Introduction
Enterococcus faecalis belongs to the abundant Enterococcus genus, and is a gram-positive, aerotolerant, spherical or oval bacteria that can exist singly or form pairs, chains, or groups. The most important characteristics of E. faecalis are persistence and high adaptability, allowing it to survive in harsh environmental conditions [1, 2]. It is a widespread bacterium in the environment, and it also occurs as a natural coloniser of the gastrointestinal tract of humans and animals. However, it should be remembered that it has pathogenic potential, especially due to its surface proteins, with adhesin function, which are associated with the initial adherence of bacteria and subsequent formation of a biofilm [3–5]. The above features enable the bacteria to trigger infections, including neonatal infections, infections of the urinary tract, abdominal and pelvic cavities, also prosthetic joints, as well as more invasive infections of the circulatory system, such as bacteraemia and infective endocarditis (IE) [3, 6, 7].
A natural feature of E. faecalis, as well as the entire Enterococcus genus, is reduced susceptibility to many antimicrobial agents, including b-lactams. The bacteria are resistant to almost all cephalosporins, anti-staphylococcal penicillins, and aztreonam. In vitro, E. faecalis is susceptible to carbapenems, while there are few clinical data regarding their use in humans [3, 8]. Enterococci are also resistant to other antibiotics including clindamycin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and to clinically achievable concentrations of aminoglycosides. The susceptibility of the Enterococcus genus to tetracyclines and erythromycin is not used clinically due to widespread acquired resistance to these antibiotics. They may be susceptible to vancomycin; however, emerging resistance genes to this antibiotic among the Enterococcus genus have been reported. Furthermore, enterococci rapidly acquire resistance to newly introduced antibiotics, such as linezolid or daptomycin, although most remain susceptible to them [9–11].
Infective endocarditis is a disease that develops as a result of infection of the endocardium with bacteria or fungi. The vegetations most frequently affect the heart valves, but can also appear in the ventricles, atria, or on foreign bodies present in the heart, such as pacemaker leads [12]. IE is characterised by high morbidity and mortality, as indicated by recent data showing that the annual incidence of IE is about 3–10 for every 100,000 people per year, whereas mortality reaches up to 30% within 30 days of the onset of the first symptoms [13–16].
Streptococcus spp. and Staphylococcus spp. are the most frequent aetiological factors, together representing more than 70% of cases of IE. Another group are enterococci with an IE-causing frequency of 9%, among which E. faecalis constitutes 90% of cases [17]. The remaining aetiological factors of bacterial IE include bacteria from the HACEK group (Haemophilus spp., Aggregatibacter spp., Cardiobacterium spp., Eikenella spp., and Kingella spp.), fungi (Candida spp., Aspergillus spp. or Histoplasma capsulatum), polymicrobial infections, and there are also cases in which bacteria do not grow from blood cultures (Figure 1) [16, 18].
Infective endocarditis is twice as common in men as in women, with a prevalence primarily in the elderly between 60 and 80 years old, but it can also occur in other population groups (Figure 2) [19–21]. Patients most often have multiple comorbidities including diabetes, chronic heart disease, chronic kidney disease, or cancer [13, 16, 22]. An increased risk of IE has also been noted in patients with degenerative valve disease, having a prosthetic valve, an implanted cardiac device, patients who have undergone surgery in the past few months, or those who have taken intravenous drugs [23, 24].
Patients are very often dismissive of the first manifestations and therefore may not visit the doctor for a prolonged period, thinking that the symptoms will soon subside. By the time they finally present themselves to the physician, they most frequently report the sudden onset of fever, generalised muscle and joint pain, malaise, weight loss, or breathlessness [17, 25–27]. In some cases, endocarditis may manifest as skin lesions including rash, petechiae, or the classic but rare diagnostic signs of Osler’s nodules, Janeway lesions, or Roth spots on the eye fundus [12]. Some patients may be asymptomatic and then present to the doctor with complications of IE, such as myocardial infarction or stroke [15].
The symptoms of IE are nonspecific and remarkably similar to much more common inflammatory or infectious diseases, thus presenting difficulties during diagnosis and occasionally causing patients to be treated for another disease entity [17]. This is associated with increased time to diagnosis of IE and can contribute to an enhanced risk of complications of the disease, which may include fatal outcomes [28–30]. Therefore, results from microbiological analysis, laboratory tests, and diagnostic imaging are needed to establish the diagnosis. All the above are components needed to diagnose IE through the clinically modified Duke diagnostic criteria (Figure 3) [31, 32]. However, it should be remembered that these criteria were created for classification for scientific research and not as a diagnostic tool for clinicians; hence, the limitations in their use in patients with suspected prosthetic valve endocarditis, right-sided endocarditis, and infections of implanted cardiac devices [12, 33].
Aim of the research
The main purpose of this systematic review is to compile case reports of patients with E. faecalis-related IE and to determine whether the results of physical examination, laboratory tests, and imaging examinations for the diagnosis of IE tended to corelate with the patients’ features.
Methods
Criteria for considering studies for the review
Only case reports (CRs) that were published entirely in English were included in this review. CRs were considered for inclusion if they were based on papers of a patient with IE and with E. faecalis as the primary cause of the presenting complaints. We also considered reports describing cases of patients treated in an atypical and different manner than proposed in guidelines for this condition. Cases in which the manifestation of endocarditis was presented with atypical symptoms or by another disease entity were also included.
Search methods
The search was conducted up to December 2022 in the following databases, with no restriction on either publication year or publication status:
- PubMed (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), (Access on 28 December 2022),
- EBSCO host (https://search.ebscohost.com), (Access on 28 December 2022),
- OVID (https://ovidsp.ovid.com), (Access on 28 December 2022).
The following search strategy was used for the PubMed database: “ALL = infective endocarditis AND enterococcus faecalis AND case report”. The same strategy was also applied to the EBSCO host database and OVID.
Restrictions were applied to the language in which the CR was published. CRs that contained the entire text in English were considered, while those containing only an abstract in English were rejected. On the other hand, all the CRs were included regardless of the country from which they originated.
The authors also scanned the references of all relevant articles.
The titles and abstracts identified through the search process were reviewed by the authors. This was followed by retrieving the full texts of selected CRs and evaluating them for eligibility.
Results
The search results were summarised in the flow diagram in Figure 4, and the articles included in the systematic review are listed in Table 1.
Of the 231 publications identified, 89 were potentially suitable for this systematic review. Then, 61 articles were excluded: 43 due to inappropriate research methods (the articles were incompatible with the search topic), 15 due to repetition of articles between databases, and 3 due to inability to access the full text of the CRs. The final analysis included 28 publications yielding data on E. faecalis as a cause of IE, taken from 89 reported cases.
Discussion
Through analysis of the reviewed CRs [34–61], men were more often affected by IE than were women (in 18 out of 28 CRs). The disease was observed mostly in the age group between 60 and 80 years. As many as 18 patients, both male and female, were in this age range according to the gathered CRs. However, in 3 cases IE was diagnosed in patients under the age of 40 [38, 46, 54]. Unfortunately, in some cases, it was impossible to identify the gender and age of the patient [35, 52].
According to the CRs, patients presented to the physician or emergency room with a variety of symptoms, of which the most common were fever, chills, shortness of breath, cough, or generalised fatigue [34–38, 40, 43–45, 49, 51–57, 60]. In general, these are non-specific symptoms that do not allow a straightforward diagnosis but are recurrent enough in most patients to suggest that further diagnostics should also be directed toward IE. On the other hand, there have been patients in whom symptoms were absent for a prolonged period [34, 45] or appeared with sudden blindness [39, 48], soreness in the joints [40], acute pain and numbness in the leg [46, 56, 61], or various forms of skin lesions [43, 47]. In the case of the 64-year-old patient [50], these lesions appeared as erythema, erosions with scales, and crusts on the face and upper part of the thorax. The patient had a skin sample taken for histopathological examination, which led to a diagnosis of pemphigoid. However, the lesions did not respond to treatment, and due to persistent inflammatory parameters, further diagnosis was pursued. It was eventually found that the pemphigoid appeared secondary to IE. Sometimes the first symptom was a complication of IE, which was manifested as acute coronary syndrome with ST-segment elevation [51, 52], or weakness of the left side of the body in a patient with stroke [41, 59]. In the case presented by Labbe et al. [56] the complication of IE was also a stroke, which manifested as word-finding problems and moderate headaches that persisted for more than 1 week. Interestingly, the patient had a previous history of deep vein thrombosis diagnosed 6 weeks before the current hospitalisation. In another case [61], a 63-year-old man sustained sudden dysphasia and hemianopia following a stroke. In the aforementioned 2 cases, the CT scan revealed multiple minor brain infarcts caused by septic embolism.
When comparing patients with IE, several of them had diseases such as hypertension, dyslipidaemia, obesity, or diabetes [35–37, 40, 41, 45, 51, 60]. Three out of 28 cases had comorbid chronic kidney disease [34, 42, 60]. For some patients, among the concomitant diseases was cancer, either in remission or currently undergoing treatment [37, 39, 48, 51, 56, 60], while most patients did not have coexisting illnesses or were not mentioned in the CRs [38, 43, 44, 46, 50, 52, 55, 59]. Based on the physical examination, in some cases it has been possible to establish the probable cause of developing an E. faecalis infection; however, in up to 70% of patients it is not possible to identify the main cause of the infection [56]. The most common cause of E. faecalis infection was due to the formation of vegetations on the pacemaker wires or prosthetic valves [41, 45, 50, 52, 57]. Because of the presence of E. faecalis in the gastrointestinal microbiota, infections also came from lesions of the colonic mucosa – a small perforation in the rectal area [51], or a previous polyp removal [53]. For the 63-year-old man, the first symptom of IE was rapidly progressing heart failure and lower extremity pain, which appeared several weeks after dental treatment [61]. In addition, chronic urinary tract inflammations and transurethral surgeries predisposed to bacteraemia with the aetiology of E. faecalis [42, 43]. Moreover, in the case of an 80-year-old patient, regular catheterisation due to an enlarged prostate led to micro-injuries through which bacteria entered the general circulation and subsequently became the cause of this patient’s IE [58]. However, there were also completely different cases, as in the case report of Tamura et al. [38], in which the patient developed IE as a result of a caesarean section performed 3 months earlier, or as presented in the case report of Nishanth et al. [44], in which the patient’s repeated blood transfusions led to the development of 2 vegetations on the pulmonary valve.
Regarding the laboratory test findings, the most frequent deviations from normal were increased levels of C-reactive protein and white blood cells [34, 37, 38, 40, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 60]. In addition, some patients had decreased haemoglobin levels and elevated platelet parameters [37, 38, 40, 44, 47, 56, 60]. Only in 1 case, the panel of tests was expanded to include rheumatoid factor, which was necessary to confirm the diagnosis of IE according to the modified Duke criteria [37]. Patients first had their blood drawn for cultures, which were essential both for the diagnosis of bacteraemia and its aetiological agent. Unfortunately, negative cultures have also been reported [34, 35, 57], and then only imaging examinations could be used, which also turned out to be unsuccessful in 1 case of a 70-year-old female patient [34]. The patient developed acute mitral valve insufficiency, which was treated surgically. The vegetation on the mitral valve was found only intraoperatively, and blood cultures performed after surgery grew E. faecalis.
When diagnosing IE, imaging examinations are important. Most commonly, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is performed, which is a simple and readily available method to visualise vegetations on the heart valves. This technique is often adequate to make the diagnosis of IE [35, 38, 39, 41, 43–45, 47, 59]. Nevertheless, in some cases, TTE is insufficient or requires confirmation, and then transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is additionally performed. This method is more sensitive and specific, thus significantly increasing the chance of detecting vegetations on the valve [36, 40, 46, 49, 51, 53–55, 58] as well as other changes characteristic of IE including abscess [42, 50, 54], or pseudoaneurysm and aneurysm [48, 50]. In the case report presented by Bourlond et al. [52], none of the imaging modalities were able to visualise the valve lesions, and only post-mortem examination revealed the presence of multiple vegetations on the prosthetic aortic valve. When the above-mentioned imaging examinations become insufficient, and it is not possible to detect lesions on the valves or within the pacemaker leads with their assistance, then 18F-FDG positron emission tomography computed tomography (PET/CT) may be used. This method was used in the case of a 51-year-old woman [57] in whom, despite symptoms suggestive of IE, both blood cultures and echocardiography failed to detect the disease. At that time, 18F-FDG PET/CT was used, which revealed increased bacterial uptake of glucose along the pacemaker electrode pathway, including additionally the right ventricle and the device pocket.
In patients who developed IE, the vegetations most often occupied the left side of the heart, i.e. the changes were situated primarily on the aortic valve and followed by the mitral valve [34, 36–43, 46, 48–54, 56, 58–61]. Out of the 28 CRs reviewed, they were present in 13 and 10 cases, representing 43.3% and 33.3%, respectively. Among them, in 1 case, both these valves were simultaneously involved [40]. The pulmonary valve was next in order of involvement in IE, being affected in 3 out of 28 cases, accounting for 10% [35, 44, 53]. Of these, there was a case in which both the aortic and pulmonary valves were simultaneously affected [53]. Only in 1 case was the tricuspid valve occupation observed [47], which is an unusual localisation for IE, especially if the patient has no factors predisposing to this, such as the use of intravenous drugs. In the case described by Wilczynska et al. [47], the patient presented to the doctor with back pain and a lumbar rash, and the medical history revealed that he had symptoms of lumbar spondylosis in addition to concomitant ischaemic heart disease. In contrast, there was no history of previous surgical procedures or chronic urinary tract infections, and all possible sources of E. faecalis infection were ruled out during hospitalisation. Hence, the presence of vegetation on the tricuspid valve was not a surprise to the attending physicians and was associated with the extended time required to diagnose IE. The last 3 cases [41, 45, 57] were related to the presence of vegetations on the pacemaker leads. While 2 patients presented with numerous comorbidities, the third patient, a 51-year-old woman, only suffered from postpartum cardiomyopathy [57]. The localisation of IE E. faecalis vegetations are summarised in Figure 5.
The lesions, occurring on the valves, are the reason for their damage, resulting in their regurgitation. This condition has been observed in nearly every case, regardless of the type of valve involved [34–53, 55–61]. An exception was a case reported by Buggey and Hoit [54], wherein a patient with a previous history of intravenous drug use, as the complication of prosthetic aortic valve insufficiency, presented stenosis. In addition, the patient was observed to have perivalvular thickening, which at surgery was found to be due to abscess formation and dehiscence. If the valves were severely damaged and caused significant myocardial overload, manifested by increasing dyspnoea and prompt fatigue of patients, then they were replaced with prosthetic valves [35, 36, 38, 40, 41, 56, 60, 61].
Currently, 2 methods are recommended for the treatment of IE caused by E. faecalis: the combination of a -lactam with an aminoglycoside and the use of a double -lactam [62]. These methods are considered the standard of treatment based on
in vitro experimental data and multiple case series. In the first method, the preferable b-lactam is penicillin or ampicillin in combination with gentamicin, and this treatment is recommended, although with the duration of therapy it is associated with a high risk of nephrotoxicity, especially in the elderly. Such treatment was used in 9 out of 28 patients [38, 40–42, 44, 49, 55, 56, 60]. The double b-lactam method uses the synergistic effect of ampicillin with ceftriaxone, whereby ampicillin leads to partial saturation of penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) 4 and 5, while ceftriaxone leads to complete saturation of PBPs 2 and 3. This leads to a marked impairment of cell wall synthesis and exerts a synergistic bactericidal effect against E. faecalis. It has similar effectiveness to the aforementioned method and is recommended for patients with an increased risk of nephrotoxicity and HLAR strain infection. The risk of inducing E. faecalis resistance to vancomycin and Clostridioides difficile infection is a disadvantage of the therapy. This treatment modality was used in 6 out of 28 patients [35–37, 50, 51, 58]. In other cases, treatment variants were used with amoxicillin instead of ampicillin [39, 43, 47, 52]. In cases with an allergy to b-lactams or increased resistance to them, vancomycin [45, 53] or daptomycin [46] was included. In 2 cases, vancomycin alone was used in the treatment of IE [48, 57].
Infective endocarditis is a burdensome disease, and patients with IE were exposed to an additional risk of developing various types of severe complications. These manifested, as already mentioned, by myocardial infarction [51, 52] or stroke [41, 43, 51, 56, 59, 61]. The disease also unusually appeared as diffuse alveolar haemorrhage [37]. Complications can be associated with the detachment of embolic material from the vegetation, located on the valve or pacemaker electrodes, creating a septic embolism. Depending on where it is transported with the blood, it may cause a wide range of complications that manifest as the previously mentioned stroke, pain in the lower extremities resulting from a thrombus in the popliteal artery and superficial femoral artery [46], or by causing mycotic aneurysms in various regions of the body. In 2 out of 28 cases reviewed, the complication of IE was the development of a mycotic aneurysm in the distal superior mesenteric artery [43] presenting with severe abdominal pain and nausea, and a very rare case of a mycotic aneurysm in the aortic bifurcation into the common iliac arteries [61]. Despite the diagnosis of IE and the inclusion of appropriate treatment, some patients developed multiple organ failure in the course of septic shock, or acute renal insufficiency and sudden heart failure. These conditions have unfortunately been associated with fatal outcomes [36, 42, 51, 52, 59].
Conclusions
Infective endocarditis occurs especially in the elderly. They have an increased susceptibility to serious systemic infections due to numerous comorbidities, such as chronic kidney disease, chronic heart disease, diabetes, or cancer. Additionally, they have naturally reduced immunity with age, or among others because of treatment with glucocorticosteroids. The systematic review of the reported cases revealed an enhanced mortality rate due to multiple organ failure in patients with prosthetic valves and numerous comorbidities. Furthermore, the presence of an artificial valve was associated with an atypical course of IE in patients. This was similar in patients who had a history of cancer or were undergoing treatment at the time of hospitalisation. Moreover, it was observed that IE in people under 60 years of age was mostly associated with either an atypical presentation or manifestation as another disease entity.
Infective endocarditis, despite advances in diagnosis and microbiological techniques, remains a severe condition that, if untreated, can be life-threatening for the patient. Although the symptoms are nonspecific, which does not allow a direct diagnosis, a rudimentary echocardiogram should be performed in any such case to exclude the presence of valvular lesions in the heart. The clinicians should be even more vigilant if the patient reports a history of malignancy or prosthetic valve replacement. It is also important to pay attention to individual patient characteristics and the risk of serious consequences of IE when making treatment decisions.
Funding
No external funding.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Arias CA, Murray BE. The rise of the Enterococcus: beyond vancomycin resistance. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012 Mar; 10(4): 266-278.
2.
Schleifer KH, Kilpper-Bälz R. Transfer of Streptococcus faecalis and Streptococcus faecium to the genus Enterococcus nom. rev. as Enterococcus faecalis comb. nov. and Enterococcus faecium comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 1984 Jan; 34: 31-34.
3.
García-Solache M, Rice LB. The Enterococcus: a model of adaptability to its environment. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019 Jan; 32(2): e00058-18.
4.
Telford JL, Barocchi MA, Margarit I, Rappuoli R, Grandi G. Pili in Gram-positive pathogens. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006 Jul; 4(7): 509-519.
5.
Nallapareddy SR, Singh KV, Sillanpää J, Garsin DA, Höök M, Erlandsen SL, Murray BE. Endocarditis and biofilm-associated pili of Enterococcus faecalis. J Clin Invest. 2006 Oct; 116(10): 2799-2807.
6.
Ali L, Goraya MU, Arafat Y, Ajmal M, Chen JL, Yu D. Molecular mechanism of quorum-sensing in enterococcus faecalis: its role in virulence and therapeutic approaches. Int J Mol Sci. 2017 May; 18(5): 960.
7.
Arias CA, Contreras GA, Murray BE. Management of multidrug-resistant enterococcal infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010 Jun; 16(6): 555-562.
8.
Murray BE. The life and times of the Enterococcus. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1990 Jan; 3(1): 46-65.
9.
Florescu I, Beuran M, Dimov R, Razbadauskas A, Bo- chan M, Fichev G, Dukart G, Babinchak T, Cooper CA, Ellis-Grosse EJ, Dartois N, Gandjini H; 307 Study Group. Efficacy and safety of tigecycline compared with vancomycin or linezolid for treatment of serious infections with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or vancomycin-resistant enterococci: a Phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, randomized study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008 Sep; 62 Suppl 1: i17-i28.
10.
Roberts MC. Epidemiology of tetracycline-resistance determinants. Trends Microbiol. 1994 Oct; 2(10): 353-357.
11.
Van Tyne D, Gilmore MS. Friend turned foe: evolution of enterococcal virulence and antibiotic resistance. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2014 Apr; 68: 337-356.
12.
Wang A, Gaca JG, Chu VH. Management considerations in infective endocarditis: a review. JAMA. 2018 Jul; 320(1): 72-83.
13.
Rajani R, Klein JL. Infective endocarditis: a contemporary update. Clin Med (Lond). 2020 Jan; 20(1): 31-35.
14.
Cahill TJ, Baddour LM, Habib G, Hoen B, Salaun E, Pettersson GB, Schäfers HJ, Prendergast BD. Challenges in infective endocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Jan; 69(3): 325-344.
15.
Cahill TJ, Prendergast BD. Infective endocarditis. Lancet. 2016 Feb; 387(10021): 882-893.
16.
Murdoch DR, Corey GR, Hoen B, Miró JM, Fowler Jr VG, Bayer AS, Karchmer AW, Olaison L, Pappas PA, Moreil- lon P, Chambers ST, Chu VH, Falcó V, Holland DJ, Jones P, Klein JL, Raymond NJ, Read KM, Tripodi MF, Utili R, Wang A, Woods CW, Cabell CH; International Collaboration on Endocarditis-Prospective Cohort Study (ICE-PCS) Investigators. Clinical presentation, etiology, and outcome of infective endocarditis in the 21st century: the International Collaboration on Endocarditis-Prospective Cohort Study. Arch Intern Med. 2009 Mar; 169(5): 463-473.
17.
Dahl A, Bruun NE. Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis: focus on clinical aspects. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2013 Sep; 11(9): 1247-1257.
18.
Liesman RM, Pritt BS, Maleszewski JJ, Patel R. Laboratory diagnosis of infective endocarditis. J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Sep; 55(9): 2599-2608.
19.
Apolinário P, Campos I, Oliveira C, Silva C, Arantes C, Martins J, Salgado A, Salomé N, Rodrigues C, Medeiros P, Pinho JB, Marques J, Vieira C. Infective endocarditis: epidemiology and prognosis. Rev Port Cardiol. 2022 Apr; 41(4): 283-294.
20.
Vallejo FAG. Epidemiology of Infective Endocarditis. Contemporary Challenges in Endocarditis. InTech 2016.
21.
Selton-Suty C, Célard M, Le Moing V, Doco-Lecompte T, Chirouze C, Iung B, Strady C, Revest M, Vandenesch F, Bouvet A, Delahaye F, Alla F, Duval X, Hoen B; AEPEI Study Group. Preeminence of Staphylococcus aureus in infective endocarditis: a 1-year population-based survey. Clin Infect Dis. 2012 May; 54(9): 1230-1239.
22.
Toyoda N, Chikwe J, Itagaki S, Gelijns AC, Adams DH, Egorova NN. Trends in infective endocarditis in California and New York State, 1998-2013. JAMA. 2017 Apr; 317(16): 1652-1660.
23.
Hubers SA, DeSimone DC, Gersh BJ, Anavekar NS. Infective endocarditis: a contemporary review. Mayo Clin Proc. 2020 May; 95(5): 982-997.
24.
Fernández-Hidalgo N, Almirante B, Tornos P, Pigrau C, Sambola A, Igual A, Pahissa A. Contemporary epidemiology and prognosis of health care-associated infective endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Nov; 47(10): 1287-1297.
25.
Silverman ME, Upshaw CB Jr. Extracardiac manifestations of infective endocarditis and their historical descriptions. Am J Cardiol. 2007 Dec; 100(12): 1802-1807.
26.
Servy A, Valeyrie-Allanore L, Alla F, Lechiche C, Nazeyrollas P, Chidiac C, Hoen B, Chosidow O, Duval X; Association Pour l’Etude et la Prévention de l’Endocardite Infectieuse Study Group. Prognostic value of skin manifestations of infective endocarditis. JAMA Dermatol. 2014 May; 150(5): 494-500.
27.
Fernández Guerrero ML, Goyenechea A, Verdejo C, Roblas RF, de Górgolas M. Enterococcal endocarditis on native and prosthetic valves: a review of clinical and prognostic factors with emphasis on hospital-acquired infections as a major determinant of outcome. Medicine (Baltimore). 2007 Nov; 86(6): 363-377.
28.
Herzstein J, Ryan JL, Mangi RJ, Greco TP, Andriole VT. Optimal therapy for enterococcal endocarditis. Am J Med. 1984 Feb; 76(2): 186-191.
29.
Rice LB, Calderwood SB, Eliopoulos GM, Farber BF, Karchmer AW. Enterococcal endocarditis: a comparison of prosthetic and native valve disease. Rev Infect Dis. 1991 Jan-Feb; 13(1): 1-7.
30.
Fernández-Hidalgo N, Escolà-Vergé L, Pericàs JM. Enterococcus faecalis endocarditis: what’s next? Future Microbiol. 2020 Mar; 15: 349-364.
31.
Li JS, Sexton DJ, Mick N, Nettles R, Fowler Jr VG, Ryan T, Bashore T, Corey GR. Proposed modifications to the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Apr; 30(4): 633-638.
32.
Prendergast BD. Diagnostic criteria and problems in infective endocarditis. Heart. 2004 Jun; 90(6): 611-613.
33.
Pérez-Vázquez A, Farińas MC, García-Palomo JD, Bernal JM, Revuelta JM, González-Macías J. Evaluation of the Duke criteria in 93 episodes of prosthetic valve endocarditis: could sensitivity be improved? Arch Intern Med. 2000 Apr; 160(8): 1185-1191.
34.
Yamashita S, Tago M, Katsuki NE, Ajimi T, Nagatomo D, Kotooka N, Node K, Yamashita SI. Acute mitral regurgitation of unknown etiology associated with disseminated intravascular coagulation eventually diagnosed as Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis by mitral valve surgery. Am J Case Rep. 2018 Dec; 19: 1467-1473.
35.
Yamashita S, Tago M, Katsuki NE, Ajimi T, Nagatomo D, Kotooka N, Node K, Yamashita SI. Acute mitral regurgitation of unknown etiology associated with disseminated intravascular coagulation eventually diagnosed as Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis by mitral valve surgery. Am J Case Rep. 2018 Dec; 19: 1467-1473.
36.
Akram A, Ibe U, Kazi A. A twisting tale of infective endocarditis. Cureus. 2019 Nov; 11(11): e6116.
37.
Morita M, Tomioka H. Infective endocarditis presenting as diffuse alveolar hemorrhage: a case report. Respir Med Case Rep. 2019; 28: 100931.
38.
Tamura M, Shoji M, Fujita K, Nakamura S, Takahashi Y, Suzuki Y, Asakura M, Kimizuka S, Sasaki M, Sugawara K. Postpartum infective endocarditis with Enterococcus faecalis in Japan: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2017 Nov; 11(1): 324.
39.
Andrews J, Borooah S. Endocarditis and monocular blindness. BMJ Case Rep. 2016 Oct; 2016: bcr2016217345.
40.
Tracy SI, Brown SA, Ratelle JT, Bhagra A. Rare case of simultaneous enterococcal endocarditis and prosthetic joint infection. BMJ Case Rep. 2016 May; 2016: bcr2016214369.
41.
Dyal HK, Sehgal R. The catastrophic journey of a retained temporary epicardial pacemaker wire leading to Enterococcus faecalis endocarditis and subsequent stroke. BMJ Case Rep. 2015 Jan; 2015: bcr2014206215.
42.
Agrawal A, Amor MM, Iyer D, Parikh M, Cohen M. Aortico-left atrial fistula: a rare complication of bioprosthetic aortic valve endocarditis secondary to Enterococcus faecalis. Case Rep Cardiol. 2015; 2015: 473246.
43.
Lodge F, Conway N, Waterfield N. Conservative management of a ruptured mycotic aneurysm. BMJ Case Rep. 2013 May; 2013: bcr2013008579.
44.
Nishanth KR, Seshadri S, Pandit V, Krishnanand N. Isolated pulmonary valve endocarditis in a patient with aplastic anaemia. BMJ Case Rep. 2013 Mar; 2013: bcr2013008769.
45.
Barra S, Semedo F, Providencia R, Pinto C. Thirteen square centimetre mass causing syncope in a patient with device related infective endocarditis. BMJ Case Rep. 2011 Dec; 2011: bcr1020114943.
46.
Kalavakunta JK, Shumway P, Nichols W, Gupta V. An unusual case of endocarditis- a rare occurrence with unique etiology. Am Heart Hosp J. 2010 Winter; 8(2): E128-E129.
47.
Wilczynska M, Khoo JP, McCann GP. Unusual extracardiac manifestations of isolated native tricuspid valve endocarditis. BMJ Case Rep. 2010 Nov; 2010: bcr1120092502.
48.
Zhang L, Nguyen J, Epelman S, Prichett A, Dokainish H. Enterococcal endocarditis presenting as an isolated aortic valve aneurysm: case report and review of literature. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008 Dec; 21(12): 1391.e5-6.
49.
Milbrandt E. A novel source of enterococcal endocarditis. Clin Cardiol. 1998 Feb; 21(2): 123-126.
50.
Ioannou P, Tsagkaraki E, Vamvoukaki R, Kouvidou C, Krasagakis K, Chamilos G, Gikas A. Infective endocarditis due to Enterococcus faecalis manifesting as pemphigus foliaceus. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2019 May-Jun; 60(3): 202-204.
51.
Seby R, Kim C, Khreis M, Khreis K. Enterococcus faecalis-induced infective endocarditis: an unusual source of infection and a rare clinical presentation. J Int Med Res. 2022 Jul; 50(7): 3000605221112019.
52.
Bourlond B, Pierre-Henri G, Voide C, Martinez JJG. When Enterococcus faecalis becomes a murderer. Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2022 Jun; 71(3): 181-186.
53.
Jagadish PS, Bob-Manuel T, Simmons T, Marella HK, Kelly J, Ibebuogu UN. What is causing this patient’s cyclical fever? JAAPA. 2019 Nov; 32(11): 53-55.
54.
Buggey J, Hoit BD. A case of prosthetic aortic valve dehiscence due to infective endocarditis without paravalvular regurgitation. Echocardiography. 2019 Jul; 36(7): 1409-1412.
55.
Reza AS, Anand D, Cheng SH, Anand D. Rare cause for a common presentation: isolated pulmonary valve endocarditis yet another mimicker. BMJ Case Rep. 2018 Jul; 2018: bcr2018224703.
56.
Labbé BM, Harvey-Michaud PL, Lafleur A. A 59-year-old man with persistent fever, aphasia and leg pain. CMAJ. 2021 Apr; 193(15): E517-E520.
57.
Freitas AA, Elvas L, Silva R, Gonçalves L, Ferreira MJ. 18F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of cardiac device-related infective endocarditis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2021 Dec; 28(6): 3093-3095.
58.
Hawes AM, Chou C, Co I. An 80-year-old man with persistent Enterococcus faecalis bacteremia. Chest. 2021 Jun; 159(6): e377-e380.
59.
Distefano M, Calandrelli R, Arena V, Pedicelli A, Della Marca G, Pilato F. A puzzling case of cryptogenic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Apr; 28(4): e33-e35.
60.
Okazaki A, Oyama Y, Hosokawa N, Ban H, Miyaji Y, Moody S. The first report of calcified amorphous tumor associated with infective endocarditis: a case report and review of literature. Am J Case Rep. 2020 May; 21: e922960.
61.
Woldendorp K, Selvaraj CN, Bannon PG, Dubenec S. Simultaneous Enterococcus faecalis mitral valve endocarditis, mycotic aortoiliac, and intracranial aneurysms: a surgical dilemma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 May; 157(5): e223-e225.
62.
Beganovic M, Luther MK, Rice LB, Arias CA, Rybak MJ, LaPlante KL. A review of combination antimicrobial therapy for Enterococcus faecalis bloodstream infections and infective endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Jul; 67(2): 303-309.