eISSN: 1897-4309
ISSN: 1428-2526
Contemporary Oncology/Współczesna Onkologia
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Addendum Special Issues Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
3/2023
vol. 27
 
Share:
Share:
Review paper

Circulating tumor cells in colorectal cancer – a review of detection methods and clinical relevance

Salma Saadi
1
,
Meryem Aarab
1
,
Imane Tabyaoui
1
,
Nadia Tahiri Jouti
1

  1. Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Inflammatory, Degenerative and Oncologic Pathophysiology – Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Casablanca Hassan II University, Casablanca, Morocco
Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2023; 27 (3): 123–131
Online publish date: 2023/12/21
Article file
- Circulating tumor.pdf  [0.16 MB]
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 

Introduction

A new category of biomarkers, which has attracted growing interest in the screening of several tumors, including lung, breast, prostate, renal and colorectal cancer (CRC), is circulating tumor cells (CTCs) [13]. These tumor cells can be isolated from the peripheral blood circulation. Their enumeration may potentially predict survival and response to treatment in patients. This review, based on the literature findings, aims to highlight the clinical utility of CTCs in CRC patients and the detection methods.

Colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers and the second cause of cancer deaths worldwide [4]. Since no early screening procedure has been standardized yet, CRC is mostly diagnosed at relatively advanced stages, making it difficult to properly treat. Worldwide, 95% of CRC cases are sporadic and 5% are hereditary [5]. Colorectal cancer is localized in the colon or the rectum. About 90% of CRCs are adenocarcinomas; the remaining 10% consist of rare forms of CRC that may contain lymphomas and sarcomas [6].

Risk factors for development of CRC can be clinical, older age, previous colonic polyps, and presence of inflammatory bowel disease [7, 8]. Environmental factors play a major role in developing CRC: sedentary lifestyle, consuming red meat, obesity, smoking and alcohol consumption [911].

Screening for CRC includes fecal occult blood testing, flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy, and it should be done every ten years to prevent development of polyps along with the dosage of serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA); a high level > 5 ng/ml is significantly associated with shorter overall survival (OS), and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 is considered a serum marker for liver metastasis [12, 13].

In order to manage CRC, clinicians consider several factors to predict a patient’s prognosis. First of all are clinical factors such as tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stages [14]. Furthermore, histological features include mainly the type of the tumor, which is adenocarcinomas [15]. Moreover, genetic factors include a high frequency of chromosomal instability and microsatellite instability (15% of CRCs), mutations in codons 12 and 13 responsible for the expression of gene Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) (40% of CRCs), mutation in BRAF (10% of CRCs) and alteration of tumor suppressor genes, for instance TP53 [12, 14, 1619].

Treatment of CRC patients depends on the stage of the tumor, according to which the patients are either eligible to undergo a surgical procedure to ablate the tumor or benefit from chemotherapy if the tumor is difficult to resect [20]. However, treatment options seem to be of limited efficiency if the tumor has already metastasized. The last decade witnessed the rise of a new screening method utilizing tumor cells disseminated in the peripheral blood to prevent inducing metastasis and eventually increasing the overall survival. Those cells are the circulating tumors cells.

Circulating tumor cells

The two main biomarkers detected in liquid biopsies are CTCs and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), and both provide complementary information. But the analysis of ctDNA remains limited, since the latter is difficult to detect in comparison with CTCs; it is fragmented and found in small concentrations [21]. Furthermore, ctDNA’s role is also limited; it can only be analyzed at the genomic level, unlike CTCs, which can be analyzed at genomic, transcriptomic and proteasomic levels using in vivo (isolated and enriched CTCs implanted in animal models) and in vitro functional assays [21]. That is why we chose to focus on CTCs rather than ctDNA in our review.

Isolation of CTCs provides the possibility of studying them in terms of morphology and phenotyping through to molecular testing, enabling comparison with the primary tumor, which is not the case for ctDNA. CTCs also offer an accessible, non-invasive source of tumor material from cancer patients.

Circulating tumor cells are tumor cells shed in the blood circulation by the primary tumor. Tumor cells can infiltrate as single cells, in clusters, in strands or in single files [22]. Ashworth first described these cells in 1869; cells similar to those found in tumors were found in the blood after death of the patient [23]. However, in the last decade the research field took interest in these cells and their massive role in prevention of metastasis and relapse.

Millions of tumor cells are released in the circulation but only some of them can reach their destination and induce metastasis in distant sites (Fig. 1) [22]. This decrease of CTC number is due to the fact that CTCs are affected by several mechanisms which prevent them reaching the distant organs. Those obstacles are shearing forces and collisions with blood cells, generated by the blood flow. Circulating tumor cells that have undergone epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) can resist these forces [24]. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition is a phenomenon whereby CTCs change from the epithelial phenotype via downregulation of expression of the epithelial markers (Fig. 2) to the mesenchymal phenotype by upregulating its markers (Fig. 2) during the metastatic process in order to acquire migratory ability and be invasive. Colorectal carcinomas use EMT in order to initiate invasion via activation of the following signaling pathways: transforming growth factor, Wingless/ integrated WNT, platelet-derived growth factor and IL-6 [25]. This leads to activation of the following transcription factors: SNAIL, TWIST and Zinc Finger E-Box Binding Homeobox responsible for the mesenchymal phenotype [22].

Fig. 1

Circulating tumor cells are tumor cells released into the circulation from the primary tumor. Their transendothelial passage is facilitated by the epithelial-mesenchymal transition phenomenon. In contrast, tissue colonization of a metastatic site is accompanied by a mesenchymalepithelial transition phenomenon, and the tumor cells thus extravasated regain their epithelial phenotype

The figure was created using BioRender.com (accessed on 4 December 2022).

/f/fulltexts/WO/52057/WO-27-52057-g001_min.jpg
Fig. 2

Epithelial and mesenchymal markers of circulating tumor cells

The figure was created using BioRender.com (accessed on 4 December 2022).

CTC – circulating tumor cell, EMT – epithelial-mesenchymal transition, EpCAM – epithelial cell adhesion molecule,

MET – mesenchymal epithelial transition

/f/fulltexts/WO/52057/WO-27-52057-g002_min.jpg

Anoikis is when cells lose their attachment to the extracellular matrix and surrounding cells resulting in their apoptosis. Resistance to anoikis is achieved by activating tropomyosin-related kinase B, which may allow cancer cells to survive during systemic circulation, promoting subsequent tumor growth in distant organs [26].

On the other hand, CTCs may escape the immune system by developing a protecting phenotype with the overexpression of CD47 in CRC. This marker is anti-phagocytic and is expressed by the tumor cells to prevent their attack by macrophages and dendritic cells [27].

Circulating tumor cells are rare in the peripheral circulation, which makes their detection challenging. Adding to that, the most commonly used techniques to isolate CTCs target only their epithelial phenotype; so, CTCs that have undergone EMT may not be identified.

Markers

The characterization of CTCs in CRC is based on the expression of CTC surface antigens. These antigens may be epithelial markers such as epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) and cytokeratins (CK). However, due to the EMT the dedifferentiated CTCs may also express mesenchymal markers such as vimentin or N-cadherin (Fig. 2). This transition makes their capture quite challenging.

EpCAM

The epithelial cell adhesion molecule is a cell surface glycoprotein of 40 kDa, overexpressed in epithelial cancers, which is often associated with decreased patient survival. The epithelial cell adhesion molecule is involved in cell proliferation, migration, adhesion, differentiation and cell signaling. High expression of EpCAM usually correlates with poor prognosis except in renal and thyroid carcinoma, where its overexpression correlate with increased survival [28]. A Chinese meta-analysis suggested that EpCAM expression is higher in CRC patients than in normal controls. However, loss of its expression correlates with the progression, metastasis and poor prognosis of CRC [29].

Cytokeratins

Cytokeratins are epithelium-specific intermediate filaments with diameters of 6 nm to 25 nm [30]. They are an important component of intermediate filaments, which help cells resist mechanical stress due to their flexibility and ability to stretch. Circulating tumor cells expressing CK (8, 18, 19) reveal their epithelial origin. Cytokeratin 20 is a well-known cytokeratin expressed mostly by gastrointestinal epithelial cells, subsequently by the tumor derived from these cells [31]. Hinz et al. found a significant correlation between CK 20 expression and worse 5-year OS and disease-free survival (DFS) [31].

N-cadherin

N-cadherin is a transmembrane protein; it is expressed abnormally and plays a role in cancer metastasis by providing a mechanism for transendothelial migration. In CRC, N-cadherin may be an independent prognostic marker since its high expression was correlated with tumor progression [32]. Targeting N-cadherin helps isolate CTCs that have undergone EMT [33].

Vimentin

Vimentin is a mesenchymal marker, which belongs to the type III intermediate filament family. It plays a massive role in the immune response, stabilizing cytoskeletal interactions and preserving the cell shape. In CRC, expression of vimentin is correlated with a poor prognosis of the disease result [34]. In prostate cancer, vimentin was used to enumerate CTCs with a mesenchymal origin and was associated with cancer progression [35].

Methods of detection

Several techniques have been established to enumerate and characterize CTCs from blood circulation in CRC (Table 1). Circulating tumor cells are rare (1–100 cells per ml), which represents a challenge for their isolation [36].

Table 1

Different techniques used for circulating tumor cell isolation, enrichment and characterization in colorectal cancer

TechniqueDescriptionRef.
CTCs‘ isolation and enrichmentImmunomagnetic separation
CellSearch®Enrichment of CTCs is achieved by using ferrofluids coated with EpCAM antibodies. Every tumor cell with a profile of EpCAM+, CD45- and 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole+ is considered a CTC. This technique is the only one approved by the Food and Drug Administration although it remains limited to isolation of epithelial tumor cells only[1]
[37]
Adna testEnrichment of CTCs is achieved by using magnetic beads coated with EpCAM and mucin 1 antibodies, in breast and colorectal cancer[38]
[39]
Size based separation
Isolation by size
of epithelial
tumor cells
This technique was developed by Giovanna Vona and her team in 2 000. It provides morphological, immunocytological and genetic characterization of CTCs. A small amount of blood is filtered. This filtration allows blood cells to pass and contain CTCs due to their larger size[40]
Screen cellThe blood flow passes through a microporous membrane filter attached to a metal ring placed between a filtration reservoir and a detachable nozzle which guides the insertion of a collection tube to vacuum the blood through an IS leaving the CTCs on it[16]
[41]
Density based separation
Density gradient centrifugation/CellBlockAfter centrifuging diluted blood with Ficoll-Paque, isolation of CTCs is done from the buffy coat that contains peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Then, the cell suspension will be subjected to:
CytoSpin to finally obtain slides of CTCs fixed by ethanol and ready for characterization
Construction of a cellblock with solidifying agents such as gelatin or HistoGel
[42]
[43]
RosettesepThis assay is the only EpCAM-independent enrichment method to detect CTCs. It is based on negative enrichment by leukocyte depletion. Unwanted cells are crosslinked to red blood cells forming immunorosettes[44]
Microfluidic technologies
CEE technologyCEE is a platform enriching rare cells by combining antibody-functionalized surfaces with a microfluidics channel. Using functionalized posts and particular antibodies that only adhere to target cells, the CEE system captures cells as they pass past it. Cells that have been captured can be used for additional research. The cell sample remains suitable for characterization[45]
CTCs’characterizationImmune approaches
ImmunocytochemistryThis technique is used to characterize the isolated CTCs. It is used to study the expression of a specific protein or antigen in CTCs. The target antigen is combined with a specific primary antibody. Then the reaction can be visualized by an amplification/revelation system
[46]
EPISPOTThe EPISPOT plate is composed of a nitrocellulose membrane precoated with a specific antibody targeting CTCs
DNA and RNA approaches
Multiplex PCRAfter DNA extraction, multiplex PCR consists of using polymerase chain reaction to amplify numerous different DNA sequences at the same time. Thus, many genes can be targeted on the CTCs. More than one pair of primers is required in the same reaction. The primers can specifically combine with their corresponding DNA template, and more than one DNA fragment will be amplified in one reaction simultaneously[39]
[47]
[48]
RT-PCRAfter RNA extraction, RNA is reverse transcribed into complementary DNA. Then, specific DNA target mutations are amplified using PCR. This technique is characterized by its high sensitivity and specificity. It gives the opportunity to study the mutations in CTCs[31]
RT-qPCRQuantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) is used when the starting material is RNA. The cDNA is then used as the template for the qPCR reaction. The latter enables monitoring of the amplification in real time. This technique offers the possibility to profile the gene expression of the isolated CTCs[49]
[48]

[i] CEE – cell enrichment extraction, CTCs – circulating tumor cells, EpCAM – epithelial cell adhesion molecule, IS – isolation system

Some techniques are preferred to others, especially the immunomagnetic ones due to their sensitivity to detect CTCs using EpCAM antibodies.

Isolation and circulating tumor cell enrichment

Size based isolation

Isolation by size of epithelial tumor cells (ISET) and ScreenCell are two methods for isolating CTCs from whole blood based on their size and membrane capacity. Being larger than the other blood cells, CTCs are promptly isolated (Table 1).

Isolation through immunoaffinity

Targeting the epithelial markers such as EpCAM is one of the assays used to select CTCs positively, e.g. CellSearch, Adna Test. These techniques use immunomagnetic beads coated with EpCAM antibodies. Other immunoassays proceed by CD45 expressed cell depletion such as epithelial immunospot (Table 1).

Density based separation

Density gradient centrifugation of diluted blood allows the enrichment of CTCs from the buffy coat containing peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) (Table 1).

Characterization of circulating tumor cells

After isolation and enrichment of CTCs, their characterization may be done through immunoassays such as immunocytochemistry or using molecular approaches (Multiplex PCR, RT-PCR, RT-qPCR) (Table 1).

The detection and utilization of CTCs in a routine clinical setting are cost-effective because conventional patient management and monitoring techniques are either time-consuming or very costly. And since one of the major advantages of CTCs as a liquid biopsy is the possibility of repeated analyses, it would be economically challenging to implement them in cancer management unless further advances are made in reducing the cost of conventional techniques while increasing their effectiveness.

Furthermore, there are several limits in the detection of CTCs regarding some techniques, especially those targeting epithelial markers of CTCs, which are suitable only for well-differentiated cancer cells but not for that undergoing the epithelial mesenchymal transition. Other limitations are viability of CTCs after their detection, the fact that techniques using immunomagnetic CTC enrichment by antibodies are less sensitive in the early stages of tumor development, and approaches using immunomagnetic beads coated by antibodies present a possibility of false-positive findings due to expression of a selection marker being present in other cells [50]. Other techniques are size dependent, like ISET; it cannot discriminate between malignant and benign cells and the diameter of the pores may allow small tumor cells to pass through, making this approach less sensitive [51]. In molecular approaches there is no morphological confirmation of the isolated CTCs [50].

Clinical utility of circulating tumor cells in colorectal cancer patients

Circulating tumor cells represent a new category of bio-- markers; these tumor cells play a massive role in the screening of several tumors including lung, breast and prostate cancer [1, 38, 52]. Isolating CTCs has been the aim of numerous studies as well as associating their count with the histopathological features and predicting the outcome of the disease and the response of the patients regarding the treatment.

As a serum biomarker for CRC, it was crucial to study whether there is an association between CEA and CTCs. A significant correlation was reported between high CTCs at baseline and the rate of CEA along with a high tumor/liver ratio [53]. According to Aggarwal et al., associating CTCs with CEA might add predictive information in terms of prognosis: a cut-off of CTCs ≥ 3/7.5 ml with CEA < 50 ng/ml predicts a decrease in survival [54]. A study conducted by Yang et al. suggested that the combination of CTCs with the tumor marker CEA has better OS prediction than individual CTCs or CEA and serves as a more effective prediction model in patients with CRC [55].

Cytokeratins 20 is a well-known CRC biomarker. In colon cancer patients, presence of CTCs which express CK20 is associated with a significantly higher risk of developing a recurrent disease compared to the group without CTCs [31].

In a study aiming to highlight the clinical relevance of EMT in CTCs from metastatic CRC patients, those who do not express CK20 may express phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3Ka) and protein kinase B (Akt2), whose expression has been implicated in EMT and cancer stem cell renewal [48].

Correlation between CTC count and TNM stages was the aim of Eliasova’s study conducted on 98 patients. Circulating tumor cells were detectable in all the stages with high percentages especially in Stage II (92.86%) although this result was statistically non-significant [56]. In contrast, in a prospective study conducted on 287 non-metastatic CRC patients, the association between CTCs and tumor stages was significant [57]. Patients with a stage IV CRC and a diffuse metastasis had a high number of CTCs compared to those with a limited metastasis to lung or liver with a low number of CTCs [58].

Patients suffering from a non-metastatic CRC and with a high CTC count (> 5 CTCs/2 ml) may develop distant metastasis in contrast to patients with a CTC count < 5. Thus CTCs may be considered as an independent prognostic marker for non-metastatic CRC patients with high risk of early recurrence [59]. This conclusion is in concordance with Thorsteinsson et al., who found a low rate of CTCs in non-metastatic colon cancer and it decreased post-operatively [60].

Lung and liver are the main sites of metastasis in CRC patients. A peak of CTCs was observed after the resection of the metastasis [61]. Furthermore, they found that CTCs express macrophage and leukocyte markers such as CD14 and CD45 so they hypothesized that CTCs can fuse with macrophages so that they can be tolerated by the immune system [61]. Recently, these cells have been described as circulating hybrid cells. They are also used as biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and monitoring; indeed dual expression of CK and CD45 was reported to be associated with a worse prognosis [62].

Among the genetic factors of developing CRC, there is KRAS mutation. To determine the origin of the CTCs and demonstrate that they are colorectal tumor cells, it was crucial to research the KRAS mutation in CTCs. Buim et al. found concordance between CTCs and the primitive tumor in term of KRAS mutation [40]. Adding to that, the presence of KRAS mutation is a specific predictive marker for inefficacy of cetuximab, which is a monoclonal antibody that specifically blocks epidermal growth factor receptor [63].

The association between the progression of CTCs during the treatment and the relapse was significant (p = 0.029) in the study carried out by Garrigós et al. [64]. A high number of CTCs predict a decrease in OS in advanced CRC patients receiving cetuximab as a third line treatment combined with chemotherapy [63]. The screening of CTCs in the follow-up may predict a decrease in the survival of the patients with a positive CTC status [65]. Even at an early assessment, CTC status during treatment was significantly associated with tumor response: patients who had an unfavorable CTC changed profile did not respond to the treatment. Therefore, these patients had a significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and OS in contrast to those harboring a favorable CTC profile. Moreover, CTC status assessed early during treatment with an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody may predict treatment failure in advance compared to imaging-based tools [39].

Predicting response to treatment has been the aim of numerous studies. A decrease in the rate of CTCs or their disappearance is correlated with the efficiency of the treatment in metastatic CRC patients, whereas their continuous appearance reveals progression of the tumor [38]. Enumeration of CTCs before and during treatment can be an independent prognostic marker for PFS and OS. Patients with a low number of CTCs during the first chemotherapy had a good outcome in contrast to those with a persistently high number of CTCs [66]. This study offers the possibility of molecular characterization of CTCs in order to create a personalized and targeted therapy [49]. A Spanish study carried on 180 metastatic CRC patients receiving first line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab showed that enumeration of CTCs before treatment is a strong and independent prognostic factor for the results of PFS and OS. Thus a change in the number of CTCs during treatment defined 3 groups: patients with a number below 3 have a long PFS and OS; patients with a high number of CTCs before and during treatment have a short PFS and OS; and patients in whom the number converted from high to low have an intermediate result [67]. A Chinese team studied the count of CTCs and the prognosis of patients after platinum-based first line chemotherapy: patients with presence of CTCs suffered from a short DFS after receiving the treatment (p < 0.01) compared to the patients from the CTC- group. They also found that a high count of CTCs was associated with high expression of vimentin, E-cadherin, RAS mutation, tumor location and tumor M-stage. They also suggested that targeted therapy with cetuximab might have worse efficacy in patients with a high CTC count [68].

The clinical potential of isolating CTCs in CRC patients has been shown by several studies; a pilot study conducted by Cohen et al. on 430 patients with metastatic CRC aimed to study the relationship of CTCs with tumor response, PFS and OS. They demonstrated that a number of 3 or more CTCs in 7.5 ml of blood was correlated with a decrease in PFS and OS whether it is at baseline or during treatment. This study was the first to set a cutoff of 3 CTCs, with CellSearch, which is associated with a worse prognosis [69]. Therefore, CTC analysis using CellSearch technology as routine procedure is applied in therapeutic management of metastatic breast, colorectal and prostate cancer patients. The same team found in another study that OS decreased statistically significantly in metastatic CRC patients with unfavorable CTCs, but when the patients recovered from unfavorable to favorable in terms of CTCs, consequently there was an increase of PFS and OS [70]. Also, Barbazan et al. demonstrated that before treatment, PFS and OS of the patients with a high level of the CTC markers was 6.3 and 12.7 months respectively against 12.7 and 24.2 months in patients with a low level of CTCs [71]. Li et al. found an association between the presence of CTC count and advanced age (≥ 63 years old; p = 0.037), a high platelet-lymphocyte ratio value (p = 0.008) and a high neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio value (p = 0.034). Also the CTC count was significantly associated with PFS of metastatic CRC patients who received chemotherapy [72].

Detection and enumeration of CTCs plays an outstanding role in predicting the prognosis and cancer management as well as in predicting a relapse in the future. Several recent studies have demonstrated that CTC count was an indicator of poor prognosis (Table 2).

Table 2

Prognostic/predictive value of circulating tumor cells in colorectal cancer

Patients and CTC detection methodsCTCs (% of positivity or number)Prognostic valueRef.
61 patients/CellSearch44.3% (27/60): at least one CTC was detectedHeterozygosity and heterogeneity in KRAS status amid CTCs compared to primary tumors[73]
50 patients/CellSearch64% of patients at baseline had detectable CTCsA decrease in PFS in patients with ≥ 3 CTCs after treatment with regorafenib[37]
130 patients/MACS51.54% (67/130)Postoperative CTCs is not only an independent factor in predicting tumor recurrence in stage II–III CRC, but also an indicator of poor prognosis when associated with female gender, older age, higher TNM stage, and preoperative CEA levels[74]
80 patients/GILUPI
CellCollector, CellSearch
31.3% (25/80) by CellSearch and 41.3% (33/80) by CellCollectorPresence of CTCs as an indicator of poor prognosis when correlated with advanced “Union for International Cancer Control” stage, distant metastasis, presence of lymph node metastases, and reduced overall survival[75]
57 patients/(44) NYONE, (31) ScreenCell,
(41) Cytokeratin-20 RT-qPCR
36.4% (NYONE), 100% (ScreenCell), 80.5% (PCR)All methods revealed a positive correlation of CTC presence and higher tumor burden (advanced stages)[41]
589 patients/CellSearch41% (241): ≥ 3 baseline CTCs count/7.5 ml≥ 3 baseline CTC count as an indicator of worse prognosis when associated with worse performance status, stage IV at diagnosis, three metastatic sites (liver, bone, lung) and elevated CEA levels[76]
175 patients
and 127 patients/CTCBIOPSY, Immuno-cytochemistry
42.29% (74/175) pre-MCTC, 32.28% (41/127) post-MCTCsMesenchymal CTC status as a sign of poor prognosis when associated with unfavorable clinicopathological parameters such as presence of lymphovascular invasion and advanced TNM stage. The persistent positivity of mesenchymal CTCs before and after anticancer therapy was an independent risk factor affecting the OS and RFS of CRC patients[77]
40 patients/flow cytometry≥ 4 CTCs: 60 % (24/40) at T1 (skin incision), 72.5% (29/40) at T2 (after surgical resection)Elevated CTC counts at T2 were significantly associated with female sex, vascular invasion, tumor localization in the colon and metastatic lymph nodes[78]
149 patients/immuno nano-magnetic spheres48.32% (72)
> 3 CTCs/7.5 ml
Elevated CTC counts were associated with increasing tumor stage and T stage, negative changes in the survival curve and risk curve escalated more rapidly in the CTCs+ group[79]
186 patients/MiSelect R system37% (69)CTCs count of ≥ 5 as an indicator of worse OS as well as poor prognosis when associated with lower CEA levels, higher CA19-9 levels, and both node status and presence of distant metastasis[55]
218 patients/CellSearch24% (51) at baseline, 38% (83) at the time of disease progressionGreat prognosis observed in case of total CTC absence while their presence at any timepoint is associated with a poor prognosis (lower PFS and OS)[80]

[i] CEA – carcinoembryonic antigen, CRC – colorectal cancer, CTCs – circulating tumor cells, PFS – progression-free survival, TNM – tumor-node-metastasis

Table 2 shows the prognostic and predictive value of CTC detection in patients with CRC. The table also shows values such as the number of patients, the methods used and the ratio of CTC positivity.

Conclusions

Through this review of the literature, we wanted to highlight all the aspects related to CTCs, namely the techniques of detection and characterization on the one hand, but also the role of these cells in the management of patients with CRC. This review was intended to be exhaustive in order to allow a useful and efficient adjustment of the undeniable role of this new type of markers in the management of CRC. CTCs are involved in the management of CRC in terms of therapeutic and prognostic management, including the need for CTC status in order to decide on the course of treatment.

This review highlights the clinical potential of CTCs in CRC patients. As a biomarker, CTCs play a major role in predicting the response of the patients regarding the treatment and a relapse in the future.

Notes

[3] Conflicts of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1 

Ligthart ST, Coumans FAW, Bidard FC, et al. Circulating tumor cells count and morphological features in breast, colorectal and prostate cancer. PLoS One 2013; 8: e67148.

2 

Matikas A, Voutsina A, Trypaki M, Georgoulias V. Role of circulating free DNA in colorectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2016; 8: 810.

3 

Nel I, Gauler TC, Bublitz K, et al. Circulating tumor cell composition in renal cell carcinoma. PLoS One 2016; 11: 1-14.

4 

Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68: 7-30.

5 

Nguyen HT, Duong HQ. The molecular characteristics of colorectal cancer: implications for diagnosis and therapy (review). Oncol Lett 2018; 16: 9-18.

6 

Wu X, Lin H, Li S. Prognoses of different pathological subtypes of colorectal cancer at different stages: a population-based retrospective cohort study. BMC Gastroenterol 2019; 19: 1-8.

7 

Arvelo F, Sojo F, Cotte C. Biology of colorectal cancer. Ecancermedicalscience 2015; 9: 520.

8 

Hossain MS, Karuniawati H, Jairoun AA, et al. Colorectal cancer: a review of carcinogenesis, global epidemiology, current challenges, risk factors, preventive and treatment strategies. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14: 1732.

9 

Botteri E, Borroni E, Sloan EK, et al. Smoking and colorectal cancer risk, overall and by molecular subtypes: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2020; 115: 1940-1949.

10 

Jochem C, Leitzmann M. Obesity and cancer. Recent Results Cancer Res 2016; 208: 17-41.

11 

Troche JR, Mayne ST, Freedman ND, et al. Alcohol consumption-related metabolites in relation to colorectal cancer and adenoma: two case-control studies using serum biomarkers. PLoS One 2016; 11: 1-14.

12 

De Divitiis C, Nasti G, Montano M, Fisichella R, Iaffaioli RV, Berretta M. Prognostic and predictive response factors in colorectal cancer patients: between hope and reality. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 15049-15059.

13 

Vatandoost N, Ghanbari J, Mojaver M, et al. Early detection of colorectal cancer: from conventional methods to novel biomarkers. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2016; 142: 341-351.

14 

Erstad DJ, Tumusiime G, Cusack JC. Prognostic and predictive biomarkers in colorectal cancer: implications for the clinical surgeon. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 22: 3433-3450.

15 

Fleming M, Ravula S, Tatishchev SF, Wang HL. Colorectal carcinoma: pathologic aspects. J Gastrointest Oncol 2012; 3: 153-173.

16 

Desitter I, Guerrouahen BS, Benali-Furet N, et al. A new device for rapid isolation by size and characterization of rare circulating tumor cells. Anticancer Res 2011; 31: 427-441.

17 

Coppedè F, Lopomo A, Spisni R, Migliore L. Genetic and epigenetic biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 943-956.

18 

Zhang K, Civan J, Mukherjee S, Patel F, Yang H. Genetic variations in colorectal cancer risk and clinical outcome. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 4167-4177.

19 

Meng M, Zhong K, Jiang T, Liu Z, Kwan HY, Su T. The current understanding on the impact of KRAS on colorectal cancer. Biomed Pharmacother 2021; 140: 111717.

20 

Kaur J, Singh Sara JD, Grothey A. Colorectal cancer. In: Cardio-oncology practice manual: a companion to braunwald ’s heart disease. 1st edition. Elsevier 2023, 341-348.

21 

Tan CRC, Zhou L, El-Deiry WS. Circulating tumor cells versus circulating tumor DNA in colorectal cancer: pros and cons. Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep 2016; 12: 151-161.

22 

Joosse SA, Gorges TM, Pantel K. Biology, detection, and clinical implications of circulating tumor cells. EMBO Mol Med 2015; 7: 1-11.

23 

Nieva JJ, Kuhn P. Fluid biopsy for solid tumors: a patient’s companion for lifelong characterization of their disease. Futur Oncol 2012; 8: 989-998.

24 

Mitchell MJ, King MR. Computational and experimental models of cancer cell response to fluid shear stress. Front Oncol 2013; 3: 1-11.

25 

Cao H, Xu E, Liu H, Wan L, Lai M. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in colorectal cancer metastasis: a system review. Pathol Res Pract 2015; 211: 557-569.

26 

Douma S, Laar T Van, Zevenhoven J, Meuwissen R. Suppression of anoikis and induction of metastasis by the neurotrophic receptor TrkB. Nature 2004; 430: 1034-1039.

27 

Steinert G, Schölch S, Niemietz T, et al. Immune escape and survival mechanisms in circulating tumor cells of colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 2014; 74: 1694-1704.

28 

Schnell U, Cirulli V, Giepmans BNG. EpCAM: Structure and function in health and disease. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr 2013; 1828: 1989-2001.

29 

Han S, Zong S, Shi Q, et al. Is Ep-CAM expression a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for colorectal cancer? A systematic meta-analysis. EBioMedicine 2017; 20: 61-69.

30 

Chatterjee S. Cytokeratins in health and disease. Oral Maxillofac Pathol J 2012; 3: 198-202.

31 

Hinz S, Hendricks A, Wittig A, et al. Detection of circulating tumor cells with CK20 RT-PCR is an independent negative prognostic marker in colon cancer patients–a prospective study. BMC Cancer 2017; 17: 1-11.

32 

Yan X, Yan L, Liu S, Shan Z, Tian Y, Jin Z. N-cadherin, a novel prognostic biomarker, drives malignant progression of colorectal cancer. Mol Med Rep 2015; 12: 2999-3006.

33 

Po JW, Roohullah A, Lynch D, et al. Improved ovarian cancer EMT-CTC isolation by immunomagnetic targeting of epithelial EpCAM and mesenchymal N-cadherin. J Circ Biomarkers 2018; 7: 1-10.

34 

Niknami Z, Eslamifar A, Emamirazavi A, Ebrahimi A, Shirkoohi R. The association of vimentin and fibronectin gene expression with epithelial-mesenchymal transition and tumor malignancy in colorectal carcinoma. EXCLI J 2017; 16: 1009-1017.

35 

Satelli A, Batth I, Brownlee Z, et al. EMT circulating tumor cells detected by cell-surface vimentin are associated with prostate cancer progression. Oncotarget 2017; 8: 49329-49337.

36 

Sharma S, Zhuang R, Long M, et al. Circulating tumor cell isolation, culture, and downstream molecular analysis. Biotechnol Adv 2018; 36: 1063-1078.

37 

Matsusaka S, Hanna DL, Ning Y, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor mRNA expression: a potential molecular escape mechanism from regorafenib. Cancer Sci 2020; 111: 441-450.

38 

Hauch S, Zimmermann S, Lankiewicz S, Zieglschmid V, Böcher O, Albert WH. The clinical significance of circulating tumour cells in breast cancer and colorectal cancer patients. Anticancer Res 2007; 27: 1337-1341.

39 

Musella V, Pietrantonio F, Di Buduo E, et al. Circulating tumor cells as a longitudinal biomarker in patients with advanced chemorefractory, RAS-BRAF wild-type colorectal cancer receiving cetuximab or panitumumab. Int J Cancer 2015; 137: 1467-1474.

40 

Buim ME, Fanelli MF, Souza VS, et al. Detection of KRAS mutations in circulating tumor cells from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer Biol Ther 2015; 16: 1289-1295.

41 

Hendricks A, Brandt B, Geisen R, et al. Isolation and enumeration of CTC in colorectal cancer patients : introduction of a novel cell imaging approach and comparison to cellular and molecular detection techniques. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12: 2643.

42 

Aarab M, Saadi S, Tabyaoui I, Badre L, Jouti NT. An improved method for paraffin-embedded cytological preparations : application to the detection of circulating tumour cells. Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2023; 27: 35-40.

43 

Nam SJ, Yeo HY, Chang HJ, Kim BH, Hong EK, Park JW. A new cell block method for multiple immunohistochemical analysis of circulating tumor cells in patients with liver cancer. Cancer Res Treat 2016; 48: 1229-1242.

44 

Grillet F, Bayet E, Villeronce O, et al. Circulating tumour cells from patients with colorectal cancer have cancer stem cell hallmarks in ex vivo culture. Gut 2017; 66: 1802-1810.

45 

Pecot CV, Bischoff FZ, Mayer JA, et al. NIH Public Access 2012; 1: 580-586.

46 

Oh BY, Kim J, Lee WY, Kim HC. A new size-based platform for circulating tumor cell detection in colorectal cancer patients. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2017; 16: 214-219.

47 

Markou A, Strati A, Malamos N, Georgoulias V, Lianidou ES. Molecular characterization of circulating tumor cells in breast cancer by a liquid bead array hybridization assay. Clin Chem 2011; 57: 421-430.

48 

Ning Y, Zhang W, Hanna DL, et al. Clinical relevance of EMT and stem-like gene expression in circulating tumor cells of metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Pharmacogenomics J 2016.

49 

De Albuquerque A, Kubisch I, Stölzel U, et al. Prognostic and predictive value of circulating tumor cell analysis in colorectal cancer patients. J Transl Med 2012; 10: 1-6.

50 

Yadav A, Kumar A, Siddiqui MH. Detection of circulating tumour cells in colorectal cancer: Emerging techniques and clinical implications. World J Clin Oncol 2021; 12: 1169-1182.

51 

Hofman V, Ilie M, Selva E, Hofman P. Les cellules tumorales circulantes : méthodes de détection et intérêt en oncologie. Rev Franc Lab 2013; 448: 63-70.

52 

Nel I, Baba HA, Ertle J, et al. Individual profiling of circulating tumor cell composition and therapeutic outcome in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Transl Oncol 2013; 6: 420-428.

53 

Kaifi JT, Kunkel M, Das A, et al. Circulating tumor cell isolation during resection of colorectal cancer lung and liver metastases: a prospective trial with different detection techniques. Cancer Biol Ther 2015; 16: 699-708.

54 

Aggarwal C, Meropol NJ, Punt CJ, et al. Relationship among circulating tumor cells, CEA and overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2013; 24: 420-428.

55 

Yang C, Lin C, Huang S, Lu R, Lo L. Enhanced prognostic value of combined circulating tumor cells and serum carcinoembryonic antigen in patients with colorectal cancer. J Chin Med Assoc 2023; 86: 465-471.

56 

Eliasova P, Pinkas M, Kolostova K, Gurlich R, Bobek V. Circulating tumor cells in different stages of colorectal cancer. Folia Histochem Cytobiol 2017; 55: 1-5.

57 

Bork U, Rahbari NN, Schölch S, et al. Circulating tumour cells and outcome in non-metastatic colorectal cancer: A prospective study. Br J Cancer 2015; 112: 1306-1313.

58 

Kaifi JT, Kunkel M, Zhu J, et al. Circulating tumor cells are associated with diffuse spread in stage IV colorectal cancer patients. Cancer Biol Ther 2013; 14: 1174-1181.

59 

Tsai WS, Chen JS, Shao HJ, et al. Circulating tumor cell count correlates with colorectal neoplasm progression and is a prognostic marker for distant metastasis in non-metastatic patients. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 4-11.

60 

Thorsteinsson M, Söletormos G, Jess P. Low number of detectable circulating tumor cells in non-metastatic colon cancer. Anticancer Res 2011; 31: 613-617.

61 

Kaifi JT, Kunkel M, Dicker DT, et al. Circulating tumor cell levels are elevated in colorectal cancer patients with high tumor burden in the liver. Cancer Biol Ther 2015; 16: 690-698.

62 

Kaigorodova EV, Kozik AV, Zavaruev IS, Grishchenko MY. Hybrid/atypical forms of circulating tumor cells: current state of the art. Biochem 2022; 87: 380-390.

63 

Kuboki Y, Matsusaka S, Minowa S, et al. Circulating tumor cell (CTC) count and epithelial growth factor receptor expression on CTCs as biomarkers for cetuximab efficacy in advanced colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res 2013; 33: 3905-3910.

64 

Garrigós N, Gallego J, Guillén-Ponce C, et al. Circulating tumour cell analysis as an early marker for relapse in stage II and III colorectal cancer patients: a pilot study. Clin Transl Oncol 2010; 12: 142-147.

65 

Romiti A, Raffa S, Di Rocco R, et al. Circulating tumor cells count predicts survival in colorectal cancer patients. J Gastrointest Liver Dis 2014; 23: 279-284.

66 

Tol J, Koopman M, Miller MC, et al. Circulating tumour cells early predict progression-free and overall survival in advanced colorectal cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and targeted agents. Ann Oncol 2010; 21: 1006-1012.

67 

Sastre J, Maestro ML, Gómez-España A, et al. Circulating tumor cell count is a prognostic factor in metastatic colorectal cancer patients receiving first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab: a Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumors study. Oncologist 2012; 17: 947-955.

68 

Yu J, Zhang J, Peng T, Fei Z, Jin L, Yang M. Predictive value of circulating tumor cells in prognosis of stage III/IV colorectal cancer after oxaliplatin-based first-line chemotherapy. In Vivo (Brooklyn) 2022; 36: 806-813.

69 

Cohen SJ, Punt CJA, Iannotti N, et al. Relationship of circulating tumor cells to tumor response, progression-free survival, and overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 3213-3221.

70 

Cohen SJ, Punt CJA, Iannotti N, et al. Prognostic significance of circulating tumor cells in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2009; 20: 1223-129.

71 

Barbazan J, Muinelo-Romay L, Vieito M, et al. A multimarker panel for circulating tumor cells detection predicts patient outcome and therapy response in metastatic colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer 2014; 135: 2633-2643.

72 

Li H, Liu Q, Liang S, et al. Circulating tumor cells and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio are predictive markers for metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Transl Cancer Res 2021; 10: 288-297.

73 

Kondo Y, Hayashi K, Kawakami K, Miwa Y, Hayashi H. KRAS mutation analysis of single circulating tumor cells from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer 2017; 17: 311.

74 

Wang D, Yang Y, Jin L, et al. Prognostic models based on postoperative circulating tumor cells can predict poor tumor recurrence-free survival in patients with stage II–III colorectal cancer. J Cancer 2019; 10: 4552–4563.

75 

Dizdar L, Fluegen G, Dalum G, et al. Detection of circulating tumor cells in colorectal cancer patients using the GILUPI CellCollector : results from a prospective, single-center study. Mol Oncol 2019; 13: 1548-1558.

76 

Sastre J, Orden V De, Martínez A, et al. Association between baseline circulating tumor cells, molecular tumor profiling and clinical characteristics in a large cohort of chemo-naïve metastatic colorectal cancer patients prospectively collected. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2020; 19: e110-e116.

77 

Shi DD, Yang CG, Han S, Wang SHUYI, Xiong BIN. Dynamic evaluation of mesenchymal circulating tumor cells in patients with colorectal cancer: clinical associations and prognostic value. Oncol Rep 2020; 44: 757-767.

78 

Mușină AM, Zlei M, Mentel M, et al. Evaluation of circulating tumor cells in colorectal cancer using flow cytometry. J Int Med Res 2021; 49: 300060520980215.

79 

Pan R, Sun J, Yu C. Detection and clinical value of circulating tumor cells as an assisted prognostic marker in colorectal cancer patients. Cancer Manag Res 2021; 13: 4567-4578.

80 

Magri V, Marino L, Nicolazzo C, et al. Prognostic role of circulating tumor cell trajectories in metastatic colorectal cancer. Cells 2023; 12: 1-12.

Copyright: © 2023 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.