Bieżący numer
Archiwum
Artykuły zaakceptowane
O czasopiśmie
Rada naukowa
Bazy indeksacyjne
Kontakt
Zasady publikacji prac
Standardy etyczne i procedury
Panel Redakcyjny
Zgłaszanie i recenzowanie prac online
|
5/2019
vol. 94 Artykuł oryginalny
The level of primitive reflex integration in children who play a musical instrument
Ewa Gieysztor
1
,
Anna M. Choińska
1
,
Mateusz Kowal
1
,
Anna Pecuch
1
,
Wojciech Borowicz
2
,
Małgorzata Paprocka-Borowicz
1
Data publikacji online: 2019/11/19
Plik artykułu:
- The level of primitive.pdf
[0.38 MB]
ENW EndNote
BIB JabRef, Mendeley
RIS Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero
AMA
APA
Chicago
Harvard
MLA
Vancouver
INTRODUCTIONPrimitive reflex integration (PRI) is a natural process, which shows maturity progress in the central nervous system (CNS) of toddlers. It has been observed that some children, even those of school age, have primitive reflexes that persist. The primitive reflexes, if persistent, can influence a child’s development. Primitive reflexes coexist with poor psychomotor levels and trunk rotation in healthy children [1–3], and additionally, as some authors have indicated, these reflexes can be observed in a trace form even in adults [4, 5]. The persistence of primitive reflexes can be the reason for emotional and behavioural immaturity as well as learning disorders [6]. Therefore, influencing the modulation of the primitive reflexes’ level can be the aim of various professional practitioners as well as the parents themselves. It is very important to begin with a very basic multidisciplinary treatment of a child’s problems, which seems to be the proper way to integrate primitive reflexes.In this research we studied three of them: asymmetrical tonic neck reflex (ATNR), symmetrical tonic neck reflex (STNR), and tonic labyrinthine reflex (TLR). We analysed the difference in PRI between children who play a musical instrument and children who do not play a musical instrument. The impact of music on the acoustic changes and speech processing in the child is a common and well-researched field. However, we could not find any studies related to music and PRI. Therefore, we decided to undertake this study. The aim of the study was to establish the level of PRI in musically trained children in comparison with their non-musically trained peers. MATERIAL AND METHODSPARTICIPANTSThe study was approved by the Medical University Ethical Committee. All the parents of the subjects were kept informed of the purpose and process of examination and subsequently gave their written consent prior to the study. The data were collected from 45 healthy children between the ages of six and seven years from a school in Wroclaw, Poland. The condition for exclusion was a statement of special educational needs. The group of musically trained children (22 students) were examined and compared to the group of non-musically trained children (23 students). The groups were not statistically different (p < 0.05) in terms of age, sex, weight, height, and BMI, as shown in Table 1. Also, there was no correlation found between age, sex, BMI, and PR integration level (respectively, 0.062, –0.127, –0.009). One group consisted of children who had played a musical instrument for a year in a professional capacity, and the other group was made up of children from a general class, i.e. with no additional musical training. The music pupils had been playing instruments and taking music lessons such as: instrumental lessons twice a week for an hour, vocal lessons once a week for two hours, and musical theory. All the instruments that the music participants were playing are shown in Table 2. The most frequent instrument was the piano, which was practiced by 27% of the examined children, the subsequent two most popular instruments were the guitar and violin (18% each). The piano and violin were being studied simultaneously by 5% of the group. Every child from the examined groups was assessed individually by primitive reflex tests (ATNR, STNR, and TLR) [4, 7]. MEASUREMENT OF PRIMITIVE REFLEXESIn the primitive reflex examination we followed the methods described by Gieysztor et al. [8]. The classification was made according to a five-point rating scale suggested by Goddard-Blythe [4, 7, 9]:0 – no reflex occurs, 1 – reflex present in 25%, 2 – reflex present in 50%, 3 – reflex present in 75%, 4 – reflex survived 100%. All the points from the reflex tests ATNR left (L) and ATNR right (R), STNR FLX and STNR EXT, TLR FLX and TLR EXT were summed up, and the results showed the level of reflex integration from 0 to 4. The better the integration, the lower the score the child could have achieved. STATISTICAL ANALYSISThe statistical analysis was carried out using Statistica version 12. Descriptive statistics were computed for all variables. Results are presented as mean and standard deviation (±SD) or percentages. The normality of distribution was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. The occurrence of primitive reflexes due to gender and musically trained or non-musically trained status were performed using the χ2 test with the Yates correction. Spearman’s correlation was applied for dependency between variables. All parameters were considered to be significantly different statistically if p < 0.05.RESULTSThe children who took music lessons had a significantly better level of PRI than the non-musically trained children (p < 0.03). Table 3 represents the percentage of PRI level.In the group of the musicians there were none with grade 3 or 4 disintegration, and nearly 20% of them showed full PRI. About 80% of the musically trained children showed a trace of retained primitive reflexes. In the non-musically trained group, there were no pupils with level 0, which means that there must have been at least one of the six disintegrated reflexes in each child. The study shows that the degree of retained primitive reflexes in musicians is between “none” and “medium”, which indicates a trace level of the occurrence. Conversely, 4% of children from the non-musically trained group demonstrated a high level of unintegrated primitive reflexes (3 points). Both groups showed the tendency of maturity of the nervous system. Furthermore, the musically trained group showed full integration at 18%, as opposed to the non-musically trained group. There were no children in the non-musically trained group whose reflexes were totally integrated. The comparison is shown in Table 3. Moreover, we analysed the primitive reflexes one by one. This analysis is indicated in Table 4. The most frequently occurring reflex was the ATNR L (83% of the non-musically trained children and 55% of the musically trained children), and the least frequently occurring was TLR FLX – 8% of the non-musically trained children. We observed that TLR FLX was the best integrated reflex. It was not only fully integrated in 100% of the musically trained children, but also in 91% of the non-musically trained children. Reflexes such as: STNR FLX and EXT, TLR FLX and EXT, and ATNR R did not demonstrate maximum intensity in any of the children. The percentage results are shown in the figures. We found that ATNR L performed at the top of the scale (4 points), appearing in 4% of the non-musically trained children and 9% in the musically trained children. Successively, the largest amount on a three-point scale was the reflex ATNR R (17%), STNR EXT (13%), and TLR EXT in 4% of children. STNR FLX and TLR FLX were the mildest, in 61–91% of the examined groups (Fig. 1). Analysis of the persistence of PRI in the musically trained group shows that the best integrated reflex in this group was TLR FLX and EXT. TLR FLX was fully integrated in 100% of the group, and TLR EXT was fully integrated in 77% and mildly disintegrated (1 point) in 23% of the musically trained group. ATNR L was the most disintegrated amongst the examined reflexes. There were 9% of children who achieved as high as 4 points during the examination. The “All results” column in Figure 2 reflects this. Figure 3 shows the level of primitive reflex persistence in the groups of musicians and non-musicians, p < 0.03. DISCUSSIONOur findings indicate that the PRI can be influenced by musical training – not only music perception and productivity in music technique, but also very complex processing mechanisms, such as the integration of primitive reflexes. In our research, each of the non-musicians demonstrated at least one primitive reflex, and 8% of them at level 3. Compared to the musicians, 82% retained at least one primitive reflex in its mild intensity, and none of them achieved level 3 and 4. The above leads us to the conclusion that musical training may have an impact on neurological development. It is noteworthy that TLR FLX was fully integrated in the musically trained group. We might justify this result by the fact that the children have to sit in a still position for a long time while playing an instrument and concentrating on reading notes, which we observed during musical training. This complex task can stimulate CNS for more specific brain function and has an impact on TLR. Musically trained children have to co-ordinate their hands, legs, and reading skills while playing an instrument. This process highly engages the brain, thus influencing CNS maturity.We know that persistent primitive reflexes can influence a child’s cognitivism and motoric function as well as psychomotor development, as found in the Goddard-Blythe and Hyland [7], Goddard-Blythe [9], Madejewska et. al [3] and Gieysztor et al. [8] studies. Reflex integration training is the tool used in improving children’s abilities in the developmental process. As a result of this study, we found that the next tool for increasing the degree of PRI might be music training. In the case of a lack of CNS integration, the joint efforts of movement rehabilitation proposed by Goddard-Blythe and music training may reinforce the treatment. As many authors have proven, changes in the brain and synaptic plasticity under the influence of music training is obvious [10–18]. However, we can also prove their existence by clinical signs of the differentiation in neural maturity. The clinical tests are easy to use and might be applied whenever needed. Therefore, they could be used in a periodic examination to verify children’s neurodevelopment. To reinforce the significance of our results, it seems reasonable to conduct a longitudinal study in this field. The improvement in other areas of life impacted by music have been studied by other authors. Yang et al. [19] studied the cognitive benefits of music training. They found better language achievement in musically trained pupils by conducting a language learning skills test, but they found no influence on intellectual benefits. Elmer et al. [20] found an impact of music training on speech processing. Rauscher et al. in their longitudinal research also indexed improvement in spatial-temporal reasoning as a result of music training [21]. Other authors found improvement in many other fields [22, 23]. As Carmichael described, musicians have an ability called cross-model perception, which is seen in the integration of visual, auditory, physical, and movement senses in instrument players [24]. The high engagement of the musician’s senses, which reorganise the brain’s paths and have an impact on areas such as listening, brain development, perception, and the ability to move the limbs separately, have been demonstrated in many papers [11–13, 25, 26]. Also, Habibi et al. [27] conducted cognitive, social, and neural tests based on children attending music or sport classes. However, surprisingly, they found that music had no impact on their abilities. Many developmental treatments can have an impact on children’s development. One of them is music. If any disturbances or disintegration is observed, both the parents and therapists might involve music in everyday life for better neuro-stimulation. This training is not only effective for children at high disorder risk but can also be helpful for maximum stimulation of CNS maturity in any child. The weakness of the study we indicate as being the low number of participants; a wider group should be examined in the future. We can also point out that future research should contain an experimental part, and the first examination should be repeated as a follow-up after half a year or a year of music training and then compared with the control group (to be examined in the same cycle). CONCLUSIONSBased on the above findings, we can conclude that performing music by children can enhance their PRI. Moreover, music lessons may be implemented as a tool in reflex inhibition therapy for better therapeutic effects.ACKNOWLEDGMENTSThis project was partly supported by Wroclaw Medical University grant Number ST.E060.17.020.We are very grateful to the children, parents, and the Director of School No. 9 in Wrocław, Ms Małgorzata Bredschneider, Ms Lilla Oberc, Mr Krzysztof Goleń, Ms Joanna Mamulska, and all the staff for their very kind co-operation. DISCLOSUREThe authors declare no conflict of interest.REFERENCES1. Gieysztor E, Sadowska L, Choińska A, Paprocka-Borowicz M. Trunk rotation due to persistence of primitive reflexes in early school-age children. Adv Clin Exp Med 2018; 27: 363-366.2. Gieysztor EZ, Sadowska L, Choińska AM. The degree of primitive reflexes integration as a diagnostic tool to assess the neurological maturity of healthy preschool and early school age children. Piel Zdr Publ 2017; 26: 5-11. 3. Madejewska M, Choińska AM, Gieysztor EZ, Trafalska A. Neuromotorical Assessment of Children Aged 4–7 from the Kamienna Góra District Based on Sally Goddard Tests. Piel Zdr Publ 2016; 6: 179-186. 4. Goddard-Blythe S. The role of primitive survival reflexes in the development of the visual system. J Behav Optom 1995; 6: 31-36. 5. Bruijn SM, Massaad F, Maclellan MJ, et al. Are effects of the symmetric and asymmetric tonic neck reflexes still visible in healthy adults? Neurosci Lett 2013; 556: 89-92. 6. Bilbilaj S, Aranit G, Fatlinda S. Measuring Primitive Reflexes in Children with Learning Disorders. Eur J Multidiscip Stud 2017; 2: 285-298. 7. Goddard-Blythe S, Hyland D. Screening for Neurological Dysfunction in the Specific Learning Difficulty Child. Br J Occup Ther 1998; 61: 459-464. 8. Gieysztor EZ, Choińska AM, Paprocka-Borowicz M. Persistence of primitive reflexes and associated motor problems in healthy preschool children. Arch Med Sci 2018; 14: 167-173. 9. Goddard-Blythe S. The Well Balanced Child: Movement and Early Learning, 2nd ed. Hawthorn Press, Stroud 2005. 10. Kuriki S, Kanda S, Hirata Y. Effects of musical experience on different components of MEG responses elicited by sequential piano-tones and chords. J Neurosci 2006; 15: 4046-4053. 11. Merrett DL, Peretz I, Wilson SJ. Moderating variables of music training-induced neuroplasticity: a review and discussion. Front Psychol 2013; 4: 606. 12. Ohnishi T, Matsuda H, Asada T, et al. Functional anatomy of musical perception in musicians. Cereb Cortex 2001; 11: 754-760. 13. Mehr SA, Schachner A, Katz RC, Spelke ES. Two Randomized Trials Provide No Consistent Evidence for Nonmusical Cognitive Benefits of Brief Preschool Music Enrichment. PLoS One 2013; 8: e82007. 14. Ostwald PF, Baron BC, Byl NM, Wilson FR. Performing arts medicine. West J Med 1994; 160: 48-52. 15. Carlson EA, Jacobvitz D, Sroufe LA. A Developmental Investigation of Inattentiveness and Hyperactivity. Child Dev 1995; 66: 37-54. 16. Potter PJ, Jones IC. Medical problems affecting musicians. Can Fam Physician 1995; 41: 2121-2128. 17. Qi GY. The significance of music in early childhood education: considerations for early childhood teachers and music educators. Educating Young Children 2012; 18: 40. 18. Sutherland ME, Paus T, Zatorre RJ. Neuroanatomical correlates of musical transposition in adolescents: a longitudinal approach. Front Syst Neurosci 2013; 7: 113. 19. Yang H, Ma W, Gong D, et al. A Longitudinal Study on Children’s Music Training Experience and Academic Development. Sci Rep 2014; 4: 5854. 20. Elmer S, Meyer M, Jäncke L. Neurofunctional and Behavioral Correlates of Phonetic and Temporal Categorization in Musically Trained and Untrained Subjects. Cereb Cortex 2012; 22: 650-658. 21. Rauscher FH, Shaw GL, Levine LJ, et al. Music training causes long-term enhancement of preschool children’s spatial-temporal reasoning. Neurol Res 1997; 19: 2-8. 22. Bhattacharya J, Petsche H, Pereda E. Long-range synchrony in the gamma band: role in music perception. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 2001; 21: 6329-6337. 23. Magne C, Schön D, Besson M. Musician Children Detect Pitch Violations in Both Music and Language Better than Nonmusician Children: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Approaches. J Cogn Neurosci 2006; 18: 199-211. 24. Carmichael A. Learning to Play: Cognitive and Physical Development of Children and the Requirements of Playing the Piano. Music Offer 2014; 5: 15-36. 25. Halwani GF, Loui P, Rüber T, Schlaug G. Effects of practice and experience on the arcuate fasciculus: comparing singers, instrumentalists, and non-musicians. Front Psychol 2011; 2: 156. 26. Hannon EE, Trainor LJ. Music acquisition: effects of enculturation and formal training on development. Trends Cogn Sci 2007; 11: 466-472. 27. Habibi A, Ilari B, Crimi K, et al. An equal start: absence of group differences in cognitive, social, and neural measures prior to music or sports training in children. Front Hum Neurosci 2014; 8: 690. Copyright: © 2019 Polish Society of Paediatrics. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
|