4/2008
vol. 4
Short communication Patients undergoing coronary angiography because of chest pain with hepatitis C virus seropositivity have a higher prevalence of obstructive coronary artery disease than a control group
Arch Med Sci 2008; 4, 4: 452–454
Online publish date: 2009/01/26
Get citation
Introduction
Vassalle et al. [1] reported in a Letter to the Editor that there was an association between hepatitis C virus seropositivity and coronary artery disease (CAD). Momiyama et al. [2] reported in a Letter to the Editor that hepatitis C virus was present in 3.4% of Japanese patients with CAD and in 2.8% of a control group (P not significant). The prevalence of hepatitis C virus seropositivity tended to increase with a greater number of coronary arteries with CAD [2].
We are reporting the prevalence of 1-vessel obstructive CAD,
of 2-vessel obstructive CAD, of 3-vessel obstructive CAD, of 1, 2, or
3-vessel obstructive CAD, and of 2 or 3-vessel obstructive CAD in 36 patients seropositive for hepatitis C virus and in 36 age-matched and sex-matched patients with similar coronary risk factors seronegative for hepatitis C virus undergoing coronary angiography because of chest pain.
Material and methods
In a prospective study, 36 patients (31 men and 5 women), mean age 53±9 years, seropositive for hepatitis C virus and a control group of 36 patients (31 men and 5 women), mean age 53±9 years, seronegative for hepatitis C virus with similar coronary risk factors underwent coronary angiography because of chest pain. Cardiovascular drug therapy was not significantly different between the 2 groups. None of the patients in either group had prior coronary artery bypass surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention or underwent previous investigation for chest pain. The only significant difference between the 2 groups was the presence or absence of seropositivity for hepatitis C virus. Obstructive CAD was diagnosed if there was >50% obstruction of at least 1 major coronary artery [3].
Student’s t tests were used to analyze continuous variables. Chi-square tests were used to analyze dichotomous variables.
This study was approved by the New York Medical College Institutional Review Board and by the Institutional Review Board of Westchester Medical Center.
Results
Table I shows the prevalence of coronary risk factors in 36 patients with hepatitis C virus seropositivity and in 36 age-matched and sex-matched patients with hepatitis C virus seronegativity undergoing coronary angiography because of chest pain. No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups.
Table II shows the prevalence of obstructive CAD and the number of major coronary arteries with obstructive CAD in 36 patients with hepatitis C virus seropositivity and in 36 age-matched and sex-matched patients with hepatitis C virus seronegativity undergoing coronary angiography because of chest pain. Table II also shows the levels of statistical significance.
Discusion
Vassalle et al. [1] reported that the prevalence of hepatitis C seropositivity was 6.3% in patients with CAD vs. 2.0% in a control group (P<0.05). However, Momiyama et al. [2] reported that hepatitis C virus was present in 3.4% of Japanese patients with CAD and in 2.8% of a control group (P not significant). The prevalence of hepatitis C virus seropositivity tended to increase with a greater number of coronary arteries with CAD and was 2.9% in patients with 1-vessel CAD, 3.6% in patients with 2-vessel CAD, and 4.1% in patients with
3-vessel CAD [2].
To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the only prospective study investigating the prevalence of obstructive CAD in patients undergoing coronary angiography for chest pain who were seropositive or seronegative for hepatitis C virus. Both groups were similar for age, gender, coronary risk factors, and use of cardiovascular drugs. This prospective study showed that patients seropositive for hepatitis C virus with similar coronary risk factors as an age-matched and
sex-matched control group undergoing coronary angiography because of chest pain had a significantly higher prevalence of obstructive CAD than the control group (89 vs. 58%, P<0.005). The present study also found that obstructive
2-vessel or 3-vessel CAD was present in 58% of patients seropositive for hepatitis C virus and in 25% of patients seronegatve for hepatitis C virus (P<0.005).
Inflammation is recognized to be involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis [4, 5]. Whether inflammation is contributing to obstructive CAD in patients seropositive for hepatitis C virus is unknown. Further studies are indicated to investigate the relationship between hepatitis C virus and obstructive CAD including markers of inflammation.
References
1. Vassalle C, Masini S, Bianchi F, Zucchelli GC. Evidence for association between hepatitis C virus seropositivity and coronary artery disease. Heart 2004; 90: 565-6.
2. Momiyama Y, Ohmori R, Kato R, Taniguchi H, Nakamura H, Ohsuzu F. Lack of any association between persistent hepatitis B or C virus infection and coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis 2005; 181: 211-3.
3. Ravipati G, Aronow WS, Lai H, et al. Comparison of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of stress testing versus 64-multislice coronary computed tomography angiography in predicting obstructive coronary artery disease diagnosed by coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol 2008; 101: 774-5.
4. Willerson JT, Ridker PM. Inflammation as a cardiovascular risk factor. Circulation 2004; 109 (21 Suppl II): II2-10.
5. Pai JK, Pischon T, Ma J, et al. Inflammatory markers and the risk of coronary heart disease in men and women. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2599-610.
Copyright: © 2009 Termedia & Banach. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
|
|