en POLSKI
eISSN: 2956-7548
ISSN: 1734-1558
Forum Ortodontyczne / Orthodontic Forum
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Special Issues Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
Search
Editorial Policies
Sarajevo Declaration on Integrity and Visibility of Scholarly Publications
1/2021
vol. 17
 
Share:
Send email
Share:
Case report

Interceptive treatment of class III malocclusions – a case report

Anna Szpinda-Barczyńska
1
,
Konrad Perkowski
2

  1. Private practice
  2. Department of Orthodontics, Medical University of Warsaw
Forum Ortod 2021; 17 (1): 64-70
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/for.2021.105082
Online publish date: 2021/05/04
Article file
- 64-70 Anna Szpinda-Barczyõska.pdf  [2.52 MB]
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 
1. Rabie AB, Gu Y. Diagnosis criteria for pseudo-Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 117: 1-9.
2. Tweed CH. Clinical Orthodontics. Mosby 1966; 715-26.
3. Ngan P, Hu AM, Fields HW. Treatment of Class III problems begins with differential diagnosis of anterior crossbites. Pediatr Dent 1997; 19: 386-95.
4. Major PW, Glover K. Treatment of anterior crossbite in early mixed dentition. J Can Dent Assoc 1992; 58: 574-9.
5. Lee BD. Correction of crossbite. Dent Clin North Am 1978; 22: 647-68.
6. Gravely JF. A study of the mandibular closure path in Angle Class III relationship. Br J Orthod 1984; 11: 85-91.
7. Giancotti A, Maselli A, Mampieri G, Spano E. Pseudo-Class III malocclusion treatment with Balters’ Bionator. J Orthod 2003; 30: 203-15.
8. Kravitz ND. Interceptive Orthodontics with Resin Turbos for Pseudo- Class III Malocclusions. Case Rep Dent 2019; 2019: 1909063.
9. Wiedel AP, Bondemark L. Fixed versus removable orthodontic appliances to correct anterior crossbite in the mixed dentition – a randomized control trial. Eur J Orthod 2015; 37: 123-7.
10. Franchi L, Baccetti T, Tollaro I. Predictive variables for the outcome of early functional treatment of Class III malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997; 112: 80-6.
11. Stockfisch H. Differential effectiveness of rigid and elastic - movable appliances in daily practice. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1984; 45: 251-64.
12. Rakosi T, Schilli W. Class III anomalies: A coordinated approach to 6. skeletal, dental and soft tissue problems. J. Oral Surg 1981; 39: 860-70.
13. Shaw WC. The influence of children’s dentofacial appearance on their 7. social attractiveness judged by peers and lay adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1981; 79: 399-415.
14. Karaiskos N, Wiltshire WA, Odlum O, Brothwell D, Hassard TH. Preventive and interceptive orthodontic treatment needs of an inner-city group of 6- and 9-year-old Canadian children. JCDA 2005; 71: 649.
15. Väkiparta MK, Kerosuo HM, Nyström ME, Heikinheimo KA. Orthodontic treatment need from eight to 12 years of age in an early treatment oriented public health care system: a prospective study. Angle Orthod 2005; 75: 344-9.
16. Hagg U, Tse A, Bendeus M, Rabie AB. A follow-up study of early treatment of pseudo Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod 2004; 74: 465-72.
This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.