eISSN: 1897-4309
ISSN: 1428-2526
Contemporary Oncology/Współczesna Onkologia
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Addendum Special Issues Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
1/2023
vol. 27
 
Share:
Share:
Original paper

Expression profile of interleukin-6, 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal, and hypoxia-inducible factor 1-α in women with breast cancer and their association with clinicopathological parameters

Saddek Yahia
1
,
Zineb Tahari
1, 2
,
Asmahane Medjdoub
1, 2
,
Fatima Zohra Tahari
1, 3
,
Nadia Bessaih
4
,
Moussa Messatfa
5, 6
,
Fatiha Deblaoui
7
,
Mourad Raiah
8
,
Houria Ouldcadi
1
,
Sonia Seddiki
1
,
Tewfik Sahraoui
1

  1. Biology of Development and Differentiation Laboratory, Ahmed Ben Bella Oran 1 University, Oran, Algeria
  2. Department of the Living and Environment, University of Sciences and Technology of Oran, Mohammed-Boudiaf, Oran, Algeria
  3. University Ain Temouchent Belhadj Bouchaib, Ain Temouchent, Algeria
  4. Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Establishment of Oran, Faculty of Medicine, Ahmed Ben Bella Oran 1 University, Oran, Algeria
  5. Faculty of Medicine, Abdelhamid Ben Badis University Mostaganem, Mostaganem, Algeria
  6. Immunology Laboratory, Pasteur Institute of Oran, Oran, Algeria
  7. Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Establishment of Oran, Oran, Algeria
  8. Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University Hospital of Oran, Faculty of Medicine, Ahmed Ben Bella Oran 1 University, Oran, Algeria
Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2023; 27 (1): 14–21
Online publish date: 2023/04/27
Article file
- Expression profile.pdf  [0.11 MB]
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 

Introduction

Breast cancer (BC) is a highly heterogeneous disease, with 2.26 million new cases estimated in 2020, BC has become the world’s most frequently diagnosed cancer and second most common cause of cancer death in women worldwide [13].

In Algeria BC occupies the first place with an incidence of 12,536 cases, a prevalence of 38,886 cases, and a mortality rate of 12.5% in 2020 [4].

Breast cancer involves a multi-step process with several cell types. It generally starts with ductal hyperproliferation and progresses to benign tumours and even metastatic carcinomas after being constantly stimulated by various carcinogenic factors [5].

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are mediators that can induce DNA damage and genomic instability, resulting in the loss of cellular integrity, function, and viability [6]. Breast cancer cells have higher levels of ROS, and DNA damage induced by ROS is strongly associated with the occurrence and development of BC [7]. Most studies have evaluated the systemic pro-oxidative profile of BC patients by measuring the action of free radicals on lipids, known as lipid peroxidation, resulting in the production of aldehydes, such as 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (4-HNE) and other toxic substances [8, 9]. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a pleiotropic cytokine that plays important roles in the immune response, inflammation, and haematopoiesis [10]. The direct effect of IL-6 on BC cell growth is not entirely understood, and results are slightly contradictory, with some studies showing both direct growth inhibitory effects and inhibitory effects on proliferation, while other studies show growth promoting effects [11]. IL-6 expression in BC tissues is related to early stages of the disease. In advanced stages, IL-6 expression predicts a better prognosis [12].

Hypoxia-inducible factor 1-α (HIF-1α) is a transcription factor implicated in carcinogenesis and in the metastatic propagation of tumour cells [13]. In BC, cells react to oxygen reduction by activating HIF-1α, regulating multiple genes involved in metastatic progression [14].

The limitations of existing detection methods indicate the need for alternative tests to assist in the early identification of BC. This need has highlighted the potential value of circulating biomarkers for the early detection of BC [15].

Furthermore, there is a lack of biomarkers to predict BC initiation and progression, and more accurate markers are needed to aid in the differential diagnosis of premalignant breast lesions and disease progression.

The objective of this study was to examine the concentrations of IL-6 and HIF-1α, and to evaluate the oxidative stress by the determination of the marker of lipid peroxidation 4-HNE, as well as to study the correlation with clinicopathological parameters and find the influence of age and molecular subtype on serum levels of these molecules in patients with BC from western Algeria.

Material and methods

Population

The current study is a case-control study. Seventy patients with BC and 23 controls presumed to be healthy were recruited from October 2020 to February 2022 at the University Hospital Establishment of Oran of Oran (Department of Medical Oncology and Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics), all of whom consented to participation by answering questionnaires and accepting all biological examinations performed on their blood. The dosage of IL-6, 4-HNE, and HIF-1α were established by ELISA technique in the Biology of Development and Differentiation Laboratory (Ahmed Ben Bella Oran 1 University) and the Pasteur Institute of Algeria, Oran Branch (immunology laboratory).

Patients who had received chemotherapy or any other type of cancer therapy and patients with incomplete medical records are not included in this study.

The information collected by the basic questionnaire included socio-demographic and anthropometric characteristics (weight and height), fertility history, hormone use for infertility and menopause, date of cancer diagnosis, anatomopathological characteristics, and family and/or personal history of BC.

For each patient, age, Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (SBR) grade, histologic type, and molecular classification were collected from the medical records.

Methods

The blood is collected from a venipuncture in the fold of the arm on a heparinized tube, and the plasma was separated by centrifugation at 3000 g for 10 minutes and then stored at –80°.

Two ELISA tests were used in our investigations. The ELISA sandwich test for dosage of IL-6 with Human IL-6 ELISA Kit (Product number: Rab 0306) and HIF-1α with Human HIF-1α ELISA Kit (Product number: RAB1057. Laboratoire sigmaaldrich), whereas the ELISA competitive test was used for the dosage of 4-HNE with the 4-HNE ELISA Kit (Catalogue No. abx257639, Laboratoire Abbexa).

The optical density OD was measured spectrophotometrically at 450 nm in a microplate reader, from which the concentration of IL-6, 4-HNE, and HIF-1α was calculated.

Statistical analysis

Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 21.0 was used for the statistical analysis. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test showed that the data were not normally distributed (p < 0.05), and hence a non-parametric test was used. The Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare the study variables. Spearman’s correlation test analysis was conducted to assess the strength of IL-6, 4-HNE, and HIF-1α serum levels with SBR grade and number of lymph nodes. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The average age of the patients was 52.37 ±12.23 years.

As shown in Figure 1, the most common age groups were 40–49 years and 50–59 years, with a percentage of 31.4% for each group, the 30–39 year olds and the over 70 year olds with 12.9%, and finally the 60–69 year olds with 11.4%.

Fig. 1

Percentage of breast cancer patients by age group

Descriptive analysis of breast cancer cases shows that the most frequent age groups are 40–49 and 50–59 with 31.4% for each group, followed by 30–39 and over 70 with 12.9% and finally 60-69 with 11.4%.

/f/fulltexts/WO/50638/WO-27-50638-g001_min.jpg

According to the SBR histoprognostic classification of the tumours, more than half of the cases were grade II (64.3%), followed by grade III (32.8%), and grade I (2.9%). Analysis of the SBR prognostic value is shown in Figure 2.

Fig. 2

Scarff-Bloom-Richardson grade of patients

SBR – Scarff-Bloom-Richardson

Scarff-Bloom-Richardson histoprognostic classification of tumors shows that over half of cases belong to grade II with 64.3% of cases, followed by grade III (32.8%) and grade I (2.9%).

/f/fulltexts/WO/50638/WO-27-50638-g002_min.jpg

Histopathological analysis of BC cases shows that 81.3% were invasive carcinoma of no special type – 57 cases, followed by ductal carcinoma in situ, invasive lobular carcinoma, and metaplastic breast carcinoma – 4.3% for each type (3 cases), and finally invasive micropapillary breast carcinoma and pure mucinous breast carcinoma represent 2.9% (2 cases) for each type.

The results of patients’ histological type of BC are illustrated in Table 1.

Table 1

Patients’ histological types of breast cancer

Histological types of BCNumberPercentage (%)
Ductal carcinoma in situ34.3
Invasive lobular carcinoma34.3
Metaplastic breast carcinoma34.3
Invasive micropapillary breast carcinoma22.9
Invasive carcinoma of no special type5781.3
Pure mucinous breast carcinoma22.9
Total70100%

[i] BC – breast cancer

[ii] Histopathological analysis of breast cancer cases shows that 81.3% are Invasive carcinoma of no special type, followed by ductal carcinoma in situ, Invasive lobular carcinoma and metaplastic breast carcinoma with 4.3% for each type, finally Invasive micropapillary breast carcinoma and Pure mucinous breast carcinoma represent 2.9% for each class.

The immunohistochemical (IHC) study revealed that 35.4% of the tumours were luminal B, 32.3% were triple negative (TN) with absence of progesterone receptor (PR), estrogen receptor (ER), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression, 26.2% were luminal A, 4.6% were luminal (we could not determine whether they were subtype A or B because the Ki-67 test was not performed), and 1.5% were HER2+ overexpression of the HER2 receptor and absence of PR and ER expression. The molecular classification of patients’ tumours is outlined in Figure 3.

Fig. 3

Molecular classification of patients tumours

HER2 – human epidermal growth factor receptor 2

According to immunohistochemical analysis, 35.4% of tumors are luminal B,followed by triple-negative with 32.3% of cases and luminal A, luminal

(we couldn’t determine if it was a subtype A or B because the Ki-67 test was not performed), and HER2+ with 26.2%, 4.6%, and 1.5% of cases respectively.

/f/fulltexts/WO/50638/WO-27-50638-g003_min.jpg

No significant difference (p > 0.05) was observed in IL-6 serum levels between patients and controls, with p = 0.104; average for patients = 119.42 pg/ml, and for controls = 498.35 pg/ml, standard deviation (SD) for patients = 303.76 pg/ml, and for controls = 650.49 pg/ml.

There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) in serum HIF-1α levels between patients and controls, with p = 0.051; the average for patients = 0.21 ng/ml and for controls = 1.87 ng/ml, SD for patients = 0.71 ng/ml and 4 for controls = 72 ng/ml.

However, a significant difference was observed between patients and controls in terms of 4-HNE serum levels, with p = 0.006; average for patients = 2.66 ng/ml and for controls = 1.73 ng/ml, SD = 1.67 ng/ml and 0.94 ng/ml of patients and controls, respectively.

The results of the comparative analysis are presented in Table 2.

Table 2

Comparison analysis of interleukin-6, 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal and hypoxia-inducible factor 1-α serum levels between patients and controls

ParametersAverageSDp-value
IL-6 [pg/ml]
Patients119.42303.76
Controls498.35650.490.104
4-HNE [ng/ml]
Patients2.661.67
Controls1.730.940.006
HIF-1α [ng/ml]
Patients0.210.71
Controls1.874.720.051

[i] HIF-1α – hypoxia-inducible factor 1-α, Il-6 – interleukin-6, SD – standard deviation, 4-HNE – 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal

[ii] There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) in IL-6 and HIF-1α serum levels between patients and controls, whereas a significant difference was observed in 4-HNE serum levels (p < 0.05).

No significant difference (p > 0.05) was found in the analysis of IL-6 serum levels in different age groups, with p = 0.094; average (SD) = 6.52 (19.58) pg/ml, 202.91 (469.19) pg/ml, 41.37 (78.65) pg/ml, and 172.88 (224.72) pg/ml for age groups 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, and ≥ 70 years, respectively.

No significant difference (p > 0.05) was found in the analysis of 4-HNE serum levels in different age groups, with p = 0.35; average (SD) = 2.67 (1.07) ng/ml, 3.01 (1.83) ng/ml, 2.23 (0.75) ng/ml, and 2.21 (0.92) ng/ml for age groups 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, and ≥ 70 years, respectively.

No significant difference (p > 0.05) was found in the analysis of HIF-1α serum levels in different age groups, with p = 0.738; average (SD) = 0.06 (0.19) ng/ml, 0.28 (0.8) ng/ml, 0.35 (0.97) ng/ml, and 0.01 (0.04) ng/ml for age groups 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, and ≥ 70 years, respectively.

The results are presented in Table 3.

Table 3

Comparison analysis of interleukin-6, 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal and hypoxia-inducible factor 1-α serum levels in different age groups

Age class30–3940–4950–59≥ 70p-value
IL-6 average (SD) [pg/ml]6.52 (19.58)202.91 (469.19)41.37 (78.65)172.88 (224.72)0.094
4-HNE average (SD) [ng/ml]2.67 (1.07)3.01 (1.83)2.23 (0.75)2.21 (0.92)0.35
HIF-1α average (SD) [ng/ml]0.06 (0.19)0.28 (0.8)0.35 (0.97)0.01 (0.04)0.738

[i] HIF-1α – hypoxia-inducible factor 1-α, Il-6 – interleukin-6, SD – standard deviation, 4-HNE – 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal

[ii] Analysis of IL-6, 4-HNE, and HIF-1a serum levels revealed no significant differences (p > 0.05) between different age groups.

The results in Table 4 indicate that no significant difference of IL-6 was noted between different molecular subtypes of BC, with p = 0.492; average (SD) = 0 (0) pg/ml, 59.17 (5.38) pg/ml, 21.73 (45.55) pg/ml, 118.79 (225.33) pg/ml, and 228.22 (490.07) pg/ml for molecular subtypes HER2+, luminal, luminal A, luminal B, and triple-negative, respectively.

Table 4

Comparison analysis of interleukin-6, 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal and hypoxia-inducible factor 1-α serum levels in different subtypes molecular of breast cancer

Subtypes molecularHER2+LuminalLuminal ALuminal BTriple negativep-value
IL-6 average (SD) [pg/ml]0 (0)59.17 (59.38)21.73 (45.55)118.79 (225.33)228.22 (490.07)0.492
4-HNE average (SD) [ng/ml]0 (1.73)1.96 (0.33)2.39 (0.67)2.7 (1.49)2.96 (2.42)0.622
HIF-1α average (SD) [ng/ml]0 (0)0 (0)0.29 (0.96)0.068 (0.25)0.394 (0.939)0.369

[i] HER2 – human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, HIF-1α – hypoxia-inducible factor 1-α, Il-6 – interleukin-6, SD – standard deviation, 4-HNE – 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal

[ii] Serum levels of IL-6, 4-HNE, and HIF-1a were analyzed, showing that there was no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) between different molecular subtypes of breast cancer

No significant difference in 4-HNE was observed between different molecular subtypes, with p = 0.622; average (SD) = 0 (1.73) ng/ml, 1.96 (0.33) ng/ml, 2.39 (0.67) ng/ml, 2.7 (1.49) ng/ml, and 2.96 (2.42) ng/ml for molecular subtypes HER2+, luminal, luminal A, luminal B, and triple-negative, respectively.

No significant difference of HIF-1α was noted between different molecular subtypes of BC, with p = 0.369; average (SD) = 0 (0) ng/ml, 0 (0) ng/ml, 0.29 (0.96) ng/ml, 0.068 (0.25) ng/ml, and 0.394 (0.939) ng/ml for molecular subtypes HER2+, luminal, luminal A, luminal B, and triple- negative, respectively.

The correlation analysis of patients’ serum of IL-6, 4-HNE, and HIF-1α levels with SBR grade and numbers of lymph nodes is as follows (Table 5):

Table 5

Correlation analysis of patients serum interleukin-6, 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal and hypoxia-inducible factor 1-α levels with Scarff-Bloom-Richardson grade and numbers of lymph nodes

ParametersSBR gradeNumbers of lymphnodes
IL-6 p-value (correlation coefficient)0.248 (0.142)0.026 (–0.272)
4-HNE p-value (correlation coefficient)0.564 (-0.071)0.762 (–0.038)
HIF-1a p-value (correlation coefficient)0.173 (0.165)0.943 (–0.009)

[i] HIF-1α – hypoxia-inducible factor 1-α, Il-6 – interleukin-6, SBR – Scarff-Bloom- Richardson, 4-HNE – 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal

[ii] No correlation (p > 0.05) was observed between serum levels of IL-6, 4-HNE and HIF-1a and SBR grade of tumors and no significant correlation (p > 0.05) was observed between serum levels of 4-HNE, HIF-1a and number of lymph nodes on the other hand IL-6 expression was negatively correlated (p < 0.05) with number of lymph nodes.

  • there was no correlation (p > 0.05) between IL-6, 4-HNE, and HIF-1α serum levels and SBR grade of tumours with p (correlation coefficient) = 0.248 (0.142), 0.564 (–0.071), and 0.173 (0.165), respectively,

  • the expression of IL-6 expression was negatively correlated (p < 0.05) with number of lymph nodes, with p (correlation coefficient) = 0.026 (–0.272),

  • no significant correlation (p > 0.05) was observed between 4-HNE, HIF-1α serum levels, and number of lymph nodes, with p (correlation coefficient) = 0.762 (–0.038) and 0.943 (–0.009), respectively.

Discussion

Breast cancer is known to be a major cause of death and the most common cancer in women [16, 17]. However, the incidence of BC is estimated to be around 260,000 per year, and more than 400,000 will die from this disease [18, 19].

Age is a very important risk factor in BC [20]. The incidence rate of BC increases significantly with age, peaking at the age of menopause and then gradually decreasing or remaining constant [21]. Goswami et al. [22] found that the age range most affected was between 41 and 60 years. Our results are in accordance with these findings.

The average age of patients is 52.37 ±12.234 years. The literature review shows similar averages to our results: 50 ±11.8 years in Algeria [23], 51.1 ±11.2 years in Morocco [24], and 52 years in France [25].

Scarff-Bloom-Richardson grade is a well-established prognostic factor in BC [26]. In our study we found that grade II is the most frequent with 64.3%, followed by grade III with 32.8%, and grade I with 2.9% of cases. These results reflect those of Bangaly Traoré et al. [27] and Mahjoub et al. [28], who also found that SBR grade II takes first place followed by grade III and grade II, respectively.

The histological type of BC can easily be detected in clinical practice. It has been shown to be an important indicator of prognosis [29]. The most common form of invasive carcinoma, called “invasive carcinoma of no special type (NST)”, does not fit into any other category and accounts for 80% of BC [30]. Ben Hammouda et al. [31] and Djounidi et al. [32] found that NST presents 82.5% and 88.87% of cases, respectively. We also found that NST occupies the first place with 81.3% of cases; our results are in line with the previous literature data.

The World Health Organization and other learned societies recommend determination of hormone receptor status and HER2 oncoprotein status at the tumour cell level by IHC as predictive and prognostic markers for BC [31]. The determination of ER, PR, and HER2 protein expression allows tumours to be classified as luminal A, luminal B, HER2+, and TN [33]. The immunohistochemical study shows that subtype luminal B is the most frequent, followed by TN, luminal A, luminal, and HER2+ (35.4%, 32.3%, 26.2%, 4.6%, and 1.5%, respectively). Our results agree with a study performed in Morocco by El Fouhi et al. [34], which also found that luminal B is the most frequent phenotype followed by triple-negative, luminal A, and finally HER2+. IL-6 is a pleiotropic cytokine that plays an important role in various aspects of tumour behaviour, including apoptosis, tumour growth cell proliferation, migration and invasion, angiogenesis, and metastasis [35]. Indeed, the prognostic significance of the expression of these cytokines in BC has not yet been studied in a large cohort of patient samples [10]. Our results are consistent with the literature data. In fact, a meta-analysis performed by Lin et al. [36] showed that IL-6 expression in BC was not correlated with histological grade SBR. Another study conducted at the National Centre Hospital in Korea showed no association between serum IL-6 level and SBR grade [37].

Several studies found that serum IL-6 levels are high in BC compared to control subjects [3840]. Other studies have reported that IL-6 expression predicts a better prognosis of BC, and their expression is associated with earlier stages [10, 12]. In the present study, we observed no statistically significant difference of serum IL-6 levels between BC patients and controls. According to Benoy et al. [40] the median serum IL-6 levels were almost 10 times higher in patients with metastatic BC than in those with locoregional BC. Patients with 2 or more metastatic sites had higher IL-6 values than those with a single metastatic site [41]. Further studies are needed to clarify the different functions of IL-6 at each stage of BC and the variation in their effects in metastatic and locoregional BC.

Any factor associated with the number of positive lymph nodes is likely to be associated with survival and is a significant prognostic factor in BC [42]. One of the main findings of the present study is the negative correlation between IL-6 expression and lymph nodes. IL-6 was found to be a positive prognostic factor for overall survival and disease-free survival, and its expression was strongly associated with early-stage tumours [12]. A study performed in 2018 revealed that high levels of IL-6 suggest a good prognosis in early-stage invasive BC [10]. Accor-ding to the traditional American Joint Committee on Cancer, N-stage is based on the number of positive lymph nodes and is considered to be one of the most powerful prognostic factors for BC [43]. Furthermore, IL-6 has been demonstrated to be produced by dendritic cells (DCs) in lymph nodes, where it impacts on T cell activation, expansion, survival and polarisation by mobilising anti-tumour T cell responses [44, 45]. Wang et al. [46] report that intact IL-6 signaling in T cells is important for controlling cancer progression and that IL-6 signaling in peripheral blood T cells at diagnosis is considered as a predictive biomarker for clinical result in BC. Vecchi et al. [47] found that IL-6 expression was lower in BC samples classified as N1 and N2 and high in N0 samples.

According to the literature, the IL-6 findings are a good prognosis in early-stage invasive BC, probably by its effect on the number of positive lymph nodes, which is considered as one of the most powerful prognostic factors for BC.

A number of studies indicate that the expression of certain cytokines is influenced by age [48]. A study in the USA found that IL-6 production does not increase with age [49]. Also, Cai et al. [50] and Salgado et al. [41] reported that serum IL-6 levels were not significantly related to age. The results of our study showed that there was no significant difference of IL-6 in different age groups. This result is in agreement with the previous literature data showing that age does not influence IL-6 expression.

Each tumour subtype can communicate differentially with the immune system and produce a specific cytokine profile [15, 51], which may have different effects on tumour progression [37]. Vecchi et al. [47] showed that IL-6 expression is elevated in triple-negative BC (TNBC), and weakly and moderately expressed in the other subtypes (luminal A, luminal B, and HER2+). Another in vitro study by Pe et al. [52] shows that IL-6 levels are significantly elevated in TNBC tissue compared to non-TNBC tissue. Our results are in line with previous studies showing that IL-6 expression is higher in the triple-negative subtype compared to the other molecular subtypes, but no significant difference of IL-6 was observed in the different molecular subtypes. According to our results and those of the literature, the expression of IL-6 differs depending on the BC subtype, but extensive studies are required to elucidate the precise roles of IL-6 in each BC subtype.

Production of ROS is a physiological phenomenon. The disequilibrium in this phenomenon is called oxidative stress, which is involved in the aetiology of several pathologies such as cancer by accelerating the lipid peroxidation of polyunsaturated fatty acids in the cell membrane, leading to the production of toxic substances such as 4-HNE [8, 53]. 4-HNE has been demonstrated to play an important role in cell signal transduction, while increasing cell growth and differentiation, with elevated levels found in invasive human BC. In physiological situations, 4-HNE is present at low levels, but with high concentrations it can become cytotoxic and mutagenic [54, 55].

Our study found a significant difference between 4-HNE serum levels of BC patients and controls. These results mirror those of Sharma et al. [56], who found that high levels of 4-HNE were observed in BC. AL-Musawi et al. [57] demonstrated that high lipid peroxidation is an important risk factor for BC. Another study conducted in Finland by Karihtala et al. [58] showed that 4-HNE is a marker of lipid peroxidation, which increases during breast carcinogenesis, suggesting a role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of BC.

Many scientific articles have been published since 1956 on the theory of ageing by free radicals, confirming or refuting this theory [59]. In the present study there was no statistical difference between serum 4-HNE concentrations in the different age groups. According to Câmara et al. [60] age does not influence lipid peroxidation. Kozakie- wicz et al. [59] also found no age-dependent change in malondialdehyde (MDA) levels (markers of lipid peroxidation) during aging. Our results corroborate with data from the literature, in which age does not impact lipid peroxidation. As a result, numerous researchers have focused on the broader concept that multiple forms of damage are causative factors in the ageing process, with ROS as one of the main causes, but not the only one [61].

There are not many studies comparing serum levels of 4-HNE or other markers of lipid peroxidation in different subtypes of BC. Our results showed no significant difference between serum 4-HNE levels in the different molecular subtypes. Antioxidants are a wide range of compounds that can protect lipids from oxidation [62]. Zhang et al. [7] showed that there was no statistical difference between the BC subtypes and systematic oxidative stress (based on 5 biomarkers of systematic oxidative stress). Another study by Bel’skaya et al. [63] found that there was no statistical difference of antioxidant activity in the different BC subtypes. According to previous literature, our results suggest that the anti-oxidative capacity is equivalent in different BC subtypes. However, further studies are needed to understand the role of oxidative stress and antioxidant capacity in each molecular subtype of BC.

There was no correlation between serum 4-HNE levels and SBR grade of tumours. This finding corroborates the work of Karihtala et al. [58], who found that 4-HNE was not associated with SBR grade. Another study conducted by Tas et al. [64] also showed no correlation between lipid peroxidation and histological grade. Indeed, our results suggest that lipid peroxidation was independent of tumour SBR grade.

Lymph node metastasis is an important predictor of disease survival, and it is affected by several cellular and molecular events, notably oxidative stress [65]. A study conducted in Brazil demonstrated that the assessment of lipid peroxidation profiles shows no difference with lymph node status [9]. Carioca et al. [65] showed that there is no association between oxidative stress parameters and lymph node status. Tas et al. [64] also showed that there was no correlation between lipid peroxidation marker MDA and axillary nodes. Our results agree with previous studies, according to which the number and status of lymph nodes are not correlated with the lipid peroxidation marker 4-HNE. These results suggest that oxidative stress does not influence the number and status of lymph nodes, and probably other factors and molecules are involved. Further studies are needed to understand the molecular mechanisms and molecules involved in lymph node metastasis.

Hypoxia is a common feature associated with many types of cancer, and it is an ever-present condition in the tumour environment due to the rapid growth of tumour cells that are not supported by an adequate blood supply. This state may impact on the production of HIF-1α, a transcription factor implicated in carcinogenesis, tumour growth, and other biological mechanisms [66, 67]. In BC, hypoxia is known to play a crucial role in cancer progression and cancer treatment failure [68].

The results obtained in the current study show there was no statistically significant difference in serum HIF-1α levels between controls and patients.

No significant difference was found between HIF-1α serum levels in different molecular subtypes of BC. This finding supports the study of Gunawan et al. [14], who found that the levels of HIF-1α mRNA and soluble HIF-1α protein in tissues and blood were similar in different molecular subtypes, and that no association was found. Our results also agree with the findings of Nie et al. [69], who reported that there is no significant difference of HIF-1α in the different molecular subtypes.

Detecting significant age-related changes would contribute to understanding how the response to hypoxia changes with age and may provide important information on how to predict hypoxia-induced diseases. However, it is not known if the expression of HIF-1α changes with age [70]. Several studies have noted that there is no correlation or association between HIF-1α expression and age [69, 71, 72]. Our results corroborate with previous studies that there is no significant association between HIF-1α serum levels in different age groups. These results indicate that the concentration of HIF-1α is not influenced by age.

HIF-1α expression has been reported to be associated with lymphatic metastasis in various types of cancer, but the underlying mechanism has not yet been well established [73]. We noted that there was no correlation between serum HIF-1α levels and the number of lymph nodes. Similar results have been obtained in other studies [13, 74, 75]. Our results suggest that HIF-1α is not a marker of lymph node metastasis in BC.

No significant correlation was noted between the expression of HIF-1α and SBR tumour grade. This result concurs with the findings of Cai et al. [71] and Li et al. [72].

Conclusions

Our results showed high levels of 4-HNE, a marker of lipid peroxidation, in our BC patients, indicating the presence of oxidative stress; this imbalance between the production of ROS and antioxidants has been implicated in several diseases such as cancer, including BC.

IL-6 was found to be negatively correlated with lymph node count, which is one of the strongest prognostic factors for BC, suggesting that IL-6 is a good prognostic factor.

However, there was no association between 4-HNE, HIF-1α, and the number of lymph nodes.

In addition, our results show that serum levels of 4-HNE, IL6, and HIF-1α were independent of tumour SBR grade as well as age, and that BC molecular subtypes do not influence their levels.

In the future we plan to analyse the mutational spectrum of the P53 tumour suppressor gene by analysing specific hotspots altered under the effects of oxidative stress, and to study the polymorphism of antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase.

Notes

[11] Conflicts of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1 

Ignatov A, Eggemann H, Burger E, Ignatov T. Patterns of breast cancer relapse in accordance to biological subtype. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2018; 144: 1347-1355.

2 

Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, et al. Cancer statistics for the year 2020: an overview. Int J Cancer 2021; 149: 778-789.

3 

DeSantis CE, Siegel RL, Sauer AG, et al. Cancer statistics for African Americans, 2016: progress and opportunities in reducing racial disparities. CA Cancer J Clin 2016; 66: 290-308.

4 

Globocan. Algeria Source: Globocan 2020. The Global Cancer Observatory 2020.

5 

Sun YS, Zhao Z, Yang ZN, et al. Risk factors and preventions of breast cancer. Int J Biol Sci 2017; 13: 1387.

6 

Dizdaroglu M. Oxidatively induced DNA damage and its repair in cancer. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res 2015; 763: 212-245.

7 

Zhang K, Ping L, Du T, et al. A novel systematic oxidative stress score predicts the prognosis of patients with operable breast cancer. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2021; 2021: 9441896.

8 

Li Y, Zhao T, Li J, et al. Oxidative stress and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (4-hne): implications in the pathogenesis and treatment of aging-related diseases. J Immunol Res 2022; 2022: 2233906.

9 

De Oliveira ST, Bessani MP, Scandolara TB, et al. Systemic lipid peroxidation profile from patients with breast cancer changes according to the lymph nodal metastasis status. Oncoscience 2022; 9: 1.

10 

Ahmad N, Ammar A, Storr SJ, et al. IL-6 and IL-10 are associated with good prognosis in early stage invasive breast cancer patients. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2018; 67: 537-549.

11 

Dethlefsen C, Højfeldt G, Hojman P. The role of intratumoral and systemic IL-6 in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013; 138: 657-664.

12 

Karczewska A, Nawrocki S, Bręborowicz D, Filas V, Mackiewicz A. Expression of interleukin-6, interleukin-6 receptor, and glycoprotein 130 correlates with good prognoses for patients with breast carcinoma. Cancer 2000; 88: 2061-2071.

13 

Rajkovic-Molek K, Mustac E, Hadžisejdic I, Jonjic N. The prognostic importance of nuclear factor κB and hypoxia-inducible factor 1α in relation to the breast cancer subtype and the overall survival. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2014; 22: 464-470.

14 

Gunawan I, Hatta M, Benyamin AF, Islam AA. The hypoxic response expression as a survival biomarkers in treatment-naive advanced breast cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2020; 21: 629-637.

15 

Gonzalez RM, Daly DS, Tan R, Marks JR, Zangar RC. Plasma biomarker profiles differ depending on breast cancer subtype but RANTES is consistently increasedbreast cancer subtypes and biomarkers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2011; 20: 1543-1551.

16 

Lee G, Lee M. Classification of genes based on age-related differential expression in breast cancer. Genomics Inform 2017; 15: 156-161.

17 

Saeed MS, Al-Lawati T, Al Lawati F, Elias RN. Evaluation of intraoperative touch imprint cytology of axillary sentinel lymph node accuracy in comparison to the permanent histology diagnosis. a prospective study of 25 invasive breast cancers. Gulf J Oncol 2021; 1: 70-78.

18 

Al Kharusi S, Baraka B, Al Balushi L, Nassar M. Compliance with oral hormonal therapy for breast cancer at oman national oncology center; descriptive study. Gulf J Oncol 2021; 1: 56-61.

19 

Sahraoui G, Khanchel F, Chelbi E. Profil anatomopathologique du cancer du sein dans le cap bon tunisien. Pan Afri Med J 2017; 26: 11.

20 

Merviel P, Jouvance O, Naepels P, et al. Existe-t-il encore des facteurs de risque de survenue d’un cancer du sein? Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2011; 39: 486-490.

21 

Momenimovahed Z, Salehiniya H. Epidemiological characteristics of and risk factors for breast cancer in the world. Breast Cancer 2019; 11: 151-164.

22 

Goswami B, Mittal P, Gupta N. Correlation of levels of IL-6 with tumor burden and receptor status in patients of locally advanced carcinoma breast. Indian J Clin Biochem 2013; 28: 90-94.

23 

Belhadj A, Seddiki S, Belhadj A, Zakmout B, Araba AEKA, Sahraoui T. Prevalence and prognosis of molecular phenotypes in breast cancer patients by age: a population-based retrospective cohort study in western Algeria. Pan Afr Med J 2021; 38: 88.

24 

Mechita NB, Tazi MA, Er-Raki A, et al. Survie au cancer du sein à Rabat (Maroc) 2005–2008. Pan Afr Med J 2016; 25: 144.

25 

El Khal M, Perrier L, Carretier J, et al. Coût du programme d’éducation thérapeutique «Mieux manger, mieux bouger à l’aide de l’éducation nutritionnelle» chez les patientes atteintes d’un cancer du sein. Bull Cancer 2020; 107: 1252-1259.

26 

Tahari Z, Medjdoub A, Sahraoui T, et al. Analyse de l’état du stress oxydatif dans le cancer du sein à l’Ouest algérien via les tests FORD et FORT et corrélation avec le grade histopronostique SBR. Afr J Cancer 2013; 5: 16-21.

27 

Traoré B, Koulibaly M, Diallo A, Bah M. Molecular profile of breast cancers in Guinean oncological settings. Pan Afr Med J 2019; 33: 22.

28 

Mahjoub N, Kamel BS, Mokrani A, et al. Profil épidémiologique et anatomopathologique du cancer du sein dans la région du Nord-Ouest de la Tunisie. Tunis Med 2021; 99: 441.

29 

Hauts-de-France RRdCO. Référentiel régional de prise en charge du cancer du sein. Issu des travaux du groupe de professionnels du Nord et du Pas-de-Calais 2018. Onco Aura 2018.

30 

Vincent-Salomon A. Classification morphologique des carcinomes mammaires de type rare. Lett Cancérol 2013; 4.

31 

Hammouda SB, Abdessayed N, Abdeljelil NB, Hanchi H, Mokni M. Cancer du sein triple négatif: particularités anatomo-cliniques et moléculaires. Pan Af Med J 2022; 42:30.

32 

Djounidi A, Merair N, Allam H, et al. Profil histo-épidémiologique des cancers du sein: à propos de 151 cas observés au niveau de l’Hôpital Militaire Régional d’Oran Universitaire d’Oran (HMRUO). ASJP 2021; 8: 32-35.

33 

Chen L, Cook LS, Tang MTC, et al. Body mass index and risk of luminal, HER2-overexpressing, and triple negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2016; 157: 545-554.

34 

El Fouhi M, Benider A, Gaëtan KZA, Mesfioui A. Profil épidémiologique et anatomopathologique du cancer de sein au CHU Ibn Rochd, Casablanca. Pan Afr Med J 2020; 37: 41.

35 

Qu Z, Sun F, Zhou J, Li L, Shapiro SD, Xiao G. Interleukin-6 prevents the initiation but enhances the progression of lung cancer Il-6 in lung cancer. Cancer Res 2015; 75: 3209-3215.

36 

Lin S, Gan Z, Han K, Yao Y, Min D. Interleukin-6 as a prognostic marker for breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Tumor J 2015; 101: 535-541.

37 

Cho YA, Sung MK, Yeon JY, Ro J, Kim J. Prognostic role of interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and leptin levels according to breast cancer subtype. Cancer Res Treat 2013; 45: 210-219.

38 

Rashmi D, Jain M, Shukla S, Thomas S. Assessment of serum IL-6 level in breast cancer and its correlation with tumor size. Ann Romanian Soc Cell Biol 2020: 1745-1752.

39 

Ma Y, Ren Y, Dai ZJ, Wu CJ, Ji YH, Xu J. IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α levels correlate with disease stage in breast cancer patients. Adv Clin Exp Med 2017; 26: 421-426.

40 

Benoy I, Salgado R, Colpaert C, Weytjens R, Vermeulen PB, Dirix LY. Serum interleukin 6, plasma VEGF, serum VEGF, and VEGF platelet load in breast cancer patients. Clin Breast Cancer 2002; 2: 311-315.

41 

Salgado R, Junius S, Benoy I, et al. Circulating interleukin-6 predicts survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Int J Cancer 2003; 103: 642-646.

42 

Tripsianis G, Papadopoulou E, Romanidis K, et al. Overall survival and clinicopathological characteristics of patients with breast cancer in relation to the expression pattern of HER-2, IL-6, TNF-α and TGF-β1. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2013; 14: 6813-6820.

43 

Escobar PF, Patrick RJ, Rybicki LA, Weng DE, Crowe JP. The 2003 revised TNM staging system for breast cancer: results of stage re-classification on survival and future comparisons among stage groups. Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 14: 143-147.

44 

Fisher DT, Appenheimer MM, Evans SS. The two faces of IL-6 in the tumor microenvironment. Semin Immunol 2014; 26: 38-47.

45 

Hope J, Cumberbatch M, Fielding I, Dearman R, Kimber I, Hopkins S. Identification of dendritic cells as a major source of interleukin-6 in draining lymph nodes following skin sensitization of mice. Immunology 1995; 86: 441-447.

46 

Wang L, Miyahira AK, Simons DL, et al. IL6 signaling in peripheral blood t cells predicts clinical outcome in breast cancer. Cancer Res 2017; 77: 1119-1126.

47 

Vecchi L, Mota STS, Zóia MAP, et al. Interleukin-6 Signaling in triple negative breast cancer cells elicits the annexin A1/formyl peptide receptor 1 axis and affects the tumor microenvironment. Cells 2022; 11: 1705.

48 

Decker ML, Grobusch MP, Ritz N. Influence of age and other factors on cytokine expression profiles in healthy children–a systematic review. Front Pediatr 2017; 5: 255.

49 

Beharka AA, Meydani M, Wu D, Leka LS, Meydani A, Meydani SN. Interleukin-6 production does not increase with age. Biol Sci Med Sci 2001; 56: B81-B8.

50 

Cai C, Peng X, Zhang Y. Serum IL-6 level predicts the prognosis and diagnosis in cervical cancer patients. Int J Womens Health 2022; 14: 655-663.

51 

Schuettfort VM, Pradere B, Trinh QD, et al. Impact of preoperative plasma levels of interleukin 6 and interleukin 6 soluble receptor on disease outcomes after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2022; 71: 85-95.

52 

Pe KCS, Saetung R, Yodsurang V, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer influences a mixed M1/M2 macrophage phenotype associated with tumor aggressiveness. PLoS One 2022; 17: e0273044.

53 

Houria O, Sonia S, Zohra B, Mohcen G, Zohra E, Tewfik S. Evaluation of oxidative status in the colorectal cancer population living in the west of Algeria. Arch Med Sci Aging 2020; 3: 1-6.

54 

Li YP, Tian FG, Shi PC, et al. 4-hydroxynonenal promotes growth and angiogenesis of breast cancer cells through HIF-1α stabilization. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015; 15: 10151-10156.

55 

Jakovčević A, Žarković K, Jakovčević D, et al. The appearance of 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (HNE) in squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx. Molecules 2020; 25: 868.

56 

Sharma R, Sharma A, Chaudhary P, et al. Role of 4-hydroxynonenal in chemopreventive activities of sulforaphane. Free Rad Biol Med 2012; 52: 2177-2185.

57 

Al-Musawi A, Al-Rubae’i S, Mahdi M. Role of Caspase-3, IL-1β and oxidative stress in Iraqi women with breast cancer. J Physics Conf Ser 2021; 1853 012050.

58 

Karihtala P, Kauppila S, Puistola U, Jukkola-Vuorinen A. Divergent behaviour of oxidative stress markers 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (HNE) in breast carcinogenesis. Histopathology 2011; 58: 854-862.

59 

Kozakiewicz M, Kornatowski M, Krzywińska O, Kędziora-Kornatowska K. Changes in the blood antioxidant defense of advanced age people. Clin Interv Aging 2019; 14: 763-771.

60 

Câmara AB, Brandão IA. The relationship between vitamin D deficiency and oxidative stress can be independent of age and gender. Int J Vitam Nutr Res 2019; 91: 108-123.

61 

Gladyshev VN. The free radical theory of aging is dead. Long live the damage theory! Antioxid Redox Signal 2014; 20: 727-t31.

62 

Cillard J, Cillard P. Mécanismes de la peroxydation lipidique et des anti-oxydations. Oleagineux, Corps Gras Lip 2006; 13: 24-29.

63 

Bel’skaya LV, Sarf EA. «Salivaomics» of different molecular biological subtypes of breast cancer. Curr Issu Mol Biol 2022; 44: 3053-3074.

64 

Tas F, Hansel H, Belce A, et al. Oxidative stress in breast cancer. Med Oncol 2005; 22: 11-15.

65 

Carioca A, Verde S, Luzia L, et al. Association of oxidative stress biomarkers with adiposity and clinical staging in women with breast cancer. Eur J Clin Nutr 2015; 69: 1256-1261.

66 

Pezzuto A, Carico E. Role of HIF-1 in cancer progression: novel insights. A review. Curr Mol Med 2018; 18: 343-351.

67 

Kozal K, Krześlak A. The role of hypoxia-inducible factor isoforms in breast cancer and perspectives on their inhibition in therapy. Cancers 2022; 14: 4518.

68 

Calahorra J, Martínez-Lara E, Granadino-Roldán JM, et al. Crosstalk between hydroxytyrosol, a major olive oil phenol, and HIF-1 in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Sci Rep 2020; 10: 1-15.

69 

Nie C, Lv H, Bie L, Hou H, Chen X. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha expression correlates with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with breast cancer. Medicine 2018; 97: e13551.

70 

Tipoe GL, Y-H Lau T, Nanji AA, Fung ML. Expression and functions of vasoactive substances regulated by hypoxia-inducible factor-1 in chronic hypoxemia. Cardiovasc Hematol Agents Med Chem 2006; 4: 199-218.

71 

Cai FF, Xu C, Pan X, et al. Prognostic value of plasma levels of HIF-1a and PGC-1a in breast cancer. Oncotarget 2016; 7: 77793.

72 

Li M, Xiao D, Zhang J, et al. Expression of LPA2 is associated with poor prognosis in human breast cancer and regulates HIF-1α expression and breast cancer cell growth. Oncol Rep 2016; 36: 3479-3487.

73 

Kurokawa T, Miyamoto M, Kato K, et al. Overexpression of hypoxia-inducible-factor 1α (HIF-1α) in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma correlates with lymph node metastasis and pathologic stage. Br J Cancer 2003; 89: 1042-1047.

74 

Campbell EJ, Dachs GU, Morrin HR, Davey VC, Robinson BA, Vissers M. Activation of the hypoxia pathway in breast cancer tissue and patient survival are inversely associated with tumor ascorbate levels. BMC Cancer 2019; 19: 1-13.

75 

Badowska-Kozakiewicz AM, Budzik MP. Triple-negative breast cancer: expression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α in triple-negative breast cancer with metastasis to lymph nodes. Breast Cancer Surg 2018.

Copyright: © 2023 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.