eISSN: 1897-4309
ISSN: 1428-2526
Contemporary Oncology/Współczesna Onkologia
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Addendum Special Issues Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
4/2024
vol. 28
 
Share:
Share:
abstract:
Original paper

Quality of life of patients treated for stage IV breast cancer. Multidimensional assessment and examination of determining factors

Juan Ignacio Arraras
1, 2, 3
,
Jose Juan Illarramendi
1, 3
,
Ana Manterola
2, 3
,
Uxue Zarandona
2, 3
,
Berta Ibañez
4
,
Andrew Bottomley
5
,
Lucia Teijeira
1, 3
,
Ignacio Visus
2, 3
,
Susana de la Cruz
1, 3
,
Marta Barrado
2, 3
,
Ruth Vera
1, 3

  1. Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
  2. Radiotherapeutic Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
  3. Institute for Health Research of Navarre (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain
  4. Methodology Unit, Navarrabiomed, RICAPPS, Spain
  5. Bottomley Consulting Group, Brussels, Belgium
Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2024; 28 (4): 350–357
Online publish date: 2025/01/15
View full text Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
Introduction:
Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) can profoundly impact patients’ lives. The health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of MBC metavivors remains a paramount concern. This study exa­mined the multifaceted aspects of HRQOL in MBC metavivors.

Material and methods:
Ninety-eight participants with over 4 years of meta­static disease were evaluated using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaires QLQ-C30, QLQ-BR42 and QLQ-BM22 alongside the Assessment of Survivor Concerns (ASC) questionnaire.

Results:
HRQOL scores were high (> 80/ 100 points) in some HRQOL areas, including role, cognitive and social functioning and breast symptoms. Moderate limitations (> 30 points) occurred in global QOL and financial impact (QLQ-C30); sexual functioning, sexual enjoyment, future perspective, breast satisfaction, upset by hair loss, skeletal symptoms, and weight gain (QLQ-BR42); and psychosocial aspects of QLQ-BM22. Worries were moderate in the two ASC factors (6.8 and 5.3) and the global scale (11.7). The multivariate model that best explains high risk of low global QOL included limiting comorbidity, financial impact, cancer worry and role functioning (R2 = 0.692). Patients with only bone metastases showed higher cancer and health worries (ASC scale) than patients with soft tissues and visceral sites.

Conclusions:
This study shows that MBC metavivors adapted well to their situation and underscores the persistent HRQOL challenges they face. In-depth analysis of the QLQ-C30 glo­bal score highlights the need to address not only medical aspects but also integrated psychosocial and economi­cal support in MBC metavivor care. HRQOL variations across metastatic sites underscore the need to tailor interventions to address site-specific challenges.

keywords:

neoplasm metastasis, breast neoplasms, metavivors, quality of life

Quick links
© 2025 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.