Bieżący numer
Archiwum
Filmy
Artykuły w druku
O czasopiśmie
Suplementy
Rada naukowa
Recenzenci
Bazy indeksacyjne
Prenumerata
Kontakt
Zasady publikacji prac
Opłaty publikacyjne
Standardy etyczne i procedury
Panel Redakcyjny
Zgłaszanie i recenzowanie prac online
|
3/2022
vol. 124 streszczenie artykułu:
Artykuł oryginalny
Czynniki prognostyczne poprawy ostrości wzroku i morfologii plamki po operacji idiopatycznej błony nasiatkówkowej
Michał Post
1
,
Magdalena Durajczyk
2
,
Anna Okruszko
1
,
Maciej Mularczyk
3
,
Agnieszka Piwowarczyk
1
,
Wojciech Lubiński
2
,
Jacek P. Szaflik
1
KLINIKA OCZNA 2022, 124, 3: 142-149
Data publikacji online: 2022/09/21
Pełna treść artykułu
Pobierz cytowanie
ENW EndNote
BIB JabRef, Mendeley
RIS Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
Aim of the study To assess the predictors of functional and anatomical improvement in patients with idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM). Material and methods A two-center retrospective cohort study. A review of consecutive patients with ERM who underwent pars plana vitrectomy with ERM peeling from January 2017 to December 2019. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography markers (central macular thickness [CMT], ectopic inner foveal layer [EIFL] thickness, outer nuclear layer [ONL] thickness, presence of cotton ball sign, ellipsoid zone disruption, cystoid macular edema [CME]) were collected at baseline and at one year, and included as covariates in a multivariate logistic regression model with final BCVA improvement as a binary outcome. Results One-hundred twenty eight eyes (125 patients) were enrolled in the study. At one-year follow-up, BCVA improvement was observed in 98 eyes (group 1 – 76.6%; BCVA 0.52 vs. 0.17, p < 0.001). BCVA stabilization or deterioration was observed in 30 eyes (group 2 – 23.4%; BCVA 0.34 vs. 0.38, p = 0.32). In group 1, preoperative BCVA was worse than in group 2 (0.52 vs. 0.34, p < 0.001). Good preoperative BCVA (OR = 2.16, p = 0.001) and young age (OR = 0.87, p = 0.011) were found to be predictors of postoperative BCVA improvement. Young age (OR = 0.81, p = 0.049) and high preoperative CMT (OR = 24.93, p = 0.048) had a positive effect on the normalization of CMT. The presence of CME had a negative effect on the normalization of CMT (OR = 0.02, p = 0.014), but no effect on the change in BCVA (OR = 0.4, p = 0.239). Conclusions None of the morphological signs included in this study precluded good visual recovery in long-term follow-up. Younger patients had better functional and anatomical gains. |
|