eISSN: 2299-551X
ISSN: 0011-4553
Journal of Stomatology
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Share:
Share:
abstract:
Original paper

Effect of two different fluoride varnishes on enamel de-mineralization and re-mineralization: an in vitro study

Rizk Elagamy
1

  1. Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University,
J Stoma 2024; 77, 4:
Online publish date: 2024/07/26
View full text Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
Introduction:
Interdental stripping, mechanical grinding of the proximal tooth surface, is a common practice to reduce mesiodistal diameter for orthodontic management of minor crowding and tooth shape or size disharmony.

Objectives:
The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Duraphat and Clinpro varnishes in protecting stripped enamel and re-mineralizing initial enamel lesion.

Material and methods:
Sixty-six stripped and sixty-six de-mineralized proximal surfaces of human premolars were covered with acid-resistant nail varnish, except for 3 × 4 mm enamel windows, and were assigned to group 1 (stripped enamel) and group 2 (initial enamel lesion), respectively. Each group was equally divided into 3 sub-groups (n = 22) according to varnish treatment for exposed windows: sub-group A (no varnish treatment, control), sub-group B (Duraphat varnish), and sub-group C (Clinpro varnish). Before each varnish application to its respective sub-groups, baseline Vickers micro-hardness test for each sub-group was done. All specimens were subjected to de-mineralizing solution for 10 days. Vickers micro-hardness for each sub-group was measured again at exposed enamel windows, and two specimens from each sub-group were examined under SEM.

Results:
High statistically significant difference in micro-hardness was found between control sub-groups (228.2 ± 14.2 and 158.6 ± 13.3) and their respective sub-groups treated with either Duraphat (351.3 ± 15.2 and 281.5 ± 16.8) or Clinpro varnish (350.6 ± 15.4 and 280.4 ± 16.4), respectively (p = 0.000). No statistically signifi­cant difference was found in comparison between Duraphat and Clinpro sub-groups, or between treated sub-groups and their respective baseline values (p > 0.05). Under SEM, protective layer of crystals was observed in treated sub-groups, while honeycomb-like de-mineralized enamel and variable sizes of porosities were seen in control sub-groups.

Conclusions:
Both varnishes protect stripped enamel and re-mineralized initial enamel lesion.

keywords:

de-mineralized enamel, fluoride varnish, stripped enamel, re-mineralization, micro-hardness test

 
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.