Current issue
Archive
Manuscripts accepted
About the journal
Editorial board
Abstracting and indexing
Contact
Instructions for authors
Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
|
2/2024
vol. 99 Original paper
Neutropaenia following intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in paediatric patients with immune thrombocytopaenia
Martyna Szuster
1
,
Julia Gajewska
1
,
Artur Janek
1
,
Jagoda Perlikowska
1
,
Andrzej Badeński
2
,
Marta Badeńska
2
,
Tomasz Szczepański
1
,
Aneta Pobudejska-Pieniążek
1
Pediatr Pol 2024; 99 (2): 123-127
Online publish date: 2024/06/27
Article file
- Neutropaenia following.pdf
[0.54 MB]
ENW EndNote
BIB JabRef, Mendeley
RIS Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
INTRODUCTIONAs documented in the literature, around 80–90% of patients experience spontaneous resolution of immune thrombocytopaenia (ITP) within 7–14 days from onset, regardless of the treatment modality employed. Nevertheless, due to the risk of life-threatening bleeding such as intracranial haemorrhage or gastrointestinal bleeding, ITP in paediatric patients with severe thrombocytopaenia or at higher risk of bleeding require pharmacological treatment. According to the study findings (both Polish and international guidelines), the recommended first-line treatments for ITP in paediatric patients include intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) or corticosteroids [1, 2]. It is crucial to consider not only the benefits but also the drawbacks of each therapy.When it comes to the corticosteroids, it can be stated that they are effective in a specific percentage of cases (72–80% depending on the drug dosage), but their onset of action is generally slower than IVIG. It is worth noting that corticosteroids can induce numerous side effects, such as mood disorders, reduced activity, sleeping disorders, gastritis, cushingoid obesity, hypertension, hyperglycaemia, cataracts, and osteoporosis [1, 3, 4]. These side effects increase proportionally with the dosage and duration of use, so steroids should be administered for as short a period as possible to achieve a safe platelet count. Corticosteroids continue to be a significant therapeutic choice for treating ITP in children in need of therapy, but without life-threatening bleeding, primarily owing to their low cost, high rates of initial response, universal availability, simplicity of administering treatment, absence of contact with numerous blood contributors, and reasonable short-term tolerability [5]. In many centres bone marrow aspiration is required before starting steroid treatment. Regarding IVIG therapy, it raises the platelet count in more than 80% of children [1]. The primary advantage of IVIG is its rapid response to treatment, making it the preferred strategy in cases of severe mucosal bleeding. Although the exact pathophysiology of ITP is still not known, it is believed that abnormalities in both humoral and cellular immune systems are involved (Cines and Blanchette, 2002) – IVIG has an effect on both of these immune system elements and is therefore considered to have immunomodulatory properties [6]. However, IVIG therapy has some disadvantages: it is associated with numerous side effects, including mild symptoms such as fever, nausea, vomiting, muscle aches, and allergic reactions, with headache being the most common. Additionally, there are more severe adverse effects, such as the risk of thrombosis and the risk of kidney damage; fortunately, these occur less frequently [1, 4, 7]. Also, it has been observed that some children with ITP treated with IVIG develop neutropaenia [1, 8–11]. In this study, we focused on the issue of neutropaenia induced by the administration of IVIG during the treatment of ITP in children. The purpose of the research was to indicate the presence of neutropaenia and possible predisposing factors in the course of immunoglobulin therapy during the treatment of ITP. MATERIAL AND METHODSStudied groupsWe performed a retrospective study of 123 paediatric patients with ITP who underwent IVIG therapy in the Department of Haematology and Paediatric Oncology in Zabrze, between April 2014 and December 2021. Out of the total, 79 patients were female and 44 were male. Inclusion criteria were the following: age under 18 years, diagnosis of ITP, IVIG therapy, and data completeness (complete blood count on the day of IVIG administration and in 3 consecutive days after treatment). Patients with neutropaenia on admission or with a medical history of cancer and post-transplant immunosuppression treatment were excluded from the study.Laboratory testsWe obtained clinical data such as: age, sex, weight, height, diagnosed disease, dose and type of treatment, and neutrophil and platelet counts on administration day and 1, 2, and 3 days after treatment from official medical records. When considered necessary, patients were treated with intravenous immunoglobulin. Eighty-two children (63.6%) received Privigen, 33 children (25.6%) received Kiovig, and the others received Gammagard (4.7%), Octagamma (3.1%), IgVena (2.3%), or Flebogamma (0.8%). The mean total dose of IVIG was 1.7 ±0.48 g/kg body weight. We also collected data from the hospitalisation period of each patient with red blood cell count, white blood cell count, platelet levels, haemoglobin, C-reactive protein, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and total bilirubin tests.Statistical analysisStatistical analyses were carried out by means of basic descriptive statistics including medians, modal values, means, and standard deviations. Pearson’s χ2 test was used to determine whether there was a statistically significant difference between the expected frequencies. Because the data were not normally distributed, it was decided to use the Mann-Whitney U test to compare differences between independent groups. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. All statistical analyses were made using Statistica software version 10.Anthropometric measurementsThe database also includes information on anthropometric measurements of patients. Height measurements were made with a standardised stadiometer, and weight measurements were performed with digital infant scale or electronic floor scale. Measurement results were rounded to the first decimal place. We did not use body mass index or standardised body mass index, nor did we apply percentile grids in our study. The average weight for females was 25.36 kg, and for males 35.29 kg (median 24 kg). The average height in females was 118.93 cm, and in males 125.62 cm (median 126 cm).RESULTSThe retrospective cohort study involved 123 children (79 girls, 44 boys) with ITP. There were 79 female patients and 44 male, with an average patient age of 8.03 ±4.55 years, ranging from 0.8 to 17.9 years. Median platelet count on admission reached 18 ´ 10⁹/l. A significant increase in platelet level was observed usually on the first (67.5%) or second (20.3%) day after initial administration of IVIG. Median absolute neutrophil count (ANC) on admission was 3100/mm³. After the course of IVIG, neutropaenia (ANC of < 1500/mm³) was observed in 50 subjects (40.7%); 29 of them (58%) were diagnosed with mild neutropaenia (ANC of 1000–1500/mm³), 14 subjects (28%) with moderate neutropaenia (ANC of 500–1000/mm³), and 7 subjects (14%) with severe neutropaenia (ANC of < 500/mm³). The neutropaenia occurred mostly on the first (54%) and second (22%) day after administration of initial dose of IVIG. It is worth mentioning that neutropaenia was observed in 3 patients at the time of ITP diagnosis, and all of them experienced a significant decrease in neutrophil levels after IVIG administration. None of the subjects had a significant infection during or immediately after the neutropaenic episode. There was a positive correlation between the onset of neutropaenia and lower age of patients (p = 0.04) (Figure 1). The pretreatment neutrophil count in a group of children with IVIG-induced neutropaenia (median ANC 2530/mm³) was significantly lower than in the patients without neutropaenia (median ANC 3400/mm³) (p = 0.005) (Figure 2). What is more, the decrease in the neutrophil count was more distinct in the group of subjects with neutropaenia (Figure 3). There was no significant correlation between the occurrence of neutropaenia and gender of the patients, total dose size of IVIG, or platelet count on admission (p > 0.05).DISCUSSIONThe aim of our study was to determine the risk of neutropenia during ITP treatment using immunotherapy. When assessing the validity of IVIG therapy, potential benefits and side effects of treatment, individual characteristics, and long-term treatment goals should be taken into account [12]. Intravenous immunoglobulin applies to thrombocytopaenia treatment in children when there is a high risk of serious bleeding and a rapid increase in platelet count is desired, i.e. when the platelet count decreases below 30 ´ 10⁹/l, mucosal bleeding occurs, or an invasive procedure causing blood loss is planned [13–15]. The main goals of ITP therapy in children are to prevent the consequences of a drastically reduced platelet count such as bleeding, avoid splenectomy, improve health-related quality of life, and prevent chronic diseases and relapses. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy is only one of the treatment options, while glucocorticosteroid monotherapy remains the basis of symptomatic treatment [16, 17]. First-line IVIG therapy with concomitant steroids increases platelet count to a safe level faster than glucocorticosteroids alone, especially when a rapid rise in platelet count is desired [18, 19]. This increases the attractiveness of immunoglobulin therapy and encourages its use in patients who have contraindications to glucocorticosteroid therapy and/or the patient’s condition requires a rapid increase in platelet count to reduce acute bleeding. According to another study [20] and the results of our database analysis, a significant increase in platelet count is usually (in 67.5% of our patients) observed on the first day (within 24 hours) after IVIG administration. Target platelet count in this case is in the range of ≥ 20–30 ´ 10⁹/l, and it is sufficient to stop bleeding or reduce its risk [15]. The presented study shows that the neutropaenia occurred mostly in the first 24 hours and 48 hours after administration of IVIG, whereas in the case of the research by Ansari et al. [20] it occurred in the first 72 hours, and when it comes to the study by Berkovitch et al. [10], in the first 24 hours. It must be noted that ITP is considered to be a heterogeneous disease. Thus, IVIG may have different effects on different patients, which explains why not all patients respond similarly and different side effects, such as headache, nausea, vomiting, and allergic reactions can occur. Despite that, IVIG therapy is considered to be well tolerated by paediatric patients [6, 19]. Another problem in children with ITP is the possibility of developing chronic ITP, which can have a significant impact on children and their families due to the risk of bleeding, fatigue, parental anxiety, and other problems that can lower health related quality of life. The risk of life-threatening complications in chronic ITP is slight, but clinically significant bleeding occurs in 13–27% of children, which affects frequent parental decisions to limit activity to prevent unwanted injuries [6]. In a systematic review Kochhar et al. [17], it was found that IVIG administration is the only modifiable risk factor for the development of chronic ITP (platelet count < 150 × 10⁹/l) after 6 months from the onset of first ITP symptoms. When deciding on primary ITP therapy using IVIG, the risk of developing chronic forms should be verified. In a multicentre randomised trial comparing IVIG and non-IVIG therapy of children with immune thrombocytopaenia, primary ITP treatment with IVIG was associated with a reduced tendency to develop chronic ITP, but the endpoint (frequency of chronic ITP) did not differ statistically between these 2 groups [21]. It should also be added that chronic ITP is considered to be a process that worsens by itself (Cines and Blanchette, 2002), and it is hypothesised that IVIG may have a more beneficial effect when given early [6].If patients are at low risk of bleeding, observation rather than pharmacological treatment is recommended [1], because the introduction of medicines, as well as therapeutic effects, carries the risk of side effects, such as post-IVIG neutropaenia. Nevertheless, our research has not shown that this neutropaenia was associated with a tendency of infection and the decline in immunity in children, which is supported by the fact that inflammatory marker levels were not elevated. Other studies [10, 18, 20] also confirm that neutropaenia appears to be self-limiting and transient, requiring no medical intervention. Therefore, in connection with the above, it can be concluded that the advantages of IVIG therapy outweigh the disadvantages (the benefits outweigh the losses), especially if we have shown that most patients who exhibited neutropaenia were diagnosed with its mild type (58%). Our study had several strengths. One of the advantages was the fact that it included a high number of patients in comparison to other similar studies. For instance, in the one performed by Ansari et al. [20], the research group of comprised 89 patients, and in the study by Berkovitch et al. [10] the sample size was 30 patients. What is more, the age range of children in the this research varied similarly to [9, 20], whereas in [10] it was narrower. This study had some limitations: It would be worth adding a control group and conducting the study in other regions of the world to create a meta-analysis in the future. The limitations could also include sources of potential bias or inaccuracy. CONCLUSIONSIntravenous immunoglobulin therapy in children with ITP can lead to neutropaenia. Patients get noticeable benefits from IVIG therapy, and neutropaenia in this case tends to be a transient, self-limiting condition. There is a positive correlation between onset of neutropaenia and lower age of patients or lower pretreatment neutrophil count.DISCLOSURE
REFERENCES1. Neunert C, Terrell DR, Arnold DM, et al. American Society of Hematology 2019 guidelines for immune thrombocytopenia. Blood Adv 2019; 3: 3829-3866. 2.
Zawilska K, Podolak-Dawidziak M, Chojnowski K, et al. Polskie zalecenia postępowania w pierwotnej małopłytkowości immunologicznej, opracowane przez Grupę ds. Hemostazy Polskiego Towarzystwa Transfuzjologów i Hematologów. Pol Arch Med Wewn 2010; 120: 10-16. 3.
Provan D, Stasi R, Newland AC, et al. International consensus report on the investigation and management of primary immune thrombocytopenia. Blood 2010; 115: 168-186. 4.
Kim TO, Despotovic JM. Pediatric immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) treatment. Ann Blood 2021; 6: 4. 5.
Cuker A, Liebman HA. Corticosteroid overuse in adults with immune thrombocytopenia: cause for concern. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 2021; 5: e12592. 6.
Cines DB, Blanchette VS. Immune thrombocytopenic purpura. N Engl J Med 2002; 346: 995-1008. 7.
Książek A, Szczepański T. Primary immune thrombocytopenia in children. Pediatr Pol 2021; 96: 53-59. 8.
Onisâi M, Vlădăreanu A, Iordan I, et al. Primary, secondary or less frequent causes of immune thrombocytopenia: a case report. Exp Ther Med 2021; 22: 1096. 9.
Niebanck AE, Kwiatkowski JL, Raffini LJ. Neutropenia following IVIG therapy in pediatric patients with immune-mediated thrombocytopenia. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2005; 27: 145-147. 10.
Berkovitch M, Dolinski G, Tauber T, et al. Neutropenia as a complication of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy in children with immune thrombocytopenic purpura: common and non-alarming. Int J Immunopharmacol 1999; 21: 411-415. 11.
Park JY, Park JA, Park SS, et al. Change of neutrophil count after treatment of intravenous immunoglobulin in children with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Korean J Pediatri 2008; 51: 204-208. 12.
Schifferli A, Cavalli F, Godeau B, et al. Understanding immune thrombocytopenia: looking out of the box. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8: 613192. 13.
D’Orazio JA, Neely J, Farhoudi N. ITP in children: pathophysiology and current treatment approaches. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2013; 35: 1-13. 14.
Rodeghiero F, Stasi R, Gernsheimer T, et al. Standardization of terminology, definitions and outcome criteria in immune thrombocytopenic purpura of adults and children: report from an international working group. Blood 2009; 113: 2386-2393. 15.
Park YH, Kim DY, Kim S, et al. Management of immune thrombocytopenia: 2022 update of Korean experts recommendations. Blood Res 2022; 57: 20-28. 16.
Lim JH, Kim YK, Min SH, et al. Epidemiology and viral etiology of pediatric immune thrombocytopenia through Korean public health data analysis. J Clin Med 2021; 10: 1356. 17.
Kochhar M, Neunert C. Immune thrombocytopenia: a review of upfront treatment strategies. Blood Rev 2021; 49: 100822. 18.
Guo Y, Tian X, Wang X, et al. Adverse effects of immunoglobulin therapy. Front Immunol 2018; 9: 1299. 19.
Schmidt DE, Heitink-Pollé KMJ, Bruin MCA, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) in childhood immune thrombocytopenia: towards personalized medicine – a narrative review. Ann Blood 2021; 6: 3. 20.
Ansari S, Shirali A, Khalili N, et al. Neutropenia following intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in pediatric patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Iranian J Blood Cancer 2014; 6: 81-85. 21.
Heitink-Pollé KMJ, Uiterwaal CSPM, Porcelijn L, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin vs observation in childhood immune thrombocytopenia: a randomized controlled trial. Blood 2018; 132: 883-891.
Copyright: © 2024 Polish Society of Paediatrics. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
|