Esophageal stents for less invasive treatment of mediastinitis

Jarmil Safranek; Jan Geiger; Vladimir Vesely; Josef Vodicka; Vladislav Treska

doi:10.5114/wiitm.2014.40156

!!!NEW!!! CLINICAL FORUM !!!NEW!!!
to make the quarterly livelier and more beneficial for doctors and scientists !!!

On June the 1st, 2021 VSJ launches a new discussion platform in the journal.

We invite all MIS surgeons to rapidly submit for publication:
- small forms describing unusual clinical situations related to their practice,
- short clinical comments relating to any publications in VSJ, including the clinical situations described above
- brief communications of original studies deserving fast publication
- your personal opinions as part of a larger discussion on the VSJ publication
- letters concerning the topics described above

Clinical Forum gives you a means of rapid presentation of your findings in the medical databases, scientific citations on the international forum, and also an Impact Factor!

For further details, see: Instructions for Authors

eISSN: 2299-0054
ISSN: 1895-4588

Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques

Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Editorial board Reviewers Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures

Editorial System

Submit your Manuscript

Editorial Policies

Sarajevo Declaration on Integrity and Visibility of Scholarly Publications

1/2014
vol. 9

Send email

Copy url:

abstract:

Original paper

Esophageal stents for less invasive treatment of mediastinitis

Jarmil Safranek

,

Jan Geiger

,

Vladimir Vesely

,

Josef Vodicka

,

Vladislav Treska

Videosurgery Miniinv 2014; 9 (1): 1–5

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2014.40156

Online publish date: 2014/01/25

View full text Get citation

PlumX metrics:

Introduction: In spite of the progress in diagnosis and therapeutic options, esophageal perforation resulting in mediastinitis is a very serious condition with a high morbidity.

Aim: To evaluate the use of esophageal stents for the treatment of patients suffering from mediastinitis.

Material and methods: Retrospective (2008–2012) analysis of a group of patients requiring surgical treatment. The evaluation was focused on the cause of perforation, stent type and its parameters, the surgical method used, duration of stenting and total length of treatment.

Results: In total, 16 patients were treated by stenting. All patients were treated with the stent being placed across the defect in the esophagus. Mediastinitis was accessed and drained with the aid of a thoracotomy or thoracolaparotomy (8 cases), or using a combination of a laparotomy/laparostomy and pleural drainage (5 cases). The most basic interventions were either pleural or external cervical drainage (3 and 1 cases, respectively). One patient, in whom a stricture had developed at the healed perforation, was subjected to esophageal resection. Four patients died. The average period that the stent was left in situ was 53.7 days. The average period of hospitalization of those patients who survived was 53.4 days.

Conclusions: Using stents in therapy neither increased survival (mortality of 25%), nor decreased the length of therapy of patients once mediastinitis had developed. The main advantage of stenting is the preservation of the native esophagus and the reduced extent of surgical mediastinal drainage.

keywords:

Esophageal stents for less invasive treatment of mediastinitis

Jarmil Safranek , Jan Geiger , Vladimir Vesely , Josef Vodicka , Vladislav Treska

mediastinitis, esophageal perforation, esophageal stent

Jarmil Safranek

,

Jan Geiger

,

Vladimir Vesely

,

Josef Vodicka

,

Vladislav Treska