eISSN: 2300-6722
ISSN: 1899-1874
Medical Studies/Studia Medyczne
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
4/2020
vol. 36
 
Share:
Share:
abstract:
Original paper

Comparison of different sizes of Iranian bone allograft particles (CenoBone) in preserving grafted socket dimensions

Leila Golpasand Hagh
1
,
Seyed Alireza Mousavi Azarang
1

  1. Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
Medical Studies/Studia Medyczne 2020; 36 (4): 282–289
Online publish date: 2020/12/31
View full text Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
Introduction
Teeth are extracted for a variety of reasons, including severe decay, endodontic problems, severe periodontal destruction, inadequate residual crown structure, root resorption, iatrogenic factors such as perforations, injuries due to trauma, and cosmetic problems. Aim of the research: To compare different sizes of Iranian bone allograft particles (CenoBone) in preserving grafted socket dimensions.

Material and methods
It was an experimental study. Twenty healthy patients who had 25 unpreserved single-rooted teeth were included in the study. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. In the first group, allograft particles with a size of 150–500 µm and in the second group, particles with a size of 1000–2000 µm were placed in the socket. Then, Iranian resorbable membrane (CenoBone) was placed on the socket openings and buccal wall and was initially closed by a coronalizing buccal flap. Buccal wall height and ridge width in the two groups were compared immediately after surgery and 4 months after surgery with radiological evaluation (cone-beam computed tomography – CBCT) of the region.

Results
In both groups the horizontal dimension was significantly different after treatment (p < 0.002). In both groups the vertical height was significantly different after treatment (first group: p < 0.001, second group: p < 0.003).

Conclusions
Use of CenoBone to fill bone socket is essential to preservation alveolar bone dimensions, because use of this material improves soft and hard tissue.

keywords:

CenoBone, grafted, dimension, bone allograft particles

Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.