en POLSKI
eISSN: 2956-7548
ISSN: 1734-1558
Forum Ortodontyczne / Orthodontic Forum
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Special Issues Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
Search
Editorial Policies
Sarajevo Declaration on Integrity and Visibility of Scholarly Publications
4/2020
vol. 16
 
Share:
Send email
Share:
Review paper

Functional and Orthopedic Treatments Supported By Skeletal Anchorage in Class II Malocclusions: A Comprehensive Literature Review

Fahad Shukur Alsalihi
1
,
Muhammed Hilmi Buyukcavus
1

  1. Orthodontics, Suleyman Demirel University, Turkey
Forum Ortod 2020; 16 (4): 300-6
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/for.2020.102227
Online publish date: 2020/12/30
Article file
- FO_nr 4_Alsalihi.pdf  [2.15 MB]
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 
1. Prateek D, Shami D, Sandhya D. Fixed functional appliances: An overview. Int J Current Res 2017; 9: 47407-14.
2. Papadopoulos MA. Skeletal Anchorage in Orthodontic Treatment of Class II Malocclusion E-Book: Contemporary applications of orthodontic implants, miniscrew implants and mini plates. Elsevier 2014: 129-251.
3. Chung KR, Cho JH, Kim SH, Kook YA, Cozzani M. Unusual extraction treatment in Class II division 1 using C-orthodontic miniimplants. Angle Orthod 2007; 77: 155-66.
4. Block MS, Hoffman DR. A new device for absolute anchorage for orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995; 107: 251-8.
5. Uysal T. Implants and Orthodontics. Cum. Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2005; 8: 146-55.
6. Karacay S, Akin E, Olmez H, Gurton AU, Sagdic D. Forsus nitinol flat spring and Jasper jumper corrections of Class II division 1 malocclusions. Angle Orthod 2006; 76: 666-72.
7. Gazivekili C. The cephalometric evaluation of Jasper Jumper appliance in conjunction with skeletal bone anchorage in skeletal class II Cases with mandibular retrognathism. Marmara University 2007.
8. Manni A, Pasini M, Mauro C. Comparison between Herbst appliances with or without miniscrew anchorage. J Dent Res 2012; 9: 216-21.
9. Manni A, Pasini M, Mazzotta L, Mutinelli S, Nuzzo C, Grassi FR, Cozzani M. Comparison between an Acrylic Splint Herbst and an Acrylic Splint Miniscrew-Herbst for Mandibular Incisors Proclination Control. Int J Dent 2014; 2014: 173187.
10. Luzi C, Luzi V. Skeletal Class II treatment with the miniscrew-anchored Herbst. L'Orthodontie francaise 2013; 84: 307-18.
11. Lopes KB, Dominguez GC, Biasi C, Rossi JL. Flexural strength of mini-implants developed for Herbst appliance skeletal anchorage: a study in Minipigs br1 cadavers. Dent Press J Orthod 2013;
12. 18: 124-9.
13. Barretto-Lopes K, Dominguez GC, Tortamano A, Rossi JL, Vigorito JW. In vitro flexural strength evaluation of a mini-implant prototype designed for Herbst appliance anchorage. Dent Press J Orthod 2010; 15: 38e1-6.
14. Aslan BI, Kucukkaraca E, Turkoz C, Dincer M. Treatment effects of the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device used with miniscrew anchorage. Angle Orthod 2014; 84: 76-87.
15. Celikoglu M, Unal T, Bayram M, Candirli C. Treatment of a skeletal Class II malocclusion using fixed functional appliance with miniplate anchorage. Eur J Dent 2014; 8: 276-80.
16. Unal T, Celikoglu M, Candirli C. Evaluation of the effects of skeletal anchoraged Forsus FRD using miniplates inserted on mandibular symphysis: a new approach for the treatment of Class II malocclusion. Angle Orthod 2015; 85: 13-9.
17. Ünal T. The cephalometric evaluation of forsus FRD appliance effects in conjunction with skeletal anchorage in post-peak skeletal class II subjects with mandibular retrognathism. Karadeniz Technical University 2014.
18. Elkordy SA, Abouelezz AM, Salah Fayed MM, Attia KH, Rahman Ishaq RA, Mostafa YA. Three-dimensional effects of the mini-implant– anchored Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device: A randomized controlled trial. Angle Orthod 2016; 86: 292-305.
19. Elkordy SA, Fayed MM, Abouelezz AM, Attia KH. Comparison of patient acceptance of the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device with and without mini-implant anchorage: A randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2015; 148: 755-64.
20. Elkordy SA, Aboelnaga AA, Fayed MM, AboulFotouh MH, Abouelezz AM. Can the use of skeletal anchors in conjunction with fixed functional appliances promote skeletal changes? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod 2016; 38: 532-45.
21. Özdemir Özel B, İşeri HT. Dental and skeletal effects of using mini screw in class II division 1 treatment. Ankara University 2009.
22. Ozbilek S, Gungor AY, Celik S. Effects of skeletally anchored Class II elastics: A pilot study and new approach for treating Class II malocclusion. Angle Orthod 2017; 87: 505-12.
This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.