Quality of life after breast reconstruction by DIEP – literature analysis

Sabina Anna Dyszy

eISSN: 2084-9850
ISSN: 1897-3116

Pielęgniarstwo Chirurgiczne i Angiologiczne/Surgical and Vascular Nursing

Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures

Editorial System

Submit your Manuscript

2/2021
vol. 15

Send email

Copy url:

Review paper

Quality of life after breast reconstruction by DIEP – literature analysis

Sabina Anna Dyszy

¹

Zespoł Opieki Zdrowotnej w Świętochłowicach sp. z o.o., Świętochłowice, Polska

Pielęgniarstwo Chirurgiczne i Angiologiczne 2021; 2: 74–76

Online publish date: 2021/07/29

Article file

- PChiA 2 2021 DRUK.pdf - Range 3.pdf [0.09 MB]

Get citation

1. Macadam A, Zhong T, Weichman K. Quality of life and patient-reported outcomes in breast cancer survivors: a multicenter comparison of four abdominally based autologous reconstruction methods. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137: 758-771.

2. Miller D, Siegel L, Lin C. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics. Cancer J Clin 2016; 66: 271-289.

3. Mundy R, Homa K, Klassen F, Pusic L, Kerrigan L. Breast cancer and reconstruction: normative data for interpreting the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017; 139: 1046e-1055e.

4. Hofer P, Damen C, Mureau M, Rakhorst A., Roche A. A critical review of perioperative complications in 175 free deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstructions. Ann Plast Surg 2007; 59: 137-142.

5. Brandt A, Przybyła-Basista H. Decyzja o rekonstrukcji piersi u kobiet po mastektomii – motywy, obawy, percepcja efektow. Psychoonkol 2016; 20: 17-26.

6. Yueh H, Slavin A, Adesiyun T. Patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparative evaluation of diep, tram, latissimus flap, and implant techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 125: 1585-1595.

7. Pusic L, Klassen F, Scott M, Klok A, Cordeiro G, Cano S. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124: 345-353.

8. Cano J, Klassen A, Pusic A. The Science behind quality-of-life measurement: a primer for plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123: 98e-106e.

9. Cohen A, Mundy R, Ballard S. The BREAST-Q in surgical research: a review of the literature 2009–2015. J Plast Reconstr Aesthethetic Surg 2016: 69: 149-162.

10. Allen R, Treece P. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 1994; 32: 32-38.

11. Ulatowski Ł, Noszczyk B. BREAST-Q questionnaire: tool for evaluation of quality of life following breast reconstruction with DIEP/ SIEA flap. Pol J Surg 2018; 90: 1-5.

12. Ashing T, George V. Health-related quality of life and care satisfaction outcomes: informing psychosocial oncology care among Latina and African-American young breast cancer survivors. Psychooncol 2018; 27: 1213-1220.

13. Kolacinska A, Hodorowicz-Zaniewska D, Bocian A. Landscape of oncoplastic breast surgery across Poland. Pol J Surg 2017; 89: 14-19.

14. Pusic A, Matros E, Fine N. Patient-reported outcomes 1 year after immediate breast reconstruction: results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium study. J Clin Oncol 2017; 35: 2499-2506.

Copyright: © 2021 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.

Quality of life after breast reconstruction by DIEP – literature analysis

Sabina Anna Dyszy 1

Sabina Anna Dyszy

¹