eISSN: 1689-1716
ISSN: 0324-8267
Archiwum Medycyny Sądowej i Kryminologii/Archives of Forensic Medicine and Criminology
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Supplements Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Ethical standards and procedures
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Search
Editorial Policies
Sarajevo Declaration on Integrity and Visibility of Scholarly Publications
1/2020
vol. 70
 
Share:
Send email
Share:
abstract:
Original paper

Analysis of forensic medical opinions issued in criminal cases of alleged medical error in obstetrics at the Department of Forensic Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, in 2010–2016

Magdalena E. Kusior
1
,
Karina Polak
1
,
Nadia Sajuk
1
,
Szymon Kłaptocz
1
,
Michał Knapik
1
,
Joanna Rypel
1
,
Tomasz Konopka
2

  1. Studenckie Koło Naukowe Medycyny Sądowej, Collegium Medicum Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków, Polska
  2. Katedra i Zakład Medycyny Sądowej, Collegium Medicum Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, Kraków, Polska
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol 2020; 70 (1): 19–43
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/amsik.2020.97826
Online publish date: 2020/07/02
View full text Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
Aim of the study
Analysis of forensic medical opinions in the field of obstetrics prepared at the Department of Forensic Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College in Krakow, in 2010–2016, in order to evaluate changes in the number of filed cases involving an alleged medical error over the years, and determine the most common situations where medical errors are suspected by patients, and the most prevalent types of medical errors in obstetrics.

Material and methods
The opinions were divided into two groups. In the first group, the medical management was appropriate, while in the second group medical errors were identified. The medical errors were categorised as diagnostic/therapeutic, technical, and organisational. The effects of medical errors were classified as death, impairment to health, exposure to death, and exposure to impairment to health, by considering them separately for post-natal women, and for foetuses and neonates (during the first days of life).

Results
A total of 73 forensic medical opinions were analysed. In 25 cases, a medical error was identified. The most common situations in which a medical error was committed, and in which the suspicion of medical error proved to be unfounded, were listed. Overall, there were 17 diagnostic/therapeutic errors, 7 organisational errors, and 4 technical errors. In cases where a medical error was identified, there were 15 deaths, and in cases without a medical error – 31 deaths.

Conclusions
It was found that 66% of the analysed forensic medical opinions involved no medical errors. In most of these cases, a therapeutic failure occurred, including perinatal haemorrhage, tight wrapping of the umbilical cord around the foetal neck (nuchal cord), premature birth, and septic complications. A few cases involved uncooperative patients. The most prevalent medical error was failure to perform or delaying a caesarean section when it was needed (because of emergency or urgent indications). The second most common medical error was related to incorrect CTG interpretation.

keywords:

medical error, obstetrics, medico-legal expert opinions
Termedia
About us Contact
Copyright notice Privacy policy Advertising policy Contact us
Quick links
Journals Books eBooks Events
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.