eISSN: 2081-2841
ISSN: 1689-832X
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy
Current Issue Archive Supplements Articles in Press Journal Information Aims and Scope Editorial Office Editorial Board Register as Author Register as Reviewer Instructions for Authors Abstracting and indexing Subscription Advertising Information Links
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

3/2009
vol. 1
 
Share:
Share:

Application of the ring applicator in patients with cervical cancer in whom tandem was not possible

Małgorzata Klimek
,
Eleonora Góra
,
Krzysztof Urbański
,
Jacek Pudełek

J Contemp Brachyther 2009; 1, 3: 193-194
Online publish date: 2009/10/08
Article file
Get citation
 
 
Purpose: Assessment of efficacy of the ring applicator in patients with cervix cancer with extremely difficult anatomical conditions.
Material and methods: In retrospective analysis we compared the dose distributions of the ring (diameter range from 2.5 cm to 5.5 cm) in the first insertion in the group of ten patients with exofitic cervix cancer Ib-IIa in whom identification of external orifice of the cervix was not possible with the tandem and ovoids or tandem and ring in the next insertions when cervix orifice could be identified. In that time, in this specific clinical situations other methods of treatment (surgery or external beam irradiation) for the different reasons were not possible to apply. All patient were treated with brachytherapy using Selectron LDR/MDR. The knowledge of the advantages and limitations of the ring in this difficult anatomical conditions is important. Point A was the reference point for the nine patients and the dose range from 10 (2 patients) to 20 Gy (7 patients). For one patient dose has been calculated one cm from the applicator surface. Eight patients have tandem and ovoids or tandem and ring in second insertion, two in third insertion. It was possible thanks to the remission after first application (80% of pts), or second and improvement of anatomical conditions. The doses to the point B, rectum and urinary bladder were compared in the same patients for first and next insertions.
Results: Our results have shown that in the case of the ring in the first insertion adoption of the point A as reference point provides better dose distribution than for 1 cm from applicator surface. Although ring in the first insertion provides suboptimal dose distribution compared with tandem and ovoids or tandem and ring in the next insertions, prescription of the dose 20 Gy to the reference point A and proper diameter of the ring assured adequately high dose to the whole exofitic infiltration, which does allow then inserting tandem.
Copyright: © 2009 Termedia Sp. z o. o. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.