eISSN: 2391-6052
ISSN: 2353-3854
Alergologia Polska - Polish Journal of Allergology
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Special issues Editorial board Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
2/2024
vol. 11
 
Share:
Share:
Original paper

Relationship between the switched memory B level and clinical course of coronavirus disease 2019 in patients with common variable immunodeficiency

Filiz Sadi Aykan
1
,
Fatih Çölkesen
1
,
Eray Yıldız
2
,
Mehmet Kılınç
1
,
Recep Evcen
1
,
Şevket Arslan
1

  1. Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey
  2. Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Necip Fazıl City Hospital, Kahramanmaraş, Turkey
Alergologia Polska – Polish Journal of Allergology 2024; 11, 2: 148–153
Online publish date: 2024/06/07
Article file
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 

Introduction

In the primary immunodeficiency spectrum, the most common symptomatic type is common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) [1]. Diagnostic criteria include serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) at least 2 standard deviations below age-appropriate reference levels in individuals over 4 years of age, low serum immunoglobulin A (IgA) and/or immunoglobulin M (IgM), impaired or absent accompanying specific antibody production, and exclusion of other causes of hypogammaglobulinaemia [2].
Although recurrent-persistent infectious complications are more common in patients with CVID, non-infectious complications such as interstitial lung disease, enteropathy, autoimmunity, allergic diseases, lymphoproliferation, and malignancy can also be seen [2]. The molecular defects that lead to CVID are still unknown; however, it has been reported to be caused by errors in the innate and acquired immune systems [3, 4].
About 90% of patients with CVID have normal B-cell levels. Therefore, differentiation errors during the final stage of the B cell may be associated with major causes of the disease [5–8]. The defect in antibody production in these patients suggests that there is a defect of transformation process of B cells into plasma and memory cells [5]. The numbers of plasma cells, class-switched memory B cells (cSMBCs) (CD19+CD27+IgD), and IgM memory B cells (CD19+CD27+) are reduced in patients with CVID [9–11].
Progression of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is associated with the host’s immune response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) at the time of first encounter [12]. As well as T cells and natural killer (NK) cells, B cells also play a critical role in establishing a memory response to clear cytopathic viruses and preventing re-infection [13].

Aim

However, the relationship of B cells and antibody production to SARS-CoV-2 infection remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the association of cSMBCs with the clinical course of COVID-19 in patients with CVID.

Material and methods

Study design
This study was carried out retrospectively at Necmettin Erbakan University Faculty of Medicine, Adult Allergy, and Immunology Clinic. The Local Ethics Committee approved the study protocol (decision no. 2022/3889), which complied with tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki (1975). Due to the retrospective data-scanning method of the study, it was optional to obtain informed consent after Ethics Committee approval. Therefore, informed consent was not obtained from the patients. Patients with CVID followed in our clinic were screened for COVID-19 infection. Between March 2020 and June 2022, the clinical features, basal cSMBC level, and IgG, IgM, IgA, and CD19+ B cell levels of CVID patients with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-positive COVID-19 disease were evaluated. Among 62 adult CVID patients, 24 patients with COVID-19 were included in the study. The patients were classified according to disease severity based on the clinical features specified by the National Institutes of Health and data in the hospital archives [14].
Mild disease: Presence of any symptoms of COVID-19, such as fever, sore throat, weakness, myalgia, headache, cough, loss of taste and smell, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhoea, without abnormality in lung imaging, excluding shortness of breath.
Moderate disease: Clinical signs or imaging of lower airway involvement but room air oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≥ 94% at sea level.
Severe disease: Lung infiltrates > 50% or respiratory rate > 30/min, SpO2 < 94%, PaO2/FiO2 < 300 mmHg in room air at sea level.
COVID-19 symptoms, hospitalisation duration, the results of PCR tests performed at 48-hour intervals on nasal and oropharyngeal swabs during hospitalisation, and positivity duration were recorded.
Data collection
Demographic information, medical history, and laboratory values of patients were obtained from the local medical archive and recorded in an electronic database. Symptoms, hospitalisation history, vital signs (to determine disease severity), oxygen saturation, radiological findings, serum IgG, IgM, IgA levels, number of B lymphocyte subgroups, and basal cSMBC levels were recorded. The values of cSMBC and B lymphocyte subgroups were taken from the records of initial diagnosis of CVID. Immunoglobulin levels were measured on the first day of outpatient or inpatient follow-up during the diagnosis of COVID-19 disease before receiving treatment. The relationships among COVID-19 symptom duration, duration of PCR positivity, hospitalisation duration, disease severity, mortality, serum immunoglobulin, and basal cSMBC levels were evaluated.
SARS-CoV-2 RNA isolation
SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) from simultaneous oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal swabs using a VNAT solution (Bioaxen, Istanbul, Turkey) with the Bio-Speedy SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR kit (Bioaxen) on a Rotor-Gene Q instrument (Qiagen, Antwerp, Belgium). Results were analysed using Rotor-Gene Q software.
Serum immunoglobulin measurements
Serum immunoglobulin levels were measured using a nephelometric method (BN II System; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). When the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection was made, the serum IgG, IgM, and IgA values measured just before receiving intravenous immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) were recorded on the first day of follow-up.
Flow cytometric analysis
Peripheral blood samples were taken at the time of diagnosis of CVID and tested in anticoagulant tubes with EDTA within 6 hours. B-cell subset numbers (cells/ml) were counted using multicolour flow cytometry. Surface markers were detected using human monoclonal anti-CD27 phycoerythrin (PE), anti-CD19 allophycocyanin (APC), and anti-IgD fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) (all BD Biosciences, Erembodegem, Belgium) antibodies. Cells were analysed using a BD FACS Canto II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). The B-cell subgroups were naive B cells (CD19+ CD27IgD+) cSMBCs (CD19+CD27+IgD) and non-switched memory B cells (CD19+CD27+IgD+). None of the patients were receiving any immunosuppressive therapy, including steroids, at the time of flow cytometric analysis.
Statistical analysis
Continuous variables are given as medians with interquartile range (IQR), and categorical variables as numbers and percentages for each category. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to evaluate continuous data according to the disease severity and cSMBC level. Spearman’s correlation was used to assess the association between cSMBC level and PCR positivity duration. SPSS statistical software (ver. 22.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used in the analysis. P-values < 0.05 were considered indicative of statistical significance.

Results

All patients in the study were infected by the ancestral Wuhan-like strain, no variant was detected. Also, patients had COVID-19 disease before their first vaccination. The median age of 24 patients was 48 years (IQR: 32–58), and 62.5% of them were female. The patients were hospitalised and followed up, and 3 (13%) were followed in the intensive care unit. One-third of the patients had severe disease. The clinical courses of the patients are summarised in Table 1. Three of the 8 patients in the severe group (37.5%; aged 34, 41, and 65 years) required intensive care, all of whom died during follow-up. There were comorbidities (asthma, ulcerative colitis, liver cirrhosis) in the patients who died.
All patients were undergoing Ig replacement therapy (IgRT) every 3 weeks. However, regardless of the time of the last routine IgRT dose, we additionally repeated IgRT at the time of diagnosis of COVID-19. The median time between the last IgRT and the onset of symptoms was 13 days (min.–max.: 3-20).
CD19 levels were similar between the mild-moderate and severe disease groups, but the number of cSMBCs was found to be lower in the severe group (p = 0.018). IgG levels were significantly lower, and patients were significantly older, in the severe disease group (Table 2). To investigate the age-related changes in the rate of cSMBCs, patients were divided into 2 groups under 50 years old and over. Median cSMBC was 3.4% (IQR: 1.8–9.7) in patients under 50 years of age and 4.6% (IQR: 3.7–5.2) in patients over 50 years of age. No significant difference was found between age groups (p = 0.379).
The cSMBC level was in the normal range (9.2–18.9 cells/ml) in 13 patients and low in 11 patients; the latter patients had longer durations of hospitalisation, symptoms, and SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity (Table 3). The cSMBC level was significantly negatively correlated with the SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity duration (r = 0.397, p = 0.038) (Figure 1).

Discussion

In this study, a low cSMBC level was associated with severe disease, increased mortality, and prolonged hospitalisation, symptom duration, and PCR positivity. Decreased total B and cSMBC numbers in the normal population are known independent risk factors for COVID-19-related mortality and increased disease severity [15]. In a multivariate analysis of indicators of COVID-19 disease severity, impaired activation of monocytes and neutrophils, depletion of active cSMBCs, and severe depletion of NK cells as the most prominent early-onset immunological markers of severe COVID-19 disease were found [16]. However, there have been no studies evaluating the relationship between cSMBC level and the clinical course and severity of COVID-19 in patients with CVID.
The COVID-19 pandemic has affected more than 600 million people and caused the death over 6 million people [17]. The high contagiousness of SARS-CoV-2 and rapid increase in the number of affected patients is associated with the lack of an immune response to exposure to viral antigens [18]. COVID-19 may follow a course ranging from asymptomatic to acute respiratory distress syndrome and multi-organ failure, and it may result in death [19, 20].
CVID is a type of primary immunodeficiency in which T- and B-cell abnormalities accompany hypogammaglobulinaemia. A meta-analysis of 14 studies evaluated data from 68 patients with CVID and COVID-19. In that study, approximately 29% of CVID patients had moderate to severe disease (needing oxygen support), and 10% were classified as critically ill (requiring intubation); the COVID-19-related mortality rate was 13% [21]. In this study, we found that one-third of patients with CVID had severe COVID-19 disease, 37.5% of patients with severe disease, and 12.5% of all patients died.
The mortality rate of patients with CVID is significantly increased compared to the general population [21, 22]. The lack of systematic evaluations in most cohort studies suggests that the mortality rate may be overstated, given that mild or asymptomatic cases may have been excluded [23]. An impaired B lymphocyte response and IL-6 deficiency in patients with CVID may protect against macrophage hyperactivation and cytokine storm [24]. Although a lower mortality rate was reported in a later large-scale systematic study, it was higher than in the normal population [25].
T and B cells are essential for eliminating viral infections. T cells exert their effects via the chemokines and cytokines released from antigen-presenting cells, and B cells produce neutralising antibodies [26]. After B-cell activation, specific memory B cells differentiate into high-affinity plasma cells during recurrent infection. Memory B cells and T cells are major components of the virus-specific protective immune response [27].
The B cell begins to develop in the bone marrow and completes its development in the peripheral tissue. Immature B cells differentiate into marginal zone B cells or naive peripheral follicular B cells. Marginal zone B cells transform into IgM memory B cells. Follicular B cells differentiate into cSMBCs and antibody-secreting plasma cells in the germinal centres [9, 28]. Memory B cells are recognised by the CD27 surface marker. B cells with IgM and IgD on their surface are non-switched memory B cells; cSMBCs are those that have IgG, IgA, or IgE on their surface but lack IgM and IgD [5]. Proper development of germinal centres is required for the production of cSMBCs in secondary lymphoid organs. Germinal centre impairment is related to a reduced number of cSMBCs [23]. Memory B cells can survive for years after encountering antigens. Exposure to antigens or environmental signals may induce their differentiation into antibody-secreting plasma cells [5].
Patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and more memory B cells show accelerated recovery [29]. There is a negative correlation between COVID-19 symptom duration during convalescence and the cSMBC level [30]. SARS-CoV-2–specific memory B cells are formed after about 1 month; this early protective immune response begins before specific memory B cell formation. This may be associated with enhanced cross-reactive B- and T-cell responses resulting from previous exposure to coronaviruses [31].
Patients with CVID who have a low cSMBC level have more frequent recurrent respiratory tract infections and bronchiectasis. Such patients require more special care services, and the cSMBC level could have prognostic value [32]. In this study, a small number of cSMBCs were associated with mortality, severe disease, and greater durations of hospitalisation, symptoms, and PCR positivity. Also, the number of cSMBCs was significantly negatively associated with the duration of PCR positivity.
This study had some limitations. First, it was a cross-sectional, retrospective study. Second, we did not enumerate memory B cells specific for SARS-CoV-2. Third, a larger number of patients would have increased the statistical power.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study on the relationship between the clinical course, severity, and mortality of COVID-19 and the cSMBC level in patients with CVID. The findings provide insight into the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 and other viruses.

Conclusions

The durations of SARS-COV-2 PCR positivity, hospitalisation, and symptoms were more severe in patients with CVID who had a low cSMBC level. CVID patients with severe COVID-19 had lower cSMBC levels. In patients with prolonged SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity, this was associated with lower cSMBC levels. Therefore, measurement of the basal cSMBC levels in patients with CVID may enable early identification of those at risk of severe COVID-19. In such patients, timely administration of aggressive treatments (e.g. high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin and antivirals) would reduce the morbidity and mortality rates.

Funding

No external funding.

Ethical approval

This study was carried out retrospectively at Necmettin Erbakan University Faculty of Medicine, Adult Allergy, and Immunology Clinic. The Local Ethics Committee approved the study protocol (decision no. 2022/3889), which complied with tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki (1975).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Hammarstrom L, Vorechovsky I, Webster D. Selective IgA deficiency (SIgAD) and common variable immunodeficiency (CVID). Clin Exp Immunol 2000; 120: 225-31.
2. Seidel MG, Kindle G, Gathmann B, et al. The European Society for Immunodeficiencies (ESID) Registry Working Definitions for the Clinical Diagnosis of Inborn Errors of Immunity. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2019; 7: 1763-70.
3. Azizi G, Rezaei N, Kiaee F, et al. T-cell abnormalities in common variable immunodeficiency. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2016; 26: 233-43.
4. Sharifi L, Tavakolinia N, Kiaee F, et al. A review on defects of dendritic cells in common variable immunodeficiency. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets 2017; 17: 100-13.
5. Ahn S, Cunningham-Rundles C. Role of B cells in common variable immune deficiency. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2009; 5: 557-64.
6. Warnatz K, Schlesier M. Flowcytometric phenotyping of common variable immunodeficiency. Cytometry B Clin Cytom 2008; 74: 261-71.
7. Ganjalikhani-Hakemi M, Yazdani R, Esmaeili M, et al. Role of apoptosis in the pathogenesis of common variable immunodeficiency (CVID). Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets 2017; 17: 332-40.
8. Yazdani R, Fatholahi M, Ganjalikhani-Hakemi M, et al. Role of apoptosis in common variable immunodeficiency and selective immunoglobulin A deficiency. Mol Immunol 2016; 71: 1-9.
9. Carsetti R, Rosado MM, Donnanno S, et al. The loss of IgM memory B cells correlates with clinical disease in common variable immunodeficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005; 115; 412-7.
10. Warnatz K, Denz A, Drager R, et al. Severe deficiency of switched memory B cells (CD27(+)IgM(-)IgD(-)) in subgroups of patients with common variable immunodeficiency: a new approach to classify a heterogeneous disease. Blood 2002; 99: 1544-51.
11. Piqueras B, Lavenu-Bombled C, Galicier L, et al. Common variable immunodeficiency patient classification based on impaired B cell memory differentiation correlates with clinical aspects. J Clin Immunol 2003; 23: 385-400.
12. Quinti I, Mezzaroma I, Milito C. Clinical management of patients with primary immunodeficiencies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2021; 17: 163-8.
13. Huang AT, Garcia-Carreras B, Hitchings MDT, et al. A systematic review of antibody mediated immunity to coronaviruses: kinetics, correlates of protection, and association with severity. Nat Commun 2020; 11: 4704.
14. National Institutes of Health (2022). Clinical Spectrum of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines [online]. Website https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/overview/clinical-spectrum/ [accessed September 26, 2022].
15. Colkesen F, Kepenek Kurt E, Vatansev H, et al. Memory B cells and serum immunoglobulins are associated with disease severity and mortality in patients with COVID-19. Postgrad Med J 2022; 98: 765-71.
16. Bean J, Kuri-Cervantes L, Pennella M, et al. Multivariate indicators of disease severity in COVID-19. Sci Rep 2023; 13: 5145.
17. World Health Organization (2022). Coronavirus disease Dashboard: World Health Organization [online]. Website https://covid19.who.int/ [accessed 2 November 2022].
18. World Health Organization (2020). Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic [online]. Website https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019. [Accessed 13 December 2022].
19. Chen X, Zhao B, Qu Y, et al. Detectable serum severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 viral load (RNAemia) is closely correlated with drastically elevated interleukin 6 level in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019. Clin Infect Dis 2020; 71: 1937-42.
20. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2020; 395: 1054-62.
21. Weifenbach N, Jung A, Lotters S. COVID-19 infection in CVID patients: what we know so far. Immun Inflamm Dis 2021; 9: 632-4.
22. Hauser A, Counotte MJ, Margossian CC, et al. Estimation of SARS-CoV-2 mortality during the early stages of an epidemic: a modeling study in Hubei, China, and six regions in Europe. PLoS Med 2020; 17: e1003189.
23. Wehr C, Kivioja T, Schmitt C, et al. The EUROclass trial: defining subgroups in common variable immunodeficiency. Blood 2008; 111: 77-85.
24. Petricau C, Nedelea I, Deleanu D. Surprising protective mechanisms against severe forms of COVID-19 infection among common variable immunodeficiency patients—one center experience. Research Square https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-57542/v1.
25. Nye D, Kaminsky L, Al-Shaikhly T. Clinical outcomes of COVID-19 in common variable immunodeficiency patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2022; 149: AB141.
26. Prompetchara E, Ketloy C, Palaga T. Immune responses in COVID-19 and potential vaccines: lessons learned from SARS and MERS epidemic. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol 2020; 38: 1-9.
27. Plotkin SA. Correlates of protection induced by vaccination. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2010; 17: 1055-65.
28. Weller S, Faili A, Garcia C, et al. CD40-CD40L independent Ig gene hypermutation suggests a second B cell diversification pathway in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 1166-70.
29. De Biasi S, Lo Tartaro D, Meschiari M, et al. Expansion of plasmablasts and loss of memory B cells in peripheral blood from COVID-19 patients with pneumonia. Eur J Immunol 2020; 50: 1283-94.
30. Newell KL, Clemmer DC, Cox JB, et al. Switched and unswitched memory B cells detected during SARS-CoV-2 convalescence correlate with limited symptom duration. PLoS One 2021; 16: e0244855.
31. Mateus J, Grifoni A, Tarke A, et al. Selective and cross-reactive SARS-CoV-2 T cell epitopes in unexposed humans. Science 2020; 370: 89-94.
32. Vodjgani M, Aghamohammadi A, Samadi M, et al. Analysis of class-switched memory B cells in patients with common variable immunodeficiency and its clinical implications. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2007; 17: 321-8.
Copyright: © Polish Society of Allergology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.



Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.