eISSN: 2449-8580
ISSN: 1734-3402
Family Medicine & Primary Care Review
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Reviewers Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
1/2024
vol. 26
 
Share:
Share:
abstract:
Original paper

Evaluating primary care programmes: a problem-solving cycle with literature review on programme evaluation for cervical cancer screening at a community health centre, Jakarta, Indonesia

Muhammad Habiburrahman
1, 2, 3
,
Afid Brilliana Putra
1, 2

  1. Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
  2. Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
  3. Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
Family Medicine & Primary Care Review 2024; 26(1): 26–38
Online publish date: 2024/03/15
View full text Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
Background
Cervical cancer (CC) poses a significant burden on various aspects of public health, including overall well-being, social dynamics and economic factors.

Objectives
This report aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a primary care programme focused on CC screening through the Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (VIA) test at a community health centre (CHC) in urban South Jakarta, Indonesia.

Material and methods
We used a problem-solving cycle (PSC) approach to evaluate the programme’s implementation and outcomes. This evaluation process included problem identification, situation analysis, root-cause determination using the Ishikawa diagram, prioritisation of problem-solving strategies based on the urgency, seriousness and growth (USG) and importance, technical feasibility and resource availability (ITR) matrix, as well as proposing recommendations for improvement using the magnitude, importance, vulnerability and cost (MIV/C) matrix.

Results
The low VIA test coverage at our CHC (13.39% in 2020) highlights the need for targeted interventions to increase participation. Inefficient implementation of the programme stems from various reasons (input, process and environmental factors). The solutions target root causes such as material, actuation and community response to improve CC screening. Inadequate knowledge, limited healthcare accessibility and socio-economic disparities hinder programme success. Despite these challenges, programme evaluation can enhance the level of community health, improve the quality of life, increase early CC case detection and reduce morbidity and mortality.

Conclusions
This study offers valuable insights and guidance for healthcare professionals in improving primary care programmes for CC screening. Future efforts should focus on addressing barriers and implementing targeted strategies to enhance programme effectiveness and reach.

keywords:

uterine cervical neoplasms, early detection of cancer, community health centers, primary health care, program evaluation, vaginal smears

 
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.