eISSN: 2449-8238
ISSN: 2392-1099
Clinical and Experimental Hepatology
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
1/2018
vol. 4
 
Share:
Share:
Short report

Cannulation in patients with large periampullary diverticulum using SpyBite miniforceps

Mahadevan Balkrishanan
,
Mayank Jain
,
Chenduran SNK
,
Sridhar CG
,
Ravi Ramakrishnan
,
Jayanthi Venkataraman

Clin Exp HEPATOL 2018; 4, 1: 41-42
Online publish date: 2018/01/20
Article file
- Cannulation.pdf  [0.07 MB]
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 
Periampullary diverticulum (PAD) is a duodenal outpunching characterised by herniation of the mucosa or submucosa that occurs via a defect in the muscle layer within an area of 2 to 3 cm around the papilla. The prevalence of such diverticula increases with age [1]. Cannulation is difficult in patients with PAD. The described success rate varies from 61% to 95.4%, which is significantly lower than that observed in patients without PAD [2].
Cannulation of intradiverticular papilla is challeng­ing and time consuming. The majority of failures occur due to the inability of the endoscopist to locate the papilla [3]. Various methods have been described in literature for overcoming this difficulty. Use of biopsy forceps to pull the duodenal mucosa adjacent to the papilla is useful to bring the papillary orifice out of the diverticulum. Another instrument, either a cannula or sphincterotome, can then be introduced and biliary cannulation can be attempted with the coordination of the two instruments [4]. Use of reversed guidewire method [5], double endoscope method [6], balloon dilatation of the diverticular neck [7], endoclip or cap assisted cannulation [8, 9], prior pancreatic duct stenting [10], and use of rendezvous technique [11, 12] have been described in the literature.
Over the last few years, we too have encountered such difficult cannulations in our department. In our last four cases with PAD, despite repeated attempts, we were unable to locate the papilla and cannulate. To overcome this difficulty, we used SpyBite forceps (Boston Scientific) to pull out the papillary orifice and then perform the cannulation using a sphincterotome introduced through the same working channel. This was done as per previous reports in literature on the use of biopsy forceps for such difficult cannulations [4]. No prior consent for the same was taken from patients and the Ethics Committee was intimated regarding the procedure. This method reduced the time required for cannulation. In all four of our cases, we had 100% success in cannulation. Moreover, the diameter of the SpyBite forceps was 1 mm, which was much less than standard biopsy forceps, and this eases the manoeuvr­ability of the accessories to have a higher chance of cannulation. Figure 1 shows simultaneous introduction of SpyBite miniforceps for holding and a sphincte­rotome for cannulation in one of our cases.
To conclude, use of SpyBite miniforceps in difficult cannulations in patients with PAD is useful and has an excellent success rate.

Disclosure

Authors report no conflict of interest.

References

1. Shemesh E, Klein E, Czerniak A, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with gallbladder in situ: the influence of periampullary duodenal diverticula. Surgery 1990; 107: 163-166.
2. Zoepf T, Zoepf DS, Arnold JC, et al. The relationship between juxtapapillary duodenal diverticula and disorders of the bilio­pancreatic system: analysis of 350 patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 56-61.
3. Tyagi P, Sharma P, Sharma BC, et al. Periampullary diverticula and technical success of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Surg Endosc 2009; 23: 1342-1345.
4. Fujita N, Noda Y, Kobayashi G, et al. ERCP for intradiverticular papilla: two-devices-in-one-channel method. Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48: 517-520.
5. Elmunzer BJ, Boetticher NC. Reverse guidewire anchoring of the papilla for difficult cannulation due to a periampullary diverticulum. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 82: 957.
6. Külling D, Haskell E. Double endoscope method to access intradiverticular papilla. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 811-812.
7. Tóth E, Lindström E, Fork FT. An alternative approach to the inaccessible intradiverticular papilla. Endoscopy 1999; 31: 554-556.
8. Huang CH, Tsou YK, Lin CH, et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for intradiverticular papilla: endoclip-assisted biliary cannulation. Endoscopy 2010; 42 Suppl 2: E223-E224.
9. Myung DS, Park CH, Koh HR, et al. Cap-assisted ERCP in patients with difficult cannulation due to periampullary diverticulum. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 352-355.
10. Fogel EL, Sherman S, Lehman GA. Increased selective biliary cannulation rates in the setting of periampullary diverticula: main pancreatic duct stent placement followed by pre-cut biliary sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 47: 396-400.
11. Calvo MM, Bujanda L, Heras I, et al. The rendezvous technique for the treatment of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 511-513.
Copyright: © Clinical and Experimental Hepatology. This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) enables reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.