eISSN: 2299-0054
ISSN: 1895-4588
Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Editorial board Reviewers Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Search
Editorial Policies
Sarajevo Declaration on Integrity and Visibility of Scholarly Publications
3/2021
vol. 16
 
Share:
Send email
Share:
abstract:
Original paper

Robotic single-site surgery versus laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in early-stage endometrial cancer: a case-control study

Hao Sun
1
,
Jinghai Gao
1
,
Zhijin Jin
1
,
Yuxian Wu
1
,
Yang Zhou
1
,
Xiaojun Liu
1

  1. Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Shanghai, China
Videosurgery Miniinv 2021; 16 (3): 597–603
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2021.103955
Online publish date: 2021/02/26
View full text Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
Introduction
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) can reduce the limited invasiveness of conventional laparoscopy while providing superior cosmetic results. Robotic single-site surgery (RSSS) can overcome this shortcoming to a certain extent. Aim: To evaluate the advantages of RSSS in treating early-stage endometrial cancer by comparing RSSS with LESS.

Material and methods
From January 2018 to August 2018, patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer from endometrial curettage and imaging studies were selected for this prospective cohort study, with 22 undergoing RSSS and 18 undergoing LESS. All surgical procedures were performed using the conventional da Vinci Si surgical system with the Lagiport single port or a conventional laparoendoscopic instrument with the Lagiport single port. Operative time was recorded electronically. Intraoperative parameters and postoperative parameters were recorded and further analyzed.

Results
The operation was successfully completed, and a pure single-point approach was adopted. There were no laparotomy or intraoperative complications. Compared with the LESS group, the RSSS group had significantly longer pre-surgical time, significantly lower median operation time, significantly lower median blood loss, and significantly lower vaginal cuff closure time. The median length of hospital stay in the RSSS group was significantly lower than that in the LESS group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of early and late complications between the two groups. No recurrence events were observed in either the RSSS or the LESS group.

Conclusions
RSSS is feasible and safe in patients with early-stage endometrial cancer. RSSS can reduce operating time, blood loss and length of hospital stay compared with LESS.

keywords:

robotic, laparoendoscopic, single site, single port, endometrial cancer, gynecologic surgery
  
Termedia
About us Contact
Copyright notice Privacy policy Advertising policy Contact us
Quick links
Journals Books eBooks Events
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.