Ta strona używa pliki cookies, w celu polepszenia użyteczności i funkcjonalności oraz w celach statystycznych. Dowiedz się więcej w Polityce prywatności.
Korzystając ze strony wyrażasz zgodę na używanie plików cookies, zgodnie z aktualnymi ustawieniami przeglądarki.
Akceptuję wykorzystanie plików cookies
eISSN: 1897-4295
ISSN: 1734-9338
Advances in Interventional Cardiology/Postępy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
4/2024
vol. 20
 
Share:
Share:
Image in intervention

Dual guide catheter technique to seal an Ellis III coronary artery perforation during primary percutaneous coronary intervention: the paramount importance of careful wiring

Charalampos Kakderis
1
,
Matthaios Didagelos
1
,
Antonios Kouparanis
1
,
Konstantinos C. Theodoropoulos
1
,
Antonios Ziakas
1

  1. 1st Cardiology Department, AHEPA University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
Adv Interv Cardiol 2024; 20, 4 (78): 506–508
Online publish date: 2024/11/20
Article file
- dual guide (1).pdf  [0.25 MB]
Get citation
 
 

A 67-year-old woman with a medical history of dyslipidemia was admitted to our center with an inferior ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). A coronary angiogram was performed via right radial access, revealing the left coronary system without severe stenoses. The right coronary artery (RCA) was then engaged with a 6 Fr JR 4.0 guide catheter, which revealed proximal occlusion of the vessel. Wiring was challenging, and eventually a workhorse guidewire (Cougar XT, Medtronic, MN, USA) with the support of a 1.5 × 20 mm over-the-wire (OTW) balloon seemed to have crossed the lesion into the true lumen (Figure 1 A). However, antegrade flow was not restored and predilatations were performed at the point of the occlusion with the same balloon and with a 2.0 × 20 mm semi-compliant balloon. After the inflations, subsequent contrast injections revealed that the guidewire was inside the pericardial space, having perforated the RCA, which resulted in an Ellis III coronary perforation (Figure 1 B). Prolonged balloon inflations were performed proximal to the site of the perforation to stop the bleeding and prevent cardiac tamponade, but without success (Figure 1 C). The patient gradually became hemodynamically unstable and a large circumferential pericardial effusion was depicted with a bedside echocardiogram. Urgent pericardiocentesis was performed, autologous blood transfusion from the pericardium to the right femoral vein was achieved through a central venous catheter, and a right femoral arterial access was secured. A second 7 Fr JR 4.0 guide catheter was then advanced from the right femoral artery while a semi-compliant balloon from the 6 Fr catheter was inflated in the proximal RCA to prevent further bleeding (dual catheter/ping-pong technique) (Figure 1 D). The semi-compliant balloon was then transiently deflated and a new workhorse guidewire (Cougar XT, Medtronic, MN, USA) was successfully advanced via the second catheter across the perforation site into the true lumen, and finally crossed the occlusion (Figure 1 E). The first guidewire was removed and subsequent predilatations at the RCA occlusion point with a 3.0 × 30 mm semi-compliant balloon limited the blood extravasation. After the deployment of a 3.0 × 20 mm PK Papyrus covered stent (BIOTRONIK AG) at the point of artery perforation, the leak into the pericardium disappeared (Figure 1 F). A 3.5 × 15 mm zotarolimus-eluting stent (Resolute Integrity, Medtronic, Minneapolis, USA) was also implanted proximally, nicely overlapping the covered stent. The perforation was successfully sealed and the final angiographic result was satisfactory, with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 3 flow in the RCA. Six months later the patient remained asymptomatic and stable.

Figure 1

A – Proximal occlusion of the right coronary artery (RCA) (white arrow). A workhorse guidewire (blue arrow) crossed the lesion (as we falsely believed) with the support of an over-the-wire balloon (red arrow). B – After predilatations at the point of the occlusion, contrast injections revealed that the guidewire was inside the pericardial space having perforated the RCA, which resulted in an Ellis III coronary perforation (white arrow). C – Proximal balloon inflations were performed (white arrow), but without success. Cardiac tamponade was developed from the large circumferential pericardial effusion (red arrows). D – A 7 Fr guide catheter (white arrow) was advanced to the ostium of the RCA while a semi-compliant balloon (red arrow) from the 6 Fr guide catheter was inflated to prevent further bleeding into the pericardium (dual catheter/ping-pong technique). Urgent pericardiocentesis was performed to stabilize the patient (blue arrow: catheter of the pericardiocentesis). E – The semi-compliant balloon was transiently deflated and a new workhorse guidewire from the 7 Fr catheter crossed the occlusion (white arrow). F – After the implantation of a 3.0 × 20 mm PK Papyrus covered stent (BIOTRONIK AG) in the perforation entry point, the leak into the pericardium disappeared (white arrow)

/f/fulltexts/PWKI/55166/PWKI-20-55166-g001_min.jpg

This case highlights the paramount importance of careful wiring during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) [1, 2]. Orthogonal views are essential to assess the guidewire movement, especially in cases of total occlusions, before advancing further equipment. Alternatively, a small amount of contrast can be applied through a microcatheter to confirm the guidewire position into the true lumen. In cases of uncertainty, balloon predilatations should not be performed. Urgent pericardiocentesis and autologous blood transfusion is a life-saving first step if cardiac tamponade develops. The dual guide catheter (ping-pong) technique represents an effective way to seal perforations with better mortality rates compared to single catheter use [3]. Although the incidence of coronary perforation remains low (0.39%) [4], interventional cardiologists should always be alerted to deal with this fatal complication.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1 

Tyrovolas K, Lampropoulos K. A nightmarish case of simultaneous coronary perforations in the catheterization laboratory. Adv Interv Cardiol 2023; 19: 292-3.

2 

Theodoropoulos KC, Bazmpani MA, Kouparanis A, et al. Funny coronary arteriole perforation causes tamponade post-primary percutaneous coronary intervention. J Invasive Cardiol 2024; 36(2). doi: 10.25270/jic/23.00152.

3 

Ben-Gal Y, Weisz G, Collins MB, et al. Dual catheter technique for the treatment of severe coronary artery perforations. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 75: 708-12.

4 

Mikhail P, Howden N, Monjur M, et al. Coronary perforation incidence, outcomes and temporal trends (COPIT): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Heart 2022; 9: e002076.

Copyright: © 2024 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2025 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.