Introduction
Disposable medical masks commonly used to protect against airborne pathogenic microorganisms gained popularity during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic [1, 2]. Until the Comirnaty vaccine was approved by the European Commission on 21 December 2020, masks had been the main element in the protection against the infection [3]. Manufacturers guaranteeing a bacterial filtration efficiency (BFE) of 95% also state that the masks are intended for protection of the respiratory system against particulate matter pollutants.
Aim of the research
The aim of the article is to assess the suitability of the mask as a means of protecting the respiratory system against harmful dust during periods of high PM2.5 air pollution levels. Using microscopic examination of individual mask layers, the quantitative and qualitative composition of the material subjected to aeration in the zone affected by urban pollution was analysed.
Material and methods
The FFP2 mask, commonly available on the market, manufactured in accordance with the EN 149:20001 + A1:2009 standard, was analysed. Round samples (47 mm) were cut using a surgical scalpel blade and were placed in the pneumatic system of a Fidas 200 dust monitor manufactured by Palas, in the Jan Kochanowski University of Kielce (UJK) mobile laboratory equipped with an Airpointer measurement system, using accredited methods for PM2.5 and PM10, Polish Centre for Accreditation – AB 1622 [4]. The measurement took place in the centre of Kielce within the UJK university campus at the Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences (at Uniwersytecka Str. 7) and lasted 24 h. The recorded flow (4.8 dm3/min) allowed us to determine the volume pumped through the sample to 6912 dm3. The sample placed in the dust monitor outside the measurement line did not affect the 2.5 µm PM fraction measurement. During the test, weather conditions were determined using the Vaisala WXT 536 weather station integrated with the Airpointer and validated with a certified LAT sensor. Observations and sample analysis were conducted using an Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS) microanalyser in a Scanning Electron Microscopy System FEI Quanta 250 in the UJK University Environmental Testing Laboratory, Kielce. After 24 h the piece of mask installed in the dust monitor was delaminated into 5 individual fibre coatings and placed on a 12.7-mm nail-shaped sample table using copper tape and covered with a layer (10 nm) of 24-karat gold in a Leica EM SC050 sputtering device in an argon 5.0 atm. The use of electron beam scanning to sample surfaces allowed us to visualise differences in the elemental composition of individual samples in a relatively quick and simple way. Identification of elements (EDS analysis) was performed using the registration of the X-ray energy spectrum emitted by sample atoms excited by an electron beam.
Results
The test began on 29 November 2023 at 10 p.m. and lasted 24 h. The average air temperature was –3.2°C (with a minimum of –7.8°C at 10 p.m. and a maximum of 0.3°C at 1 p.m.). There was no precipitation during the tests, and the average relative air humidity was 84.8%. The wind was blowing at an average speed of 0.5 m/s, mainly from the WSW-SSW sectors and did not exceed 1.2 m/s. The average PM2.5 concentration was 44.8 µg/m3. The highest value of PM2.5 concentration (86.1 µg/m3) was recorded at 11 p.m., while the lowest (26.1 µg/m3) was recorded at 3 p.m. (Figure 1). Based on 1-hour PM2.5 measurement data, air quality was classified in accordance with the guidelines of State Environmental Monitoring [5]. The Air Quality Index (AQI) allowed us to qualify 9 h within the 24 h under analysis to the good class, 5 h – to moderate, 4 h – sufficient, and 2 to the bad class.
The microscopic examination (SEM) of the mask surface showed the presence of particles of various sizes and shapes on polypropylene fibres (Figure 2). However, the outer layers (1 and 5) featured the lowest compaction, but with much thicker mask fibres, acting as protection against falling out of the internal (much thinner) fibres. The particles on photographs had various sizes, but no larger than 20 µm. Their shape (round as well as sharp-edged) indicated both natural and anthropogenic origin. Spherical particles composed of Al-Si-Fe, come from high-energy combustion of fossil fuels [5], while the larger, sharp-edged structures of Ca-Mg-Na and Al indicate local sources (emissions from households) and natural processes of rock weathering [6].
The analysis with the EDS system allowed us to determine the quantities of individual elements detected on the surface of mask layers under analysis. The analysis excluded the elements from internal coatings (Br, Te, Nb), copper (copper tape), and gold.
Due to the sample specificity, the chemical composition was dominated by carbon and oxygen. Aluminium, silicon, and calcium with sodium and potassium were identified as mineral admixtures (layer 4 and 5). The image of particles with a significant share of chromium was detected on the outer layer (1), while on the last one (5) a significant share of magnesium was found. The highest elemental diversity was observed in the analysis of layers 4 and 5, which proves that these layers feature much better adsorption properties.
Discussion
Atmospheric dust, especially its finer fractions up to 2.5 µm, is generally considered harmful as a carrier of not only natural minerals, but also of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and many elements, including heavy metals [7, 8]. It has been proven that the smallest particles penetrate the lung space, from where they can be carried by blood to other organs, contributing to the development of many diseases and even death [9–11]. The main sources of anthropogenic dusts are production and fuel burning processes, especially the combustion of solid fuels [12]. Large amounts of dust are emitted by the power, mining, metallurgical, chemical, and construction industries (cement and lime production) [13, 14] and by the transport sector [15], as well as by the utilities and housing sector, which is the most important source in winter in Polish cities [16, 17]. During the heating season, in many cities in Central and Eastern Europe that use coal as the primary source of energy, permissible particulate matter levels are exceeded [18, 19]. In recent years, the problem of failure to meet the permissible levels of dust concentration in atmospheric air [20] has been affecting the countries in Central and Eastern Europe as well in the Balkans [21]. It is therefore a key issue for human health to reduce dust emissions and protect against pollution by wearing disposable dust masks. The comfort of wearing them and their effectiveness in intercepting pathogenic microorganisms was confirmed by many studies conducted during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic [22–24]. The impact of elevated or exceeded pollution concentration, mainly in densely populated areas, on human health can be reduced by wearing disposable face masks [25–28]. The individual mask layers provided the images of particles of various shapes and chemical compositions. Similar studies conducted in urban areas have confirmed the presence of soot, gypsum, or aluminosilicates on selected adsorption surfaces [29, 30]. The images of similar particles have been detected on the mask surface (Figures 3, 4), wherein their size, shape, and chemical composition indicate the formation of multimolecular conglomerates (halite, aluminosilicates, and concentric spherules).
Conclusions
The experiment confirmed that protective masks made of 5-layer polypropylene (PP) non-woven fabric with slim design, intended for protection of the respiratory system against pathogenic microorganisms transmitted by droplets, retain particulate matter. The structural features of individual mask layers affect the diverse adsorption properties. The external mask layers (1 and 5) had much thicker fibres and larger free spaces between them as compared to the internal mask layers (especially 3 and 4). The internal mask layers under analysis showed much higher compaction level of finer fibres, thanks to which their adsorption properties were better. The microscopic imaging revealed diverse particles on the surface of individual face mask layers, including multi-element conglomerates – particles of soot, minerals, and concentric spherules with predominating shares of Fe, Cr, Al, and Mg. Further studies using the presented method will focus on the quantitative analysis of urban pollutants deposited on filters (masks).
Funding
This article has been financed by a grant awarded by the Head of the Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce for the activities of Student Scientific Clubs in 2024 and the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (Research Projects nos. SUPB.RN.24.107, SUPB.RN.24.110).
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): Masks. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/coronavirus-disease-covid-19-masks (accessed on 19 June 2024).
2.
Ueki H, Furusawa Y, Iwatsuki-Horimoto K, Imai M, Kabata H, Nishimura H, Kawaoka Y. Effectiveness of face masks in preventing airborne transmission of SARS-COV-2. mSphere. 2020; 5: e00637-20.
3.
EMA recommends first COVID-19 vaccine for authorisation in the EU|European Medicines Agency. Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/ema-recommends-first-covid-19-vaccine-authorisation-eu (accessed on 19 June 2024).
4.
Polskie Centrum Akredytacji. Available online: https://lmr.ujk.edu.pl/files/z_AB%201622_zakres_30.08.2021.pdf (accessed on 19 June 2024).
5.
Maňkovská B, Godzik B, Badea O, Shparyk Y, Morav- čı K P. Chemical and morphological characteristics of key tree species of the Carpathian Mountains. Environ Pollut. 2004; 130(1): 41-54.
6.
Jóźwiak M, Jóźwiak M. Influence of cement industry on accumulation of heavy metals in bioindicators. Ecol Chem Engin S. 2009; 16(3): 323-334.
7.
Ocena jakości powietrza – Bieżące dane pomiarowe – GIOŚ. Available online: https://powietrze.gios.gov.pl/pjp/current (accessed on 19 June 2024).
8.
Bi C, Chen Y, Zhao Z, Li Q, Zhou Q, Ye Z, Ge X. Characteristics, sources and health risks of toxic species (PCDD/Fs, PAHs and heavy metals) in PM2.5 during fall and winter in an industrial area. Chemosphere. 2020; 238: 124620.
9.
Zioła N, Słaby K. The content of selected heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in PM10 in Urban-Industrial Area. Sustainability. 2020; 12(13): 5284.
10.
Bi S, Cao H, Zhang B, Dong H, Gao Y, Zhou X, Jiang Y, Jiang W. PM2.5-bound PAHs near a typical industrial park: determining health risks associated with specific industrial sources. Atm Environ. 2023; 302: 119715.
11.
Holme JA, Vondráček J, Machala M, Lagadic-Gossmann D, Vogel CFA, Ferrec EL, Sparfel L, Øvrevik J. Lung cancer associated with combustion particles and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) – The roles of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR). Biochem Pharmacol. 2023; 216: 115801.
12.
Sielski J, Kaziród-Wolski K, Jóźwiak MA, Jóźwiak M. The influence of air pollution by PM2.5, PM10 and associated heavy metals on the parameters of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Sci Total Environ. 2021; 788: 147541.
13.
Vohra K, Vodonos A, Schwartz J, Marais EA, Sulprizio MP, Mickley LJ. Global mortality from outdoor fine particle pollution generated by fossil fuel combustion: results from GEOS-Chem. Environ Res. 2021; 195: 110754.
14.
Wang J, Azam W. Natural resource scarcity, fossil fuel energy consumption, and total greenhouse gas emissions in top emitting countries. Geosci Front. 2024; 15(2): 101757.
15.
Szwed M, Żukowski W, Kozłowski R. The presence of selected elements in the microscopic image of pine needles as an effect of cement and lime pressure within the region of Białe Zagłębie (Central Europe). Toxics. 2021; 9(1): 15.
16.
Szwed M, Żukowski W, Misztal K, Kozłowski R. High-Energy transformations of fossil fuels in the cement industry. Energies. 2023; 16(9): 3634.
17.
Heidari M, Darijani T, Alipour V. Heavy metal pollution of road dust in a city and its highly polluted suburb; quantitative source apportionment and source-specific ecological and health risk assessment. Chemosphere. 2021; 273: 129656.
18.
Vallack HW, Olawoyin OO, Hicks WK, Kuylenstierna JCI, Emberson LD. The Global Atmospheric Pollution Forum (GAPF) emission inventory preparation tool and its application to Côte d’Ivoire. Atm Pollution Res. 2020; 11(9): 1500-1512.
19.
Zhang J, Smith KR, Ma Y, Ye S, Jiang F, Qi W, Liu P, Khalil MAK, Rasmussen RA, Thorneloe SA. Greenhouse gases and other airborne pollutants from household stoves in China: a database for emission factors. Atm Environ. 2000; 34(26): 4537-4549.
20.
Khomenko S, Cirach M, Pereira-Barboza E, Mueller N, Barrera-Gómez J, Rojas-Rueda D, de Hoogh K, Hoek G, Nieuwenhuijsen M. Premature mortality due to air pollution in European cities: a health impact assessment. Lancet Planetary Health. 2021; 5(3): 121-134.
21.
Reizer M, Juda-Rezler K. Explaining the high PM10 concentrations observed in Polish urban areas. Air Qual Atm Health 2015; 9(5): 517-531.
22.
Obwieszczenie Ministra Klimatu i Środowiska z dnia 6 maja 2024 r. w sprawie ogłoszenia jednolitego tekstu rozporządzenia Ministra Klimatu i Środowiska w sprawie dokonywania oceny poziomów substancji w powietrzu (Dz.U. 2024 poz. 870).
23.
Shen Y, De Hoogh K, Schmitz O, Clinton N, Tuxen-Bettman K, Brandt J, et al. Europe-wide air pollution modeling from 2000 to 2019 using geographically weighted regression. Environ Int. 2022; 168: 107485.
24.
Liao M, Liu H, Wang X, Hu X, Huang Y, Liu X, Brenan K, Mecha J, Nirmalan M, Lu JR. A technical review of face mask wearing in preventing respiratory COVID-19 transmission. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci. 2021; 52: 101417.
25.
Brooks JT, Butler JC, Redfield RR. Universal masking to prevent SARS-COV-2 transmission – the time is now. JAMA. 2020; 324(7): 635.
26.
Ma Q, Shan H, Zhang H, Li G, Yang R, Chen J. Potential utilities of mask-wearing and instant hand hygiene for fighting SARS-CoV-2. J Med Virol. 2020; 92(9): 1567-1571.
27.
Bissiri A, Jiao J, Chen Y. A scoping review of the benefits of face mask use on pedestrian and bicyclist exposure to air pollutants. J Transport Health. 2022; 26: 101484.
28.
Liu W, Du C, Chu X, Wang Z. “Inverted quarantine” in the face of environmental change: initiative defensive behaviors against air pollution in China. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 2021; 26: 493-503.
29.
Szwed M, Kozłowski R, Żukowski W, Mbengue S, Suchánková L, Prokes R. Insights into the chemical characteristics of atmospheric aerosols from urban-industrial and rural sites in south-east of Poland during winter. Quaestiones Geographicae. 2023; 42(3): 89-99.
30.
Szwed M, Kozłowski R, Żukowski W. Assessment of air quality in the South-Western part of the Świętokrzyskie Mountains based on selected indicators. Forests. 2020; 11(5): 499.