Current issue
Archive
Manuscripts accepted
About the journal
Editorial board
Abstracting and indexing
Contact
Instructions for authors
Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
|
1/2023
vol. 98 Review paper
Container baby syndrome – has infant equipment overuse an impact on motor skill development?
Agata Michalska
1
,
Katarzyna Połatyńska
2
,
Aleksandra Gładyś-Jakubczyk
1
,
Sebastian Kędzierski
1
,
Justyna Pogorzelska
1
Pediatr Pol 2023; 98 (1): 66-69
Online publish date: 2023/03/31
Article file
- Container baby.pdf
[0.11 MB]
ENW EndNote
BIB JabRef, Mendeley
RIS Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
INTRODUCTIONThe childhood ability to play is crucial for building the child’s interactions with the environment. Exploratory play is the driving force behind the child’s development and learning processes. To have that ability, however, both timely neurological and motor development are required. Motor development is conditioned by the interaction between biological, genetic, and environmental processes.Stability (the ability to control central parts of the body) and mobility (the ability to make increasingly complex movements) are significant motor skills. Proper development of motor skills affects other areas such as cognitive, social, language, and adaptive behaviour development. The connections between the former and the latter are especially strong in the first year of life. Any delays in early motor behaviours lead to limitations in exploration of the environment and can negatively impact the infant’s global development [1]. Container baby syndrome is a term used to describe problems observed in infants who spend too much time in devices that limit spontaneous motor activity [2]. Such devices include equipment used for transporting babies (car seats, strollers), accessories securing the lying or sitting position (bouncers, rockers, swings, slings, floor seats, highchairs), items which help to maintain upright position and locomotion (exersaucers, jumpers, walkers), or pillows. The aim of the study is to present the issue of container baby syndrome and to put forward recommendations that would help to avoid this problem. SAFE SLEEPThere have been many campaigns aimed at reducing the incidence of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). The most famous one is the Back to Sleep campaign on the initiative of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). The supine position is considered the safest. The risk of death from SIDS is higher in the prone position (2.3–13.1 times), and the lateral position (2.0 times) compared with the supine one. To reduce the risk of SIDS, infants should be set up for sleep in a supine position (wholly on their back) on a separate, firm, non-inclined surface for every sleep until one year of age. This position does not increase the risk of choking and aspiration in infants and is recommended for every sleep, even for infants with gastroesophageal reflux. Soft objects such as pillows and pillow-like toys should be removed from the baby’s bed. Infants should sleep in their parents’ bedroom, close to their parents’ bed, but on a separate surface. Breastfeeding and offering a pacifier at naptime and bedtime are recommended. Sitting devices are not recommended for routine sleep, particularly for infants under 4 months old [3–6].The effectiveness of the AAP campaign in reducing the percentage of deaths from SIDS has been proven as many developed countries have started implementing its recommendations [3, 4]. The results of numerous studies, however, point out that optimal sleep routines and care practices are not commonly used. The percentage of women who are unaware of the correct baby sleeping position is very high [7, 8]. The campaign has increased the interest in the problem of child safety and influenced the change of parental attitudes. Overinterpretation of those recommendations has influenced awake positioning practices. It has led to avoidance of the prone position also during wakeful time. The consequences of such conduct are an increased rate of deformational plagiocephaly and gross motor delays, which have been confirmed in many studies [9–16]. Thus, the AAP has tried to solve the problem. In 2006, recommendations for developmental surveillance at each well-child visit and a standardized screening of all children at 9, 18, and 30 months to observe for possible developmental delays were established. In 2008, recommendations regarding the positioning of a child in the prone position (immediately after birth for 3 to 5 minutes, 2 to 3 times a day) were developed [6, 17]. TUMMY TIME, FLOOR-BASED PLAYThe supine position is considered to be the safest and, in addition, is favoured by both parents and infants. It is easier to make eye contact with the child or to organize play. In comparison with the prone lying position, the supine position is easier to maintain due to the lower intensity of anti-gravity muscle activity. It also allows infants to observe the environment freely (because the head rests on the ground) and play (the upper limbs are not involved in supporting functions). However, it cannot be the only position in which the child remains. Experience gained in the prone position is crucial for optimal development of infants. This position gives the opportunity to improve synergistic trunk muscle control and to increase motor control against the force of gravity. The balance between trunk flexors and extensors provides synergistic stability for distal muscles [1]. “Tummy time” is the term used to describe time spent awake lying in the prone position with unrestricted movement of limbs. Tummy time promotes exploratory play, stimulating the infant’s desire to move, and it reduces the risk of positional plagiocephaly. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that infants under one year old be physically active several times a day in a variety of ways, which is best in the form interactive floor-based play. This activity should include at least 30 minutes in the prone position (tummy time) spread throughout the day while awake [18]. In 2022 the AAP recommended supervised, awake tummy time for short periods beginning soon after hospital discharge, increasing to at least 15–30 minutes total daily by 7 weeks of age [5]. Buchanan et al. [19] analysed the influence of early tummy time (before or after 4 weeks of age) on the total development and sleep behaviours. Early introduction of tummy time and the higher frequency of the activity has been associated with more favourable movement and sleep in young children at 12 and 24 months of age.CONTAINER BABY SYNDROMELimiting the child’s spontaneous motor activity by making it remain in a forced, often asymmetric, supination position for a long time may cause motor development delay and secondary delay in other areas (i.e. sensory, cognitive, communication, social, emotional). Prolonged pressure on the occipital area can lead to deformative plagiocephaly, asymmetrical facial features, or brachycephaly. Long-term consequences such as decreased muscle strength, poor coordination, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), increased weight, or obesity may occur [2, 9–15]. According to the WHO, infants under one year of age should not be restrained for more than one hour at a time [18].Studies on the use of containers concern mainly car seats and walkers. When sitting in a semi-reclined position, babies born prematurely or babies with medical conditions may experience breathing problems due to poor head control. Arya et al. [20] assessed the risk of cardiovascular failure in children in a car seat. Both term and preterm infants showed more significant signs of potentially adverse cardio-respiratory effects in the 40° upright position during motion than when in a 30° position. This may suggest that it is the more vertical position combined with movement of the vehicle that is responsible for the occurrence of harmful effects in infants rather than the prolonged period spent in a sitting position. For those reasons, the AAP recommends predischarge observation of all pre-term and at-risk newborns while seated in car seat, to monitor for episodes of apnoea, bradycardia, and oxygen desaturation. The observation called the Infant Car Seat Challenge should be conducted in the child’s own car seat at the angle at which it will be used in the vehicle [21]. The assessment of segmental postural control while sitting, performed in a group of moderate-to-late preterm infants has shown that baby rocking recliner and baby walker usage were negative factors for achieving the sitting milestone [22]. Car seats should not be used as sleeping devices outside of the vehicle, and children should never remain in a car seat with u nbuckled or partially buckled straps [5, 23]. In a retrospective review of deaths involving sitting and carrying devices Batra et al. [23] pointed out that strangulation from straps, and positional asphyxia are the main causes of death. Baby walkers are a popular type of equipment which is highly associated with head and neck injuries that are most often caused by falling down the stairs. Soft tissue injuries, lacerations, and skull fractures are the most common. Those devices are used to passively maintain a standing position or to accelerate learning to walk, often without close supervision of parents who are doing household chores at the time [24, 25]. According to Yaghini et al. [26] gross movement abnormality was more frequent in baby walker users at the age of 12 months, but no significant difference was found between users and non-users. Recent studies indicate that walkers do not cause a delay in gait acquisition but they can cause qualitative changes in kinematic and trunk gait control and thus should not be recommended for use [27, 28]. PARENT EDUCATIONIt can be difficult to change the container lifestyle because it is impossible to completely eliminate the equipment that facilitates positioning of the infants. However, it should be used as intended with care for the safety of children. There are no specific guidelines in the literature regarding the time a child may spend in the container. A period of up to 30–60 minutes is given at one time without specifying a daily limit.The task of medical professionals dealing with neurodevelopment is to educate parents, aiming at raising awareness of the negative consequences of overuse of containers. The benefits of tummy time and floor-based play should be emphasized. The following are examples of recommendations that can be used in parent communication. Recommendations for parents:
CONCLUSIONSConscious and mature parenthood requires both parents to be responsible for the health and life of a child, to create the best conditions for its development, and to acquire the ability to care for it after birth. Container lifestyle is a response to the need to ensure the safety of the child during various everyday situations, such as traveling. It makes life easier because the child can be quickly placed in a stable, controlled position and quickly moved to another room where the parent is currently present. Importantly, this position is well-tolerated by the child, often being more attractive to it and not objectionable. Most containers are considered essential. The huge selection of various products creates the belief that if the product goes on sale, it must be safe for the child. It cannot be denied that the use of some of the products mentioned above is recommended (e.g. the obligation to transport children in a car in safety seats). However, some equipment is used improperly; this concerns most often car seats that are used as recliners or seats. Using infant equipment inconsistently with its intended use and outright misuse (e.g. extending the time of use) limits tummy time, floor play, and exploration. It furthermore reduces the amount of time infants spend playing with their parents and reduces tactile and vestibular stimulation and mother/father-infant interaction.The role of medical professions such as neuro-paediatricians and physiotherapists is to educate parents about safe use of containers and home routine change, appropriate techniques for handling and positioning the baby, the importance of lying on the stomach as an activity conducive to the acquisition of motor skills, and developing age-appropriate motor skills. DISCLOSUREThe authors declare no conflict of interest.REFERENCES1. Bly L. Components of typical and atypical motor development. NDTA Publishing, Laguna Beach, CA, 2011. 2.
Anitha B. Container Baby Syndrome. Pon J Nurs 2019; 12: 21-24. 3.
De Luca F, Hinde A. Effectiveness of the ‘back-to-sleep’ campaigns among healthcare professionals in the past 20 years: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2016; 6: e011435. 4.
AAP task force on sudden infant death syndrome. SIDS and other sleep-related infant deaths: updated 2016 recommendations for a safe infant sleeping environment. Pediatrics 2016; 138: e20162938. 5.
Moon RY, Carlin RF, Hand I. Task force on sudden infant death syndrome and the committee on fetus and newborn. Evidence base for 2022 updated recommendations for a safe infant sleeping environment to reduce the risk of sleep-related infant deaths. Pediatrics 2022; 150: e2022057991. 6.
Moon RY, Carlin RF, Hand I. Task force on sudden infant death syndrome and the committee on fetus and newborn. Sleep-related infant deaths: updated 2022 recommendations for reducing infant deaths in the sleep environment. Pediatrics 2022; 150: e2022057990. 7.
Cole R, Young J, Kearney L, et al. Awareness of infant safe sleep messages and associated care practices: findings from an Australian cohort of families with young infants. BMJ Paediatr Open 2021; 5: e000972. 8.
Pease AS, Blair PS, Ingram J, et al. Mothers’ knowledge and attitudes to sudden infant death syndrome risk reduction messages: results from a UK survey. Arch Dis Child 2018; 103: 33-38. 9.
Cross J, Eastman D, Brovender S, et al. Intolerance to prone positioning as a clinical marker of motor delay in infants. J Pediatr Child Care 2017; 3: 06. 10.
Majnemer A, Barr RG. Influence of supine sleep positioning on early motor milestone acquisition. Dev Med Child Neurol 2005; 47: 370-376. 11.
Kuo YL, Liao HF, Chen PC, et al. The influence of wakeful prone positioning on motor development during the early life. J Dev BehavPediatr 2008; 29: 367-376. 12.
Monson RM, Deitz J, Kartin D. The relationship between awake positioning and motor performance among infants who slept supine. Pediatr Phys Ther 2003; 15: 196-203. 13.
Hewitt L, Kerr E, Stanley RM, et al. Tummy time and infant health outcomes: a systematic review. Pediatrics 2020; 145: e20192168. 14.
Pin T, Eldridge B, Galea MP. A review of the effects of sleep position, play position, and equipment use on motor development in infants. Dev Med Child Neurol 2007; 49: 858-67. 15.
Littlefield T, Kelly K, Reiff J. et al. Car seats, infant carriers, and swings: their role in deformational plagiocephaly. J Prosthet Orthot 2003; 15: 102-106. 16.
Kim EH, Kim KE, Jeon J, et al. Delayed motor development and infant obesity as risk factors for severe deformational plagiocephaly: a matched case-control study. Front Pediatr 2020; 8: 582360. 17.
Council on Children With Disabilities; Section on Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics; Bright Futures Steering Committee; Medical Home Initiatives for Children With Special Needs Project Advisory Committee. Identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the medical home: an algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening. Pediatrics 2006; 118: 405-420. 18.
World Health Organization. Guidelines on physical activity, sedentary behavior and sleep for children under 5 years of age, 2019. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/311664/9789241550536eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. 19.
Buchanan L, Xu H, Hewitt L, et al. A Longitudinal analysis examining the associations of tummy time with active playtime, screen time, and sleep time. J Phys Act Health 2021; 18: 1215-1222. 20.
Arya R, Williams G, Kilonback A, al. Is the infant car seat challenge useful? A pilot study in a simulated moving vehicle. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2017; 102: F136-F141. 21.
Davies N, Zenchenko Y, Lever A, et al. Car seat safety for preterm neonates: implementation and testing parameters of the infant car seat challenge. Acad Pediatr 2013; 13: 272-277. 22.
Sangkarit N, Siritaratiwat W, Bennett S, et al. Factors associating with the segmental postural control during sitting in moderate- to-late preterm infants via longitudinal study. Children (Basel) 2021; 8: 851. 23.
Batra EK, Midgett JD, Moon RY. Hazards associated with sitting and carrying devices for children two years and younger. J Pediatr 2015; 167: 183-187. 24.
Sims A, Chounthirath T, Yang J, et al. Infant walker-related injuries in the United States. Pediatrics 2018; 142: e20174332. 25.
Albarrak YA, Algwaiz AF, Sharaf AM, et al. The reasons and associated injuries related to baby walkers use among children in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Cureus 2021; 13: e17122. 26.
Yaghini O, Goodarzi M, Khoei S, et al. Effect of baby walker use on developmental status based on ages and stages questionnaire score (ASQ). Iran J Child Neurol 2020; 14: 105-111. 27.
Chagas PSC, Fonseca ST, Santos TRT, et al. Effects of baby walker use on the development of gait by typically developing toddlers. Gait Posture 2020; 76: 231-237. 28.
Bezgin S, Uzun Akkaya K, Çelik Hİ, et al. Evaluation of the effects of using a baby walker on trunk control and motor development. Turk Arch Pediatr 2021; 56: 159-163.
Copyright: © 2023 Polish Society of Paediatrics. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
|