1. Ghosh SK. Human cadaveric dissection: a historical account from ancient Greece to the modern era. Anat Cell Biol 2015; 48: 153-69.
2.
Ayoub T, Chow J. The conventional autopsy in modern medicine. J R Soc Med 2008; 101: 177-81.
3.
Long Z, Lu P, Grooms T, et al. Molecular evaluation of biopsy and autopsy specimens from patients receiving in vivo retroviral gene therapy. Hum Gene Ther 1999; 10: 733-40.
4.
Cacchione RN, Sayad P, Pecoraro AM, Ferzli GS. Laparoscopic autopsies. Surg Endosc 2001; 15: 619-22.
5.
Fan JKM, Tong DKH, Poon JTC, et al. Multimodality minimally invasive autopsy – a feasible and accurate approach to post-mortem examination. Forensic Sci Int 2010; 195: 93-8.
6.
Fernandes F, Castillo P, Bassat Q, et al. Contribution of the clinical information to the accuracy of the minimally invasive and the complete diagnostic autopsy. Hum Pathol 2019; 85: 184-93.
7.
Langer R, Tröhler A, Schnüriger B, et al. Implementation of modern tools in autopsy practice - the way towards contemporary postmortal diagnostics. Virchows Arch 2019; 474: 149-58.
8.
van der Linden A, Blokker BM, Kap M, et al. Post-mortem tissue biopsies obtained at minimally invasive autopsy: an RNA-quality analysis. PLoS One 2014; 9: e115675.
9.
Lewis C, Hill M, Arthurs O, et al. Factors affecting uptake of postmortem examination in the prenatal, perinatal and paediatric setting. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2018; 125: 172-81.
10.
Skowronek R, Chowaniec C. Ewolucja techniki sekcyjnej – od Virchowa do Virtopsy®. Arch Med Sad Krym 2010; LX: 48-54.
11.
Avrahami R. Laparoscopic vs conventional autopsy: a promising perspective. Arch Surg 1995; 130: 407-9.
12.
Avrahami R, Watemberg S, Daniels-Philips E, et al. Endoscopic autopsy. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1995; 16: 147-50.
13.
Catheline JM, Turner R, Guettier C, Champault G. Autopsy can be performed laparoscopically. Surg Endosc 1999; 13: 1163-4.
14.
Blokker BM, Wagensveld IM, Weustink AC, et al. Non-invasive or minimally invasive autopsy compared to conventional autopsy of suspected natural deaths in adults: a systematic review. Eur Radiol 2016; 26: 1159-79.
15.
Duband S, Raoux D, Dumollard JM, et al. Intérêts de l’autopsie hospitalière illustrés par la casuistique. Rev Méd Interne 2008; 29: 94-9.
16.
Blokker BM, Weustink AC, Hunink MGM, Oosterhuis JW. Autopsy rates in the Netherlands: 35 years of decline. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0178200.
17.
Sperhake J, Püschel K. Das Hamburger Sektionsgesetz vom 9. Februar 2000—Entwicklung der Sektionszahlen in Hamburgs Prosekturen. Pathology 2003; 24: 204-6.
18.
Bombí JA, Ramírez J, Solé M, et al. Clinical and autopsy correlation evaluated in a University Hospital in Spain (1991–2000). Pathol Res Pract 2003; 199: 9-14.
19.
Kapusta ND. Declining autopsy rates and suicide misclassification: a cross-national analysis of 35 countries. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011; 68: 1050-7.
20.
Shojania KG, Burton EC. The vanishing nonforensic autopsy. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 873-5.
21.
Burton JL, Underwood J. Clinical, educational, and epidemiological value of autopsy. Lancet 2007; 369: 1471-80.
22.
Weustink AC, Hunink MGM, van Dijke CF, et al. Minimally invasive autopsy: an alternative to conventional autopsy? Radiology 2009; 250: 897-904.
23.
Wagensveld IM, Hunink MGM, Wielopolski PA, et al. Hospital implementation of minimally invasive autopsy: a prospective cohort study of clinical performance and costs. PLoS One 2019; 14: e0219291.
24.
Oluwasola OA, Fawole OI, Otegbayo AJ, et al. The autopsy: knowledge, attitude, and perceptions of doctors and relatives of the deceased. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2009; 133: 78-82.
25.
Goldman L. Autopsy 2018: still necessary, even if occasionally not sufficient. Circulation 2018; 137: 2686-8.
26.
Nemetz PN, Tanglos E, Sands LP, et al. Attitudes toward the autopsy: an 8-state survey. MedGenMed 2006; 8: 80.
27.
Shojania KG, Burton EC, McDonald KM, Goldman L. Changes in rates of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review. JAMA 2003; 289: 2849-56.
28.
Goldman L, Sayson R, Robbins S, et al. The value of the autopsy in three medical eras. N Engl J Med 1983; 308: 1000-5.
29.
Marshall HS, Milikowski C. Comparison of clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings: six-year retrospective study. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2017; 141: 1262-6.
30.
Abraham L, Kreipe H, Hussein K. Comparison of clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings in 54 cases with lymphoid neoplasms. J Hematop 2019; 12: 67-74.
31.
Cardoso MP, Bourguignon DC, Gomes MM, et al. Comparison between clinical diagnoses and autopsy findings in a pediatric intensive care unit in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2006; 7: 423-7.
32.
Saad R, Yamada AT, Pereira da Rosa FHF, et al. Comparison between clinical and autopsy diagnoses in a cardiology hospital. Heart 2007; 93: 1414-9.
33.
Tavora F, Crowder CD, Sun CC, Burke AP. Discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnoses: a comparison of university, community, and private autopsy practices. Am J Clin Pathol 2008; 129: 102-9.
34.
Karunaratne S, Benbow EW. A survey of general practitioners’ views on autopsy reports. J Clin Pathol 1997; 50: 548-52.
35.
Cullen S, Mooney E, Casey B, Downey P. An audit of healthcare professionals’ knowledge regarding perinatal autopsy. Ir J Med Sci 2019; 188: 583-5.
36.
Benbow EW. Medical students’ views on necropsies. J Clin Pathol 1990; 43: 969-76.
37.
Żaba C, Dobosz T, Kis-Wojciechowska M, et al. Wybrane zagadnienia z medycyny sądowej. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Medycznego im. Karola Marcinkowskiego, Poznań 2014.
38.
Wang Z, Ma K, Zou D, et al. Diagnosis of drowning using postmortem computed tomography combined with endoscopic autopsy: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99: e19182.
39.
Wąsik D. Stosunek wielkich religii do sekcji zwłok. Forum Teol 2014; 15: 149-59.
40.
Goodman NR, Goodman JL, Hofman WI. Autopsy: traditional Jewish laws and customs ‘Halacha’. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2011; 32: 300-3.
41.
Ben Taher M, Pearson J, Cohen M, Offiah AC. Acceptability of post-mortem imaging among Muslim and non-Muslim communities. Br J Radiol 2018; 91: 20180295.
42.
Hull MJ, Nazarian RM, Wheeler AE, et al. Resident physician opinions on autopsy importance and procurement. Hum Pathol 2007; 38: 342-50.
43.
Geller SA. Religious attitudes and the autopsy. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1984; 108: 494-6.
44.
Damore LJ, Barth RF, Morrison CD, et al. Laparoscopic postmortem examiantion: a minimally invasive approach to the autopsy. Ann Diagn Pathol 2000; 4: 95-8.
45.
Lewis C, Riddington M, Hill M, et al. Availability of less invasive prenatal, perinatal and paediatric autopsy will improve uptake rates: a mixed-methods study with bereaved parents. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 2019; 126: 745-53.
46.
Hutchinson JC, Shelmerdine SC, Lewis C, et al. Minimally invasive perinatal and pediatric autopsy with laparoscopically assisted tissue sampling: feasibility and experience of the MinImAL procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 54: 661-9.
47.
Sebire NJ, Weber MA, Thayyil S, et al. Minimally invasive perinatal autopsies using magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopic postmortem examination (“keyhole autopsy”): feasibility and initial experience. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25: 513-8.
48.
Lewis C, Hill M, Arthurs OJ, et al. Health professionals’ and coroners’ views on less invasive perinatal and paediatric autopsy: a qualitative study. Arch Dis Child 2018; 103: 572-8.
49.
Lewis C, Latif Z, Hill M, et al. We might get a lot more families who will agree”: Muslim and Jewish perspectives on less invasive perinatal and paediatric autopsy. PLoS One 2018; 13: e0202023.
50.
Lewis C, Simcock IC, Arthurs OJ. Improving uptake of perinatal autopsy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2021; 33: 129-34.
51.
Lewis C, Hutchinson JC, Riddington M, et al. Minimally invasive autopsy for fetuses and children based on a combination of post-mortem MRI and endoscopic examination: a feasibility study. Health Technol Assess 2019; 23: 1-104.
52.
Kang X, Cos T, Guizani M, et al. Parental acceptance of minimally invasive fetal and neonatal autopsy compared with conventional autopsy: parental acceptance of MIA in fetuses and neonates. Prenat Diagn 2014; 34: 1106-10.
53.
Shelmerdine SC, Hutchinson JC, Arthurs OJ, Sebire NJ. Latest developments in post‐mortem foetal imaging. Prenat Diagn 2020; 40: 28-37.
54.
Rentschler L, Märkl B, Schaller T, et al. All-Body-Cavity (ABC)-scopy – an approach for a feasible method of minimally invasive autopsy to allow for postmortem tissue sampling in cases where a conventional autopsy is denied. Pathol Res Pract 2023; 241: 154263.
55.
Frantzides CT, Carlson MA, Budzyński A, Kostewicz W. Atlas chirurgii laparoskopowej i zabiegów małoinwazyjnych. Elsevier Urban & Partner, Wrocław 2011.
56.
Gordon AG, Taylor P, Brough W, Royston CMS. Practical Laparoscopy. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford 1993; 151.
57.
Avrahami R. Thoracoscopy vs conventional autopsy of the thorax: a promising perspective. Arch Surg 1995; 130: 956-8.
58.
Catheline JM, Biaggi A, Barrat C, et al. La laparoscopie diagnostique post mortem. Chirurgie 1999; 124: 66-8.
59.
Simcock IC, Lamouroux A, Sebire NJ, et al. Less-invasive autopsy for early pregnancy loss. Prenat Diagn 2023; 43: 937-49.
60.
Ernst LM. A pathologist’s perspective on the perinatal autopsy. Semin Perinatol 2015; 39: 55-63.
61.
Piercecchi-Marti MD, Liprandi A, Sigaudy S, et al. Value of fetal autopsy after medical termination of pregnancy. Forensic Sci Int 2004; 144: 7-10.
62.
Asamura H, Shiozaki T, Sato N, Hayashi T. Trial investigation of post-mortem non-invasive transnasal endoscopy. Forensic Sci Int 2012; 220: 184-90.
63.
Amberg R, Pollak S. Postmortem endoscopy of the ocular fundus. Forensic Sci Int 2001; 124: 157-62.
64.
Butnor KJ, Proia AD. Unexpected autopsy findings arising from postmortem ocular examination. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2001; 125: 1193-6.
65.
Tsujinaka M, Bunai Y. Postmortem ophthalmologic examination by endoscopy. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2006; 27: 287-91.
66.
Ang JL, Collis S, Dhillon B, Cackett P. The eye in forensic medicine: a narrative review. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol 2021; 10: 486-94.
67.
Van der Veer J, Rzepczyk S, Żaba C. Keep an eye on the crime – a new look at the forensic use of post-mortem eye examination to estimate time of death. J Med Sci 2023; 92: e753.
68.
Şahin B, Orhan KS, Aslıyüksek H, et al. Endoscopic evaluation of middle ear anatomic variations in autopsy series: analyses of 204 ears. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 86: 74-82.
69.
Rorat M, Jurek T, Simon K. Post-mortem diagnostics in cases of sepsis. Part 1. Aetiology, epidemiology and microbiological tests. Arch Forensic Med Criminol 2014; 64: 280-94.
70.
Rorat M, Jurek T, Simon K. Post-mortem diagnostics in cases of sepsis. Part 2. Biochemical and morphological examinations. Arch Forensic Med Criminol 2015; 65: 55-66.
71.
Zanuncio AV, Crosara PFTB, Becker HMG, et al. Setting of an endoscopic nasal reference point for surgical access to the anterior base through an anatomical study on cadavers. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 82: 630-5.
72.
Tan HKK, Ong YK. Sphenoid sinus: an anatomic and endoscopic study in Asian cadavers. Clin Anat 2007; 20: 745-50.
73.
Köster G, Willert HG, Buchhorn GH. Endoscopy of the femoral canal in revision arthroplasty of the hip. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1999; 119: 245-52.
74.
Dirnhofer R, Jackowski C, Vock P, et al. VIRTOPSY: minimally invasive, imaging-guided virtual autopsy. RadioGraphics 2006; 26: 1305-33.
75.
Bolliger SA, Thali MJ, Ross S, et al. Virtual autopsy using imaging: bridging radiologic and forensic sciences. A review of the Virtopsy and similar projects. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 273-82.
76.
Christe A, Flach P, Ross S, et al. Clinical radiology and postmortem imaging (Virtopsy) are not the same: Specific and unspecific postmortem signs. Leg Med 2010; 12: 215-22.
77.
Thali MJ, Jackowski C, Oesterhelweg L, et al. VIRTOPSY – The Swiss virtual autopsy approach. Leg Med 2007; 9: 100-4.
78.
Jackowski C, Schweitzer W, Thali M, et al. Virtopsy: postmortem imaging of the human heart in situ using MSCT and MRI. Forensic Sci Int 2005; 149: 11-23.
79.
Borowska-Solonynko A, Solonynko B, Fudalej M, Żyłkowski J. Postmortem computed tomography with the use of air for blood vessel enhancement – early experience. Forensic Sci Int 2016; 261: 116-22.
80.
Jackowski C, Sonnenschein M, Thali MJ, et al. Virtopsy: postmortem minimally invasive angiography using cross section techniques--implementation and preliminary results. J Forensic Sci 2005; 50: 1175-86.
81.
Borowska-Solonynko A, Koczyk K, Blacha K, Prokopowicz V. Significance of intracranial gas on post-mortem computed tomography in traumatic cases in the context of medico-legal opinions. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 2020; 16: 3-11.
82.
Grafton ST, Sumi SM, Stimac GK, et al. Comparison of postmortem magnetic resonance imaging and neuropathologic findings in the cerebral white matter. Arch Neurol 1991; 48: 293-8.
83.
Thayyil S, De Vita E, Sebire NJ, et al. Post-mortem cerebral magnetic resonance imaging T1 and T2 in fetuses, newborns and infants. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: e232-8.
Copyright: © 2023 Fundacja Videochirurgii This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
