Position of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy in clinical practice and comparison (matched case-control study) with standard laparoscopic nephrectomy

Milan Hora; Viktor Eret; Petr Stránský; Ivan Trávníček; Tomáš Ürge; Jiří Ferda; Fredrik Petersson; Ondřej Hes

doi:10.5114/wiitm.2014.43019

eISSN: 2299-0054
ISSN: 1895-4588

Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques

Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Editorial board Reviewers Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures

Editorial System

Submit your Manuscript

Editorial Policies

Sarajevo Declaration on Integrity and Visibility of Scholarly Publications

3/2014
vol. 9

Send email

Copy url:

abstract:

Original paper

Position of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy in clinical practice and comparison (matched case-control study) with standard laparoscopic nephrectomy

Milan Hora

,

Viktor Eret

,

Petr Stránský

,

Ivan Trávníček

,

Tomáš Ürge

,

Jiří Ferda

,

Fredrik Petersson

,

Ondřej Hes

Videosurgery Miniinv 2014; 9 (3): 371–379

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2014.43019

Online publish date: 2014/05/26

View full text Get citation

EndNote

Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero

AMA

Hora M, Eret V, Stránský P, et al. Position of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy in clinical practice and comparison (matched case-control study) with standard laparoscopic nephrectomy. Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques. 2014:371-379. doi:10.5114/wiitm.2014.43019.

APA

Hora, M., Eret, V., Stránský, P., Trávníček, I., Ürge, T.,  & Ferda, J. et al. (2014). Position of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy in clinical practice and comparison (matched case-control study) with standard laparoscopic nephrectomy. Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques, 371-379. https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2014.43019

Chicago

Hora, Milan, Viktor Eret, Petr Stránský, Ivan Trávníček, Tomáš Ürge, Jiří Ferda,  and Fredrik Petersson et al. 2014. "Position of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy in clinical practice and comparison (matched case-control study) with standard laparoscopic nephrectomy". Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques: 371-379. doi:10.5114/wiitm.2014.43019.

Harvard

Hora, M., Eret, V., Stránský, P., Trávníček, I., Ürge, T., Ferda, J., Petersson, F.,  and Hes, O. (2014). Position of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy in clinical practice and comparison (matched case-control study) with standard laparoscopic nephrectomy. Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques, pp.371-379. https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2014.43019

MLA

Hora, Milan et al. "Position of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy in clinical practice and comparison (matched case-control study) with standard laparoscopic nephrectomy." Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques, 2014, pp. 371-379. doi:10.5114/wiitm.2014.43019.

Vancouver

Hora M, Eret V, Stránský P, Trávníček I, Ürge T, Ferda J et al. Position of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy in clinical practice and comparison (matched case-control study) with standard laparoscopic nephrectomy. Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques. 2014:371-379. doi:10.5114/wiitm.2014.43019.

PlumX metrics:

Introduction: One way how to reduce morbidity and improve cosmesic of kidney surgery is single site laparoscopy. Relatively well described concept but without defined position in clincal practise.

Aim: To report of institutional experience with laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) nephrectomy (NE) and compare (matched case-control study) it with that of standard laparoscopic NE (LNE).

Material and methods: In the period 8/2011 to 10/2013, we performed 183 mini-invasive NE (132 tumours, 51 benign aetiology); 45 of them (24.6%) were LESS, the rest LNE. The main but not absolute indications for LESS were: non-obese men, and less advanced tumours. In 13 patients undergoing LESS-NEs (28.9%) there was a transumbilical approach. For the rest, a pararectal incision was performed and an accessory port was added in 31.1% (14) – 2/22 (9.1%) left sided, 12/23 (52.2%) right sided. Twenty-four LESS-NE were performed by a more experienced surgeon (mean operation time (MOT) 73.1 min), 21 LESS-NE by 4 other surgeons (MOT 132.8 min). These 24 were compared with 43 LNE done by the same surgeon before the period of LESS (1/2007–8/2011) and with similar characteristics of cases (body mass index (BMI) ≤ 35 kg/m2, less advanced tumour).

Results: We found no statistically significant differences in any of the parameters studied. The MOT 73.1 min vs. 75.0 min (p = 0.78), BMI 27.4 kg/m2 vs. 29.2 kg/m2 (p = 0.08), blood loss 54.7 vs. 39.2 (p = 0.47). Complications (4.2% vs. 11.6%) were only of internal character in origin. No conversion in either group. In LESS-NE, staplers were used more frequently (more expensive than clips) for division of renal hilar vessels (70.8% vs. 51.2%). The mean price of LESS-NE was €367 higher.

Conclusions: The LESS NE performed by an experienced surgeon is a safe and efficient method for the surgical treatment of both malignant and benign renal conditions in patients with BMI < 30 kg/m2 and with low-stage tumours. The LESS NE is more expensive compared to LNE.

keywords:

Position of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery nephrectomy in clinical practice and comparison (matched case-control study) with standard laparoscopic nephrectomy

Milan Hora , Viktor Eret , Petr Stránský , Ivan Trávníček , Tomáš Ürge , Jiří Ferda , Fredrik Petersson , Ondřej Hes

kidney tumour, nephrectomy, laparoscopy, laparoendoscopic single-site surgery

Milan Hora

,

Viktor Eret

,

Petr Stránský

,

Ivan Trávníček

,

Tomáš Ürge

,

Jiří Ferda

,

Fredrik Petersson

,

Ondřej Hes