eISSN: 2449-8580
ISSN: 1734-3402
Family Medicine & Primary Care Review
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Reviewers Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
3/2024
vol. 26
 
Share:
Share:
Review paper

Artificial intelligence in family medicine: a scoping review

Amin Habibi
1
,
Masomeh Kalantarion
2
,
Hamed Khani
1
,
Abtin Heidarzadeh
3
,
Farzad Mohseni
3

  1. Department of Medical Education, Educational Development Center (EDC), Smart University of Medical Sciences (SmUMS), Tehran, Iran
  2. Department of Medical Education, School of Medical Education and Learning Technologies, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. Department of Community and Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Science and Health Services, Rasht, Iran
Family Medicine & Primary Care Review 2024; 26(3): 357–382
Online publish date: 2024/09/30
Get citation
 
PlumX metrics:
 
1. Naidoo S, Bottomley D, Naidoo M, et al. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Proposals for policy development in South Africa. S Afr J Bioeth Law 2022; 15(1): 11–16.
2. Owoyemi A, Owoyemi J, Osiyemi A, et al. Artificial intelligence for healthcare in Africa. Front Digit Health 2020; 2: 6.
3. Ghebreyesus TA, Swaminathan S. Get ready for AI in pandemic response and healthcare. BMJ Opin 2021; 28. Available from URL: https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/10/28/get-ready-for-ai-in-pandemic-response-and-healthcare/.
4. Lawrence DR, Palacios-González C, Harris J. Artificial Intelligence. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2016; 25(2): 250–261.
5. Jiang F, Jiang Y, Zhi H, et al. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future. Stroke Vasc Neurol 2017; 2(4): 230–243.
6. Hinton G. Deep learning – a technology with the potential to transform health care. J Am Med Assoc 2018; 320: 1101–1102.
7. Yu KH, Beam AL, Kohane IS. Artificial intelligence in healthcare. Nat Biomed Eng 2018; 2(10): 719.
8. Liaw W, Kakadiaris IA, Yang Z. Is artificial intelligence the key to reclaiming relationships in primary care? Am Fam Physician 2021; 104: 558–559.
9. Liaw W, Kakadiaris IA. Primary care artificial intelligence: a branch hiding inplain sight. Ann Fam Med 2020; 18: 194–195.
10. Ford E, Edelman N, Somers L, et al. Barriers and facilitators to the adoption of electronic clinical decision support systems: a qualitative interview study with UK general practitioners. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2021; 21: 193.
11. Meskó B, Hetényi G, Győrffy Z. Will artificial intelligence solve the human resource crisis in healthcare? BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 13; 18(1): 545.
12. Steinhubl S, Muse ED, Topol EJ. Can mobile health technologies transform health care? J Am Med Assoc 2013; 310(22): 2395–2396.
13. Naylor CD. On the Prospects for a (deep) learning health care system. J Am Med Assoc 2018; 320(11): 1099.
14. Steinhubl SR, Kim K, Ajayi T, et al. Virtual care for improved global health. Lancet 2018; 391(10991): 419.
15. Coiera E. The fate of medicine in the time of AI. Lancet 2018; 392(10162): 2331–2332.
16. Darcy AM, Louie AK, Roberts LW. Machine learning and the profession of medicine. J Am Med Assoc 2016; 315(6): 551–552.
17. Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat Med 2019; 25(1): 44–56.
18. Verghese A, Shah NH, Harrington RA. What this computer needs is a physician: humanism and artificial intelligence. J Am Med Assoc 2018; 319(1): 19–20.
19. Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Science 2010; 5(1): 69.
20. Peters M, Godfrey C, McInerney P, et al. The Joanna Briggs Institute reviewers’ manual 2015. Methodology for JBI scoping reviews. Available from URL: https://reben.com.br/revista/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Scoping.pdf.
21. Jordan MI. Artificial intelligence – the revolution hasn’t happened yet. Harv Data Sci Rev 2019; 1(1): 1–9.
22. Farrokhnia M, Banihashem SK, Noroozi O, et al. A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 2023, doi: 10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846.
23. Mandl KD, Bourgeois FT. The evolution of patient diagnosis: from art to digital data-driven science. JAMA 2017; 318(19): 1859–1860.
24. Topol E. Deep Medicine: How Artificial Intelligence Can Make Healthcare Human Again. New York (NY): Hachette; 2019.
25. McCartney M. Innovation without sufficient evidence is a disservice to all. BMJ 2017; 358: j3980.
26. Pimlott N. Artificial intelligence and the family physician. Can Fam Physician 2021; 67(12): 879.
27. Challen R, Denny J, Pitt M, et al. Artificial intelligence, bias and clinical safety. BMJ Qual Saf 2019, doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008370.
28. Patil HK, Seshadri R. Big data security and privacy issues in healthcare, doi: 10.1109/BigData.Congress.2014.112.
29. Asan O, Bayrak AE, Choudhury A. Artificial Intelligence and Human Trust in Healthcare: Focus on Clinicians. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22(6): e15154.
30. Upshaw TL, Craig-Neil A, Macklin J, et al. Priorities for Artificial Intelligence Applications in Primary Care: A Canadian Deliberative Dialogue with Patients, Providers, and Health System Leaders. J Am Board Fam Med 2023; 36(2): 210–220.
31. Leimanis A, Palkova K. Ethical guidelines for artificial intelligence in healthcare from the sustainable development perspective. European Journal of Sustainable Development. Eur J Sustain Dev 2021; 10(1): 90.
Copyright: © 2024 Family Medicine & Primary Care Review. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
 
Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.