eISSN: 2354-0265
ISSN: 2353-6942
Health Problems of Civilization Physical activity: diseases and issues recognized by the WHO
Bieżący numer Archiwum Online first O czasopiśmie Rada naukowa Recenzenci Bazy indeksacyjne Kontakt Zasady publikacji prac Opłaty publikacyjne Standardy etyczne i procedury
Panel Redakcyjny
Zgłaszanie i recenzowanie prac online
Poleć ten artykuł:
Udostępnij:
Artykuł oryginalny

SHAPING THE FUTURE: EXPLORING THE IMPACT OF DIGITAL HEALTH MESSAGES AND COMMUNICATION ON PROTECTION ACTION MOTIVATION TO ADOPT PREMARITAL GENETIC TESTING

Faryal Sohail
1
,
Syed Hassan Raza
2
,
Moneeba Iftikhar
3
,
Umer Zaman
4
,
Andrea Ševčovičová
5
,
Tatiana Hrindová
5

  1. Institute of Media and Communication Studies, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan
  2. School of Media and Communication, Taylor’s University, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
  3. Department of Mass Communication, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore, Pakistan
  4. Endicott College of International Studies, Woosong University, Dong-gu Daejeon, South Korea
  5. Nursing Department, St. Elizabeth University of Health and Social Work, Bratislava, Slovakia
Health Prob Civil.
Data publikacji online: 2025/01/14
Plik artykułu:
- Raza et al.pdf  [0.84 MB]
Pobierz cytowanie
 
Metryki PlumX:
 
1. Jensen TL, Gøtzsche CR, Woldbye DPD. Current and future prospects for gene therapy for rare genetic diseases affecting the brain and spinal cord. Front Mol Neurosci. 2021; 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2021.695937
2. Caroselli S, Poli M, Gatta V, Stuppia L, Capalbo A. Preconception carrier screening and preimplantation genetic testing in the infertility management. Andrology. Forthcoming 2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13744
3. Iqbal S, Zakar R, Fischer F, Zakar MZ. Consanguineous marriages and their association with women’s reproductive health and fertility behavior in Pakistan: secondary data analysis from Demographic and Health Surveys, 1990-2018. BMC Womens Health. 2022; 22: 118. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-01704-2
4. Natarajan J, Joseph MA. Premarital screening for genetic blood disorders — an integrated review on the knowledge and attitudes of Middle Eastern university students. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2021; 26: 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43043-021-00065-4
5. Alkalbani A, Alharrasi M, Achura S, Al Badi A, Al Rumhi A, Alqassabi K, et al. Factors affecting the willingness to undertake premarital screening test among prospective marital individuals. SAGE Open Nurs. 2022;8. https://doi.org/10.1177/23779608221078156
6. Jameel T, Baig M, Murad MA, Gazzaz ZJ, Mal Y, Alyoubi WE, et al. Consanguineous marriages, premarital screening, and genetic testing: a survey among Saudi university students. Front Public Health. 2024; 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1328300
7. Linga BSG, Mohammed SGAA, Farrell T, Rifai H Al, Al-Dewik N, Qoronfleh MW. Genomic newborn screening for pediatric cancer predisposition syndromes: a holistic approach. Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16112017
8. Agbozo WK, Amanor E, Acheampong EO, Kotei B, Attoh LN, Yeboah D, et al. Assessing knowledge of sickle cell disease and health beliefs on premarital genetic screening among healthcare trainees at a tertiary institution: A cross‐sectional study. Health Sci. Rep.. 2023; 6. https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1128
9. Almoliky MA, Abdulrhman H, Safe SH, Galal M, Abdu H, Towfiq B, et al. Knowledge and attitude of engaged and recently married couples toward premarital screening: a cross-sectional study. Inquiry (United States). 2022; 59. https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580221097424
10. Pokharel M, Lillie HM, Jensen JD, King AJ, Ratcliff CL, Barbour JB. political party collective norms, perceived norms, and mask wearing behavior: a test of the theory of normative social behavior. Health Commun. 2024. 39(13): 3170-3179. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2024.2309003
11. Prince SE, Muskin SE, Kramer SJ, Huang SM, Blakey T, Rappold AG. Smoke on the horizon: leveling up citizen and social science to motivate health protective responses during wildfires. Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2024; 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02641-1
12. You Z, Zhan W, Zhang F. Online information acquisition affects food risk prevention behaviours: the roles of topic concern, information credibility and risk perception. BMC Public Health. 2023; 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16814-1
13. Rimal RN, Lapinski MK. A re-explication of social norms, ten years later. Communication Theory. 2015; 25(4): 393-409. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12080
14. Chung A, Rimal RN. Social norms: a review. Review of Communication Research. 2016; 4: 1-28. https://doi.org/10.12840/issn.2255-4165.2016.04.01.008
15. Raza SH, Emenyeonu OC, Yousaf M, Iftikhar M. Citizen journalism practices during COVID-19 in spotlight: influence of user-generated contents about economic policies in perceiving government performance. Information Discovery and Delivery. 2022; 50(2): 142-54. dhttps://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-09-2020-0118
16. Liu PL, Ye JF, Ao HS, Sun S, Zheng Y, Li Q, et al. Effects of electronic personal health information technology on American women’s cancer screening behaviors mediated through cancer worry: differences and similarities between 2017 and 2020. Digit Health. 2023; 9. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231185271
17. Richardson-Parry A, Baas C, Donde S, Ferraiolo B, Karmo M, Maravic Z, et al. Interventions to reduce cancer screening inequities: the perspective and role of patients, advocacy groups, and empowerment organisations. Int J Equity Health. 2023; 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-023-01841-6
18. Rimal RN. Modeling the relationship between descriptive norms and behaviors: a test and extension of the theory of normative social behavior (TNSB). Health Commun. 2008; 23(2): 103-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410230801967791
19. Yoon H, Jang Y, Lapinski MK, Turner MM, Peng TQ, Lee S. The role of collective group orientation and social norms on physical distancing behaviors for disease prevention. Health Commun. 2024. 39(13): 3108-3121. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2024.2303826
20. Wasaya A, Prentice C, Hsiao A. The influence of norms on tourist behavioural intentions. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management. 2022; 50: 277-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2022.02.023
21. Gavrilets S, Tverskoi D, Sánchez A. Modelling social norms: an integration of the norm-utility approach with beliefs dynamics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2024; 379(1897). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2023.0027
22. Gauld C, Reeves C. Normative influences on young drivers’ illegal smartphone use: Applying an extended Theory of Normative Social Behaviour. Accid Anal Prev. 2023; 180: 106904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106904
23. Huber S, Sattler S, Guido M. Mechanisms of perceived social norms: the mediating and moderating role of morality and outcome expectations on prescription drug misuse in the working population. Deviant Behav. 2023; 44(3): 359-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2022.2046981
24. Min M. School culture, self-efficacy, outcome expectation, and teacher agency toward reform with curricular autonomy in South Korea: a social cognitive approach. Asia Pacific Journal of Education. 2023; 43(4): 951-967. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2019.1626218
25. Wang F, Wei J, Huang SK, Lindell MK, Ge Y, Wei HL. Public reactions to the 2013 Chinese H7N9 Influenza outbreak: perceptions of risk, stakeholders, and protective actions. J Risk Res. 2018; 21(7): 809-833. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2016.1247377
26. Horáčková K, Ochtinská H, Václavíková K, Šoukalová K, Brodský Z, Mandysová M, et al. Strategies for introducing preventive measures against respiratory diseases (influenza and COVID-19) in companies in the Czech Republic: meta-analysis. Health Prob Civil. 2023; 17(1): 12-23. https://doi.org/10.5114/hpc.2022.122274
27. Lindell MK, Perry RW. The protective action decision model: theoretical modifications and additional evidence. Risk Analysis. 2012; 32(4): 616-632. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01647.x
28. Lindell MK, Hwang SN. Households’ perceived personal risk and responses in a multihazard environment. Risk Analysis. 2008; 28(2): 539-556. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01032.x
29. Guo Q, Yao N, Zhu W. How consumers’ perception and information processing affect their acceptance of genetically modified foods in China: a risk communication perspective. Food Research International. 2020; 137: 109518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109518
30. Duan T, Jiang H, Deng X, Zhang Q, Wang F. Government intervention, risk perception, and the adoption of protective action recommendations: evidence from the COVID-19 prevention and control experience of China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103387
31. Firdous P, Nissar K, Ali S, Ganai BA, Shabir U, Hassan T, et al. Genetic testing of maturity-onset diabetes of the young current status and future perspectives. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018; 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00253
32. Al Eissa MM, Almsned F, Alkharji RR, Aldossary YM, AlQurashi R, Hawsa EA, et al. The perception of genetic diseases andpremarital screening tests in the central region of Saudi Arabia. BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19029-0
33. Webster TH, Beal SJ, Brothers KB. Motivation in the age of genomics: why genetic findings of disease susceptibility might not motivate behavior change. Life Sciences, Society and Policy. 2013; 9: 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/2195-7819-9-8
34. Dan V, Raupp J. A systematic review of frames in news reporting of health risks: Characteristics, construct consistency vs. name diversity, and the relationship of frames to framing functions. Health Risk Soc. 2018; 20(5-6): 203-226. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2018.1522422
35. Kang JA, Schulz P, Hubbard GT, Hwang J, Muldrow A, Barber B, et al. News framing of e-cigarettes: a cross-national study of the US, UK, and Korea. Commun Stud. 2021; 72(5): 937-956. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2021.1975142
36. Raza SH, Ogadimma EC, Shah AA, Gorpe S. Improving community health messagreception through digital journalistic practices: mixed-method evidence on health preventive behaviors and health podcast framing for emerging health issues. Journalism. 2024; 25(9): 1956-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849231194170
37. Zeballos Rivas DR, Lopez Jaldin ML, Nina Canaviri B, Portugal Escalante LF, Alanes Fernández AMC, Aguilar Ticona JP. Social media exposure, risk perception, preventive behaviors and attitudes during the COVID-19 epidemic in la Paz, Bolivia: a cross sectional study. PLoS One. 2021; 16(1): e0245859. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245859
38. Sun J, Jiang X, Gao Y, He C, Wang M, Wang X, et al. Subhealth Risk Perception Scale: development and validation of a new measure. Comput Math Methods Med. 2022; 2022: 950890. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9950890
39. Wei HL, Lindell MK, Prater CS, Wei J, Wang F, Ge YG. Perceived stakeholder characteristics and protective action for influenza emergencies: a comparative study of respondents in the United States and China. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters. 2018; 36(1): 52-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/028072701803600103
40. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis. Eighth edition. Hoboken: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2019.
41. Krejcie RV. Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 1970; 30(3): 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
42. Liu RW, Cheng Y, Foerster TA. Modeling the relationship between perceived descriptive norms and willingness to practice COVID-19 preventative behaviors: a test of the mediation and moderation mechanisms in the Theory of Normative Social Behavior. Health Commun. 2023; 39(2): 339-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2023.2165257
43. Raza SH, Yousaf M, Zaman U, Khan SW, Core R, Malik A. Unlocking infodemics and mysteries in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: nexus of conspiracy beliefs, digital informational support, psychological Well-being, and religious fatalism. Vaccine. 2023; 41(10): 1703-1715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.01.047
44. Susanto P, Hoque ME, Shah NU, Candra AH, Hashim NMHN, Abdullah NL. Entrepreneurial orientation and performance of SMEs: the roles of marketing capabilities and social media usage. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies. 2023; 15(2): 379-403. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-03-2021-0090
45. Kožená M, Mandysová M, Brodský Z, Šatera K, Horáčková K, Václavíková K. The economic and social impact of respiratory diseases on organisations. Acta Academica. 2023; 23(1):19-31. https://doi.org/10.25142/aak.2023.002
46. Václavíková K, Šoukalová K, Kožená M, Brodský Z, Mandysová M, Ochtinská H, et al. Preventive measures of respiratory diseases and impact on employee morbidity - possibilities of using electronic platforms. Mil. Med. Sci. Lett. 2024; 93(2): 206-217. 019 https://doi.org/10.31482/mmsl.2023.019
47. Versele V, Debekker P, Stok FM, Aerenhouts D, Clarys P, Deforche B, et al. Relative importance of determinants of changes in eating behavior during the transition to parenthood: priorities for future research and interventions. Nutrients. 2021; 13(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13072429
Copyright: © 2025 Pope John Paul II State School of Higher Education in Biała Podlaska. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.

© 2025 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.