en ENGLISH
eISSN: 2956-7548
ISSN: 1734-1558
Forum Ortodontyczne / Orthodontic Forum
Bieżący numer Archiwum Artykuły zaakceptowane O czasopiśmie Zeszyty specjalne Rada naukowa Recenzenci Bazy indeksacyjne Prenumerata Kontakt Zasady publikacji prac Opłaty publikacyjne Standardy etyczne i procedury
Panel Redakcyjny
Zgłaszanie i recenzowanie prac online
Wyszukiwanie
Zasady redakcyjne
Sarajevo Declaration on Integrity and Visibility of Scholarly Publications
2/2022
vol. 18
 
Poleć ten artykuł:
Wyślij znajomemu
Udostępnij:
Opis przypadku

Technika łuków segmentowych „mushroom” w indywidualnej retrakcji kłów w łuku szczękowym i żuchwowym – analiza serii przypadków

Sumathi Felicita
1

  1. Katedra Ortodoncji, Wyższa Szkoła Stomatologii Saveetha, Instytut Nauk Medycznych i Technicznych Saveetha, Uniwersytet Saveetha, Indie Department of Orthodontics, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, India
Forum Ortod 2022; 18 (2): 112-121
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/for.2022.118298
Data publikacji online: 2022/08/10
Pliki artykułu:
- Sumathi Felicita.pdf  [6.23 MB]
- Sumathi Felicita.pdf  [6.23 MB]
Pobierz cytowanie
 
Metryki PlumX:
 
1. Matsui S, Otsuka Y, Kobayashi S, Ogawa S, Kanegae H. Time-saving closing loops for anterior retraction. J Clin Orthod 2002; 36: 38-41.
2. Chaconas SJ, Caupto AA, Miyashita K. Force distribution comparisons of various retraction archwires. Angle Orthod1989; 59: 25-30.
3. Gjessing P. Controlled retraction of maxillary incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992; 101: 120-31.
4. Burstone CJ. The mechanics of the segmented arch techniques. Angle Orthod 1966; 36: 99-120.
5. Manhartsberger C, Morton JY, Burstone CJ. Space closure in adult patients using the segmented arch technique. Angle Orthod 1989; 59: 205-10.
6. Cai Y. Finite element analysis of archwire parameters and activation forces on the M/F ratio of vertical, L- and T-loops. BMC Oral Health 2020; 20:70.
7. Jie Chen, David L. Markham, Thomas R. Katona, Effects of T-Loop Geometry on Its Forces and Moments. Angle Orthod 2000; 70: 48-51.
8. Viecilli RF. Self-corrective T-loop design for differential space closure. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129: 48-53.
9. Kuhlberg AJ, Priebe D. Testing force systems and biomechanics--measured tooth movements from differential moment closing loops. Angle Orthod 2003; 73: 270-80.
10. Ferreira JB, Silveira GS, Mucha JN. A simple approach to correct ectopic eruption of maxillary canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2019; 155: 871-80.
11. Kuhlberg AJ, Burstone CJ. T-loop position and anchorage control. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997; 112: 12-8.
12. Davis S, Sundareswaran S, James J. Comparative evaluation of the efficiency of canine retraction using modified Marcotte and T-loop retraction springs - A split-mouth, randomized clinical trial. J Orthod Sci 2019; 23: 8:9.
13. Ravindra Nanda. Biomechanics in Clinical Orthodontics. Publisher Elsevier Health Sciences-W B Saunders 1997.
14. Micheal R Marcotte. Biomechanics in Orthodontics. BC Decker Inc 1990: 19106.
15. A. Sumathi Felicita. The segmental mechanics - An efficient method to reduce treatment duration in severely crowded cases. VJO 2010: 8 (serial online).
16. Kumar YM, Ravindran NS, Balasubramaniam MR. Holographic analysis of the initial canine displacement produced by four different retraction springs. Angle Orthod 2009; 79: 368-72.
17. Martins RP, Caldas SG, Ribeiro AA, Vaz LG, Shimizu RH, Martins LP. Differences in the force system delivered by different beta-titanium wires in elaborate designs. Dental Press J Orthod 2015; 20: 89-96.
18. Alhadlaq A, Alkhadra T, El-Bialy T. Anchorage condition during canine retraction using transpalatal arch with continuous and segmented arch mechanics. Angle Orthod 2016; 86: 380-5.
19. de Almeida MR, Herrero F, Fattal A, Davoody AR, Nanda R, Uribe F. A comparative anchorage control study between conventional and self-ligating bracket systems using differential moments. Angle Orthod 2013; 83: 937-42.
20. Chacko A, Tikku T, Khanna R, Maurya RP, Srivastava K. Comparative assessment of the efficacy of closed helical loop and T-loop for space closure in lingual orthodontics-a finite element study. Prog Orthod 2018; 19: 14.
21. Girsa P, Singh AK, Kannan S, Arora N, Malhotra A. Comparative evaluation of T-Loop with different amount of pre-activation curvatures in lingual orthodontics- A finite element study. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2021; 11: 118-22.
22. Techalertpaisarn P, Versluis A. T-loop force system with and without vertical step using finite element analysis. Angle Orthod 2016; 86: 372-9.
23. de Castro SM, Moreira R, Braga AC, Ferreira AP, Pollmann MC. Effect of activation and preactivation on the mechanical behavior and neutral position of stainless steel and beta-titanium T-loops. Korean J Orthod 2015; 45: 198-208.
24. Rose D, Quick A, Swain M, Herbison P. Moment-to-force characteristics of preactivated nickel-titanium and titanium-molybdenum alloy symmetrical T-loops. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 135: 757-63.
25. Caldas SG, Martins RP, Galvão MR, Vieira CI, Martins LP. Force system evaluation of symmetrical beta-titanium T-loop springs preactivated by curvature and concentrated bends. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 140: e53-8.
26. Almeida L, Ribeiro A, Parsekian Martins R, Viecilli R, Parsekian Martins L. Nickel titanium T-loop wire dimensions for en masse retraction. Angle Orthod 2016; 86: 810-7.
27. Li S, Chen J, Kula KS. Comparison of movement rate with different initial moment-to-force ratios. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2019; 156: 203-9.
28. Júnior RS, Caldas SG, Martins LP, Martins RP. Effects of stress relaxation in beta-titanium orthodontic loops: Part II. Angle Orthod 2016; 86: 386-90.
29. Makhlouf M, Aboul-Ezz A, Fayed MS, Hafez H. Evaluating the Amount of Tooth Movement and Root Resorption during Canine Retraction with Friction versus Frictionless Mechanics Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2018; 6: 384-8.
30. Kalra A, Jaggi N, Bansal M, Goel S, Medsinge SV, Abraham R, Jasoria G. Comparison of rate of canine retraction into recent extractiokn site with and without gingival fiberotomy: a clinical study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013; 14: 419-26.
31. Ozkan S, Bayram M. Comparison of direct and indirect skeletal anchorage systems combined with 2 canine retraction techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016; 150: 763-70.
32. Martins RP, Gandini LG Jr, Martins IP, Martins LP. Crimpable double tubes for segmental retraction. Orthodontics 2011; 12: 400-3.
This is an Open Access journal, all articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.