In patients with an aortic paravalvular leak (PVL), the retrograde femoral arterial approach is most commonly used [1, 2]. Nevertheless, in some cases an antegrade (via trans-septal puncture) or a retrograde transapical approach may be alternative options [3]. Particularly for the anatomically hard-to-approach calcified serpiginous tracts where an extra support is needed, an arterio-arterial loop can be established and may be key for a successful procedure [4].
A 75-year-old male with previous ischaemic stroke, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and multiple previous percutaneous coronary interventions was admitted for congestive heart failure (NYHA class III). He had a history of surgical removal of subaortic membrane and right coronary leaflet plasty, followed 20 years later by mechanical aortic valve replacement and woven fabric ascending aortic surgical graft. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) showed dilatation of left ventricle (LV) with an ejection fraction of 45%, and confirmed the presence of a calcified oval-shaped 6 × 5 mm PVL located underneath the left coronary sinus.
The patient denied a redo surgery and after heart team discussion a transcatheter PVL closure was planned. An informed consent form was signed by the patient. The procedure was performed under TEE and fluoroscopic guidance using general anaesthesia. Right femoral artery puncture was performed, and a severe paravalvular aortic regurgitation was also demonstrated by aortography (Figure 1 A). With the support of a 4-Fr Amplatz left catheter (AL2) we easily passed a hydrophilic Terumo 0.35 inch guide wire retrograde from the aorta to the LV through the calcific serpiginous PVL; however, none of the catheters used (AL2- 4Fr, Judkins right 5-Fr, Multipurpose 5-Fr, Glidecath 4-Fr) could be advanced through the leak over the hydrophilic wire. It was decided to re-advance the hydrophilic guidewire, establishing a loop in the left ventricle, and then re-direct it across the mechanical prosthetic leaflets and place it finally into the descending aorta (Figure 2 A). A Glidecath 4-Fr was subsequently advanced over the hydrophilic wire that was replaced by 0.035-inch wire, 260 cm in lenght super stiff guidewire (Boston Scientific), thus creating an arterio-aorta rail, without the need to externalize the wire through an additional radial access. Over the exchange wire a 4.0 mm PTA balloon dilatation catheter was placed across the leakage and dilated twice, not beyond its rated burst pressure, taking care to keep in place the arterio-aorta rail (Figure 2 B). The stronger support finally allowed progression of the retrograde 7-Fr delivery sheath into the LV. A specifically designed, 7 mm square twist PLD device (PLD, Occlutech, Helsingborg, Sweden) was successfully deployed (Figures 2 C, D) and the final echocardiographic and angiographic control confirmed the effective PVL closure (Figure 1 B). The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on the third post-operative day. TTE confirmed stable position of the device with trivial residual leak.
In conclusion, the balloon leakage dilation over an arterio-aorta rail strong support allowed us to get across the anatomically hard-to-approach calcified serpiginous leak with the 7-FR delivery sheath and successfully accomplish the procedure.