eISSN: 1897-4252
ISSN: 1731-5530
Kardiochirurgia i Torakochirurgia Polska/Polish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
2/2014
vol. 11
 
Share:
Share:

Surgical treatment of late aortic prosthetic valve endocarditis: 19 years’ experience

Tuncer Eylem Yayla
,
Adademir Taylan
,
Tas Serpil
,
Polat Ebru Bal
,
Dönmez Arzu Antal
,
Ak Adnan
,
Akbulut Mustafa
,
Serhat Bulbul
,
Mehmet Aksut
,
Tuncer Altug

Kardiochirurgia i Torakochirurgia Polska 2014; 11 (2): 126-131
Online publish date: 2014/06/30
Article file
- 03_Yayla.pdf  [0.38 MB]
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 

Introduction

Prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) is a devastating complication of valve surgery. The treatment is usually prolonged medical therapy and surgery in complicated cases [1]. The incidence is reported to be highest in the early period [2]. We retrospectively analyzed the results of operations performed for late aortic PVE in a single center in 19 years.

Material and methods

The patient data were collected from the hospital records retrospectively. From February 1992 to January 2011, 27 consecutive patients with aortic prosthetic valve endocarditis underwent surgery at our institution. For the definitions of active, healed, prosthetic and culture negative endocarditis, modified Aranki criteria were used [3]. Endocarditis was labeled ‘active’ if the patient had fever and/or leukocytosis at the time of surgery or required surgical treatment before completion of a standard course of antibiotic treatment. Endocarditis was labeled ‘healed’ if surgery was performed after completion of antibiotic treatment and no signs of active infection (fever, leukocytosis) were present. Prosthetic valve endocarditis was defined as infection occurring on any type of tissue or mechanical valve device. Early endocarditis was defined as infective endocarditis that occurred within 60 days of valve replacement. Late prosthetic valve endocarditis was defined as infective endocarditis that occurred after 60 days of valve replacement. These were confirmed at operation by the presence of pannus formation, of vegetations, periprosthetic leakage or perivalvular tissue destruction. The presence of acute or chronic inflammatory changes at microscopy confirmed the diagnosis of endocarditis. The diagnosis of infective endocarditis was made according to the Duke criteria [4]. All patients were examined by transthoracic (TTE) or transesophageal (TEE) echocardiography. Echocardiography revealed valvular vegetation, regurgitation, or periprosthetic leakage.
There were 17 male (63.0%) and 11 female (37.0%) patients with a mean age of 39.1 ± 14.2 (16-67) years. Of these PVE cases, 6 of them had double prosthetic valves. None of the PVE cases were early PVE. The mean duration between the valve replacement and the diagnosis of PVE was 20.0 ± 10.8 (range: 3-32) months. Vegetations on the mitral valve were detected in 3 cases (11.1%) and gross vegetations on aortic valves were detected in 6 patients (22.2%) preoperatively. Four patients (14.8%) had a history of 2 cardiac operations. The preoperative characteristics are summarized in Table I.
The blood cultures were positive in 11 patients (40.7%) and the identified microorganisms were Streptococcus in 7 cases (25.9%) and Staphylococcus in 4 patients (14.8%). Sixteen cases had negative cultures for both blood samples and the explanted surgical specimens.

Surgery

The patients were scheduled for an operation when the diagnoses were made. Fifteen patients (55.6%) underwent the operation in the active phase of the infection. In 12 cases (44.4%), the operation was performed after the antibiotic treatments were completed and the patient was stabilized. Mechanical prosthetic valves were preferred in most of the patients.
All patients underwent moderate (28°C) hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass by means of bicaval cannulation with cannulation of either the ascending aorta (23 patients) or the femoral artery (4 patients). The left ventricle was vented through the right superior pulmonary vein. Isothermic blood cardioplegic solution was administered via the retrograde route during aortic cross-clamping.
For eradication of the PVE, radical debridement of all the necrotic and infected tissues was performed. Aortic root replacement and reconstruction were performed in 8 cases. The list of procedures is presented in Table II. The most commonly performed procedure was re-replacement of the aortic prosthesis with a mechanical valve. Primary repair of the periprosthetic leak was preferred in 2 mitral PVE and 4 aortic PVE cases. Only one of these cases had primary repair of both valves’ leak repaired primarily.

Follow-up

All patients received at least four weeks of antibiotic therapy postoperatively. Broad-range antibiotics (vancomycin and aminoglycosides) were preferred for culture negative cases. The other patients were treated according to the antibiograms. The patients were involved in a follow-up program in the outpatient clinic of our hospital. The average duration of follow-up was 8.6 ± 4.7 years (0.5-18.2), adding up to a total of 136.9 patient/years.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analyses were performed with the SPSS 16.0 statistical software package. All continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and the ranges were shown. All discrete variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. Comparisons of the discrete variables were made by χ2 test. The survival, freedom from recurrence and freedom from reoperation analyses were performed with Kaplan Meier analysis.

Results

Mortality Eleven patients (40.7%) had in-hospital mortality. Low cardiac output was the primary cause of mortality in all cases except one (patient 3). Six cases with in-hospital mortality underwent an emergency operation. The time and etiology of mortality are summarized in Table III.

Morbidity

The total number of patients who had any morbidity was 18 (66.7%). Postoperative fever was seen in 11 patients (40.7%), five of whom did not have fever preoperatively. Twelve patients (44.4%) had low cardiac output and only two of them survived. Complete heart block was present in 1 (11.1%) patients postoperatively and none of them required permanent pacemaker implantation. Two of the patients with postoperative heart block had in-hospital mortality due to low cardiac output (5 cases). Renal dysfunction was present in 12 (44.4%) patients and 4 (14.8%) required dialysis. Pulmonary morbidity was present in 4 (14.8%) patients. Cerebrovascular events occurred in 3 (11.1%) patients. One of them had septic central emboli preoperatively and she died due to low cardiac output during hospitalization and another patient died in his 43rd month due to chronic renal failure.

Follow-up

Of the surviving 16 patients, follow-up was complete in all cases. Three patients (11.1%) had mortality after discharge. The time and etiology of mortality are summarized in Table III. Three patients had recurrences (11.1%) postoperatively and only one of them was operated in the active phase of infection. The actuarial survival for 1, and 5 years was 55.6 ± 9.6% and 47.6 ± 9.7%, respectively (Fig. 1).
Recurrence of infection occurred in 3 (11.1%) cases and 2 patients (5.6%) had reoperations. The blood cultures were negative in one of the patients who had recurrences. The other two patients had positive cultures for Streptococcus and Staphylococcus, respectively. The survival rate free from recurrence from infection at 1 year was 86.8 ± 7.3% and remained stable throughout the follow-up period (Fig. 2). The survival rate free from reoperation at 1 year was 92.6 ± 5.0% and remained stable throughout the follow-up period (Fig. 3).

Discussion

The incidence of PVE is reported to be 0.32 to 1.2% per patient year with a cumulative incidence of 5% in 10 years [5]. This study is important as it is focused mainly on the surgical treatment of the late aortic PVE. There was a high mortality rate with a high rate of re-replacement with a mechanical prosthesis. The majority of the patient group had congestive heart failure. So, the outcomes of this study must be carefully analyzed.
Fariñas et al. reported that preoperative NYHA functional class II or IV, alcohol consumption, and previous endocarditis were significantly associated with increased PVE risk. Among the perioperative factors, they found that postoperative fever in the ICU and gastrointestinal bleeding are associated with increased PVE risk [6]. An interesting study by Shapira et al. reported unexpected histopathological findings of inflammation in patients operated for noninfectious etiology with an incidence of 0.9% and about a quarter of them required redo surgery for PVE [7].
Common clinical presentations of PVE are persistent fever, profound anorexia, new onset murmur, heart block, congestive heart failure (CHF), and embolic events. In our patient group, 44% of them presented with fever, about 20% with septic emboli and more than 80% presented with congestive heart failure. Lytle et al. reported less than ¼ of our incidence in their series [8]. Septic embolus was reported to be a risk factor for mortality for worsening the cerebral edema or conversion of an ischemic stroke into a hemorrhagic case [9]. Of the 5 septic emboli patients, 2 of them had cerebral emboli and they both had in-hospital mortality.
Early PVE frequently involves the junction of the sewing ring and annulus, leading to valve dehiscence and paravalvular abscesses and carries worse prognosis than late PVE [5]. The incidence of annular abscess was reported to be around 15% in a previous study by Lytle and colleagues [8] but up to 63% incidence was also reported [5]. In our patient cohort, almost 50% of the patients had annular involvement.
A significant drawback of our study is the high rate of culture negative results. This fact is mostly related to the blood sampling for cultures during the antibiotic therapy. This has been stated as an important factor in the negative results [5]. We have continued the antibiotic therapy for 6 weeks in these cases especially, as did Hyde and colleagues [10]. Another factor affecting the negative results of the cultures may be the patient group. Lytle and colleagues reported much higher incidence of negative cultures in the late PVE patients [8].
The surgical treatment for PVE carries high mortality risk. Mortality rates ranging from 20% to 80% have been reported [8, 11, 12]. Musci and colleagues report that PVE is a challenging situation with high early and late mortality [13]. In a population of more than 300 PVE patients, their early mortality rates were about 30%. The long-term survivals were also not so satisfactory. The significant predictors for mortality were mechanical support, emergency operation, and preoperative high doses of inotropes, mitral valve replacement and age at the operation [13]. It can be seen that 75% of the emergency operations in this report had in-hospital mortality. Edwards and colleagues reported that age, infection of the explanted prosthesis, and size of the prosthesis had a significant effect on the early mortality [14].
Recurrence and need for reoperation for PVE is another important and life-threatening feature of PVE. In our study, 3 patients (11.1%) had recurrences. Two of them had early recurrences of PVE which presented with an early periprosthetic leak requiring reoperation and the patients died after the reoperations. Primary repair of a periprosthetic leak could be a matter of debate for recurrence. However, among the 6 primary repair procedures (4 aortic and 2 mitral), only one patient had recurrence and reoperation, presented in Table III as patient 3. The size of the patient group is too small to make significant conclusions about this matter. The other case occurred 6 months later and the patient has also died of heart failure. Excluding these cases, the recurrences and reoperation requirements were steady throughout the follow-up duration (Fig. 2 and Fig. 3). Fedoruk et al. reported that intravenous drug abuse and human immunodeficiency virus were predictors for recurrence and reoperations for PVE [15]. The high rate of reoperation-free survival in our patients is compatible with other series [14].
There is a high incidence of postoperative complications in our series. Such results have also been reported by a recent report of PVE from China [1]. Considering the high rate of preoperative congestive heart failure, these two factors may interact to increase the perioperative mortality in this patient group.
Another point of debate may be the use of a mechanical prosthesis commonly in a PVE patient group. Although bioprosthetic materials are preferred in such operations [5], mechanical prostheses are reported to have higher long-term survival in a UK registry [14]. We used silver-coated Silzone mechanical valves in operations for infective endocarditis. The rates of periprosthetic leakage were a question of debate at the time and the effect of those valves on the periprosthetic leakage has been reported before [16]. Apart from such a clinical scenario, we did not have significant problems with mechanical valves. The low rate of recurrence and reoperation-free survival also confirm this result.

Conclusions

Prosthetic valve endocarditis of the aortic valve is a challenging situation for the surgeon. A significant proportion of the patients have important comorbidities and significant valvular destruction and invasion. Emergency operations have high mortality. The surgical treatment carries a high mortality rate and the long-term survival is not so different. Among the survivors, however, recurrence and need for reoperation are unlikely.

References

1. Hee-Hwa H, Chung-Wah S, Kai-Hang Y, Hung-Fat T, Wing-Hung C, Wing-Hing C. prosthetic valve endocarditis in a multicenter registry of Chinese patients. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2010; 18: 430-434.
2. Gordon SM, Serkey JM, Longworth DL, Lytle BW, Cosgrove, III DM. Early onset prosthetic valve endocarditis: the Cleveland Clinic Experience1992–1997. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 69: 1388-1392.
3. Aranki SF, Santini F, Adams DH, Rizzo RJ, Couper GS, Kinchla NM, Gildea JS, Collins JJ Jr, Cohn LH. Aortic valve endocarditis. Determinants of early survival and late morbidity. Circulation 1994; 90: 175-182.
4. Durack DT, Lukes AS, Bright DK. New criteria for diagnosis of infective endocarditis: utilization of specific echocardiographic findings. Duke Endocarditis Service. Am J Med 1994; 96: 200-209.
5. Mahesh B, Angelini G, Caputo M, Jin, XY, Bryan A. Prosthetic valve endocarditis. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 80: 1151-1158.
6. Fariñas MC, Pérez-Vázquez A, Fariñas-Alvarez C, García-Palomo JD, Bernal JM, Revuelta JM, González-Macías J. Risk factors of prosthetic valve endocarditis: a case-control study. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 81: 1284-1290.
7. Shapira N, Merin O, Rosenmann E, Dzigivker I, Bitran D, Yinnon AM, Silberman S. Latent infective endocarditis: epidemiology and clinical characteristics of patients with unsuspected endocarditis detected after elective valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 78: 1623-1629.
8. Lytle BW, Priest BP, Taylor PC, Loop FD, Sapp SK, Stewart RW, McCarthy PM, Muehrcke D, Cosgrove DM 3rd. Surgical treatment of prosthetic valve endocarditis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 111: 198-210.
9. Maruyama M, Kuriyama Y, Sawada T, Yamaguchi T, Fujita T, Omae T. Brain damage after open heart surgery in patients with acute cardioembolic stroke. Stroke 1989; 20: 1305-1310.
10. Hyde JA, Darouiche RO, Costerton JW. Strategies for prophylaxis against prosthetic valve endocarditis: a review article. J Heart Valve Dis 1998; 7: 316-326.
11. Habib G, Tribouilloy C, Thuny F, Giorgi R, Brahim A, Amazouz M, Remadi JP, Nadji G, Casalta JP, Coviaux F, Avierinos JF, Lescure X, Riberi A, Weiller PJ, Metras D, Raoult D. Prosthetic valve endocarditis: who needs surgery? A multicentre study of 104 cases. Heart 2005; 91: 954-959.
12. Vlessis AA, Khaki A, Grunkemeier GL, Li HH, Starr A. Risk, diagnosis and management of prosthetic valve endocarditis: a review. J Heart Valve Dis 1997; 6: 443-465.
13. Musci M, Hübler M, Amiri A, Stein J, Kosky S, Meyer R, Weng Y, Hetzer R. Surgical treatment for active infective prosthetic valve endocarditis: 22-year single-centre experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010; 38: 528-538.
14. Edwards MB, Ratnatunga CP, Dore CJ, Taylor KM. Thirty-day mortality and long-term survival following surgery for prosthetic endocarditis: a study from the UK heart valve registry. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998; 14: 156-164.
15. Fedoruk LM, Jamieson WR, Ling H, Macnab JS, Germann E, Karim SS, Lichtenstein SV. Predictors of recurrence and reoperation for prosthetic valve endocarditis after valve replacement surgery for native valve endocarditis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009; 137: 326-333.
16. Mansuroğlu D, Göksedef D, Erentuğ V, Erdoğan HB, İzgi A, Kırali K, İpek G, Yakut C. Do the silver coated silzone valves cause an increase in the midterm paravalvular leak incidence related to other St. Jude valves? Turkish J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 12: 226-230.
Copyright: © 2014 Polish Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons (Polskie Towarzystwo KardioTorakochirurgów) and the editors of the Polish Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (Kardiochirurgia i Torakochirurgia Polska). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.