Stien R. Needle EMG registration of striated urethral wall and pelvic floor muscle activity pat- terns during cough, Valsalva, abdominal, hip ad- ductor, and gluteal muscle contractions in nullip- arous healthy females. Neurourol Urodyn. 1994; 13 (1): 35–41. doi: 10.1002/nau.1930130106.

15. Sapsford RR, Hodges PW. Contraction of the pel- vic floor muscles during abdominal maneuvers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 82 (8): 1081–1088. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2001.24297.

16. Madill SJ, McLean L. Relationship between ab- dominal and pelvic floor muscle activation and intravaginal pressure during pelvic floor muscle contractions in healthy continent women. Neu- rourol Urodyn. 2006; 25(7): 722–730. doi: 10.1002/ nau.20285.

17. Madill SJ, McLean L. Quantification of abdomi- nal and pelvic floor muscle synergies in response to voluntary pelvic floor muscle contractions. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2008; 18 (6): 955–964. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2007.05.001.

18. Thompson JA, O'Sullivan PB, Briffa NK, Neumann P. Altered muscle activation patterns in symptomat- ic women during pelvic floor muscle contraction and Valsalva manouevre. Neurourol Urodyn. 2006; 25(3): 268–276. doi: 10.1002/nau.20183.

PUBLISHER

Assessment of the relationship between the incidence of urogenital complaints in young women and pelvic floor muscle weakness

Julia Buszko-Michalczak 1

Julia Buszko-Michalczak

¹