Bieżący numer
Archiwum
Filmy
Artykuły w druku
O czasopiśmie
Suplementy
Rada naukowa
Recenzenci
Bazy indeksacyjne
Prenumerata
Kontakt
Zasady publikacji prac
Opłaty publikacyjne
Standardy etyczne i procedury
Panel Redakcyjny
Zgłaszanie i recenzowanie prac online
|
1/2005
vol. 107 streszczenie artykułu:
Artykuł oryginalny
Ostra neuroretinopatia – opis przypadku
Dorota Pojda-Wilczek
1
,
Ewa Herba
1
Klinika Oczna 2005, 107(1-3): 127-129
Data publikacji online: 2005/03/15
Pełna treść artykułu
Pobierz cytowanie
ENW EndNote
BIB JabRef, Mendeley
RIS Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
Introduction The aim of this study is to present rare retinal disease of unknown origin. Material and methods 27-years-old man was diagnosed because of poor vision in the left eye, which lasted 4-5 weeks. Following examinations were performed: Visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, color perception, visual field, fluorescein angiography (AF), visual evoked potentials (VEP), full-field flash electroretinography (flash ERG), focal – foveal electroretinography (focal ERG), multifocal electroretinography (multifocal ERG). Follow-up 1.5 year. Results Visual acuity of right eye was 1.25 (-0.1 log MAR) and left eye 1.0 (0.0 log MAR). In left eye between optic disc and macula irregular lesion with dots of retinal pigment epithelium atrophy and little edema was seen. AF revealed small „window” defects. In visual field of the left eye paracentral relative scotoma occurred and in stereokampimetry central relative scotoma was found about 5 degrees from the fixation point. In VEP latency of P100 was delayed and amplitude was reduced in both eyes. In flash as well as focal ERG small reduction of cone function and delayed implicit time of b-wave were found in left eye. In general examination no focal inflammation and no abnormalities in laboratory tests were found. The patient was treated with steroids for 3 weeks. After ten days of general steroid treatment visual acuity improved to 1.25 and subjective improvement of vision occurred. Control examination after 1.5 year revealed no patient's complains, visual acuity 1.25, no change in visual field, VEP improvement. In left eye flat irregular area with pigment epithelium atrophy was seen. Conclusions Acute macular neuroretinopathy may be diagnosed after detail examination. Prognosis is generally good, recovery is slow, but despite of local retinal atrophy subjective complains disappear completely. słowa kluczowe:
zapalenie siatkówki, potencjały wywołane wzrokowe, elektroretinografia |
|