eISSN: 2084-9850
ISSN: 1897-3116
Pielęgniarstwo Chirurgiczne i Angiologiczne/Surgical and Vascular Nursing
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
Search
2/2021
vol. 15
 
Share:
Send email
Share:
Review paper

Using of hydrogel dressing in the treatment of chronic wounds

Maciej Sopata
1
,
Maria T. Szewczyk
2
,
Iwona Zaporowska-Stachowiak
1
,
Paulina Mościcka
2
,
Arkadiusz Jawień
3

  1. Katedra i Klinika Medycyny Paliatywnej, Pracownia Leczenia Ran Przewlekłych, Hospicjum Palium, Uniwersytet Medyczny im. Karola Marcinkowskiego, Poznań, Polska
  2. Katedra Pielęgniarstwa Zabiegowego, Zakład Pielęgniarstwa Chirurgicznego i Leczenia Ran Przewlekłych, Wydział Nauk o Zdrowiu, Collegium Medicum w Bydgoszczy, Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu, Polska
  3. Katedra i Klinika Chirurgii Naczyniowej i Angiologii, Wydział Lekarski, Collegium Medicum w Bydgoszczy, Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu, Polska
Pielęgniarstwo Chirurgiczne i Angiologiczne 2021; 2: 61–67
Online publish date: 2021/07/29
Article file
- PChiA 2 2021 DRUK.pdf - Range 1.pdf  [0.13 MB]
Get citation
 
 
1. Sen Chandan K. Human wounds and its burden: an updated compendium of es-timates. Adv Wound Care 2019; 8: 39-48.
2. Korting HC, Schöllmann C, White RJ. Management of minor acute cutaneous wounds: importance of wound healing in a moist environment. JEADV 2011; 25; 130-137.
3. Schultz GS. Molecular regulation of wound healing. In: Acute and chronic wounds: nursing management, 2nd Edition, St. Louis 1999, 413-429.
4. Enoch S, Price P. Cellular, molecular and biochemical differences in the pathophys-iology of healing between acute wounds, chronic wounds and wounds in the aged. World Wide Wounds 2004; 1-17.
5. Boateng JS, Kerr HM, Howard NES i wsp. Wound healing dressings and drug delivery systems: a review. J Pharm Sci 2008; 97: 2892-2923.
6. Li J, Chen J, Kirsner R. Pathophysiology of acute wound healing. Clin Dermatol 2007; 25: 9-18.
7. Guo S, Dipietro LA. Factors affecting wound healing. J Dental Res 2010; 89: 219-229.
8. Auböck J. Biologie der wundheilung. In: Wild T, Auböck J (ed.). Manual der Wundheilung. Chirurgisch-Dermatologischer Leitfaden der Modernen Wundbehandlung New York, Springer, Vienna 2007, 1-9.
9. Enoch S, Price P. Cellular, molecular and biochemical differences in the pathophysiology of healing between acute wounds, chronic wounds and wounds in the aged. World Wide Wounds 2004; 13: 1-17.
10. Falabella, AF, Carson P, Eaglstein WH, Falanga V. The safety and efficacy of a proteolytic ointment in the treatment of chronic ulcers of the lower extremity. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998; 39: 737-740.
11. Trengove NJ, Bielefeldt-Ohmann H, Stacey MC. Mitogenic activity and cytokine levels in non-healing and healing chronic leg ulcers. Wound Repair Regen 2000; 8: 13-25.
12. Korting HC, Schöllmann C, White RJ. Management of minor acute cutaneous wounds: importance of wound healing in a moist environment. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2011; 25: 130-137.
13. Moreo K. Understanding and overcoming the challenges of effective case management for patients with chronic wounds. Case Manag 2005; 16: 62-67.
14. Olsson M, Järbrink K, Divakar U i wsp. The humanistic and economic burden of chronic wounds: A system-atic review. Wound Repair Regen 2019; 27: 114-125.
15. Robles DT, Berg D. Abnormal wound healing: keloids. Clin Dermatol 2007; 25: 26-32.
16. Robson MC. Discussion: dry, moist, and wet skin wound repair. Ann Plast Surg 1995; 34: 499-500.
17. Atiyeh BS, Ioannovich J, Al-Amm CA i wsp. Management of acute and chronic open wounds: the importance of moist environment in op-timal wound healing. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 2002; 3: 179-195.
18. Harding KG, Jones V, Price P. Topical treatment: which dressing to choose. Diabet Metab Res Rev 2000; 16: 47-50.
19. Finnegan S, Percival SL. Clinical and antibiofilm efficacy of antimicrobial hydrogels. Adv Wound Care 2015; 4: 398-406.
20. Roy DC, Tomblyn S, Burmeister DM i wsp. Ciprofloxacin-loaded keratin hydrogels prevent pseudomonas aeruginosa infection and support healing in a porcine full-thickness excisional wound. Adv Wound Care 2015; 4: 457-468.
21. Ousey K, Cutting KF, Rogers AA i wsp. The importance of hydration in wound healing: reinvigorating the clinical perspective. J Wound Care 2016; 25: 122-130.
22. Dissemond J, Augustin M, Eming SA i wsp. Modern wound care - practical aspects of non-interventional topical treatment of patients with chronic wounds. JDDG 2014; 12: 541-554.
23. Field CK, Kerstein MD. Overview of wound healing in a moist environment. Am J Surg 1994; 167: 2-6.
24. Zhang L, Yin H, Lei X i wsp. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical effectiveness and safety of hydrogel dressings in the management of skin wounds. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2019; 7: 342.
25. Hämmerle G, Strohal R. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of octenidine wound gel in the treatment of chronic venous leg ulcers in comparison to modern wound dressings. Int Wound J 2014; 13: 182-188.
26. Meng H, Chen L, Ye Z i wsp. The effect of a self-assembling peptide nanofiber scaffold (peptide) when used as a wound dressing for the treatment of deep second degree burns in rats. J Biomed Mater Res B: Appl Biomater 2009; 89: 379-391.
27. Eaglstein WH. Moist wound healing with occlusive dressings: a clinical focus. Dermatol Surg 2001; 27: 175-181.
28. Madden MR, Nolan E, Finkelstein JL i wsp. Comparison of an occlusive and a semi-occlusive dressing and the effect of the wound exudate upon keratinocyte proliferation. J Trauma 1989; 29: 924-931.
29. Svensjö T, Pomahac B, Yao F i wsp. Accelerated healing of full-thickness skin wounds in a wet environment. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106: 602-614.
30. Dyson M, Young SR, Hart J i wsp. Comparison of the effects of moist and dry conditions on the process of angiogenesis during dermal repair. J Invest Dermatol 1992; 99: 729-733.
31. Knighton DR, Silver IA, Hunt TK. Regulation of wound-healing angiogenesis-effect of oxygen gradients and inspired oxygen concentration. Surg 1981; 90: 262-270.
32. Hämmerle G, Strohal R. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of octenidine wound gel in the treatment of chronic venous leg ulcers in comparison to modern wound dressings. Int Wound J 2014; 13: 182-188.
33. Matiasek J, Kienzl P, Unger LW i wsp. An intra-individual surgical wound comparison shows that octenidine-based hydrogel wound dressing ameliorates scar appearance following abdominoplasty. Int Wound J 2018; 15: 914-920.
34. Stoica AE, Chircov C, Grumezescu AM. Hydrogel dressings for the treatment of burn wounds: an up-to-date overview. Materials (Basel) 2020; 13: 1-24.
35. Zhang L, Yin H, Lei X i wsp. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical effectiveness and safety of hydrogel dressings in the management of skin wounds. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2019; 7: 1-16.
36. Dumville JC, Soares MO, O’Meara S i wsp. Systematic review and mixed treatment comparison: dressings to heal diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetol 2012; 55: 1902-1910.
37. Lipp C, Kirker K, Agostinho A i wsp. Testing wound dressings using an in vitro wound model. J Wound Care 2010; 19: 220-226.
38. Mueller SW, Krebsbach LE. Impact of an antimicrobial-impregnated gauze dressing on surgical site infections including methicillin- resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Am J Infect Control 2008; 36: 651-655.
39. Kramer A, Dissemond J, Kim S i wsp. Consensus on wound antisepsis: update 2018. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2018; 31: 28-58.
40. Müller G, Langer J, Siebert J i wsp. Residual antimicrobial effect of chlorhexidine digluconate and octenidine dihydrochloride on reconstructed human epidermis. Skin Pharnacol Physiol 2014; 27: s. 1-8.
41. Marsch G, Mashaqi B, Burgwitz K i wsp. Prevention of pacemaker infections with perioperative antimicrobial treatment: an in vitro study. Europace 2014; 16: 604-611.
42. Freise J, Kohaus S, Körber A i wsp. Contact sensitization in patients with chronic wounds: results of a prospective investigation. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2008; 22: 1203-1207.
43. Kramer A, Dissemond J, Kim S i wsp. Consensus on wound antisepsis: update 2018. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2018; 31: 28-58.
44. Gallenkemper G, Rabe E, Bauer R. Contact sensitization in chronic venous insufficiency: modern wound dressings. Contact Dermatitis 1998; 38: 274-278.
45. Harrison IP, Spada F. Hydrogels for atopic dermatitis and wound management: a superior drug delivery vehicle. Pharmaceutics 2018; 10: 1-13.
46. Higuchi T. Rate of release of medicaments from ointment bases containing drugs in suspension. J Pharm Sci 1961; 50: 874-875.
47. Hämmerle G, Strohal R. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of octenidine wound gel in the treatment of chronic venous leg ulcers in comparison to modern wound dressings. Int Wound J 2014; 13: 182-188.
48. Matiasek J, Kienzl P, Unger LW i wsp. An intra-individual surgical wound comparison shows that octenidine-based hydrogel wound dressing ameliorates scar appearance following abdominoplasty. Int Wound J 2018; 15: 914-920.
49. Stoica AE, Chircov C, Grumezescu AM. Hydrogel dressings for the treatment of burn wounds: an up-to-date overview. Materials (Basel) 2020; 13: 1-24.
50. Assadian O. Octenidine dihydrochloride: chemical characteristics and antimicrobi-al properties. J Wound Care 2016; 25: 3-6.
51. Koburger T, Hübner NO, Braun M i wsp. Standardized comparison of antiseptic efficacy of triclosan, PVP-iodine, octenidine dihydrochloride, polyhexanide and chlorhexidine digluconate. J Antimicrob Chemother 2010; 65: 1712-1719.
52. Al-Doori Z, Goroncy-Bermes P, Gemmell CG i wsp. Low-level exposure of MRSA to octenidine dihydrochloride does not select for resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother 2007; 59: 1280-1281.
53. Vanscheidt W, Harding KG, Téot L i wsp. Effectiveness and tissue compatibility of a 12-week treatment of chronic venous leg ulcers with an octenidine based antiseptic--a randomized, double-blind controlled study. Int Wound J 2012; 9: 316-323.
54. Eisenbeiß W, Siemers F, Amtsberg G i wsp. Prospective, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial assessing the effect of an Octenidine-based hydrogel on bacterial colonisation and epithelialization of skin graft wounds in burn patients. Int J Burns Trauma 2012; 2: 71-79.
55. Stahl J, Braun M, Siebert J i wsp. The effect of a combination of 0.1% octenidine dihydrochloride and 2% 2-phenoxyethanol (octenisept) on wound healing in pigs in vivo and its in vitro percutaneous permeation through intact and barrier disrupted porcine skin. Int Wound J 2010; 7: 62-69.
56. Radu CA, Gazyakan E, Germann G i wsp. Optimizing Suprathel ®-therapy by the use of Octenidine-Gel®. Burns 2011; 37: 294-298.
57. Assadian O, Pilcher M, Antunes JNP i wsp. Facilitating wound bed preparation: properties and clinical efficacy of octenidine and octenidine-based products in modern wound management. J Wound Care 2016; 25: 22-23.
58. Hämmerle G, Strohal R. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of octenidine wound gel in the treatment of chronic venous leg ulcers in comparison to modern wound dressings. Int Wound J 2014; 13: 182-188.
59. Mościcka P, Cwajda-Białasik J, Szewczyk MT. Owrzodzenie żylne – problem nie tylko osób starszych. Opis trzech przypadków klinicznych. Pielęg Chir Angiol 2017; 11: 5-12
60. Mościcka P, Cwajda-Białasik J, Jawień A, Szewczyk MT. Uraz zmiażdżeniowo- oparzeniowy kończyny górnej u młodego człowieka – opis przypadku. Pielęg Chir Angiol 2019; 2: 58-61.
61. Strohal R, Hämmerle G, Braun M. The antiseptic hydrogel wound gel and the process of wound healing: interim analysis of a prospective case controlled clinical study. Oral presentation. European Wound Management Association Conference, Copenhagen 2013.
62. Sharpe A, Formiga A, Neves J i wsp. Case studies: octenidine in the management of diabetic foot ulcers. Diabet Foot J 2018; 21: 192-197.
63. Nikolić N, Kienzl P, Tajpara P i wsp. The antiseptic octenidine inhibits langerhans cell activation and modulates cytokine expression upon superficial wounding with tape stripping. J Immunol Res 2019; 2019: 5143635.
64. Seiser S, Janker L, Zila N i wsp. Octenidine-based hydrogel shows anti-inflammatory and protease-inhibitory capacities in wounded human skin. Sci Rep 2021; 11: 32.
65. Matiasek J, Kienzl P, Unger LW i wsp. An intra-individual surgical wound comparison shows that octenidine-based hydrogel wound dressing ameliorates scar appearance following abdominoplasty. Int Wound J 2018; 15: 914-920.
66. Nikolić N, Kienzl P, Tajpara P i wsp. The antiseptic Octenidine inhibits langerhans cell activation and modulates cytokine expression upon superficial wounding with tape stripping. J Immunol Res 2019; 2019: 5143635.
67. Krasowski G, Jawień A, Tukiendorf A i wsp. A comparison of an antibacterial sandwich dressing vs. dressing containing silver. Wound Rep Reg 2015; 23: 525-530.
68. Kramer A, Dissemond J, Willy C i wsp. Wundmanagement Konsensus: Auswahl von Wundantiseptika – Aktualisierung des Expertenkonsensus 2018. mhp Verlag GmbH, Wiesbaden 2019.
69. Mrozikiewicz-Rakowska B, Jawień A, Sopata M i wsp. The organization of health care of patients with diabetic foot syndrome. Leczenie Ran 2015; 12: 83-112.
70. Sopata M, Jawień A, Mrozikiewicz-Rakowska B i wsp. Wytyczne postępowania miejscowego w ranach niezakażonych, zagrożonych infekcją oraz zakażonych – przegląd dostępnych substancji przeciwdrobnoustrojowych stosowanych w leczeniu ran. Zalecenia
71. Polskiego Towarzystwa Leczenia Ran. Leczenie Ran 2020; 17: 15-16.
72. Karpiński T, Sopata M, Mańkowski B. The antimicrobial effectiveness of antiseptics as a challenge in hard to heal wounds. Leczenie Ran 2020; 17: 88-94.
73. Radischat N, Augustin M, Herberger K i wsp. Influence of human wound exudate on the bactericidal efficacy of antiseptic agents in quantitative suspension tests on the basis of European Standards (DIN EN 13727). Int Wound J 2020; 17: 781-789.
74. Szewczyk MT, Mościcka P, Cwajda-Białasik J i wsp. Zalecenia profilaktyki zakażeń miejsca operowanego w okresie pooperacyjnej opieki pielęgniarskiej na oddziałach zabiegowych. Pielęg Chir Angiol 2015; 2: 73-91.
75. Szewczyk MT, Cwajda-Białasik J, Mościcka P i wsp. Zalecenia profilaktyki zakażeń miejsca operowanego i stosowania antybiotykoterapii w okresie przedoperacyjnej opieki pielęgniarskiej na oddziałach zabiegowych. Pielęg Chir Angiol 2015; 2: 39-55
Copyright: © 2021 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Termedia
About us Contact
Copyright notice Privacy policy Advertising policy Contact us
Quick links
Journals Books eBooks Events
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.