eISSN: 2299-0038
ISSN: 1643-8876
Menopause Review/Przegląd Menopauzalny
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Special Issues Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank


4/2022
vol. 21
 
Share:
Share:
Review paper

Oxidative homeostasis in follicular fluid and reproductive outcomes – from bench to bedside

Ivana Zec
1
,
Marina Šprem Goldštajn
2
,
Krunoslav Kuna
3
,
Mislav Mikuš
2
,
Guglielmo Stabile
4
,
Bianca Bianco
5, 6
,
Giovanni Buzzaccarini
7
,
Antonio Simone Laganà
8

  1. Laboratory of Endocrinology, Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia
  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Zagreb University Hospital Centre, University of Zagreb, School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
  3. Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia
  4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute for Maternal and Child Health-IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”, Trieste, Italy
  5. Discipline of Sexual and Reproductive Health, and Populational Genetics – Department of Collective Health, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC/Centro Universitário FMABC, Santo André, Brazil
  6. Department of Urology, Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazi
  7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IRRCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
  8. Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, ARNAS "Civico – Di Cristina – Benfratelli", Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (PROMISE), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
Menopause Rev 2022; 21(4): 276-284
Online publish date: 2022/12/30
Article file
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 

Introduction

Cell metabolism continuously generates reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS, RNS) and their intermediaries. In addition to exploring the negative effect, numerous studies investigated their physiological role as part of the signal transduction within a cell. Exposing the cell to high levels of antioxidants could neutralize the effect of specific signalling proteins in the signalling network, causing a more harmful than beneficial effect [1].

The adverse effect of these highly reactive molecules is well studied, and it is prone to electron acceptance from the oxidizing macromolecules. The most reactive cell compounds eligible for oxidation are proteins, lipids, and DNA. The clearance of free radicals is highly regulated with the antioxidative cell compounds and enzymes preventing the cell from oxidative damage. Environmental factors or pathophysiological processes can generate excessive amounts of ROS/RNS, overwhelming the antioxidant system and altering redox homeostasis. This state is often called oxidative stress. Therefore, redox homeostasis represents the balance between prooxidant molecules and effective antioxidant response [2].

The large network of the antioxidant system is generally categorized as (I) enzymatic and (II) non- enzymatic antioxidants. Their primary role is a direct reaction with oxidants, preventing the oxidation of the third party, e.g. DNA, lipids, or proteins. Enzymes included in free radical scavenging are superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, glutathione peroxidase (GPx), glutathione reductase (GR), and the family of paraoxonases and peroxiredoxin I–IV. Non-enzymatic antioxidants can be of endogenous or exogenous origin. Endogenous antioxidants are uric acid, lipoic acid, bilirubin, glutathione, and melatonin, while vitamin A, C, E, flavonoids, and carotenoids are from exogenous sources [24].

Highly reactive with a short lifespan, ROS/RNS are difficult to accurately analyse. To determine the altera-tions in the redox balance, a wide variety of assays are available for quantification of the antioxidant compounds or oxidation end products.

DNA oxidation products are well studied, through the determination of 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-2’-deoxyguanosine (8-oxodG) and 8-hydroxy-2’-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), as reliable markers for measuring the effect of oxidative damage to DNA.

The extent of lipid peroxidation is often analysed by measuring polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), oxidized LDL cholesterol (oxLDL), trans-4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (4-HNE), malondialdehyde (MDA), and isoprostanes [3]. Thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances assay (TBARS) is the most widely used method for MDA determination.

There are numerous different types of protein oxidative modification, including the oxidation of sulphur- containing amino acids, aromatic amino acids, formation of carbonyls, nitration, glycoxidation, and lipoxidation [4]. The determination of stable carbonyl groups is the most commonly used method to assess protein oxidation.

In the field of female reproduction, free radicals are recognized as part of intracellular signalling in oocyte maturation, embryo development, and pregnancy. Numerous studies have investigated the relationship of oxidative stress biomarkers in a variety of clinical conditions e.g., endometriosis, polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), unexplained infertility (UI), and menopause. Assisted reproduction techniques (ART) encompass fertility treatments with a variety of hormone therapy. The procedure enables the simultaneous growth of several follicles within the ovary. The aim is to achieve an optimal number of mature oocytes, suitable for IVF (in vitro fertilization) procedures, consequently achieving pregnancy. Redox alterations in follicular fluid (FF) do not necessarily follow changes in the circulation. Systemic oxidative stress is the net result of the metabolism of all organ systems. In contrast, the follicular redox state represents the microenvironment of the oocyte within the growing follicle. For this reason, we performed a review of available evidence about redox homeostasis detected in the follicular fluid and its potential correlation with IVF outcomes. Specifically, pathophysiological considerations were drawn regarding the influence of reactive oxygen species and possible oocyte quality.

Material and methods

This review aimed to investigate the major alte-rations of redox homeostasis in the follicular fluid through pathophysiological conditions in female reproduction and its potential effect on IVF outcome.

Study selection process

The studies included in this review have been identified through research of electronic databases: Science-Direct, MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Clinicaltrials.gov, EU Clinical Trials Register, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry until 30 November 2021. In each database, the following key words were searched: assisted reproductive technology AND follicular fluid, medically assisted reproduction AND oxidative, ART AND redox homeostasis. A manual search of the reference lists of the included studies and review articles was successively performed to detect any other potential papers. We searched for published and unpublished studies from the aforementioned electronic databases.

Specifically, we included only original articles and considered review papers as support to find other possible related articles.

Study selection and data extraction

Three authors (GB, IZ, and MSG) independently screened the titles and abstracts of the papers obtained by the above-mentioned search strategy. The text of each potentially relevant study was considered for inclusion in each section of this review independently by 2 authors (ASL and BB). They also independently extracted relevant qualitative data from the included studies. Another author (MM) independently reviewed the selection process. The results were compared, and any disagreements were discussed and resolved by consensus.

Results

The studies analysed and considered in this review showed a large variety in methodological approaches and main outcomes. For this reason, we adopted a narrative review of results and discussion, dividing the results into subsections and paragraphs.

Follicular fluid and redox homeostasis

The functional integrity of cumulus cells and FF ensure oocyte quality and conditions to obtain pregnancy. The FF consists of secretory products of granulosa and theca cells and plasma exudate. The main compounds are steroid hormones, metabolites including ROS, and antioxidants, polysaccharides, and proteins. Great potential lies in the quantitative proteomics as a powerful tool to identify biologically important proteins and proteomic patterns associated with oocyte quality. Follicular proteome analysis revealed the involvement of proteins in the cellular metabolism, communication, immune responses, and cellular process, which mostly included coagulation factors and inflammatory-associated proteins. Matrix metalloproteinase-related proteins, IGF (insulin-like growth factor)-related proteins, anti-apoptotic proteins, and other growth factors are identified as an important part of the signalling network required for follicular growth and maturation [57]. Another field in development is a complex lipidome analysis that enables identification of cellular lipids in the FF. Lipids play a complex role in the cell. They are the main structural component in the cell membrane, an important energy source, mediators in the cell signalling pathways, and precursors for steroid hormones and prostaglandins [8]. Dynamic changes of sex steroids affect ovarian folliculogenesis including cell proliferation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis within the follicle [9]. It has been suggested that alterations of follicular compounds can impact oocyte quality and embryo development. Particular focus is given to the investigation of components related to oxidative stress against maturing oocytes, embryo quality, and achieving pregnancy.

Polycystic ovary syndrome and obesity

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a complex disorder with clinical heterogeneity in all phenotypes. The main features are polycystic ovaries, oligo- or anovulation, hyperandrogenism, irregular menstrual cycles, acne, and obesity. Polycystic ovary under controlled ovarian hyperstimulation produces a larger cohort of follicles, often with impaired oocyte quality. Most studies noted increased concentrations of MDA and decreased levels of SOD, thiol groups, and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) [1, 1013]. These findings support excessive ROS generation in the follicular environment, which may lead to enhanced antioxidant consumption. PCOS is characterized by increased visceral adipose tissue. Obesity is also associated with redox alterations, affecting metabolic, vascular, and particularly inflammatory pathways. Most studies focused their research on oxidative stress related to obesity in PCOS.

Comparing oxidative stress compounds within BMI categories, higher MDA, ox-LDL, and decreased TAC is found in PCOS obese women [1416]. Interestingly, a few studies did not find a significant difference in TAC and MDA concentrations between PCOS or obesity and the control group [17, 18]. These inconsistent reports lead to unclear conclusions.

Several studies reported alterations in redox state and obesity itself. Overweight or obese women without PCOS show higher levels of lipid hydroperoxides and lower TAC and PON1 activity than normal-weight women. High-density lipoprotein (HDL) serves as an antioxidant, reducing oxLDL. High-density lipoprotein functional properties measured through antioxidant activity, show higher ability to be oxidized in overweight or obese women [15]. Increased catalase and GPx activity noted in obese women could be explained as response to overproduction of hydrogen peroxide [14, 16]. In brief, PCOS patients show pronounced oxidative stress in FF compared to non-PCOS patients. Table 1 presents the list of studies and their basic characteristics related to PCOS and obesity.

Table 1

The main characteristics of studies investigating oxidative stress biomarkers in polycystic ovary syndrome and obese women

StudyDesignResults
ParticipantsGnRH-protocolsOxidantsAntioxidantsMeasured outcome
Artimani et al., 2018PCOS vs. controlsAgonistMDA, TOSTAC, thiol groupsOocyte number/quality, embryo number/quality, fertilization rate
Chattopadhayay et al., 2009PCOS vs. controlsAgonistROS, MDATACOocyte number/quality, embryo quality, fertilizati on rate, pregnancy rates, miscarriage rate
Liu et al., 2020PCOS vs. controlsAgonistMDA, TOSTAC, GSH, SODEmbryo quality
Tola et al., 2018PCOS vs. controlsAntagonistDisulphide bondThiol groupsOocyte number/quality, embryo number/quality, fertilization rate, implantation rate, pregnancy rate
Seleem et al., 2014PCOS vs. controlsAgonistSODOocyte number, embryo number/quality, fertilization rate, pregnancy rate
Nasiri et al., 2014PCOS with or without obesityAgonistMDATAC
Bacchetti et al., 2019Normal weight vs. obese womenAgonistlipid hydroperoxidesTAC, CoQ10, PON1, HDL oxidation rateOocyte number/quality, embryo quality, fertilization rate
Bausenwein et al., 2009PCOS vs. non-PCOS within BMI categoriesAgonistoxLDLSOD, catalase, GPx, GR,Pregnancy rate
Yuxel et al., 2017Normal responders within BMI categoriesAgonistMDAThiol groupsOocyte number/quality, fertilization rate
Alviggi et al., 2016PCOS: women with or without supplementsAntagonist8-isoprostaneGPx catalase, SOD, TACOocyte number/quality
Fatemi et al., 2017PCOS: vitamin E/D3 treated vs. untreatedAgonistMDATACOocyte number/quality, embryo quality, fertilization rate, implantation rate pregnancy rate
Piomboni et al., 2014PCOS: DCI or metformin treated vs. untreatedAntagonistThiol groupsOocyte number/quality,fertilization rate

[i] BMI – body mass index, CoQ10 – coenzyme Q10, DCI – D-chiro-inositol, GnRH – gonadotropin-releasing hormone, GPx – glutathione peroxidase, GR – glutathione reductase, GSH – glutathione, HDL – high-density lipoprotein, MDA – malondialdehyde, PCOS – polycystic ovary syndrome, PON1 – paraoxonase-1, SOD – superoxide dismutase, TAC – total antioxidant capacity, TOS – total oxidant status. Underlined text represents significant changes related to oxidative stress.

Studies with better stratification of PCOS patients according to their phenotype are needed for better assessment of redox homeostasis. There is a relationship between excessive fat accumulation and oxidative stress, but this association is not fully understood.

Endometriosis

Endometriosis is an oestrogen-dependent pelvic inflammatory disease with unclear aetiology [19]. The redox alterations in the follicular microenvironment are the most studied in patients with endometriosis. High concentrations of 8-OHdG are associated with the enhanced occurrence of oxidative damage of DNA in endometriosis [20]. Enhanced lipid peroxidation is detected through high concentrations of MDA in the follicular compartment, but inconsistencies in study results demand more evidence to confirm this hypothesis [11, 19, 20]. In turn, the line activation from the thiol-redox system is recognized through the association of thioredoxin with increased inflammatory cytokines, and reduced levels of GPX, GR, and glutathione [19, 20]. Lower concentrations of vitamin E are expected together with high MDA concentrations, but they are not confirmed in all studies [11, 2123]. The source of variation could be the lack of data regarding dietary intake. Significantly reduced concentrations of vitamin C are confirmed in patients with endometriosis compared to other infertile women [20, 22, 24]. Vitamin C is subjected to excessive consumption by regenerating the reduced state of vitamin E or scavenging the free radicals. SOD is a ubiquitous copper- and zinc-dependent enzyme for direct neutralization of ROS/RNS to more stable products: H2O and O2. A few studies reported a significant decrease in SOD activity [20, 22]. Patients with endometriosis also suffer from deficiency of trace elements (Se, Cu, and Zn), which could directly affect the activity of SOD [22]. Other reports show the lack of evidence in diminished enzyme activity [21, 25]. Excessive consumption of antioxidative compounds is also recognized through decreased TAC [11, 20, 22, 26]. Determining the trace elements along with recording the diet intake would contribute to better understanding of redox alterations. The basic characteristics and significant differences between studies investigating redox alterations in the endometriosis are listed in Table 2.

Table 2

The main characteristics of studies investigating oxidative stress biomarkers in women with endometriosis

StudyDesignResults
ParticipantsGnRH-protocolsOxidantsAntioxidantsOutcome
Campos-Petean et al., 2008Endometriosis vs. controlsAgonistMDAVitamin E
Choi, et al., 2015Endometriosis vs. controlsAgonist or antagonistMDASOD, GSH, GPx, TRX, TBP2, PRX4Oocyte number/quality, embryo quality, fertilization rate, implantation rate pregnancy rate
Da Broi et al.,2016Endometriosis vs. controlsAgonistTotal peroxide, MDA, AOPPGSH, SOD, TAC, vitamin E, 8-OHdGPregnancy, live birth
Goud et al., 2014Endometriosis vs. controlsAntagonistNOxOocyte number/quality, embryo quality, implantation rate, pregnancy rate
Nasiri et al., 2016Endometriosis vs. controlsAgonistMDATAC
Singh et al, 2013Endometriosis vs. controlsAgonistROS, NOx, MDASOD, catalase, GPx, GR, vitamins A, C and E, TACOocyte number/quality, embryo quality, fertilization rate, pregnancy rates, miscarriage rate
Prieto et al., 2012Endometriosis vs. controlsNot reportedMDAVitamin C, vitamin E, SODOocyte number/quality, embryo quality, fertilization rate, implantation rate, miscarriage rate
Pekel et al., 2015Infertile women vs. controlsNot reportedMDASOD, TAC,Oocyte number, embryo quality, fertilization rate
Nishihara et al., 2018Infertile womenAgonist or antagonist8-OHdGTAC, GSH, vitamin CEmbryo quality, blastocyst rates, fertilization rate, pregnancy rate
Lu et al., 2018Endometriosis vs. controls with or without vitamin CAgonistROS, MDAVitamin C, SOD, TACOocyte number/quality, embryo quality, fertilization rate, implantation rate pregnancy rate

[i] AOPP – advanced oxidation protein products, GnRH – gonadotropin-releasing hormone, GPx – glutathione peroxidase, GR – glutathione reductase, GSH –glutathione, MDA – malondialdehyde, NOx – nitric oxide metabolites, PRX4 – peroxiredoxin-4, SOD –superoxide dismutase, TAC – total antioxidant capacity, TRX – thioredoxin, TBP2-TRX – binding protein, 8-OHdG – 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine

[ii] Underlined text represents significant changes related to oxidative stress.

ART outcome

Art outcomes are strongly related to various factors, affecting both ovaries and uterus [27]. There is little agreement between oxidative stress compounds and IVF outcomes. The latter is more difficult to interpret because the studies use different criteria, e.g. the number of mature oocytes, embryo quality, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, or live births. Young women with low ovarian response have lower activity of GPx, GR, and GST, compared with oocyte donors and high responders. The lower enzymatic antioxidant activity follows higher concentrations of lipid peroxides, MDA, and 4-hydroxyalkenals [28]. Thioredoxin has significantly higher concentrations in oocyte-containing follicles from normal responders in comparison to poor responders [29]. A moderate negative association is noticed between vitamin C and TRX concentrations regarding the number of mature oocytes [24, 25]. Thioredoxin is upregulated by oestrogen, oxidative stress, and growth factors. These changes may not simply reflect the present status of follicles, but they certainly have an impact on the growth and maturation of follicles.

A lower fertilization rate is related with higher concentrations of 8-OHdG and 4-HNE, lower GSH activity, and higher activity of SOD and catalase [29, 30]. Increased antioxidative properties of HDL are associated with decreased chance of successful fertilization. The significant difference between follicular and serum HDL proteome may be responsible for enhanced antioxidative potential of follicular HDL [31]. These observations suggest the need for enhanced antioxidant protection to overcome damaging effects on the oocyte with deficient fertilization potential.

Assessment of embryo quality is often used to find the potential relationship with biomarkers in FF that originate from corresponding oocyte. High concentrations of ROS, MDA, and 8-OHdG obtained from women with different factors of infertility might have an adverse effect on embryo quality [30, 3234]. When assessing hydrogen peroxide in FF of the sibling follicles, the highest concentrations are observed from follicles following poor embryo quality, and the lowest concentrations are found in empty follicles [34]. Women with idiopathic infertility and greater GPx activity are related to high embryo quality [35].

To evaluate the pregnancy rate, several studies assessed the balance between oxidizing macromolecules and disposable antioxidants. Nitrate overproduction is attributed to women who did not achieve pregnancy [36]. Women who achieved pregnancy presented lower ROS, MDA, protein carbonyls, GR, SOD, and GST and higher TAC, GPX, and tocopherol [24, 35, 3741]. Thus, enhanced lipid and protein oxidation are present among women with an unfavourable outcome. Da Broi et al. proposed follicular 8-OHdG as a predictive marker for clinical pregnancy in patients with endometriosis [21]. The lack of defined concentrations of prooxidant and antioxidant biomarkers in physiological conditions complicates interpretation of these findings. Table 3 represents the overview of the studies that investigated the significance of oxidative stress on ART outcomes.

Table 3

The main characteristics of studies investigating association between oxidative stress biomarkers and ART outcomes

StudyDesignResults
ParticipantsGnRH-protocolsOxidantsAntioxidantsOutcome
Nuñez-Calonge et al., 2016Low vs. high responders vs. controlsAgonist or antAgonistLipid hydroperoxides, NOxGPx, GR, GSTOocyte number/quality, embryo quality, fertilization rate, pregnancy rate
Kishi et al., 2016Infertile women: normal vs. poor respondersAgonist-TRXPresence of oocyte, pregnancy rate
Prieto et al., 2012Endometriosis vs. controlsNot reportedMDAVitamin C, vitamin E, SODOocyte number/quality, embryo quality, fertilization rate, implantation rate, miscarriage rate
Choi et al., 2015Endometriosis vs. controlsAgonist or antAgonistMDASOD, GSH, GPX, TRX, TBP2, PRX4Oocyte number/quality, embryo quality, fertilization rate, implantation rate pregnancy rate
Nishihara et al., 2018Infertile womenAgonist or antAgonist8-OHdGTAC, GSH, vitamin CEmbryo quality, blastocyst rates, fertilization rate, pregnancy rate
Nagy et al., 2019Infertile womenModified natural cycleHDL oxidation rate, PON1, apoA-I, apoA-IV vitamin E, S1POocyte: number/quality, embryo quality, fertilization rate, pregnancy rate
Revelli et al., 2017Male infertilityAgonist4-HNESOD, catalaseOocyte quality, embryo quality, fertilization rate
Das et al., 2006Tubal factor infertilityAgonistROS, MDAOocyte quality, embryo quality, fertilization rate
Elizur et al., 2014Sibling follicles from infertile womenAgonist or antagonistHydrogen peroxideOocyte number, embryo quality
Jana et al., 2010Infertile womenAgonistROS, MDATACOocyte quality, embryo quality, fertilization rate
Olszak-Wąsik et al., 2019Idiopathic infertilityAntagonistTOS, MDA, lipofuscinGPx, GR, GST, SOD, thiol groups, catalase, TACEmbryo quality, pregnancy success
Goud et al., 2014Endometriosis vs. controlsAntagonistNOxOocyte number/quality, embryo quality, implantation rate, pregnancy rate
Bedaiwy et al. 2012Infertile womenAgonistROSTACOocyte number/quality, embryo quality, pregnancy rate
Borowiecka et al., 2012All causes of infertilityAgonistTBARS, PCThiol groupsPregnancy rate
Oral et al., 2006Infertile womenAgonistMDAPregnancy success
Ashraf et al., 2020Unexplained infertilityAgonistVitamin EOocyte quality, embryo quality, pregnancy success
Kumar et al., 2018Infertile womenNot reportedMDASOD, GSH, thiol groups, vitamin C, GST, GRPregnancy rate

[i] Apo – apolipoprotein, GPx – glutathione peroxidase, GR – glutathione reductase, GSH – glutathione, GST – glutathione S- transferase, HDL – high density lipoprotein, MDA – malondialdehyde, NOx – nitric oxide metabolites, PON1 – paraoxonase-1, PRX4 – peroxiredoxin, S1P – sphingosine 1 phosphate, SOD – superoxide dismutase, TAC – total antioxidant capacity, TRX – thioredoxin, TBP2-TRX – binding protein, 8-OHdG – 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine, 4-HNE – 4-hydroxynonenal

[ii] Underlined text represents significant changes related to oxidative stress.

Supplementation with antioxidants

A limited number of studies focused on the therapeutic potential of antioxidants on IVF outcomes. Varieties of antioxidative supplements were tested to potentially overcome the imbalance in redox homeostasis of PCOS women, who are prone to infertility due to lack of ovulation [42]. Patients who take supplements based on myoinositol, folic acid, and active antioxidants (glutathione, selenium, vitamins C and E, and zinc) have increased GPx activity in FF and significantly increased numbers of MII oocytes [43]. Interestingly, Vitamin D3 and E supplements, as the main defence mechanism against lipid peroxidation, do not affect follicular MDA and TAC. A positive impact is noticed through higher pregnancy and implantation rates compared to the placebo group [44]. D-chiro-inositol and metformin induce a significantly higher level of free-SH groups in FF compared to untreated PCOS patients. Apart from the protective effect on follicular proteins, treated women recovered good quality oocytes [45]. Melatonin expresses the antioxidative effect irrespective of infertility diagnosis, acting via receptors or directly on free radicals or facilitating other endogenous antioxidants. Several studies reported a positive association of higher melatonin concentrations and positive IVF outcomes, referring to the number of mature oocytes, fertilization rate or embryo quality. Subsequently, higher ROS, MDA, and 8-OHdG, and decreased TAC are associated with lower melatonin concentrations [4648]. In contrast, Fernando et al. found no difference in IVF outcome regarding melatonin supplements [49]. However, significant differences coexist in the study population, dose, and duration of melatonin intake. Treatment with vitamin E or a combination of both melatonin and vitamin E significantly reduces hexanoyl-lysine adduct from lipid peroxidation. Women under micronutrient and mineral supplementation have increased TAC and protein free-SH group and decreased MDA [50, 51]. Thus, the antioxidant changes compensate for oxidative stress, yielding fewer oocytes with impaired quality.

Ovarian stimulation

Treatment protocols in ovarian stimulation include GnRH antagonists or agonists [52, 53]. GnRH antagonists have several advantages over GnRH agonists such as a reduction in the treatment duration and the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Moreover, possible adjuvant therapies have recently been proposed [54]. A few studies compared redox homeostasis between protocols, drawing inconclusive results. Celik et al. noted higher concentrations of nitric oxide and SOD activity in the GnRH antagonist group, while Mathyk et al. found poor but significant differences in TAC [55, 56]. More studies are needed to highlight the effect of GnRH analogues on redox homeostasis in FF.

A limited number of studies compared possible alterations of FF redox balance between the natural cycle and ovarian stimulation. Reduced antioxidant properties are noted through lower PON1 paraoxonase activity, TAC, and tocopherol. Polyunsaturated fatty acids contain double bonds susceptible to oxidation in controlled ovarian stimulation, leading to a lower proportion of PUFAs and higher content of saturated fatty acids than those from a natural cycle. Among oxidative modifications of proteins, only Nε-(carboxyethyl) lysine (CEL) shows higher concentrations in COH patients compared to a natural cycle [57, 58]. Oxidative damage induced by ROS could be selective, depending on amino acid composition and their vulnerability to oxidation. Exogenous gonadotropin therapy initiates intensive growth of multiple follicles creating the source of ROS overproduction [52]. Based on some studies, the microenvironment in the natural cycle differs from the microenvironment of several maturing follicles in ovarian stimulation.

Discussion

Limitations

There are several limitations to our review, because some of the research provides contradictory results. There are several possible reasons for variations in the study results. First, there is a lack of uniformity in the study design, so a larger number of prospective studies with proper patient stratification are needed to evaluate reliable conclusions. Secondly, the lack of data on dietary intake could seriously affect the homogeneity of the study group. Thirdly, because preanalytical steps are an important part in the study design, inappropriate collection and storage conditions could influence data interpretation due to oxidation ex-vivo. A comparison of the study results is difficult due to the variety of selected biomarkers and applied assays. For example, numerous studies preferred to assess overall antioxidative defence with TAC assay but consequently failed to detect the activation of specific antioxidative mechanisms. Another assay frequently used in the literature is the TBARS assay for MDA determination. The limited analytical specificity of TBARS assay with detection of other peroxidation products, rather than malondialdehyde alone, is often overlooked in the interpretation of study results. The last decade has showed improvements in the field of chromatography and mass spectrometry. These powerful technologies have become the preferred analytical technique, based on their specificity and sensitivity. Lastly, more studies with assessment of redox balance in natural cycles are needed to facilitate the effect of hormone treatment on the follicular microenvironment.

Conclusions

An extensive overview of biomarkers included in redox homeostasis confirms undoubtedly the shift to enhanced oxidizing modification of macromolecules and antioxidative consumption in follicular fluid of women undergoing IVF treatment. Still, it is not clear whether a redox disbalance has a disruptive effect on the oocyte competence or whether it plays a role in the oocyte maturation process. Considering the large number of studies addressing the importance of IVF outcomes for a couple’s quality of life and health [59, 60], this study further promotes the knowledge of possible intervention sites for ART procedures.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflict of interest.

References

1 

Artimani T, Karimi J, Mehdizadeh M, et al. Evaluation of pro-oxidant-antioxidant balance [PAB] and its association with inflammatory cytokines in polycystic ovary syndrome [PCOS]. Gynecol Endocrinol 2018; 34: 148-152.

2 

Rahal A, Kumar A, Singh V, et al. Oxidative stress, prooxidants, and antioxidants: The interplay. Biomed Res Int 2014; 2014: 761264.

3 

Frijhoff J, Winyard PG, Zarkovic N, et al. Clinical relevance of biomarkers of oxidative stress. Antioxid Redox Signal 2015; 23: 1144-1170.

4 

Kehm R, Baldensperger T, Raupbach J, Höhn A. Protein oxidation–formation mechanisms, detection and relevance as biomarkers in human diseases. Redox Biol 2021; 42: 101901.

5 

Ambekar AS, Nirujogi RS, Srikanth SM, et al. Proteomic analysis of human follicular fluid: a new perspective towards understanding folliculogenesis. J Proteomics 2013; 87: 68-77.

6 

Zamah AM, Hassis ME, Albertolle ME, Williams KE. Proteomic analysis of human follicular fluid from fertile women. Clin Proteomics 2015; 12: 5.

7 

Poulsen L la C, Pla I, Sanchez A, et al. Progressive changes in human follicular fluid composition over the course of ovulation: quantitative proteomic analyses. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2019; 495: 110522.

8 

Dunning KR, Russell DL, Robker RL. Lipids and oocyte developmental competence: the role of fatty acids and β-oxidation. Reproduction 2014; 148: R15-27.

9 

Broi MG Da, Giorgi VSI, Wang F, Keefe DL, Albertini D, Navarro PA. Influence of follicular fluid and cumulus cells on oocyte quality: clinical implications. J Assist Reprod Genet 2018; 35: 735-751.

10 

Chattopadhayay R, Ganesh A, Samanta J, Jana SK, Chakravarty BN, Chaudhury K. Effect of follicular fluid oxidative stress on meiotic spindle formation in infertile women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2010; 69: 197-202.

11 

Nasiri N, Moini A, Eftekhari-Yazdi P, et al. Oxidative stress statues in serum and follicular fluid of women with endometriosis. Cell J 2017; 18: 582-587.

12 

Tola EN, Köroğlu N, Ergin M, Oral HB, Turgut A, Erel Ö. The role of follicular fluid thiol/disulphide homeostasis in polycystic ovary syndrome. Balkan Med J 2018; 35: 306-310.

13 

Seleem AK, Aziz A, Refaeey E, Shaalan D, Sherbiny Y, Badawy A. Superoxide dismutase in polycystic ovary syndrome patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Assist Reprod Genet 2014; 31: 499-504.

14 

Nasiri N, Moini A, Eftekhari-Yazdi P, et al. Abdominal obesity can induce both systemic and follicular fluid oxidative stress independent from polycystic ovary syndrome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2015; 184: 112-116.

15 

Bacchetti T, Morresi C, Vignini A, et al. HDL functionality in follicular fluid in normal-weight and obese women undergoing assisted reproductive treatment. J Assist Reprod Genet 2019; 36: 1657-1664.

16 

Bausenwein J, Serke H, Eberle K, et al. Elevated levels of oxidized low-density lipoprotein and of catalase activity in follicular fluid of obese women. Mol Hum Reprod 2009; 16: 117-124.

17 

Yuksel B, Kilic S, Yilmaz N, et al. Obesity is not a descriptive factor for oxidative stress and viscosity in follicular fluid of in vitro fertilization patients. Ir J Med Sci 2017; 186: 641-646.

18 

Liu Y, Yu Z, Zhao S, et al. Oxidative stress markers in the follicular fluid of patients with polycystic ovary syndrome correlate with a decrease in embryo quality. J Assist Reprod Genet 2021; 38: 471-477.

19 

Ban Frangež H, Vrtacnik Bokal E, Štimpfel M, et al. Reproductive outcomes after laparoscopic surgery in infertile women affected by ovarian endometriomas, with or without in vitrofertilisation: results from the SAFE (surgery and ART for endometriomas) trial. J Obstet Gynaecol 2021; 1-8.

20 

Lu X, Wu Z, Wang M, Cheng W. Effects of vitamin C on the outcome of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in endometriosis: A randomized controlled study. J Int Med Res 2018; 46: 4624-4633.

21 

Da Broi MG, de Albuquerque FO, de Andrade AZ, Cardoso RL, Jordão Junior AA, Navarro PA. Increased concentration of 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine in follicular fluid of infertile women with endometriosis. Cell Tissue Res 2016; 366: 231-242.

22 

Singh AK, Chattopadhyay R, Chakravarty B, Chaudhury K. Markers of oxidative stress in follicular fluid of women with endometriosis and tubal infertility undergoing IVF. Reprod Toxicol 2013; 42: 116-124.

23 

Campos Petean C, Ferriani RA, dos Reis RM, de Moura MD, Jordão AA Jr, Navarro PA. Lipid peroxidation and vitamin E in serum and follicular fluid of infertile women with peritoneal endometriosis submitted to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: a pilot study. Fertil Steril 2008; 90: 2080-2085.

24 

Prieto L, Quesada JF, Cambero O, et al. Analysis of follicular fluid and serum markers of oxidative stress in women with infertility related to endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2012; 98: 126-130.

25 

Choi YS, Cho SH, Seo SK, Park JH, Kim SH, Lee BS. Alteration in the intrafollicular thiol-redox system in infertile women with endometriosis. Reproduction 2015; 149: 155-162.

26 

Pekel A, Gönenç A, Öztürk Turhan N, Kafalı H. Changes of sFas and sFasL, oxidative stress markers in serum and follicular fluid of patients undergoing IVF. J Assist Reprod Genet 2015; 32: 233-241.

27 

Ciebiera M, Vitale SG, Ferrero S, et al. Vilaprisan, a new selective progesterone receptor modulator in uterine fibroid pharmacotherapy–will it really be a breakthrough? Curr Pharm Des 2020; 26: 300-309.

28 

Nuñez-Calonge R, Cortés S, Gutierrez Gonzalez LM, et al. Oxidative stress in follicular fluid of young women with low response compared with fertile oocyte donors. Reprod Biomed Online 2016; 32: 446-456.

29 

Revelli A, Canosa S, Bergandi L, et al. Oocyte polarized light microscopy, assay of specific follicular fluid metabolites, and gene expression in cumulus cells as different approaches to predict fertilization efficiency after ICSI. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2017; 15: 47.

30 

Nishihara T, Matsumoto K, Hosoi Y, Morimoto Y. Evaluation of antioxidant status and oxidative stress markers in follicular fluid for human in vitro fertilization outcome. Reprod Med Biol 2018; 17: 481-486.

31 

Nagy RA, van Montfoort APA, Groen H, et al. Anti-oxidative function of follicular fluid HDL and outcomes of modified natural cycle-IVF. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 12817.

32 

Das S, Chattopadhyay R, Ghosh S, et al. Reactive oxygen species level in follicular flui–embryo quality marker in IVF? Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 2403-2407.

33 

Jana SK, K NB, Chattopadhyay R, Chakravarty B, Chaudhury K. Upper control limit of reactive oxygen species in follicular fluid beyond which viable embryo formation is not favorable. Reprod Toxicol 2010; 29: 447-451.

34 

Elizur SE, Lebovitz O, Orvieto R, Dor J, Zan-Bar T. Reactive oxygen species in follicular fluid may serve as biochemical markers to determine ovarian aging and follicular metabolic age. Gynecol Endocrinol 2014; 30: 705-707.

35 

Olszak-Wąsik K, Bednarska-Czerwińska A, Olejek A, Tukiendorf A. From “every day” hormonal to oxidative stress biomarkers in blood and follicular fluid, to embryo quality and pregnancy success? Oxid Med Cell Longev 2019; 2019: 1092415.

36 

Goud PT, Goud AP, Joshi N, Puscheck E, Diamond MP, Abu-Soud HM. Dynamics of nitric oxide, altered follicular microenvironment, and oocyte quality in women with endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2014; 102: 151-9.e5.

37 

Oral O, Kutlu T, Aksoy E, Fıçıcıoğlu C, Uslu H, Tuğrul S. The effects of oxidative stress on outcomes of assisted reproductive techniques. J Assist Reprod Genet 2006; 23: 81-85.

38 

Borowiecka M, Wojsiat J, Polac I, Radwan M, Radwan P, Zbikowska HM. Oxidative stress markers in follicular fluid of women undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Syst Biol Reprod Med 2012; 58: 301-305.

39 

Ashraf M, Mustansir F, Baqir SM, Alam F, Rehman R. Changes in vitamin E levels as a marker of female infertility. J Pak Med Assoc 2020; 70: 1762-1766.

40 

Kumar S, Mishra V, Thaker R, et al. Role of environmental factors & oxidative stress with respect to in vitro fertilization outcome. Indian J Med Res 2018; 148: S125-S133.

41 

Bedaiwy MA, Elnashar SA, Goldberg JM, et al. Effect of follicular fluid oxidative stress parameters on intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome. Gynecol Endocrinol 2012; 28: 51-55.

42 

Terzic M, Aimagambetova G, Garzon S, et al. Ovulation induction in infertile women with endometriotic ovarian cysts: current evidence and potential pitfalls. Minerva Med 2020; 111: 50-61.

43 

Alviggi C, Cariati F, Conforti A, et al. The effect of FT500 Plus® on ovarian stimulation in PCOS women. Reprod Toxicol 2016; 59: 40-44.

44 

Fatemi F, Mohammadzadeh A, Sadeghi MR, et al. Role of vitamin E and D3 Supplementation in Intra-Cytoplasmic Sperm Injection outcomes of women with polycystic ovarian syndrome: a double blinded randomized placebo-controlled trial. Clin Nutr ESPEN 2017; 18: 23-30.

45 

Piomboni P, Focarelli R, Capaldo A, et al. Protein modification as oxidative stress marker in follicular fluid from women with polycystic ovary syndrome: the effect of inositol and metformin. J Assist Reprod Genet 2014; 31: 1269-1276.

46 

Tamura H, Takasaki A, Miwa I, et al. Oxidative stress impairs oocyte quality and melatonin protects oocytes from free radical damage and improves fertilization rate. J Pineal Res 2008; 44: 280-287.

47 

Latif Khan H, Bhatti S, Abbas S, et al. Melatonin levels and microRNA [miRNA] relative expression profile in the follicular ambient microenvironment in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization process. J Assist Reprod Genet 2021; 38: 443-459.

48 

Taketani T, Tamura H, Takasaki A, et al. Protective role of melatonin in progesterone production by human luteal cells. J Pineal Res 2011; 51: 207-213.

49 

Fernando S, Wallace EM, Vollenhoven B, et al. Melatonin in assisted reproductive technology: A pilot double-blind randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. Front Endocrinol [Lausanne] 2018; 9: 545.

50 

Ozkaya MO, Nazıroğlu M. Multivitamin and mineral supplementation modulates oxidative stress and antioxidant vitamin levels in serum and follicular fluid of women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 2465-2466.

51 

Luddi A, Capaldo A, Focarelli R, et al. Antioxidants reduce oxidative stress in follicular fluid of aged women undergoing IVF. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2016; 14]: 57.

52 

Bianco B, Loureiro FA, Trevisan CM, et al. Effects of FSHR and FSHBVariants on Hormonal Profile and Reproductive Outcomes of Infertile Women With Endometriosis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021; 12: 760616.

53 

Peluso C, Oliveira R, Laporta GZ, et al. Are ovarian reserve tests reliable in predicting ovarian response? Results from a prospective, cross-sectional, single-center analysis. Gynecol Endocrinol 2021; 37: 358-366.

54 

Barra F, Laganà AS, Scala C, Garzon S, Ghezzi F, Ferrero S. Pretreatment with dienogest in women with endometriosis undergoing IVF after a previous failed cycle. Reprod Biomed Online 2020; 41: 859-868.

55 

Celik E, Celik O, Kumbak B, et al. A comparative study on oxidative and antioxidative markers of serum and follicular fluid in GnRH agonist and antagonist cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 2012; 29: 1175-1183.

56 

Mathyk BA, Aslan Cetin B, Vardagli D, et al. Comparison of antagonist mild and long agonist protocols in terms of follicular fluid total antioxidant capacity. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 57: 194-199.

57 

Pérez-Ruiz I, Meijide S, Ferrando M, Larreategui Z, Ruiz-Larrea MB, Ruiz-Sanz JI. Ovarian stimulated cycles reduce protection of follicular fluid against free radicals. Free Radic Biol Med 2019; 145: 330-335.

58 

Pérez-Ruiz I, Meijide S, Hérnandez ML, et al. Analysis of protein oxidative modifications in follicular fluid from fertile women: natural versus stimulated cycles. Antioxidants [Basel] 2018; 7: 176.

59 

Bapayeva G, Aimagambetova G, Issanov A, et al. The effect of stress, anxiety and depression on in vitro fertilization outcome in kazakhstani public clinical setting: a cross-sectional study. J Clin Med 2021; 10: 937.

60 

Gullo G, Cucinella G, Perino A, et al. The gender gap in the diagnostic-therapeutic journey of the infertile couple. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18: 6184.

Copyright: © 2022 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.