eISSN: 2299-0046
ISSN: 1642-395X
Advances in Dermatology and Allergology/Postępy Dermatologii i Alergologii
Current issue Archive Manuscripts accepted About the journal Editorial board Reviewers Abstracting and indexing Subscription Contact Instructions for authors Publication charge Ethical standards and procedures
Editorial System
Submit your Manuscript
SCImago Journal & Country Rank
5/2024
vol. 41
 
Share:
Share:
abstract:
Original paper

Comparison of 15% 5-aminolevulinic acid and 10% 5-aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for the treatment of acne vulgaris: a split-face randomized pilot study

Natalia Brzezińska
1
,
Barbara Bulińska
1
,
Natalia Zawadzka
1
,
Gustaw Roter
1
,
Aneta Szczerkowska-Dobosz
1

  1. Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
Adv Dermatol Allergol 2024; XLI (5): 479-486
Online publish date: 2024/10/22
View full text Get citation
 
Introduction:
Acne vulgaris is a highly prevalent skin disorder, driving the ongoing search for innovative treatment modalities. While numerous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in managing acne vulgaris, there remains a lack of clear guidlines regarding optimal treatment parameters.

Aim:
To assess the efficacy and safety of 10% concentration 5-aminolevulinic acid-(ALA) in comparison to 15% ALA PDT for treating facial acne vulgaris.

Material and methods:
A randomized, double-blind, split-face clinical trial was conducted on 25 patients with moderate to severe acne (Leeds grades 2–4). Patients were randomly assigned to two groups with different ALA concentrations applied on one cheek, while a placebo was applied on the other side. After a 1.5-hour incubation, illumination with 633 nm red light from a Light Emitting Diode (LED) lamp (96 J/cm2) was performed in three sessions with 7–10 days’ intervals. Treatment effectiveness was assessed by the lesion reduction rate based on lesion counts before the study, after each session, and at 4 and 8 weeks after the last session.

Results:
Both 15% and 10% ALA-PDT treatments demonstrated significant reductions in inflammatory acne lesion counts compared to the placebo: 10% ALA-PDT showed a reduction of 27.36% versus 12.64% for the placebo (p = 0.04), while 15% ALA-PDT showed a reduction of 40.45% compared to 13.41% (p < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference between ALA-PDT and placebo in treating non-inflammatory lesions. Additionally, there was no difference between the effectiveness of 10% and 15% ALA in reducing any type of acne lesions.

Conclusions:
ALA-PDT is effective in treating acne vulgaris. However, ALA-PDT provides an advantage over red light only for inflammatory acne lesions. The study indicates that higher concentrations of ALA do not result in more significant reductions in acne lesions.

keywords:

red light, acne vulgaris, photodynamic therapy, 5-aminolevulinic acid, light therapy

Quick links
© 2024 Termedia Sp. z o.o.
Developed by Bentus.