Current issue
Archive
Videos
Articles in press
About the journal
Supplements
Editorial board
Reviewers
Abstracting and indexing
Subscription
Contact
Instructions for authors
Publication charge
Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
|
4/2009
vol. 111 abstract:
Original paper
Causes of epiphora in diagnosed and treated patients in Department of Ophthalmology in Military Institute of Health Service
Radosław Różycki
1
,
Aleksandra Jakubaszek
1
,
Artur Maliborski
2
Klinika Oczna 2009, 111 (4): 319-322
Online publish date: 2009/12/19
View
full text
Get citation
ENW EndNote
BIB JabRef, Mendeley
RIS Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
Introduction
Analysis of causes of epiphora in patients which have been examined in Department of Ophthalmology in Military Institute of Health Service from 2004 to 2007. Material and methods The study has comprised 330 subjects: 241 women and 89 men (mean age 58.85 ± 19.93 years). All patients have been examined because of epiphora (eyelid and lacrimal punctum position, medial canthal tendon laxity – horizontal resting position, lateral distraction test, fluorescein dye disappearance test, syringing of the upper and lower canaliculus, dacryocystography and/or lacrimal scintigraphy). Results There have been 3% patients with epiphora who have been examined in our clinic. Duration of epiphora has been mean 39.24 months. The main causes of epiphora have been: primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction, idiopathic acquired dacryostenosis, punctal stenosis (22.42%, 19.7%, 19.09%), and rare: diverticulum, punctal papilloma, stenosis after radiotheraphy, Recklinghausen’s disease. Conclusions The correct diagnosis is the condition for the proper planning of the therapy schedule. Epiphora is frequent and annoying symptom. keywords:
epiphora, lacrimal duct obstruction, dacryocystography, primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction |
|