twitter
en ENGLISH
eISSN: 2719-3209
ISSN: 0023-2157
Klinika Oczna / Acta Ophthalmologica Polonica
Bieżący numer Archiwum Filmy Artykuły w druku O czasopiśmie Suplementy Rada naukowa Recenzenci Bazy indeksacyjne Prenumerata Kontakt Zasady publikacji prac Opłaty publikacyjne Standardy etyczne i procedury
Panel Redakcyjny
Zgłaszanie i recenzowanie prac online
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
3/2024
vol. 126
 
Poleć ten artykuł:
Udostępnij:
Artykuł oryginalny

The comparison of efficiency and safety profile of anti-glaucoma surgeries: Trabeculectomy vs. Ex-PRESS implant – a retrospective analysis

Karolina Krzywicka
1, 2
,
Natalia Winiarska
1, 2
,
Jan Bombuy Gimenez
1, 2
,
Katarzyna Samelska
1, 2
,
Anna Kamińska
1, 2
,
Jacek P. Szaflik
1, 2
,
Justyna Izdebska
1, 2

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland
  2. SPKSO Ophthalmic University Hospital in Warsaw, Poland
KLINIKA OCZNA 2024, 126, 3: 136-142
Data publikacji online: 2024/05/22
Plik artykułu:
- KO-00463_EN.pdf  [0.14 MB]
Pobierz cytowanie
 
Metryki PlumX:
 
1. Marchini G, Ceruti P, Vizzari G. Management of concomitant cataract and glaucoma. Dev Ophthalmol 2012; 50: 146-156.
2. Lim R. The surgical management of glaucoma: A review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2022; 50: 213-231.
3. Moisseiev E, Zunz E, Tzur R, et al. Standard Trabeculectomy and Ex-PRESS Miniature Glaucoma Shunt: A Comparative Study and Literature Review. J Glaucoma 2015; 24: 410-416.
4. Wang L, Sha F, Guo DD, et al. Efficacy and economic analysis of Ex-PRESS implantation versus trabeculectomy in uncontrolled glaucoma: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Int J Ophthalmol 2016; 9: 124-131.
5. Chan JE, Netland PA. EX-PRESS Glaucoma Filtration Device: efficacy, safety, and predictability. Med Devices (Auckl) 2015; 8: 381-388.
6. Graffi S, Tiosano B, Naftali M, et al. Short-term anterior chamber inflammation in phacoemulsification with and without Ex-Press glaucoma implant. Eur J Ophthalmol 2020; 30: 533-537.
7. Kanner EM, Netland PA, Sarkisian SR Jr, Du H. Ex-PRESS miniature glaucoma device implanted under a scleral flap alone or combined with phacoemulsification cataract surgery. J Glaucoma 2009; 18: 488-491.
8. Ahmadzadeh A, Kessel L, Subhi Y, Bach-Holm D. Comparative Efficacy of Phacotrabeculectomy versus Trabeculectomy with or without Later Phacoemulsification: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analyses. J Ophthalmol 2021; 2021: 6682534.
9. Mathew RG, Parvizi S, Murdoch IE. Success of trabeculectomy surgery in relation to cataract surgery: 5-year outcomes. Br J Ophthalmol 2019; 103: 1395-1400.
10. Polat JK, Loewen NA. Combined phacoemulsification and trabectome for treatment of glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol 2017; 62: 698-705.
11. Sacchi M, Monsellato G, Villani E, et al. Intraocular pressure control after combined phacotrabeculectomy versus trabeculectomy alone. Eur J Ophthalmol 2022; 32: 327-335.
12. Takihara Y, Inatani M, Ogata-Iwao M, et al. Trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma in phakic eyes vs in pseudophakic eyes after phacoemulsification: a prospective clinical cohort study. JAMA Ophthalmol 2014; 132: 69-76.
13. Takihara Y, Inatani M, Seto T, et al. Trabeculectomy with mitomycin for open-angle glaucoma in phakic vs pseudophakic eyes after phacoemulsification. Arch Ophthalmol 2011; 129: 152-157.   
14. Torres-Costa S, Melo AB, Estrela-Silva S, et al. Effect of Prior Phacoemulsification Surgery in Trabeculectomy Surgery Outcomes. Clin Ophthalmol 2022; 16: 357-367.
15. Zhang Y, He B, Zhang Y, et al. Comparison of Ex-PRESS implantation versus trabeculectomy combined with phacoemulsification in primary open-angle glaucoma: a retrospective in vivo confocal microscopy study. Eye Vis (Lond) 2022; 9: 7.
16. Cairns JE. Trabeculectomy. Preliminary report of a new method. Am J Ophthalmol 1968; 66: 673-679.
17. Coleman AL. Advances in glaucoma treatment and management: surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012; 53: 2491-2494.
18. Kastner A, Stringa F, King AJ. Reporting Complications in Glaucoma Surgery: A Systematic Review. Ophthalmology 2020; 127: 550-552.
19. Bell K, de Padua Soares Bezerra B, Mofokeng M, et al. Learning from the past: Mitomycin C use in trabeculectomy and its application in bleb-forming minimally invasive glaucoma surgery. Surv Ophthalmol 2021; 66: 109-123.
20. Beckers HJ, Kinders KC, Webers CA. Five-year results of trabeculectomy with mitomycin C. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2003; 241: 106-110.
21. Bindlish R, Condon GP, Schlosser JD, et al. Efficacy and safety of mitomycin-C in primary trabeculectomy: five-year follow-up. Ophthalmology    2002; 109: 1336-1342.
22. Agarwal HC, Sharma TK, Sihota R, Gulati V. Cumulative effect of risk factors on short-term surgical success of mitomycin augmented trabeculectomy. J Postgrad Med 2002; 48: 92-96.
23. Rouse JM, Sarkisian SR Jr. Mini-drainage devices: the Ex-PRESS Mini-Glaucoma Device. Dev Ophthalmol 2012; 50: 90-95.
24. Shaarawy T, Goldberg I, Fechtner R. EX-PRESS glaucoma filtration device: Review of clinical experience and comparison with trabeculectomy [published correction appears in Surv Ophthalmol 2015; 60 (5): 508]. Surv Ophthalmol 2015; 60: 327-345.
25. Nicolai M, Franceschi A, Pelliccioni P, et al. EX-PRESS Glaucoma Filtration Device: Management of Complications. Vision (Basel) 2020; 4: 39.
26. Gedde SJ, Feuer WJ, Lim KS, et al. Postoperative Complications in the Primary Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study During 5 Years of Follow-up. Ophthalmology 2022; 129: 1357-1367.
27. Arimura S, Miyake S, Iwasaki K, et al. Randomised Clinical Trial for Postoperative Complications after Ex-PRESS Implantation versus Trabeculectomy with 2-Year Follow-Up. Sci Rep 2018; 8: 16168.   
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.