en POLSKI
eISSN: 2956-7548
ISSN: 1734-1558
Forum Ortodontyczne / Orthodontic Forum
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Special Issues Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
Search
Editorial Policies
Sarajevo Declaration on Integrity and Visibility of Scholarly Publications
2/2020
vol. 16
 
Share:
Send email
Share:
Review article

Comparison of direct and indirect bonding methods for orthodontic brackets. Literature review

Marcin Szerszeń
1
,
Julia Wiśniewska
2
,
Monika Garbacz
3
,
Anastazja Żuławnik
1
,
Małgorzata Zielonka
2
,
Barbara Pietrzak-Bilińska
3

  1. Katedra Protetyki Stomatologicznej, Warszawski Uniwersytet Medyczny

    Department of Prosthodontic, Medical University of Warsaw

  2. Studenckie Koło Naukowe, Zakład Ortodoncji, Warszawski Uniwersytet Medyczny

    Students’ Scientific Group, Department of Orthodontics, Medical Univeristy of Warsaw

  3. Zakład Ortodoncji, Warszawski Uniwersytet Medyczny

    Department of Orthodontics, Medical University of Warsaw

Forum Ortod 2020; 16 (2): 101-7
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/for.2020.97337
Online publish date: 2020/07/18
Article file
- Szerszen.pdf  [2.10 MB]
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 
1. Taylor NG, Cook PA. The reliability of positioning preadjusted brackets: an in vitro study. Br J Orthod 1992; 19: 25-34.
2. Hodge TM, Dhopatkar AA, Rock WP, Spary DJ. The Burton ap- proach to indirect bonding. J Orthod 2001; 28: 267-70.
3. Kothari A. Indirect bonding technique. World J Orthod 2006; 7: 389-93.
4. Thomas RG. Indirect bonding: Simplicity in action. J Clin Orthod 1979; 13: 93-105.
5. Hickham JH. Predictable indirect bonding. J Clin Orthod 1993; 27: 215-7.
6. Ciuffolo F, Tenisci N, Pollutri L. Modified bonding technique for a standardized and effective indirect bonding procedure. Am J Or- thod Dentofacial Orthop 2012; 141: 504-9.
7. Nichols DA, Gardner G, Carballeyra AD. Reproducibility of bracket positioning in the indirect bonding technique. Am J Orthod Den- tofacial Orthop 2013; 144: 770-6.
8. Silverman E, Cohen M, Gianelly AA, Dietz VS. A universal direct bonding system for both metal and plastic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1972; 62: 236-44.
9. Bozelli JV, Bigliazzi R, Barbosa HA, Ortolani CL, Bertoz FA, Faltin Junior K. Comparative study on direct and indirect bracket bond- ing techniques regarding time length and bracket detachment. Dent Press J Orthod 2013; 18: 51-7.
10. Castilla AE, Crowe JJ, Moses JR, Wang M, Ferracane JL, Covell DA. Measurement and comparison of bracket transfer accuracy of five indirect bonding techniques. Angle Orthod 2014; 84: 607-14.
11. DeahlST,SalomeN,HatchJP,RughJD.Practice-basedcomparison of direct and indirect bonding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 132: 738-42.
12. Gange P. More on indirect bonding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Or- thop 2000; 117: 18.
13. Aguirre MJ, King GJ, Waldron JM. Assessment of bracket place- ment and bond strength when comparing direct bonding to indi- rect bonding techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1982; 82: 269-76.
14. Hocevar RA, Vincent HF. Indirect versus direct bonding: bond- strength and failure location. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988; 94: 367-71.
15. Koo BC, Chung CH, Vanarsdall RL. Comparison of the accuracy of bracket placement between direct and indirect bonding tech- niques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 116: 346-51.
16. Read MJ, O’Brien KD. A clinical trial of an indirect bonding tech- nique with a visible light-cured adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990; 98: 259-62.
17. Rossouw PE, Bruwer HC, Stander IA. The rationale behind aviable alternative to direct bonding of orthodontic attachments.Indirect bonding. Ont Dent 1995; 72: 19-25.
18. Zanini MM, Nassar CA, Nassar PO, Busato P, Favarão J, Busato MCA. Periodontal conditions in orthodontic patients using direct and indirect bracket bonding techniques: A randomized study. J Dent Oral Hyg 2016; 8: 59-65.
19. Miles PG, Weyant RJ. A clinical comparison of two chemically- cured adhesives used for indirect bonding. J Orthod 2003; 30: 331-6.
20. KlockeA,TadicD,VaziriF,Kahl-NiekeB.Custombasepreagingin indirect bonding. Angle Orthod 2004; 74: 106-11.
21. ThiyagarajahS,SparyDJ,RockWP.Aclinicalcomparisonofbrack- et bond failures in association with direct and indirect bonding. J Orthod 2006; 33: 198-204.
22. Menini A, Cozzani M, Sfondrini MF, Scribante A, Cozzani P, Gan- dini P. A 15-month evaluation of bond failures of orthodontic brackets bonded with direct versus indirect bonding technique: a clinical trial. Prog Orthod 2014; 15: 67.
23. LiY,MeiL,WeiJ,YanX,ZhangX,ZhengW,LiYu.Effectiveness,ef- ficiency and adverse effects of using direct or indirect bonding technique in orthodontic patients: a systematic review and meta- analysis. BMC Oral Health 2019; 19: 137.
24. Sondhi A. Efficient and effective indirect bonding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 115: 352-9.
25. Zachrisson BU, Brobakken BO. Clinical comparison of direct ver- sus indirect bonding with different bracket types and adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1978; 74: 62-78.
26. BabiakM,KawalaB,AntoszewskaJ.Metodapośredniegoklejenia zamków ortodontycznych w aspekcie technicznym i klinicznym – przegląd piśmiennictwa. Forum Ortod 2010; 7: 17-27.
27. DalessandriD,DalessandriM,BonettiS.Effectivenessofanindi- rect bonding technique in reducing plaque accumulation around braces. Angle Orthod 2012; 2: 313-8.
This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.