Current issue
Archive
Videos
Articles in press
About the journal
Supplements
Editorial board
Reviewers
Abstracting and indexing
Subscription
Contact
Instructions for authors
Publication charge
Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
|
3/2010
vol. 112 abstract:
Original paper
Clinical evaluation of the ICare tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure
Patrycja Krzyżanowska-Berkowska
1
,
Magdalena Asejczyk-Widlicka
2
Online publish date: 2010/10/12
View
full text
Get citation
ENW EndNote
BIB JabRef, Mendeley
RIS Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
Purpose: To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP), values obtained with the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), and to evaluate the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT), and radius of the corneal curvature
(R) on IOP measurements. Material and methods: Eighty four eyes of 48 subjects (65 eyes of glaucoma patients and 19 eyes of healthy volunteers), were examined with ICare and Goldmann tonometers. Central corneal thickness was determined by ultrasound pachymetry. Corneal radius of curvature was determined using corneal topography. Results: There was no significant difference between IOP readings with ICare and GAT. Intraocular pressure measurements were found to be higher with the ICare tonometer, both in glaucoma patients (15.3 ± 4.0 mmHg), and normal subjects (14.4 ± 3.0 mmHg). ICare-GAT mean difference was 1.1 ± 3.6 mmHg (95% CI, -6.1-8.3 mmHg), for glaucoma patients and 1.8 ± 3.2 mmHg (95% CI, -4.6-8.2 mmHg), for healthy volunteers. Using CCT patients were divided into 2 groups: 1) thinnest corneas – CCT≤556 μm and 2), thickest corneas – CCT>556 μm. In the group of thinnest corneas there was no correlation between IOP, CCT and R. In thickest corneas there was significant correlation between IOP readings obtained by ICare and CCT (r = -0.4, p<0.01), and mean radius (R) (r = 0.5, p<0.001). Conclusions: Measurements of IOP using the ICare rebound tonometer are in good agreement with Goldmann applanation tonometer, although influenced by CCT. |
|