Current issue
Archive
Manuscripts accepted
About the journal
Editorial board
Reviewers
Abstracting and indexing
Subscription
Contact
Instructions for authors
Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
|
3/2023
vol. 76 Original paper
Comparison of nano-silver fluoride, nano-hydroxyapatite and sodium fluoride varnishes in prevention and arrestment of initial carious lesions: a randomized controlled clinical trial
Nisreen Ibrahim Khan
1, 2
,
Salwa Adel Hegazy
1
,
Rasha Ibrahim Ramadan
1
J Stoma 2023; 76, 3: 151-160
Online publish date: 2023/09/20
Article file
- JoS-00785.pdf
[0.34 MB]
ENW EndNote
BIB JabRef, Mendeley
RIS Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
IntroductionDental caries is a chronic, multifactorial, transmissible and infectious disease which occurs as a result of a shift in the demineralization/re-mineralization equilibrium favoring net demineralization of the enamel. It is still a major health problem that affects primary and permanent teeth in deprived parts of the world despite dental care improvements [1]. Approximately, 2.43 billion people (36% of the population) in the world have dental caries in their permanent teeth [2].The initial carious lesion can be defined as a primary lesion which has not reached the stage of an established lesion with cavitation. Prevention and arrestment of initial carious lesions by re-mineralizing agents is required in order to reduce the need for therapeutic intervention, which is costly and difficult in many cases among children [3]. The application of topical fluoride can prevent dental caries by inhibiting demineralization of the crystal structures inside the tooth and enhancing remineralization [4]. Sodium fluoride varnish (NaF) is used as a type of topical fluoride treatments, and it is a safe way to protect the teeth whilst providing the highest and safest possible fluoride concentration. Furthermore, its sticky nature bonds with the tooth surface for several hours. Hence, this will prevent new carious lesions and extension of previous caries [5]. However, the fluoride depends on the quantity of calcium and phosphate ions obtainable in the oral fluid, thereby limiting remineralization [6]. The synthetic hydroxyapatite is a biocompatible and bioactive material and it is widely used in medicine and dentistry. This compound has a similar chemical composition to enamel but with larger particle size. Therefore, it is not suggested to repair the damaged enamel directly [7]. With the emergence of nanotechnology in the 21st century, nano-hydroxyapatite (n-HAP) has been synthesized to possess similar properties as a biological apatite, and it also has a higher solubility, surface energy and bioactivity in order to re-mineralize initial enamel caries [8]. However, its application in preventive dentistry should be investigated further. A silver based preparation, nano-silver fluoride (NSF) was introduced by Santos et al. [9] to combat the adverse effects of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) such as black discoloration of carious tissue and ulceration [10]. NSF is a new experimental formulation containing silver nanoparticles, chitosan and fluoride that have preventive and antimicrobial properties. It is safe to be used in humans and has effective antimicrobial properties against cariogenic bacteria [11]. NSF is available as a reddish yellow solution that proves to be stable for three years, low in cost and it does not stain the teeth [12, 13]. To the best of our knowledge, most studies that have evaluated the effectiveness of nano-anticaries agents (NSF and n-HAP) were in-vitro studies. In addition, there have been few published clinical trials on the effectiveness of these agents and no comparisons were made. ObjectivesThe aim of the present study was to compare between NSF, n-HAP and NaF varnishes in arrestment (inactivation) of initial enamel caries and preventing new caries in young permanent teeth through checking the value of arrested initial caries and new caries at the level of dental surfaces and at the level of children.Material and methodsRe-mineralizing agentsOne of the three dental varnishes compared in this study was commercially available and the others were made specially for this study.1) Preparation of NSF varnish: Targino et al.’s [13] formulation was followed by the Nano Gate Company in Cairo, Egypt (https://nanogate-eg.com/en/) in the preparation of NSF varnish. The chemical reduction of silver nitrate (AgNO3) with sodium borohydride (NaBH4), and the stabilizing substance chitosan biopolymer was used to create silver nanoparticles. Melting chitosan (2.5 mg/ml) in a 1% acetic acid solution was done. AgNO3 (1 ml, 0.11 M) was added to the solution, and the mixture was stirred magnetically until homogeneous. After that, the liquid was poured into an ice-cold bath, and freshly made NaBH4 (0.3 ml, 0.8 M) was added while vigorously swirling. The shift in color of the solution from colorless to light yellow and finally reddish signaled the beginning of the reduction of Ag+. After that, the flask was taken out of the ice bath, and sodium fluoride varnish (containing 22,600 ppm of fluorine) was added to increase the solution’s stability. Silver nanoparticles 400 μg/ml, sodium fluoride 22,600 ppm (μg/ml), and chitosan 2334 μg/ml are all present in the produced solution. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to measure the size and form of silver nanoparticles. The analysis showed that 99% of the silver nanoparticles were spherical and had a particle size of 10 ± 2.0 nm as in Figure 1. 2) Preparation of n-HAP varnish: Nano gate Company in Cairo, Egypt (https://nanogate-eg.com/en/) produced hydroxyapatite nanoparticles using the wet chemical approach, largely following Ferraz et al. [14]. At room temperature, calcium chloride was vigorously agitated in an aqueous solution. The calcium chloride solution was first progressively diluted with a solution of ammonium hydrogen phosphate, and then the pH was adjusted to 10 by dilution with an ammonia solution. After reaction at 40°C for 4 hours, the reaction continued and was stirred for an additional 16 hours at room temperature. The n-HAP white precipitate developed. 10Ca (OH)2 + 6H3PO4 → Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2 + 18H2O To formulate 60 ml of n-HAP 10% varnish, 6 g of n-HAP powder was weighed out on a sensitive balance (WTC 200, RADWAG, Poland) and dispersed in 60 ml of deionized water with stirring using a hot plate and stirrer (MSH-20A, Wetige®, Germany) for 30 min then 2.4 gm of carboxymethyl cellulose (Loba Chemie, India) was scattered gradually and gently over the solution under mild temperature with strong stirring to get a homogeneous varnish. TEM was used to assess the HAP’s n-size and form. According to the analysis, n-HAP was white needle-like and 150 nm ± 30 nm in size, as in Figure 2. 3) NaF varnish (Polimo dental varnish, Imicryl, Turkey): Commercially available in a disposable package of 0.4 ml, this varnish contains 5% sodium fluoride. It was chosen in accordance with a recently published study that examined the antibacterial effects of three types of common fluoride varnishes (Polimo dental varnish, Fluoro Dose varnishes, and MI varnish containing calcium phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-AC) by measuring the diameter of the inhibition zone against two cariogenic bacteria, Streptococcus mutans (S.M.) and Lactobacillus acidophilus (L.A.), and it was concluded that the use of these varnishes seems to be appropriate for preventing dental caries [15]. Clinical trialThis study was a prospective, controlled, and randomized clinical experiment. The ethical committee of the Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University granted consent with approval number A01071221 and carried out in accordance with the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki, 2013). The trial took a place in pediatric dental clinics of the Faculty of Dentistry in the period from January 2021 to March 2022. The parents of the participating children were asked to sign informed consent, after being informed of the study objectives, risks and benefits.Participants selectionThe participants of this study were 115 children aged 7-10 years, selected from the children who attended for dental treatment in the pediatric dentistry clinic. Inclusion criteria were as follows: healthy children aged 7 to10 years with moderate or high risk of developing caries, as determined by the American Dental Association’s caries risk assessment form, and having at least one permanent tooth with a score of 0 and score of 1 or 2 according to visual scoring criteria of International Caries Detection and Assessment System II (ICDAS II) [16].Children were excluded if they had used a re-mineralizing agent other than regular toothpaste in the previous three months, with allergy to silver particles or with any intraoral pathology. Calculating the sample sizeBased on previous studies [9, 17], the sample size was calculated using the G*Power program version (3.1.9.7; Heinrich-Heine-University Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany). It was estimated that 36 children in each group were sufficient to generate statistically significant data with power of 95% and error = 0.05. In addition, to make up for possible losses (drop out), it was decided to include 40 participants in each group.RandomizationInitially 150 children were screened. 120 of them matched the inclusion criteria and were included. Block randomization was created by using a computerized randomization web site (https://www.sealedenvelope.com/simple-randomiser/v1/lists) to ensure that the number of participants in each group was distributed similarly. The generated list of participants’ numbers with their codes A, B and C was kept with the dentist who was responsible for varnish application. Each child was given his number without the code written on his recording sheet. Codes A, B and C referred to NSF, n-HAP and NaF, respectively. The actual number of children who attended all follow-up visits was 115, as shown in the CONSORT flowchart in Figure 3.Conduction of the studyDental examination: In the pediatric dentistry clinic, the dental examination was performed by one qualified and calibrated examiner in a dental chair while the subject was semi-supine, under good lighting, and while taking into account all techniques of infection control. Clinical examination was carried out using a dental mirror, ball ended pig tailed explorer, gloves, mask, and dental examination sheets. The study included the first visit and three follow-up visits; three months, six months, and twelve months following the baseline visit. Evaluations at all visits were carried out by the same examiner, who was unaware of the treatment assignment and had no access to any of the outcomes from earlier visits. The intra-examiner reliability of score records was confirmed and tested by Cohen’s kappa test, and the intra-examiner agreement was determined to be 80%. 10% of the sample was randomly chosen to be re-examined for intra-examiner reproducibility.A. Baseline evaluation
Statistical analysisWith the help of IBM SPSS for Windows (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. released 2019 version 26.0.), data were gathered, coded, input, and analyzed. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to test the distribution of quantitative data, and the median and inter-quartile range (IQR) were used to summarize non-normally distributed data. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the data in three groups, and pairwise comparisons were performed for significant outcomes. The test was used to compare the qualitative data between the three groups. Qualitative variables were reported as numbers and percentages. Cohen’s statistic was applied to assess the intra-examiner reliability. The allowed margin of error was 5%, and the significance level for the p-value was set at p > 0.05. The baseline characteristics (age, sex, and recording scores) of studied groups were compared by statistical tests prior to follow-up visits in order to ensure that no significant difference was found among the three groups. The data were analyzed at the level of teeth surfaces and at the level of children.ResultsThe present study was a randomized clinical trial. The study included a total of 115 patients aged 7-10 years old divided into three studied groups according to the type of dental varnish used as follows: NSF group – 39 children with mean age 8.8 ± 1.3, 23 males and 16 females; n-HAP group – 37 children with mean age 8.4 ± 1.2, 13 males and 24 females; NaF group – 39 children with mean age 8.3 ± 1.2, 19 males and 20 females. The results showed no statistically significant difference in the mean age and percentage of gender or in the clinical ICDAS scores (0, 1 and 2) between the three groups as shown in Table 1.New lesions and arrested (inactive) initial lesions at level of permanent surfacesThe median number and IQR of new carious lesions showed no statistically significant difference between the three groups in 3- and 6-month follow-up visits, while at the 12-month follow-up the NSF group had significantly fewer new carious lesions than in the n-HAP group (p = 0.01) as shown in Table 2.By comparing the median and IQR of inactive initial lesions, the results showed statistically significantly more inactive lesions in both NSF and NaF than n-HAP in all follow-up visits with p = 0.003, 0.01 and 0.002 at 3-, 6- and 12-month visits respectively. There were significant differences between NSF and n-HAP groups (p = 0.005, 0.01, 0.009) and also between NaF and n-HAP groups (p = 0.009, 0.04, 0.004), while there was no statistically significant difference between NSF and NaF groups (p = 1.0) among all follow-up visits, as shown in Table 2. New lesions and arrested (inactive) initial lesions at level of childrenThe number of children with new caries lesions in the NSF group did not differ significantly from the number of children with new caries lesions in the n-HAP and in the NaF group at 3- and 6-month follow-up visits. At the 12-month follow-up the NSF group had the lowest percentage of children with new caries lesions, significantly lower compared to n-HAP (23.1% vs. 56.8%, p = 0.003) and at the threshold of significance compared to the NaF group (23.1% vs. 43.5%, p = 0.05), as shown in Table 3.With regards to the arrested initial lesions, the NSF group showed the highest number of children with inactive initial lesions (87.2%), significantly higher than the n-HAP group (p = 0.001, > 0.001, 0.003 for 3-, 6- and 12-month follow-up visits, respectively) and non-significantly higher than the NaF group (p > 0.05 for all follow-up visits), as shown in Table 3. DiscussionIn this study, the three agents were in the form of varnishes, which allowed more prolonged exposure to the agent and less chair time required than that needed for foams and gels [21]. Young permanent teeth are at the highest risk of being affected by dental caries due to the more porous structure and higher protein content, so fluoride or calcium uptake could be increased when applied at that time [22].The present study did not show statistically significant differences in the number of new and arrested incipient caries lesions between the NSF and NaF groups. However, the difference between the number of children with new carious lesions in both groups after 12 months was at the threshold of significance level (a trend towards superiority of NSF varnish over NaF varnish in the prevention of dental caries). Moreover, considering the annual application of NSF varnish versus the biannual application of NaF varnish, a single intervention with the NSF varnish seems more cost-effective. The preventive and arrested effectiveness of NSF, as proved in this study, could be explained by the antimicrobial and re-mineralizing effect [12, 23]. The small size of the first component (silver nanoparticles) increases the surface area exposed to the microbe and forms free radicals, damaging the bacterial cell membrane and making it porous, leading to cell death. Furthermore, silver ions could cooperate with sulfuryl groups during protein synthesis and inhibit the replication of DNA [12, 24]. The second component of NSF varnish is chitosan, which exhibits significant antibacterial and plaque reduction action. In vitro studies showed that chitosan interferes with the demineralization of the tooth enamel, inhibiting the release of mineral elements [25]. The third element is fluoride, which enhances NSF’s action, inhibiting demineralization and increasing remineralization of tooth enamel and reducing the metabolism of the cariogenic bacteria. Fluoride has been demonstrated to inhibit the mechanism by which cariogenic bacteria metabolize carbohydrates to generate acids and thus affects adhesive polysaccharides bacterial growth [1, 26, 27]. Up to now, no published clinical trial has compared the efficacy of NSF and commercial fluoride varnish used on young permanent teeth over a 12-month period. Results of the shorter (three months and three weeks) study by Girón et al. [28] suggest that adding nano-silver particles to a fluoride varnish significantly increases the effectiveness of the varnish in arresting white spot lesions in primary dentition. Similarly, Waikhom et al. [24], who investigated the antimicrobial effectiveness of NSF, NaF, and chlorhexidine varnishes on the level of Streptococcus mutans in saliva and dental plaque during three-month follow-up period, concluded that NSF was more effective and beneficial than chlorhexidine and NaF. Other clinical trials proved the effectiveness of NSF when comparing it with a saline control and applied annually on primary [9] or permanent teeth [29]. Concerning the results of in vitro studies that evaluated the efficacy of NSF, the application of NSF on the surface of unaffected sound enamel was reported to be an effective caries preventive measure [30]. Some studies concluded that NSF might be more effective than conventional fluoride preparations in treating incipient caries lesions [31, 32]. On the other hand, some in vitro studies showed that the remineralization effect of NSF was lower [33] or similar to the effect of NaF varnish [34], but the fluorine content of the NSF used in these in vitro studies was 10,147 ppm, while NaF varnishes contained 22,600 ppm of fluoride. Regarding the n-HAP varnish, the results of the current study demonstrated that n-HAP had significantly lower efficacy than NSF and NaF in arresting initial lesions in 3-, 6-, and 12 months follow-ups. At the same time, there were no significant differences concerning preventive efficacy between the three preparations at 3- and 6-month follow-ups. The effect of n-HAP could be explained by the action of small nanoparticles which fill in the surface irregularities of damaged enamel and produce a protective layer on the tooth’s surface [8]. In the randomized controlled study by Najibfard et al. [35] 10% n-HAP dentifrice caused remineralization comparable to a 1100 ppm NaF toothpaste. Another clinical trial that evaluated the effectiveness of n-HAP paste and tri-calcium phosphate fluoride varnish revealed that n-HAP paste demonstrated better stability in its remineralization effect over the 6-month follow-up [36]. In the comparative study by Alhamed et al. [17] n-HAP gel turned out to be more effective than NaF varnish and tricalcium phosphate paste. An in vitro study proved that n-HAP brings effects similar to fluoride varnish and can be an alternative re-mineralizing agent for those at risk of dental fluorosis [37]. Differences in the results obtained in the cited research studies could be attributed to the use of different preparations, with different concentrations and application schedules. The results of the present study revealed that the n-HAP varnish was less effective in preventing new caries lesions than NSF varnish at the 12-month follow-up and less effective than NSF and NaF varnishes in arresting the incipient lesions. It must be remembered that n-HAP can effectively prevent caries, hardening the enamel surface and arresting the existing initial caries due to its chemical and structural similarity to tooth mineral content. However, its action on bacteria is limited to reducing bacterial adhesion without killing the bacteria [38]. Thus, complex preparations containing both n-HAP and fluoride have been introduced. The study of Souza et al. [39] proved that n-HAP/fluoride toothpaste was the only one able to significantly reduce dentine demineralization and to improve enamel remineralization compared to placebo. MI Paste Plus (casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate, 0.2% NaF) and 0.2% NaF toothpaste were less effective. The only study that has used the same three agents as our research was conducted in vitro to determine the re-mineralization ability of NaF varnish, n-HAP, and NSF on the enamel of primary anterior teeth. The study results showed that the greatest re-mineralization was observed in the NSF group [40], which is in agreement with our results. The limitation of the study was that the process of blinding the dentist who applied the varnishes might be compromised because the color of the three agents was different as follows: n-HAP had a white color, NSF was reddish yellow, and NaF varnish was brownish. Moreover, fluoride varnish and n-HAP varnish were applied biannually, while NSF was used only once, so we could not evaluate the effects of the same schedule of applications. Further studies are required to assess long-term efficiency after 2-3 years when the regular application is discontinued. ConclusionsSingle application of the NSF varnish was significantly more effective than biannual application of n-HAP varnish. No significant differences were found between NaF and NSF groups, although a trend towards superiority of NSF varnish over NaF varnish in the prevention of new caries lesions was seen at the 12-month follow-up. Based on the outcomes of this randomized clinical trial, annual application of NSF varnish might be recommended as an effective method of dental caries prevention and treatment of initial caries lesions.AcknowledgementsThe authors thank the nursing staff in the pediatric dental clinic at Mansoura University, children and their parents for their support in this study. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.Conflict of interestThe authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, or publication of this article.References1. Gao SS, Zhang S, Mei ML, Lo ECM, Chu CH. Caries remineralisation and arresting effect in children by professionally applied fluoride treatment – a systematic review. BMC Oral Health 2016; 16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-016-0171-6. 2.
Kassebaum NJ, Bernabé E, Dahiya M, Bhandari B, Murray CJL, Marcenes W. Global burden of untreated caries: a systematic review and metaregression. J Dent Res 2015; 94: 650-658. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034515573272. 3.
Frencken JE. Atraumatic restorative treatment and minimal intervention dentistry. Br Dent J 2017; 223: 183-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/SJ.BDJ.2017.664. 4.
Lee Y. Diagnosis and prevention strategies for dental caries. J Lifestyle Med 2013; 3: 107-109. 5.
Baik A, Alamoudi N, El-Housseiny A, Altuwirgi A. Fluoride varnishes for preventing occlusal dental caries: a review. Dent J (Basel) 2021; 9: 64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/dj9060064. 6.
Roveri N, Battistella E, Bianchi CL, et al. Surface enamel remineralization: biomimetic apatite nanocrystals and fluoride ions different effects. J Nanomater 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/746383. 7.
Bordea IR, Candrea S, Alexescu GT, et al. Nano-hydroxyapatite use in dentistry: a systematic review. Drug Metab Rev 2020; 52: 319-332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03602532.2020.1758713. 8.
Haghgoo R, Rezvani MB, Salehi Zeinabadi M. Comparison of nano-hydroxyapatite and sodium fluoride mouthrinse for remineralization of incipient carious lesions. J Dent (Tehran) 2014; 11: 406-410. 9.
Dos Santos VE, Filho AV, Ribeiro Targino AG, et al. A new “silver-Bullet” to treat caries in children – Nano Silver Fluoride: a randomised clinical trial. J Dent 2014; 42: 945-951. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.05.017. 10.
Tirupathi S, Nirmala SVSG, Rajasekhar S, Nuvvula S. Comparative cariostatic efficacy of a novel Nano-silver fluoride varnish with 38% silver diamine fluoride varnish a double-blind randomized clinical trial. J Clin Exp Dent 2019; 11: e105-e112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.54995. 11.
Haghgoo R, Saderi H, Eskandari M, Haghshenas H, Rezvani M. Evaluation of the antimicrobial effect of conventional and nanosilver-containing varnishes on oral streptococci. J Dent (Shiraz) 2014; 15: 57-62. 12.
Favaro JC, Detomini TR, Maia LP, et al. Anticaries agent based on silver nanoparticles and fluoride: characterization and biological and remineralizing effects – an in vitro study. Int J Dent 2022; 2022: 9483589. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9483589. 13.
Targino AGR, Flores MAP, dos Santos Junior VE, et al. An innovative approach to treating dental decay in children. A new anti-caries agent. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2014; 25: 2041-2047. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-014-5221-5. 14.
Ferraz MP, Monteiro FJ, Manuel CM. Hydroxyapatite nanoparticles: a review of preparation methodologies. J Appl Biomater Biomech 2004; 2: 74–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/228080000400200202. 15.
Soleimani B, Goli H, Naranjian M, Mousavi SJ, Nahvi A. Comparison of antimicrobial activity of fluoride varnishes against streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus: an in vitro study. Iran J Pediatr 2021; 31: e111422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5812/ijp.111422. 16.
Gugnani N, Pandit I, Srivastava N, Gupta M, Sharma M. International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS): a new concept. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2011; 4: 93-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1089. 17.
Alhamed M, Almalki F, Alselami A, Alotaibi T, Elkwatehy W. Effect of different remineralizing agents on the initial carious lesions – a comparative study. Saudi Dent J 2020; 32: 390-395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.11.001. 18.
Kang MK, Kim HE. Remineralizing efficacy of fluoride in the presence of oral microcosm biofilms. J Dent 2021; 115: 103848. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JDENT.2021.103848. 19.
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Fluoride therapy: the reference manual of pediatric dentistry. Chicago, III. Am Acad Pediatr Dent 2021: 302-205. 20.
Pitts NB, Ismail AI, Martignon S, Ekstrand K, Douglas GVV, Longbottom C. ICCMSTM Quick Reference Guide for Practitioners and Educators. ICCMSTM Resour 2014: 1-84. 21.
Slayton RL, Urquhart O, Araujo MWB, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guideline on nonrestorative treatments for carious lesions: a report from the American Dental Association. J Am Dent Assoc 2018; 149: 837-849.e19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2018.07.002. 22.
Nazir MA, Bakhurji E, Gaffar BO, Al-Ansari A, Al-Khalifa KS. First permanent molar caries and its association with carious lesions in other permanent teeth. J Clin Diagnostic Res 2019; 13: 36-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2019/38167.12509. 23.
Zameer M, Birajdar SB, Basheer SN, Peeran SW, Peeran SA, Reddy A. Nanosilver fluoride as a caries arresting agent: a narrative review. Contemp Pediatr Dent 2021; 2: 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51463/cpd.2021.47. 24.
Waikhom N, Agarwal N, Jabin Z, Anand A. Antimicrobial effectiveness of nano silver fluoride varnish in reducing Streptococcus mutans in saliva and plaque biofilm when compared with chlorhexidine and sodium fluoride varnishes. J Clin Exp Dent 2022: e321-e328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.59093. 25.
Cavalcante LLR, Tedesco AC, Takahashi LAU, Curylofo-Zotti FA, Souza-Gabriel AE, Corona SAM. Conjugate of chitosan nanoparticles with chloroaluminium phthalocyanine: synthesis, characterization and photoinactivation of Streptococcus mutans biofilm. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 2020; 30: 101709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PDPDT.2020.101709. 26.
Chau NPT, Pandit S, Jung JE, Jeon JG. Evaluation of Streptococcus mutans adhesion to fluoride varnishes and subsequent change in biofilm accumulation and acidogenicity. J Dent 2014; 42: 726-734. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JDENT.2014.03.009. 27.
Buzalaf MAR, Pessan JP, Honório HM, Ten Cate JM. Mechanisms of action of fluoride for caries control. Monogr Oral Sci 2011; 22: 97-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000325151. 28.
Butrón-Téllez Girón C, Mariel-Cárdenas J, Pierdant-Pérez M, Hernández-Sierra JF, Morales-ánchez JE, Ruiz F. Effectiveness of a combined silver nanoparticles/fluoride varnish in dental remineralization in children: in vivo study. Superf y Vacío 2017; 30: 21-24. 29.
Freire PLL, Albuquerque AJR, Sampaio FC, et al. AgNPs: the new allies against S. mutans biofilm – a pilot clinical trial and microbiological assay. Braz Dent J 2017; 28: 417-422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201600994. 30.
Sabbah A, Helwa I. Efficiency of nano silver fluoride on prevention of dental caries on intact enamel surface assessed by edx-analysis (in vitro study). Egypt Dent J 2022; 68: 63-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2021.103643.1846. 31.
Vieira Costa E Silva A, Teixeira JA, Mota CCBO, et al. In vitro morphological, optical and microbiological evaluation of nanosilver fluoride in the remineralization of deciduous teeth enamel. Nanotechnol Rev 2018; 7: 509-520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2018-0083. 32.
Costa e Silva AV, de Araújo Teixeira J, de Melo Júnior PC, et al. Remineralizing potential of nano-silver-fluoride for tooth enamel: an optical coherence tomography analysis. Pesqui Bras Odontopediatria Clin Integr 2019; 19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4034/PBOCI.2019.191.50. 33.
Akyildiz M, Sönmez IS. Comparison of remineralising potential of nano silver fluoride, silver diamine fluoride and sodium fluoride varnish on artificial caries: an in vitro study. Oral Health Prev Dent 2019; 17: 469-477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ohpd.a42739. 34.
El-Desouky D, Hanno A, Dowidar K, Hamza SA, El-Desouky LM. Evaluation of the anticariogenic effect of nano silver fluoride on demineralization of enamel in primary teeth (an in vitro study). Alexandria Dent J 2020; 46: 153-159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/adjalexu.2020.20537.1017. 35.
Najibfard K, Chedjieu I, Ramalingam K, Amaechi BT. Remineralization of early caries by a nano-hydroxyapatite dentifrice. J Clin Dent 2011; 22: 139-143. 36.
Badr S, Ragab H. The effectiveness of a nano-hydroxyapatite paste and a tri-calcium phosphate fluoride varnish in white spot lesions remineralization (randomized clinical trial). Egypt Dent J 2018; 64: 2757-2765. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2018.77273. 37.
Saudi R, Ibrahim MA. Comparison between nano-hydroxyapatite and CPP-ACPF in remineralizing early carious lesions (in vitro study). BAU J Creat Sustain Dev 2020; 2: 1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54729/2789-8334.1031. 38.
Hannig C, Basche S, Burghardt T, Al-Ahmad A, Hannig M. Influence of a mouthwash containing hydroxyapatite microclusters on bacterial adherence in situ. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 17: 805-814. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/S00784-012-0781-6. 39.
Souza BM, Comar LP, Vertuan M, Fernandes Neto C, Buzalaf MAR, Magalhães AC. Effect of an experimental paste with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles and fluoride on dental demineralisation and remineralisation in situ. Caries Res 2015; 49: 499-507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000438466. 40.
Nozari A, Ajami S, Rafiei A, Niazi E. Impact of nano hydroxyapatite, nano silver fluoride and sodium fluoride varnish on primary enamel remineralization: an in vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res 2017; 11: 97-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/ 41.
30108.10694.
This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
|