eISSN: 1897-4309
ISSN: 1428-2526
Contemporary Oncology/Współczesna Onkologia
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Addendum Special Issues Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
1/2023
vol. 27
 
Share:
Share:
Original paper

Association between single nucleotide polymorphisms in DNA repair genes and the efficacy of radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients

Rajaa Benzeid
1, 2
,
Amin Gihbid
3
,
Nezha Tawfik
4
,
Nadia Benchakroun
4
,
Karima Bendahhou
4
,
Abdellatif Benider
4
,
Amal Guensi
4
,
Naima El Benna
4
,
Abdelkarim Filali Maltouf
2
,
Mohammed El Mzibri
1
,
Mohammed Attaleb
1
,
Meriem Khyatti
3
,
Imane Chaoui
1

  1. Biology and Medical Research Unit, National Center of Energy, Sciences and Nuclear Techniques, Rabat, Morocco
  2. Laboratory of Microbiology and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Rabat, Morocco
  3. Laboratory of Viral Oncology, Institut Pasteur du Maroc, Casablanca, Morocco
  4. Mohammed VI Centre for Cancer Treatment, Ibn Rochd University Hospital, Casablanca, Morocco
Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2023; 27 (1): 28–34
Online publish date: 2023/04/27
Article file
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 

Introduction

According to global cancer statistics, nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) is a rare disease, but it poses a great health problem in some regions, including Southeast Asia, Africa, and the Arctic [1]. In Morocco, the annual incidence of NPC is estimated at 1.8%; the majority of patients are diagnosed with locally advanced disease or distant metastasis (80%), and more than 90% of metastatic cases die [2].

Worldwide, the deep anatomic localization of NPC and its late diagnosis limit therapeutic approaches, and radiotherapy is still the main and the most effective treatment of NPC [3]. Scientific evidence has shown that radiotherapy destroys tumour cells by acting directly on the DNA (direct effect), and indirectly by free radicals generated by ionization leading to DNA base lesion (indirect effect) [4]. This DNA injury eventually impacts cell proliferation and changes the cell cycle, inducing cellular apoptosis or activating death pathways [5].

The most important challenge is to overcome radioresistance, considered as the main cause of local recurrence and distant metastasis [6]. In the last decade, research into the molecular basis of radiation response in tumours has improved our understanding of radioresistance, and data clearly shows that radioresistance is mainly due to genetic variations involved in DNA repair pathways. As response to radiotherapy, tumour cells activate a series of complex reactions to survive [7].

Overall, four principal DNA repair pathways occur in cancer cells: mismatch repair, double strand base (DSB) repair, nucleotide excision repair, and base excision repair (BER), being the central DNA repair mechanism to maintain the genome integrity [8]. In this system, two genes, X-ray repair cross complementing 1 (XRCC1) and 3 (XRCC3), play a key role in DNA repair and are considered as important factors in damage signalling and recovery [9].

XRCC1 gene located on 19q13.2, comprising 17 exons and 16 introns, encodes a DNA repair protein that plays a key role in BER pathway by repairing DNA single-strand breaks [1012]. XRCC1 was the first gene reported to impact cell sensitivity to ionization radiation [13]. The XRCC3 gene located on 14q32.3, covering 10 exons and 9 introns, encodes for the enzyme that participates in DNA DSB repair [10, 11]. Several studies have reported an association between genetic modification of XRCC1 and XRCC3 and the response to radiotherapy in various cancers, including rectal cancer, cervical cancer, breast cancer, and lung cancer [1419]. In NPC, growing attention has been paid to the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in DNA repair genes and the response to radiotherapy. In this field, many studies have reported that SNPs in XRCC1 and XRCC3 may act as potential biomarkers for predicting radiosensitivity.

Despite the growing number of studies investigating the predictive role of these SNPs in NPC radiotherapy, the results are still controversial. Recently, Gong et al. highlighted the need of more genetic association studies related to radiation-based treatment to support the interest of considering XRCC SNPs as prognostic factors for patients receiving radiotherapy-related treatment [20]. Nonetheless, we performed this study to evaluate the association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln and XRCC3 Thr241Met SNPs in Moroccan patients with NPC and responses to radiotherapy, to assess their usefulness as prognostic biomarkers of NPC radiotherapy.

Material and methods

Study population and sampling

A total of 100 NPC patient were recruited at Mohammed VI Center for Cancer Therapy in Casablanca between January 2016 and December 2018. Peripheral blood specimens were collected in tubes containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. In this study, all recruited patients were initially scheduled to be treated with radiotherapy. All patients agreed to complete a questionnaire to provide information regarding, age, sex, smoking status, childhood habits, consanguinity, and personal and familial cancer history. Information regarding clinical and pathological status was recovered from their respective medical records. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ibn Rochd University Hospital, Casablanca, Morocco, and each recruited patient signed a written informed consent form.

DNA extraction

Genomic DNA was extracted from leukocyte nuclei using a phenol chloroform DNA extraction method [21]. The concentration of the extracted DNA was quantified using a UV spectrophotometer (Nanodrop, Thermofisher, USA). Then the quality of DNA was checked by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of a fragment of the β-globin gene using the primers PC04 (5’-CAACTTCATCCA CGT TCACC-3’) and GH20 (5’-GAAGAGCCAAGGACAGGTAC-3’), generating an amplification product of 265 bp.

Single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping

The genotyping of the 2 polymorphic sites in DNA repair genes (XRCC1 Arg399Gln [rs25487] and XRCC3 Thr241Met [rs861539]) was as-sessed by conventional PCR using loci-specific pri-mers, as reported in Table 1.

Polymerase chain reaction amplification was performed in a total volume of 25 µl containing 200 pM of each dNTP, 200 pM of each primer, 0.5 U Platinum Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen), and 100 ng of genomic DNA in 1X PCR buffer. Each PCR reaction consisted of DNA denaturation at 95°C for 2 minutes, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 seconds, and primer annealing for 30 seconds at specific temperature and DNA extension for 30 seconds at 72°C. A final extension at 72°C for 7 min was performed for all amplification mixtures. Polymerase chain reaction products were size separated by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized under ultraviolet light.

Table 1

Primer sequences used for of XRCC1 and XRCC3 single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping

SNPPrimer sequenceTm (°C)Amplicon size (Bp)
XRCC1 Arg399GlnF5'-GATCACACCTAACTGGCATCTTC-3'54265
R5'-CTGGGACCACCTGTGTTC-3'
XRCC3 Thr241MetF5'-GGTCGAGTGACAGTCCAAAC-3'58449
R5'-AGCAACGGCTGAGGGTCTT-3'

[i] SNP – single nucleotide polymorphisms

For SNP genotyping, PCR products were purified using an ExoSAP-IT® kit (Applied Biosystems, USA) to eliminate the primers and the remaining unincorporated dNTPs, and then were subjected to DNA sequencing reaction. Sequencing reactions were performed in a final volume of 10 µl, containing 200 ng of purified PCR product, 1 µl of Big Dyev3.1 ready reaction mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster city, CA, USA), and 10 pmol of the specific primer (the same used for PCR amplification). The sequencing mixtures were incubated at 95°C for 1 min and 25 cycles were performed as follows: denaturation at 95°C for 10 s, primer annealing at 50°C for 5 s, and extension at 60°C for 4 min. Sequencing products were finally purified using Sephadex G-50 gel-exclusion chromatography (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) to eliminate the excess of unincorporated labelled dNTPs. Direct sequencing of amplified DNA was performed by capillary electrophoresis on an ABI 3130XL DNA analyser (Applied Biosystems, Foster city, CA, USA). The sequencing products were analysed using a Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) and BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor to make this analysis complete.

Statistical analysis

The correlation between XRCC1 Arg399Gln and XRCC3 Thr241Met SNPs and clinical stages/response to radiotherapy were evaluated by the χ2 test using SPSS software version 23 (p-values < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant). Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by a log-rank test using Graph Pad Prism software version 9 (p-values < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant).

Ethical approval

All procedures were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the Ethics Committee of Ibn Rochd Hospital of Casablanca, Morocco of November 2017 and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.

Results

Demographic and clinicopathological characteristics

Demographic and clinicopathological characteristics of the 100 recruited patients are summarized in Table 2. In this cohort, males comprised 63% and females comprised 37%, with a male:female sex ratio of 1.70. Overall, 82% of cases were over 30 years old, and 56% had a rural childhood habitat. Most patients had no consanguinity (92%), no familial cancer history (75%), were not cigarette smokers (69%), and were not alcohol consumers (92%). Clinicopathological characteristics of tumour specimens showed that most cases were diagnosed at advanced stages III and IV (86%). Non-keratinising undifferentiated tumour was the most prevalent histological type and was reported in 93% of cases.

Table 2

Demographic and pathological characteristics of the nasopharyngeal carcinoma population study

ParametersN = 100
Gender
Male63
Female37
Age
≤ 30 years18
> 30 years82
Smoking status
Smokers31
Non-smokers69
Childhood habitat
Rural56
Urban44
Consanguinity
No92
Yes8
Familial antecedent
No75
Yes25
Alcohol consumption
Drinkers8
Non-drinkers92
Clinical stages
Stage I and II14
Stage III and IV86
Histological type
Keratinising tumour0
Non-keratinising tumour5
Non-keratinising undifferentiated tumour93
Others2

The distribution of the different XRCC1/3 single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes

The distribution of the different XRCC1/3 SNPs genotypes and alleles in NPC cases is summarized in Table 3. For XRCC1 Arg399Gln SNP, the heterozygous genotype GA, was reported in 27% of cases, whereas the homozygous genotypes GG and AA were identified in 60% and 13%, respectively. Accordingly, the G allele prevails and was reported in 73.5% of cases. The A allele was reported in only 26.5% of cases.

Table 3

Distribution of the XRCC1 and XRCC3 single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes and alleles in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients

GenotypesXRCC1 Arg399GlnGenotypesXRCC3 Thr241Met
n%n%
G/G6060C/C3636
G/A2727C/T5151
A/A1313T/T1313
AllelesAlleles
G14773.5C12361.5
A5326.5T7738.5

For XRCC3 Thr241Met SNP, the heterozygous genotype CT prevailed and was reported in 51% of cases. The homozygous genotypes CC and TT were reported in 36% and 13% of cases, respectively. Allelic distribution showed a predominance of C allele, reported in 61.5% of cases, T allele being identified in only 38.5% of cases.

Correlation between XRCC1 Arg399Gln and XRCC3 Thr241Met single nucleotide polymorphisms and clinical stages

In this study, correlation between XRCC1 Arg399Gln and XRCC3 Thr241Met SNPs and clinical stages was also evaluated, and the results are reported in Table 4. Genotypic and allelic distributions of XRCC1 Arg399Gln SNP showed no significant association with clinical stages, with p = 0.559 and p = 0.440, respectively. Likewise, NPC clinical stages were not significantly associated with XRCC3 Thr241Met SNP genotypes (p = 0.638) or with corresponding alleles (p = 0.567).

Table 4

Association between XRCC1 and XRCC3 polymorphisms and clinical stages

Clinical stagesnGenotypesAlleles
XRCC1 Arg399Gln
GG (%)GA (%)AA (%)pG (%)A (%)p
Stage I and II148 (57.1)3 (21.4)3 (21.4)0.55919 (67.9)9 (32.1)0.440
Stage III and IV8652 (60.5)24 (27.9)10 (11.6)128 (74.4)44 (25.6)
XRCC3 Thr241Met
CC (%)CT (%)TT (%)pC (%)T (%)p
Stage I and II143 (21.5)10 (71.4)1 (7.1)0.63816 (57.1)12 (42.9)0.567
Stage III and IV8633 (38.4)41 (47.7)12 (13.9)107 (62.2)65 (37.8)

Association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln and XRCC3 Thr241Met single nucleotide polymorphisms and response to radiotherapy

Among the 100 recruited NPC cases, only 68 underwent radiotherapy, and clinical follow-up revealed that 59 were sensitive to ionizing radiation and showed a positive response to radiotherapy (86.8%), whereas 9 patients exhibited radio-resistance status (13.2%) associated with relapsed, local, or distant disease cases. In this study we also investigated the association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln and XRCC3 Thr241Met SNPs and response to radiotherapy. For both SNPs, statistical analysis showed no significant association between genotypic and allelic distributions and response to radiotherapy (p > 0.05) (Table 5).

Table 5

Association between XRCC1 and XRCC3 polymorphisms and response to radiotherapy

Clinical outcomenGenotypesAlleles
XRCC1 Arg399Gln
GG (%)GA (%)AA (%)pG (%)A (%)p
Radiosensitive5937 (62.7)15 (25.4)7 (11.9)0.58389 (75.4)29 (24.6)0.459
Radio-resistant97 (77.8)1 (11.1)1 (11.1)15 (83.3)3 (16.7)
XRCC3 Thr241Met
CC (%)CT (%)TT (%)pC (%)T (%)p
Radiosensitive5920 (33.9)31 (52.5)8 (13.6)0.66071 (60.2)47 (39.8)0.590
Radio-resistant94 (44.4)4 (44.4)1 (11.1)12 (66.7)6 (33.3)

The evaluation of Arg299Gln and Thr241Met single nucleotide polymorphisms as prognosis survival biomarkers in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

To evaluate whether the Arg299Gln and Thr241Met SNPs has an impact on patients’ clinical outcomes (progression- free survival – PFS, and overall survival – OS) Kaplan- Meier analyses were performed, and the results are reported in Figure 1. Interestingly, patients with CT genotype of Thr241Met SNPs had significantly longer OS (p = 0.04 < 0.05) than those with CC and TT genotypes. However, no statically significant association was detected between Thr241Met genotypes and PFS, or between Arg399Gln genotypes and PFS and OS (p-values > 0.05) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Kaplan-Meier analyses of progression free survival and overall survival correlated to Arg299Gln and Thr241Met single nucleotide polymorphisms in nasopharyngeal cancer patients

/f/fulltexts/WO/50661/WO-27-50661-g001_min.jpg

Discussion

Radiation therapy is the mainstay primary therapeutic treatment for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. However, despite relevant scientific and technological advances, radio-resistance remains the main problem faced by clinicians in NPC management and the major cause of local recurrence and distant metastasis [22]. The sensitivity of cancer cells to radiotherapy can be strongly influenced by genetic modifications affecting specific genes, including XRCC1 and XRCC3, which are involved in DNA repair processes [7].

In the present study, our interest was focused on evaluation of the association between NPC radioresistance and XRCC1 Arg399Gln (rs25487) and XRCC3 Thr241Met (rs861539) polymorphisms, reported as important factors in the radiotherapy outcomes in several cancers [23].

In this study, no significant relationship was obtained between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and NPC patients’ clinicopathological characteristics. Arg399Gln was reported as the most common and important variation of the XRCC1 gene. However, its association with cancer development is controversial. XRCC1 Arg399Gln was reported to be associated with the incidence risk of cervical cancer [5], with lung cancer risk, and with breast cancer risk in African Americans [24]. likewise, in an updated meta-analysis, it was shown that the XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism is a potential predictor for susceptibility to NPC, especially for Asians [25].

In the current study, XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism did not reveal any association with clinical stage of NPC cases. Narter et al. previously showed that XRCC3 TT genotype and T allele exerted protective effects against bladder cancer development in a Greek population [26]. In other cancers the results are controversial. Krupa et al. reported no significant association between XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism and clinical parameters of colorectal cancer cases [27]. However, a strong relationship between XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism and oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) stages has been reported in the Brazilian population, suggesting that this SNP may contribute to the development of OSCC, metastases, and more advanced stages in these lesions [28].

During the last decades, few studies have been conducted to investigate the association between XRCC1/3 polymorphisms and NPC radio-resistance. For instance, no significant association was observed between the XRCC1 Arg399Gln and XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphisms and the response to radiotherapy (p > 0.05) in our study. In 2006, Andreassen et al. reported no significant association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln and XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphisms and risk of radiation-induced subcutaneous fibrosis [29].

Evaluation of the association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and radiotherapy outcomes in 60 Chinese patients with locally advanced NPC treated with radiation therapy showed that XRCC1 399 Gln/Gln allele correlated with a higher medium-term tumour regression ratio after radiotherapy for primary nasopharyngeal neoplasm and metastatic lymph nodes (> 80% vs. 40–60%, p < 0.01), suggesting that this SNP is good for prognosis and patients with XRCC1 Codon399 Gln/Gln allele were more likely to obtain complete remission of tumour (100% vs. 76% and 67%, p > 0.05) [30].

The association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and radio-therapeutic response was confronted by several studies in breast cancer [31], head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [32], prostate cancer [33], and non-small cell lung cancer [34].

Interestingly, many studies have addressed the association between XRCC1 399 SNP and radiation side effects. In this field, Chen et al. found that NPC patients with XRCC1 codon 399 Arg/Arg have a higher risk of developing acute radiation dermatitis. Indeed, XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism in NPC suggests that this SNP is an important predictive factor in the risk of acute radiation dermatitis during IMRT [35]. XRCC1 399 SNP was also reported, in combination with smoking, to predict poor PFS in 75 consecutive NPC patients treated with curative radiotherapy [36].

The presence of significant association between XRCC3 241 SNP and radiotherapy outcomes corroborates with previous results on radiotherapy-treated lung cancer patients [37]. Interestingly, Burri et al. reported that XRCC3 had a significant association with the development of late radiation injury in 135 consecutive patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy [38].

The association between XRCC3 241 SNP and chemotherapy was also investigated. Shen et al. reported no significant association between XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism and clinical outcomes of NSCLC patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy [39]. However, in a meta-analysis including 14 eligible studies, the predictive value of XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism on response and OS of patients with NSCLC was evaluated on 2828 patients, and a significant association was found between the variant XRCC3 241Met and response to platinum-based chemotherapy, while there was no statically significant association between this polymorphism and OS [40].

The XRCC3 Thr241Met variant is a non-conservative substitution and does not affect protein-protein interactions [41]. However, the XRCC1 Arg399Gln mutation leads to conformational changes in the XRCC1 protein, which reduces its affinity for the multi-component DNA repair protein complex [42]. Hence, these mutations may have an impact on protein activity and consequently may be associated with radio resistance status in NPC. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma radio resistance could also be the result of other mechanisms including the presence of cancer stem cells, genetic mutations, some epigenetics events, abnormal activation of certain signalling pathways, and/or alteration of the tumour microenvironment.

Conclusions

XRCC1 Arg399Gln (rs25487) polymorphism is a frequent event in NPC patients, but it is not associated with cancer severity and is not involved in tumour radio resistance. The study suggests that XRCC3 Thr241Met (rs861539) can be associated with different OS in NPC patients treated with radiotherapy. Additionally, other genetic and epigenetic alterations must be investigated to explain the mechanisms associated with NPC resistance for better management of this complicated disease.

Funding

This study was funded by Institut de Recherche sur le Cancer (grant number 201932). Financial support for publication of the article was provided by Institut de Recherche sur le Cancer, http://www.irc.ma

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Mohammed VI Centre for Cancer Treatment staff for patient recruitment, blood collection, and follow-up of patients.

Notes

[2] Conflicts of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1 

Siak PK, Khoo ASB, Leong CO, Hoh BP, Cheah SC. Current status and future perspectives about molecular biomarkers of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancers 2021; 13: 3490.

2 

Benider A, Harif M, Karkouri M, et al. Registre des cancers de la région du Grand Casablanca pour la période 2008–2012. Lalla Salma Foundation 2016.

3 

Sun XS, Li XY, Chen QY, Tang LQ, Mai HQ. Future of radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Br J Radiol 2019; 92: 20190209.

4 

Zhang X, Yang J. Role of non-coding RNAs on the radiotherapy sensitivity and resistance of head and neck cancer:from basic research to clinical application. Front Cell Dev Bio 2020; l8: 637435.

5 

Wang JS, Wang HJ, Qian HL. Biological effects of radiation on cancer cells. Military MedRes 2018; 5: 1-10.

6 

Tang L, Wei F, Wu Y, et al. Role of metabolism in cancer cell radioresistance and radiosensitization methods. J ExpClin Cancer Res 2018; 37: 87.

7 

Huang RX, Zhou PK. DNA damage response signaling pathways and targets for radiotherapy sensitization in cancer. Sig Transduct Target Ther 2020; 5, 60.

8 

Helleday T, Petermann E, Lundin C, Hodgson B, Sharma RA. DNA repair pathways as targets for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 2008; 8: 193-204.

9 

Santos RA, Teixeira AC, Mayorano MB, Carrara HH, Andrade JM, Takahashi CS. DNA repair genes XRCC1 and XRCC3 polymorphisms and their relationship with the level of micronuclei in breast cancer patients. Genet MolBiol 2010; 33: 637-640.

10 

Soliman AHM, Zaki NN, Fathy HM, Mohamed AA, Ezzat MA, Rayan A. Genetic polymorphisms in XRCC1, OGG1, and XRCC3 DNA repair genes and DNA damage in radiotherapy workers. Environ SciPollut Res Int 2020; 27: 43786-43799.

11 

Liu YP, Zheng CC, Huang YN, He ML, Xu WW, Li B. Molecular mechanisms of chemo-and radiotherapy resistance and the potential implications for cancer treatment. Med Comm 2021; 2: 315-340.

12 

Wood RD, Mitchell M, Sgouros J, Lindahl T. Human DNA repair genes. Science 2001; 291: 1284-1289.

13 

Thompson LH, West MG. XRCC1 keeps DNA from getting stranded. MutatRes 2000; 459: 1-18.

14 

Guo CX, Yang GP, Pei Q, Yin JY, Tan HY, Yuan H. DNA repair gene polymorphisms do not predict response to radiotherapy-based multimodality treatment of patients with rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015; 16: 713-718.

15 

Osti MF, Nicosia L, Agolli L, et al. PotentialRole of single nucleotide polymorphisms of XRCC1, XRCC3, and RAD51 in predicting acute toxicity in rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative radiochemotherapy. Am J Clin Onco 2017; l40: 535-542.

16 

Batar B, Guven G, Eroz S, Bese NS, Guven M. Decreased DNA repairgene XRCC1 expression is associated with radiotherapy-induced acute side effects in breast cancer patients. Gene 2016; 582: 33-37.

17 

Zhao Y, Xie Y, Jia D, Ma C, Wei D, Zhang X. Application of gene polymorphisms to predict the sensitivity of patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy. Am J Transl Res 2021; 13: 7382-7387.

18 

Siak PY, Khoo AS, Leong CO, Hoh BP, Cheah SC. Current status and future perspectives about molecular biomarkers of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13: 3490.

19 

Gurská S, Farkasová T, Gábelová A. Radiosensitivity of cervical cancer celllines: the impact of polymorphisms in DNA repair genes. Neoplasma 2007; 54: 195-201.

20 

Gong L, Luo M, Sun R, Qiu L, Chen C, Luo Z. Significant association between XRCC1 expression and its rs25487 polymorphism and radiotherapy-related cancer prognosis. Front Oncol 2021; 11: 654784.

21 

Chacon-Cortes D, Griffiths L. Methods for extracting genomic DNA from whole blood samples: current perspectives. J Biorepos Sci Appl Med 2014; 2: 1-9.

22 

Liu Z, Chen Y, Su Y, Hu X, Peng X. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: clinical achievements and considerations among treatment options. Front Oncol 2021; 11: 635737.

23 

Baskar R, Lee KA, Yeo R, Yeoh KW. Cancer and radiation therapy: current advances and future directions. Int J Med Sci 2012; 9: 193-199.

24 

Duell EJ, Wiencke JK, Cheng TJ, et al. Polymorphisms in the DNA repair genes XRCC1 and ERCC2 and biomarkers of DNA damage in human blood mononuclear cells. Carcinogenesis 2000; 21: 965-971.

25 

Lin J, Ye Q, Wang Y, Wang Y, Zeng Y. Association between XRCC1 single-nucleotide polymorphisms and susceptibility to nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an update meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97: e11852.

26 

Narter KF, Ergen A, Agaçhan B, Görmüs U, Timirci O, Isbir T. Bladder cancer and polymorphisms of DNA repair genes (XRCC1, XRCC3, XPD, XPG, APE1, hOGG1). Anticancer Res 2009; 29: 1389-1393.

27 

Krupa R, Sliwinski T, Wisniewska-Jarosinska M, et al. Polymorphisms in RAD51, XRCC2 and XRCC3 genes of the homologous recombination repair in colorectal cancer–a case control study. MolBiol Rep 2011; 38: 2849-2854.

28 

Dos Santos Pereira J, Fontes FL, de Medeiros SR, de Almeida Freitas R, de Souza LB, da Costa Miguel MC. Association of the XPD and XRCC3 gene polymorphisms with oral squamous cell carcinoma in a Northeastern Brazilian population: a pilot study 2016. Arch Oral Bio 2016; l64: 19-23.

29 

Andreassen CN, Alsner J, Overgaard M, Sørensen FB, Overgaard J. Risk of radiation-induced subcutaneous fibrosis in relation to single nucleotide polymorphisms in TGFB1, SOD2, XRCC1, XRCC3, APEX and ATM–a study based on DNA from formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissue samples. Int J Radiat Biol 2006; 82: 577-586.

30 

Zhai XM, Hu QC, Gu K, Wang JP, Zhang JN, Wu YW. Significance of XRCC1 Codon399 polymorphisms in Chinese patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with radiation therapy. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2016; 12: e125-32.

31 

Chang-Claude J, Popanda O, Tan XL, et al. Association between polymorphisms in the DNA repair genes, XRCC1, APE1, and XPD and acute side effects of radiotherapy in breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11: 4802-4809.

32 

Nanda SS, Gandhi AK, Rastogi M, et al. Evaluation of XRCC1 gene polymorphism as a biomarker in head and neck cancer patients undergoing chemoradiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 101: 593-601.

33 

Langsenlehner T, Renner W, Gerger A, et al. Association between single nucleotide polymorphisms in the gene for XRCC1 and radiation-induced late toxicity in prostate cancer patients. Radiother Oncol 2011; 98: 387-393.

34 

Yang Z, Liu Z. Potential functional variants in DNA repair genes are associated with efficacy and toxicity of radiotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. J Oncol 2020; 2020: 3132786.

35 

Chen H, Wu M, Li G, Hua L, Chen S, Huang H. Association between XRCC1 single-nucleotide polymorphism and acute radiation reaction in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96: e8202.

36 

Jin H, Xie X, Wang H, et al. ERCC1 Cys8092Ala and XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphisms predict progression-free survival after curative radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. PLoS One 2014; 9: e101256.

37 

Osawa K, Nakarai C, Uchino K, et al. XRCC3 gene polymorphism is associated with survival in Japanese lung cancer patients. Int J Mol Sci 2012; 13: 16658-16667.

38 

Burri RJ, Stock RG, Cesaretti JA, et al. Association of single nucleotide polymorphisms in SOD2, XRCC1 and XRCC3 with susceptibility for the development of adverse effects resulting from radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Radiat Res 2008; 170: 49-59.

39 

Shen XY, Lu FZ, Wu Y, Zhao LT, Lin ZF. XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism and clinical outcomes of NSCLC patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2013; 8: e69553.

40 

Qiu M, Xu L, Yang X, et al. XRCC3 Thr241Met is associated with response to platinum-based chemotherapy but not survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. PLoS One 2013; 8: e77005.

41 

Yoshihara T, Ishida M, Kinomura A, et al. XRCC3 deficiency results in a defect in recombination and increased endoreduplication in human cells. EMBO J 2004; 23: 670-680.

42 

Monaco R, Rosal R, Dolan MA, Pincus MR, Brandt-Rauf PW. Conformational effects of a common codon 399 polymorphism on the BRCT1 domain of the XRCC1 protein. Protein J 2007; 26: 541-546.

Copyright: © 2023 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.