Transanal endoscopic microsurgery combined with endoscopic posterior mesorectum resection in the treatment of patients with T1 rectal cancer – 3-year results

Piotr Wałęga; Jakub Kenig; Piotr Richter

doi:10.5114/wiitm.2014.40384

eISSN: 2299-0054
ISSN: 1895-4588

Videosurgery and Other Miniinvasive Techniques

Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Editorial board Reviewers Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures

Editorial System

Submit your Manuscript

Editorial Policies

Sarajevo Declaration on Integrity and Visibility of Scholarly Publications

1/2014
vol. 9

Send email

Copy url:

abstract:

Original paper

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery combined with endoscopic posterior mesorectum resection in the treatment of patients with T1 rectal cancer – 3-year results

Piotr Wałęga

,

Jakub Kenig

,

Piotr Richter

Videosurgery Miniinv 2014; 9 (1): 40–45

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2014.40384

Online publish date: 2014/01/30

View full text Get citation

PlumX metrics:

Introduction: Rectum-sparing transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a well-established treatment for T1 rectal cancer (RC). However, it is associated with an increased rate of local recurrence in comparison with extended resection. In most cases this failure is linked to inappropriate case selection and the presence of clinically non-detectable metastases in the regional lymph nodes. Endoscopic posterior mesorectal resection (EPMR) makes it possible to remove the relevant lymphatic drainage of the lower third of the rectum in a minimally invasive way, which in turn can help in adequate tumor staging.

Aim: To evaluate the long-term clinical results and influence of combined TEM and EPMR treatment on the anorectal functions.

Material and methods: Ten consecutive patients with T1 RC were operated on using TEM and EPMR as a two-stage procedure between 2007 and 2009.

Results: After a median follow-up of 42.6 (range: 36–80) months, none of our patients complained of symptoms of incontinence apart from one female patient with gas incontinence diagnosed preoperatively. There was no statistically significant difference in basal anal pressure, squeeze anal pressure, high pressure zone length or fecal continence assessed using the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index before and in follow-up months after the procedure. Postoperative morbidity consisted of one hematoma formation and one male patient complaining about sexual dysfunction until 6 months postoperatively. There was no evidence of locoregional recurrence.

Conclusions: Endoscopic posterior mesorectal resection in combination with TEM appears to be safe, feasible and with no impact on the basic anorectal functions in the 3-year follow-up.

keywords:

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery combined with endoscopic posterior mesorectum resection in the treatment of patients with T1 rectal cancer – 3-year results

Piotr Wałęga , Jakub Kenig , Piotr Richter

transanal endoscopic microsurgery, rectal cancer, endoscopic posterior mesorectal resection

Piotr Wałęga

,

Jakub Kenig

,

Piotr Richter