Comparison of short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted 
and laparoscopic-assisted D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

Xinsheng Zhang; Weibin Zhang; Zhen Feng; Zhiwei Sun; Qianshi Zhang; Shuangyi Ren

doi:10.5114/wiitm.2021.105731

!!!NEW!!! CLINICAL FORUM !!!NEW!!!
to make the quarterly livelier and more beneficial for doctors and scientists !!!

On June the 1st, 2021 VSJ launches a new discussion platform in the journal.

We invite all MIS surgeons to rapidly submit for publication:
- small forms describing unusual clinical situations related to their practice,
- short clinical comments relating to any publications in VSJ, including the clinical situations described above
- brief communications of original studies deserving fast publication
- your personal opinions as part of a larger discussion on the VSJ publication
- letters concerning the topics described above

Clinical Forum gives you a means of rapid presentation of your findings in the medical databases, scientific citations on the international forum, and also an Impact Factor!

For further details, see: Instructions for Authors

eISSN: 2299-0054
ISSN: 1895-4588

Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques

Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Editorial board Reviewers Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures

Editorial System

Submit your Manuscript

Editorial Policies

Sarajevo Declaration on Integrity and Visibility of Scholarly Publications

3/2021
vol. 16

Send email

Copy url:

General surgery

abstract:

Meta-analysis

Comparison of short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

Xinsheng Zhang

¹

,

Weibin Zhang

²

,

Zhen Feng

¹

,

Zhiwei Sun

¹

,

Qianshi Zhang

¹

,

Shuangyi Ren

¹

Department of General Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning Province, China
Department of General Surgery, Jinzhou Central Hospital, Jinzhou City, Liaoning Province, China

Videosurgery Miniinv 2021; 16 (3): 443–454

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2021.105731

Online publish date: 2021/04/30

View full text Get citation

PlumX metrics:

Introduction
To compare the outcomes of robot-assisted (RAGD2) and laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy (LAGD2) for patients with gastric cancer.

Material and methods
Relevant articles published up to September 2020 were searched. The weighted mean difference (WMD) was used to pool continuous variables, while risk ratio (RR) was calculated for dichotomous outcomes.

Results
RAGD2 required a longer operating time (WMD = 29.78, 95% confidence interval (CI): 15.97–43.59) and had less operative blood loss (WMD = 31.93, 95% CI: 44.03 to 19.83), shorter time to first flatus (WMD = 0.13, 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.04), shorter time to liquid diet (WMD = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.12), and fewer severe complications (RR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.43–0.90) and overall complications (RR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.62–0.91) than LAGD2.

Conclusions
RAGD2 could be beneficial in reducing operative blood loss and postoperative complications relative to LAGD2.

keywords:

Comparison of short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

Xinsheng Zhang 1 , Weibin Zhang 2 , Zhen Feng 1 , Zhiwei Sun 1 , Qianshi Zhang 1 , Shuangyi Ren 1

robot-assisted gastrectomy, laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy, meta-analysis

Xinsheng Zhang

¹

,

Weibin Zhang

²

,

Zhen Feng

¹

,

Zhiwei Sun

¹

,

Qianshi Zhang

¹

,

Shuangyi Ren

¹