Current issue
Archive
Videos
Articles in press
About the journal
Supplements
Editorial board
Reviewers
Abstracting and indexing
Subscription
Contact
Instructions for authors
Publication charge
Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
|
3/4/2002
vol. 104 abstract:
Review article
Selected problems of ophthalmological certification in legal proceedings in labour court – own experience
Roman Sobecki
1
Online publish date: 2002/09/22
View
full text
Get citation
ENW EndNote
BIB JabRef, Mendeley
RIS Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
Purpose:
Analysis of the appeals to the Appeals Labour Court and estimation of visual functions shown in court's decree. Material and methods: 248 ophthalmic court's decree were analysed. Results: In 72% of cases people were qualify as able to work. The most frequent reasons to obtain judgement of disability for labour were: eye injury, high myopia, strabismus, amblyopia, optical nerve atrophy, cataract. 54% persons were monocular Conclusions: The most appeals to the Appeals Labour Court had no sufficient grounds for stateing diability for labour keywords:
visual invalidity, ophthalmological certification |
|