eISSN: 2354-0265
ISSN: 2353-6942
Health Problems of Civilization Physical activity: diseases and issues recognized by the WHO
Current issue Archive Online first About the journal Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
Search
Editorial Policies
Sarajevo Declaration on Integrity and Visibility of Scholarly Publications

Open access

without publication fees
1/2023
vol. 17
 
Share:
Send email
Share:
PHYSICAL ACTIVITY OF SOCIAL AND PROFESSIONAL GROUPS
Original paper

VALIDITY OF THREE HIP-WORN PEDOMETERS FOR STEP COUNTS IN A LABORATORY SETTING

Ayda Karaca
1
,
Necip Demirci
1
,
Sinem Hazır Aytar
2
,
Sema Can
3
,
Vedat Yılmaz
4
,
Evrim Ünver
5

  1. Division of Physical Activity and Health, Department of Recreation, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye
  2. Department of Exercise and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Başkent University, Ankara, Türkiye
  3. Department of Coaching Education, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Hitit University, Çorum, Türkiye
  4. Division of Sports Biomechanics and Motor Control, Department of Exercise and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye
  5. Division of Movement and Training Sciences, Department of Exercise and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Hacettepe University, Türkiye
Health Prob Civil. 2023; 17(1): 76-83
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/hpc.2023.124086
Online publish date: 2023/01/24
Article file
- HPC_1 2023_Art 7_Karaca.pdf  [0.29 MB]
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 
1. Lee JA, Williams SM, Brown DD, Laurson KR. Concurrent validation of the Actigraph gt3x+, Polar Active accelerometer, Omron HJ-720 and Yamax Digiwalker SW-701 pedometer step counts in lab-based and free-living settings. J Sports Sci. 2015; 33(10): 991-1000. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2014.981848
2. Jones D, Crossley K, Dascombe B, Hart HF, Kemp J. Validity and reliability of the Fitbit Flex™ and Actigraph GT3X+ at jogging and running speeds. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2018; 13(5): 860. https://doi.org/10.26603/ijspt20180860
3. Evenson KR, Goto MM, Furberg RD. Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015; 12(1): 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-015-0314-1
4. Balmain BN, Tuttle N, Bailey J, Cheng K, Duryea M, Houlihan J, et al. Using smart socks to detect step-count at slow walking speeds in healthy adults. Int J Sports Med. 2019; 40(02): 133-138. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0732-5621
5. Puppala VK, Hofeld BC, Anger A, Tyagi S, Strath SJ, Fox J, et al. Pacemaker detected active minutes are superior to pedometer-based step counts in measuring the response to physical activity counseling in sedentary older adults. BMC Geriatr. 2020; 20(1):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01559-y
6. Cruz J, Brooks D, Marques A. Accuracy of piezoelectric pedometer and accelerometer step counts. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2016; 57(4): 426-433. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.16.06177-X
7. Behrens TK, Dinger MK. Comparisons of accelerometer and pedometer determined steps in free living samples. J Phys Act Health. 2011; 8(3): 390-397. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.8.3.390
8. Zhu W, Lee M. Invariance of wearing location of Omron-BI pedometers: a validation study. J Phys Act Health. 2010; 7(6): 706-717. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.7.6.706
9. Abel MG, Hannon JC, Eisenman PA, Ransdell LB, Pett M, Williams DP. Waist circumference, pedometer placement, and step-counting accuracy in youth. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2009; 80(3): 434-444. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2009.10599581
10. Kumahara H, Ayabe M, Ichibakase M, Tashima A, Chiwata M, Takashi T. Validity of activity monitors worn at multiple nontraditional locations under controlled and free-living conditions in young adult women. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2015; 40(5): 448-456. https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2014-0183
11. Melanson EL, Knoll JR, Bell ML, Donahoo WT, Hill J, Nysse LJ, et al. Commercially available pedometers: considerations for accurate step counting. Prev Med. 2004; 39(2): 361-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.01.032
12. Hickey A, John D, Sasaki JE, Mavilia M, Freedson P. Validity of activity monitor step detection is related to movement patterns. J Phys Act Health. 2016; 13(2): 145-153. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2015-0203
13. Hills AP, Mokhtar N, Byrne NM. Assessment of physical activity and energy expenditure: an overview of objective measures. Front Nutr. 2014; 1: 1-5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2014.00005
14. Giannakidou DM, Kambas A, Ageloussis N, Fatouros I, Christoforidis C, Venetsanou F, et al. The validity of two Omron pedometers during treadmill walking is speed dependent. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012; 112(1): 49-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-1951-y
15. Chia M. Measurement accuracy of a motıon sensor used to estımate step count. Acta Kinesiol. 2019; 13(1): 5-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210050781
16. Le Masurier GC, Tudor-Locke C. Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer accuracy under controlled conditions. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003; 35(5): 867-71. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000064996.63632.10
17. Kooiman TJ, Dontje ML, Sprenger SR, Krijnen WP, Van der Schans CP, de Groot M. Reliability and validity of ten consumer activity trackers. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2015; 7(1): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-015-0018-5
18. Huang Y, Xu J, Yu B, Shull PB. Validity of FitBit, Jawbone UP, Nike+ and other wearable devices for level and stair walking. Gait Posture. 2016; 48: 36-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.04.025
19. Hasson RE, Haller J, Pober DM, Staudenmayer J, Freedson PS. Validity of the Omron HJ-112 pedometer during treadmill walking. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009; 41(4): 805-809. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818d9fc2
20. Battenberg AK, Donohoe S, Robertson N, Schmalzried TP. The accuracy of personal activity monitoring devices. Semin Arthroplasty. 2017; 28(2): 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sart.2017.07.006
21. Omron Healthcare. Omron Instruction Manual Pedometer Model: HJ-321 2012 [Internet]. Lake Forest, IL: Omron Healthcare [access 2022 Apr 10]. Available from: https://omronhealthcare.com/wp-content/uploads/HJ-321-IM-WEB-03212012.pdf.
22. Omron Healthcare. Omron instruction manual Gosmart Pocket Pedometer Model HJ-112 2010 [Internet]. Lake Forest, IL: Omron Healthcare [access 2022 Apr 10]. Available from: https://omronhealthcare.com/wp-content/uploads/HJ112_IM_10262010.pdf.
23. Vanroy C, Vissers D, Cras P, Beyne S, Feys H, Vanlandewijck Y, et al. Physical activity monitoring in stroke: SenseWear Pro2 activity accelerometer versus Yamax Digi-Walker
24. SW-200 pedometer. Disabil Rehabil. 2014; 36(20): 1695-703. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2013.859307
25. Fokkema T, Kooiman T, Krijnen WP, Van der Schans CP, De Groot M. Reliability and validity of ten consumer activity trackers depend on walking speed. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017; 49(4): 793-800. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001146
26. Maes I, Ketels M, Van Dyck D, Clays E. The occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire (OSPAQ): a validation study with accelerometer-assessed measures. BMC Public Health. 2020; 20(1): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09180-9
27. Nelson MB, Kaminsky LA, Dickin DC, Montoye AH. Validity of consumer-based physical activity monitors for specific activity types. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016; 48(8): 1619-28. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000933
28. Schneider PL, Crouter SE, Bassett DR. Pedometer measures of free-living physical activity: comparison of 13 models. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004; 36(2): 331-335. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000113486.60548.E9
29. Tudor-Locke C, Ainsworth BE, Thompson RW, Matthews CE. Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer measures of free-living physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002; 34(12): 2045-2051. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200212000-00027
30. Colley RC, Barnes JD, Leblanc AG, Borghese M, Boyer C, Tremblay MS. Validity of the SC-StepMX pedometer during treadmill walking and running. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2013; 38(5): 520-524. https://doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2012-0321
Copyright: © 2023 Pope John Paul II State School of Higher Education in Biała Podlaska. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.

Termedia
About us Contact
Copyright notice Privacy policy Advertising policy Contact us
Quick links
Journals Books eBooks Events
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.