eISSN: 2300-6722
ISSN: 1899-1874
Medical Studies/Studia Medyczne
Bieżący numer Archiwum Artykuły zaakceptowane O czasopiśmie Suplementy Rada naukowa Bazy indeksacyjne Prenumerata Kontakt Zasady publikacji prac Opłaty publikacyjne Standardy etyczne i procedury
Panel Redakcyjny
Zgłaszanie i recenzowanie prac online
2/2016
vol. 32
 
Poleć ten artykuł:
Udostępnij:
Artykuł oryginalny

Opinia kobiet na temat stresu związanego z wizytą w gabinecie ginekologicznym

Piotr Niziurski
1

  1. Department of Gynecological and Obstetric Prophylaxis, Institute of Nursing and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland
Medical Studies/Studia Medyczne 2016; 32 (2): 96–101
Data publikacji online: 2016/07/11
Plik artykułu:
- Womens opinions.pdf  [0.64 MB]
Pobierz cytowanie
 
Metryki PlumX:
 

Introduction

According to the guidelines of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, gynaecological treatment (including the treatment with a speculum and bimanual treatment and test nipple) is one of the most intimate medical procedures, which in many women can cause a feeling of shame and embarrassment. At the same time, in some patients, the study revealed considerable discomfort, anger, and embarrassment, and even if they do not mention it they may experience prolonged stress resulting from the unpleasant and traumatic experience [1].
The ability to properly communicate with the patient is part of the doctor’s duty and is often neglected or downplayed. The proper doctor-patient communication depends on the effectiveness of diagnosis and of the gynaecologist’s examination. Additionally, effective communication ensures patient satisfaction and of their own medical professional activities. Thus, it is a skill that determines the canons of medical professionalism [2].

Aim of the research

The aim of the study was to investigate the opinions of women on the stress associated with their visit to the gynaecologist’s.

Material and methods

The anonymous study included 331 randomly selected women. The respondents were divided into three age groups: first group were women aged 29 years and below, the second group were women in the age range 30–39, and the third group were women aged 40 years and above.
The study was conducted in 2012–1013 in the author’s private gynaecology office (162 respondents) and among students of the Faculty of Health Sciences at the University of Jan Kochanowski (169 respondents). The study was conducted by using a diagnostic survey of own authorship, which contained data acquisition imprint of female patients and nine relevant questions.
The results were shown in Figures 1–9.

Results

The analysis of a survey conducted among gynaecological patients and students of the University of Jan Kochanowski in Kielce. The study included 331 anonymous women of all ages. For more accurate analysis they were divided into three age groups and were tested for a significance level of 0.05.
Among the 331 respondents, the largest group were women aged 29 years and below – 62.3%, aged 30–39 years – 22.3%, and aged 40 years and above – 15.4%.
As is clear from the survey, the biggest stress of gynaecological examination accompanied women aged 29 years and below. There is no dependence between the age of women and the stress of the examination. We formulated the hypothesis.
Calculations showed that the value of statistic is typical (2 = 8.31 value does not belong to critical region from 9.49). So there is no reason to eliminate the null hypothesis. There was no correction between stress during gynaecological examination and the age of women. Graphical presentation of results can be seen in Figure 1.
As is clear from the survey, only 10% of women aged 40 years and above visit the gynaecologist more often than once a year. Test at the level of significant showed that the age of women had a significant impact on this (2 = 46.66 the critical region 15.91) (Figure 2).
Statistically significant for most women, of all ages, the gender of the gynaecologist does not matter when choosing a doctor. However, they often chose a male gynaecologist. Test of independence showed that women’s preferences in the gender of her gynaecologist depend on the women’s age (2 = 14.79 the critical region 9.49) (Figure 3).
As is clear from the survey, the majority of women, regardless of age, when selecting a gynaecologist are primarily guided by the opinion of other women. None of the respondents would choose a gynaecologist based on mass media advertising. Important is the fact whether the gynaecologist is also working in a hospital (regardless respondents age) (2 = 9.77 the critical region 15.51) (Figure 4).
The most trusted women enjoy receiving the gynaecologist in a private office. This was said by over 50% of women. Test of independence showed that variables are independent (2 = 3.86 the critical region 9.49) (Figure 5).
The results showed that the most embarrassing moment during a visit to the gynaecologist occurs when sitting down on the gynaecological chair. Only for women aged between 30 and 39 does the most embarrassing moment occur during the examination. Test of independence showed that women’s opinions depend on their age (2 = 56.41 the critical region 15.51) (Figure 6).
The most embarrassing stage of the gynaecological treatment is the examination through the anus. Statistically significantly more frequently it is the most uncomfortable part of the consultation for women aged 40 and above and for women aged 29 and below. The variables are dependent for a 0.05 significance level (c2 = 14.12 the critical region 12.59). It seems that the percentage of women who chose the examination through the anus as the most embarrassing was inflated. Probably most of them never experienced that kind of examination because it is not a standard gynaecological examination. According to the surveyed women, breast examination is the least embarrassing stage of the gynaecological examination (Figure 7).
The vast majority of respondents, regardless of age (as much as 83%) feel more confident when alone with the doctor. Only a small group of women would like to see the presence of another person (the second doctor, midwife, husband, partner, friend) during the visit at the gynaecological office. Decisions are not age dependent (2 = 13.29 the critical region 15.51) (Figure 8).
According to the respondents, the most significant thing is that the gynaecologist was talkative and nice, but also, to a lesser extent, calm. The less significant thing to the patient is doctors age. Decision are regardless of women age (2 = 34.61 the critical region 23.68). According to the author’s opinion, analysing the gynaecologist’s professionalism and competence does not matter because there are no patients who wish to be examined by incompetent and unprofessional gynaecologist (Figure 9).

Discussion

In the analysed material, in accordance with the results of other authors [3–7], gynaecological treatment for most women is a stressful situation. Our study showed that the most negative feelings accompanied woman aged 29 years and below (46%) and aged 40 years and over (35%). The majority of patients aged 30–39 felt the stress of the gynaecological treatment at the same level as at any other medical examination (55%). These results differ from those presented by Szymoniak et al. [3], where it was found that the women who felt embarrassed at the gynaecological treatment were almost identical in all age groups (60.0–67.0%).
Gynaecological treatment constitutes the basis of the diagnosis and treatment of diseases of women, and so, for the prevention of female genital diseases it is essential to have regular checks at a medical office. According to Szymoniak et al. [3], the largest number of women to 40% reports to the gynaecological treatment once a year, 32% every 6 months; however, unfortunately as much as 19% report less often than once every 24 months. Similar results were obtained by Piskorz et al. [8], where 80% of women reported for gynaecological treatment combined with cytology every 12 months. Wychowaniec et al. [9] reported that 42 from among 99 women in the study, who had a cervical test performed and remembered having one performed (42.2%), underwent a cervical test every 2 years, 31 (31.31%) respondents did so every year, whereas 4 (4.04%) respondents had the test every 5 years. In our study we are concerned that in the group of women aged 40 years and above, up to 31% report to their doctor less than once a year, and 20% only when there is something wrong with them.
According to most authors, more than half of women prefer a female gynaecologist [3, 10, 11]. In our study, in the group of students of UJK, 43.2% of them, aged 29 and below preferred a woman gynaecologist, and for 37.1%, the sex of the doctor was not important in the age group 30–39 years, 33.3% and 41.7%, and aged 40 years and over – 36.0% and 36.0%. Different results were obtained Szymoniak [12], where the majority of women prefer a male gynaecologist (65.9%). A woman gynaecologist was chosen by 27.9% of patients, while for 6.2% of respondents the sex of doctor did not matter. Residents of the village, significantly more often preferred to be examined by a male gynaecologist (70.9%) than women living in the city (62.7%). Patients in maternity wards and departments of pathology of pregnancy significantly more often chose for their doctor a man, while in private clinics and gynaecological wards a female was preferred (respectively 76.0%, 72.0%, 66.0%, 60.2%).
Regardless of age, most women when choosing a gynaecologist direct themselves by the opinion of other women (age group I – 62%, 64% II, in III 49%). It is noteworthy that with increasing age of the respondents, whether the gynaecologist is also working in the hospital becomes more significant (in the age group I – 14%, in the second – 30%, III – 41%) According to Gruszka et al. [11], 93% of surveyed people wondered what gynaecologist they should go to, before the visit 52% of them were guided by the opinion of friends and 41% the opinion of family members.
The majority of surveyed students believe that it does not matter whether the doctor is working in a private office or a “state” one, as confirmed by 80.0% of women aged 40 years and above, 83.3% aged 30–39, and 54.5% aged 29 and below.
The survey shows that the most embarrassing moments of visit at the gynaecologist is: sitting on a gynaecological chair (62% in group I and 60.8% in group III). In the second group the most stressful thing was the gynaecological examination – 45.9%. According Szymoniak [12], for women aged up to 40 years, the most embarrassing moment of visits at the gynaecologist was to lie down on the gynaecological chair (38%), while for older women it was the gynaecological examination (35.2%). In a study conducted by Yanikkerem et al. [13] it was found that for 41.8% of patients the gynaecological examination was a sense of loss of dignity. The authors also found that one of the most important reasons for concern of women during a visit at the gynaecologist was to lie down on a gynaecological chair. In studies by Seehusen et al. [14], respondents felt significantly less discomfort during the gynaecological treatment when it took place on a gynaecological chair or couch without stirrups.
The rectal exam is the most embarrassing stage of gynaecological examination, regardless of age (51% in group I, 35% in group II, and 40% in group III). In the age group 30–39 years, in the second place was the treatment in speculums – 34%, and in the age group 29 years and under examination by the vagina – 37%. For the least stressful, surveyed woman recognised breast examination – 8% in group II and III and 2% in group I. Reddy and Wasserman [15] found that when the using a speculum examination the anxiety in treated women significantly increased. They also observed that at the time of the introduction of the speculum into the vagina there are such actions as; closing eyes, hands covering eyes, laying his hand on shoulders, thighs, or abdomen and clenching hands on the arms of the chair. According to Szymoniak [12], the most embarrassing stage was manual pelvic vaginal examination, digital rectal treatment and the treatment using a speculum. According to Synowiec-Pilat [16], most of the respondents were not afraid of breast examination by a doctor and 87% felt it was necessary.
The vast majority of women, regardless of age, feel safe alone with doctor and do not need the presence of another person while in the gynaecological office (group I – 83% in group II – 92%, in group III – 86%). Szymoniak’s test results [12] show that the greatest sense of security and welfare during gynaecological examination gave the presence of only a gynaecologist, and then qualified midwife and the additional presence of a husband or partner. Considering the age of women, she observed that the respondents in the age of 40 years and under, the presence of only one doctor, and in the age of over 40, additional presence of a midwife and then left alone with a gynaecologist, provided a greater sense of security and peace of mind. According Fiddes et al. [17], 34.0% of respondents were embarrassed when during treatment there was participation of a third person, 59.0% of patients reported a desire to stay alone with a female doctor, and 43.6% of women aged 25 and under felt embarrassment in the presence of an additional person.
Attitude, behaviour, and medical response during gynaecological visits have a huge impact on the correct communication with the patient and the course of the entire visit. Woman, when going to the examination room, expect to be greeted with a smile from the doctor, which significantly reduces the level of anxiety and provides a sense of security. Good emotional contact between doctor and patient guarantees the empathic attitude of the doctor, the ability to listen, a suitable amount of time devoted to the person, and a detailed discussion of the different stages of the treatment [18, 19]. In our study, it was found that the respondents expected a doctor during the visit to be nice, talkative, relaxed, and smiling. Rizk et al. [20] found that women with gynaecologists prefer, regardless of gender, features such as: competency, experience, manners, communication skills, professionalism, and availability. According to Chen et al. [21], psychological comfort during pelvic treatment significantly improves verbal communication. It was found that women, regardless of age, wanted to be treated by a pleasant, talkative, and calm doctor, and 64.5% of reproductive age have one permanent doctor.

Conclusions

In the opinion of women, the most embarrassing moment of visit at the gynaecologist is sitting down on a gynaecological chair and the gynaecological treatment itself. The most stressful stage of the gynaecological examination is palpation through the anus and vagina. The frequency of reporting for a gynaecological examination decreases with the age of women. The majority of women during a gynaecological visit feel safe alone with the doctor. The treated women expect from a gynaecologist to be nice, talkative, and calm. When choosing a gynaecologist, the patient is mainly guided by the opinion of other women.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

1. Chazan B. Gynaecological examination. The guidelines of the Royal College of obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Med Pract Gynaecol Obstet 2004; 5: 12-8.
2. Życińska K. Principles of good doctor-patient communication. ER Medical, Warsaw 2014.
3. Szymoniak K, Cwiek D, Berezowska E, Branecka-Woźniak D, Dzióbek I, Malinowski W. Opinions on pelvic examination at the hospital. Ginekol Pol 2009; 7: 498-502.
4. Pietras J. Preferences and expectations of women. Nursing and Call 2002; 4: 10-1.
5. Patton K, Bartfield J, Mc Erlean M. The effect of practitioner characteristics on patient pain and embarrassment during internal ED Examinations. Am J Emerg Med 2003; 21: 205-7.
6. Waszynski E. Behavior intimacy gynaecological patients in the study. Ed Astrum, Wroclaw 2000; 100.
7. Więznowska-Mączyńska K, Wilczk M, Roman P. Effects of age, place of residence and education on approach to pelvic examination frequency of visits to the gynaecologist. Overview Gynaecol Obstetrics 2004; 4: 185-9.
8. Piskorz M, Zielinska A, Józefiak A. Knowledge about cervical cancer prevention. Overv Gynaecol Obstetrics 2005; 5: 141-3.
9. Wychowaniec M, Głuszek S, Pierzak M, Kozieł A. Women’s health behaviours regarding cervical cancer prevention. Studia Medyczne 2016; 32: 29-36.
10. Schmittdiel J, Selby JV, Grumbach K, Quesenberry CP Jr. Women’s provider preferences for basic gynaecology care in a large health maintenance organization. J Women Health Gend Based Med 1999; 8: 825-33.
11. Gruszka J, Wrześniewska M, Adamczyk-Gruszka O. Visit to the gynaecologist – psychological aspect, diagnostic and therapeutic. Gen Med Health Sci 2014; 2: 126-30.
12. Szymoniak K. Expectations women to gynaecological. Ann Pomeran Med Univ Szczecin 2014; 1: 52-9.
13. Yanikkerem E, Ozdemir M, Bingol H, Tatar A, Karadeniz G. Women’s attitudes and expectations regarding to the Gynaecological examination. Midwifery 2009; 25: 500-8.
14. Seehusen DA, Johnson DR, Earwood JS, Sethuraman SN, Cornali J, Gillespie K, Doria M, Farnell E 4th, Lanham J. Improving women’s experience during routine speculum examinations at the gynaecological visit: randomized clinical trial. BMJ 2006; 333: 171.
15. Reddy DM, Wasserman SA Patient anxiety during gynecologic examinations. Behavioral indicators. J Reprod Med 1997; 42: 631-6.
16. Synowiec-Pilat M. Perception of interpersonal skills (com­munication) gynaecologists. Ginek Prakt 2003; 3: 19-24.
17. Fiddes P, Scott A, Fletcher J, Glasier A. Attitudes towards pelvic examination and chaperones: a questionnaire survey of Patients and providers. Contraception 2003; 67: 313-7.
18. Baranski J, Waszynski E, Steciwko A. Communicating a doctor with a patient. Astrum, Wrocław 2000.
19. Hilden M, Sidenius K, Langhoff-Roos J, Wijma B, Schei B. Women’s experiences of the gynaecologic examination: factors associated with discomfort. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003; 82: 1030-6.
20. Rizk DE, El-Zubeir MA, Al-Dhaheri AM, Al-Mansouri FR, Al-Jenaibi HS. Determinants of women’s choice of their obstetrican and gynaecologist provider in the UAE. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005; 84: 48-53.
21. Chen SL, Chao Yu YM, Tsai DF, Chen MJ. Gynaecologists perception of the patient-physician relationship in pelvic examinations in Taiwan. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 2008; 28: 290-5.

Address for correspondence:

Piotr Niziurski MD, PhD
Faculty of Health Sciences
Jana Kochanowski University
al. IX Wieków Kielc 19, 25-317 Kielce, Poland
Phone: +48 604 393 224
E-mail: pini1960@interia.pl
Copyright: © 2016 Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.