Current issue
Archive
Manuscripts accepted
About the journal
Editorial board
Reviewers
Abstracting and indexing
Subscription
Contact
Instructions for authors
Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
|
3/2024
vol. 77 abstract:
Original paper
Effect of sealant versus fluoride varnish on dental caries incidence in Mexican children: A randomized controlled clinical trial
Miguel Ánge Fernández-Barrera
1, 2
,
Edith Lara-Carrillo
3
,
Rogelio José Scougall-Vilchis
3
,
América Patricia Pontigo-Loyola
1
,
Mariana Mora-Acosta
1
,
Gladys Remigia Acuña-Gonzalez
4
,
Juan Alejandro Casanova-Sarmiento
4
,
Mauricio Escoffié-Ramírez
5
,
Carlo Eduardo Medina-Solis
1
,
Gerardo Maupomé
6
J Stoma 2024; 77, 3: 161-167
Online publish date: 2024/09/29
View
full text
Get citation
ENW EndNote
BIB JabRef, Mendeley
RIS Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
Introduction
Dental caries is a prevalent oral health issue that has a significant impact on the worldwide population. This condition is characterized by a range of etiological variables, and exhibits a higher prevalence in pediatric and young adult age groups. Objectives The objective of this work was to compare the effectiveness of two prevention methods in reducing the incidence of first permanent molar caries among schoolchildren aged 6-8 years. Material and methods This randomized clinical trial included 210 subjects. Schoolchildren were selected from elementary schools in Hidalgo State, Mexico. Subjects were divided into two groups: pit and fissure sealant was used on the first permanent molars in the first group (Clinpro© 3M, Saint Paul, MN, USA), and fluoride varnish (Duraphat© Colgate, New York, USA) in the second group. The incidence of dental caries was measured during a six-month period. Non-parametric tests (χ2, Mann-Whitney U test, and Fisher’s exact test) were utilized in statistical analyses with Stata package. Results The mean age of participants was 7.25 ± 0.80 years, with a basal dmft (average number of decayed, missing, and filled primary teeth) of 3.35 ± 3.45. At the six-month follow-up, there was a loss to follow-up of 15.7%. Statistical analysis revealed a larger number of caries-free molars in the group treated with pit and fissure sealant, but only in 16 (87.6%) and 36 (85.6%) molars when compared with the group treated with fluoride varnish: 16 (73.3%) and 36 (69.2%) molars. Conclusions The pit and fissure sealant treatment is found to be partially more effective than fluoride varnish. Pit and fissure sealant and fluoride varnish can be effectively applied as preventive methods in any permanent posterior teeth. keywords:
fluorides, dental caries, oral health, pit and fissure sealant |